I can speak for myself, thank you. English is my first and only fluent language. I didn't say nor imply anything about Trump, because I don't have much to say about him. So there's no need for you to interpret and restate what I said as having anything to do with him.
NO you made a comment about where I post wording it as something resembling a personal attack.
My point was that your activity is limited to socio-political discussion which is most likely to include lots of inflammatory socio-political issues, not the least of which is perversion in society and in the church.
This website has a handy search feature that makes it easy to see what individuals like to talk about.
Did I miss a forum rule about just what topics it was OK to post on?
no?
Then exactly what is your issue?
@amigo de christo didn't ask for a definition. He merely pointed out that some folks are confused about it.
You seize upon such things—that's on you.
Well actually he said I didn't know the definition and that obviously made me - (pick one) sick, evil, corrupt, disgusting, stupid, the child of Satan )
You misrepresenting that is on you
Anyway, here's what ChatGPT says:
And why would I care what an AI chat bot says about anything?
A woman is an adult human female. In terms of biological sex, women typically have two X chromosomes...
...but it's important to note that gender identity and gender expression can be more complex and go beyond biological characteristics. Gender identity is a deeply-held sense of being male, female, a blend of both, or neither, and may not necessarily align with an individual's biological sex. Gender is a social and cultural construct that encompasses a range of roles, expectations, and behaviors associated with being a woman in a given society. It's important to respect an individual's self-identified gender and to use the appropriate pronouns and terms that they prefer. (In other words:
"I have a 'deeply-held sense' that I'm an Arctic Gecko.")
Do you? Or was that just a not terribly clever way of expressing your hatred of a minority?
I've learned that AI answers like this can be fairly reliable all the way up until they get to the
"but" part.
and apparently, you haven't.
(Largely because AI learned from the same people who "taught" you.)
Sad really. I've come to expect more from you when it comes to belittling insults and personal attacks.
And people are increasingly behaving the same way. Notice that the chatbot commences answering a question that hasn't even been asked after the "but" part.
Too bad there isn't an impressive, scientific term like "biological" to put before the word "sex" that would give "gender identity" the same weight as "biological sex" to a person who possesses a properly functioning frontal lobe. (Don't be offended—most folks don't—"conservatives" included.)
Were you trying to be insulting?
You've made it very clear even in this now dreadfully off-topic thread that the definition you're trying to drag out of people who were taught very clearly what a woman is before folks got so thoroughly deceived about it must unequivocally fall within the lowest-common-denominator parameters in which you've so sadly been pickled.
Still can't provide that working definition can you?
WE GET IT.
AND WE'RE NOT BUYING THE WILDLY IRONIC (yeah) NOTION THAT PEOPLE "ARE" PROBLEMS AS OPPOSED TO "HAVING" PROBLEMS, NOR THE PHONY "HATE" LABEL YOU INSIST ON APPLYING TO THE REJECTORS OF YOUR FAILED SALE.
So it's not hate or is it not hate when YOU do it?
The Bible decides what both problems and women are—not science falsely so-called (1 Timothy 6:20).
.
And how does this jibe with you using an AI chat bot?