Melchizadek in the Dead Sea Scrolls

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

HammerStone

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Feb 12, 2006
5,113
279
83
36
South Carolina
prayerforums.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I haven't read all of the ones where he is mentioned, but it's very interesting to see Melchizadek so much in them. He's clearly the Messiah in at least one of them, I think this alone substantiates at least a little of what was found there. Anyone done a study on this? The editors/authors attribute him to Michael, but I haven't seen that in the text yet, so I wonder if it's just bad scholarship?
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
I dont think we can pay much attention to the comentaries offered by the so called scholars. They were for the most part Christian not taught what we know it wasnt til later many Jews were reading them so most of the explanation were from our blind scholars of today.
 

colinthar

New Member
Mar 25, 2009
4
0
0
what does it say about him.the trouble with translating into english is it can be done so many different wayscolin
 

WhiteKnuckle

New Member
Mar 29, 2009
866
42
0
47
I watched a show on the Dead Sea Scrolls. I can honestly say, I'm not in favor of them. So far there seems to be "extra" books in them. And one of the books that was translated seems to be hinting or saying that Jesus isn't God. That in and of itself leaves me cold and for now the Dead Sea Scrolls are left in the dust where they should've been all along in my opinion.
 

SoldierforChrist

New Member
Sep 21, 2008
102
0
0
35
I haven't read all of the ones where he is mentioned, but it's very interesting to see Melchizadek so much in them. He's clearly the Messiah in at least one of them, I think this alone substantiates at least a little of what was found there. Anyone done a study on this? The editors/authors attribute him to Michael, but I haven't seen that in the text yet, so I wonder if it's just bad scholarship?
I don't know much about the dead sea scrolls, but when it comes to who Melchizedek is, a deeper study of the Bible will show that he is the Holy Ghost.
 

JLMichaels

New Member
Oct 6, 2007
36
0
0
74
I haven't read all of the ones where he is mentioned, but it's very interesting to see Melchizadek so much in them. He's clearly the Messiah in at least one of them, I think this alone substantiates at least a little of what was found there. Anyone done a study on this? The editors/authors attribute him to Michael, but I haven't seen that in the text yet, so I wonder if it's just bad scholarship?
There is a fellow who has done the most extensive study to date on this, http.//www.inspiredbooks.comClink enter, than scroll down to the second listing, Inspired Living Books, than click Messiah Melchizadek. This is the most complete study I've found to date. If you come across a better study, please let me know as I am most interested in Melchizadek myself.Love in Christ JesusJLM
 

logabe

Active Member
Aug 28, 2008
880
47
28
66
Hebrews 7:1-2, 1 For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; 2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace; In this introduction to Melchizedek, we are brought back to the story of Abraham in Genesis 14, where this mysterious king of Salem meets Abraham with bread and wine, a type of communion. Melchizedek appears suddenly out of nowhere, having never before been mentioned by this name in the book of Genesis. We do know that he was the king of Jerusalem, for Jerusalem means “City of Salem,” or literally “City of Peace.” The fact that Melchizedek was a title, rather than a proper name as such, is shown by the translation of his name, “King of Righteousness.” Melchi means “king,” and Zadok means “righteousness.” Historical sources show that Shem was the builder of Jerusalem and its first king. He took the title of Melchizedek, and even later after his descendants were overthrown by the Canaanites, the official title of the king of Jerusalem was Adonizedek, “Lord of Righteousness.” And so we find many years later that Joshua and the Israelite army fought against Adonizedek, the king of Jerusalem (Joshua 10:1). Even as both Shem and Joshua were types of Christ, so also was Adonizedek a type of “antichrist” opposing the true Yeshua (Joshua) in the conquest of the Kingdom. The 13th chapter of the Book of Jasher records the history of how the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah refused to pay tribute to Chedorlaomer, king of Elam. In the 16 th chapter of Jasher we read how this king came with other kings under his authority to punish the people of Sodom and Gomorrah. They took many people captive, including Lot, who was Abram's nephew. And so Abram pursued these kings as far as Damascus and defeated them in battle, setting the people free, including his nephew. On the return trip, Melchizedek came from Jerusalem to bless Abram and to have communion with him (bread and wine). Jasher 16:11, 12 says, 11 And Adonizedek king of Jerusalem, the same was Shem, went out with his men to meet Abram and his people, with bread and wine, and they remained together in the valley of Melech [Valley of the King].12 And Adonizedek blessed Abram, and Abram gave him a tenth from all that he had brought from the spoil of his enemies, for Adonizedek was a priest before God. The book of Jasher uses the term Adonizedek in place of Melchizedek, showing that the terms were interchangeable, having the same essential meaning. It also clearly identifies this king as being Shem. Shem takes on a greater role later in the book of Jasher when Isaac went to Jerusalem to study the ways of God under Shem for three years (24:17). Isaac returned to his father's house after Abraham sent Eliezar to Haran to find a wife for Isaac. Thus, he was in Beersheba with his father when Eliezar returned with Rebecca. Jasher also says that Jacob also spent many years in Shem's house, because of his conflict with Esau. At any rate, Scripture itself tells us that Shem lived to be 600 years old (Gen. 11:10, 11). If we do a genealogical study, we find that Shem actually outlived Abraham, even though Abraham was nine generations down from Shem. Shem died when Isaac was 110 and Jacob was 50 years old. From the biblical perspective, then, it is likely that Shem knew Abraham personally. Not only were they related by direct lineage, but also Shem was alive during Abraham's entire life time. To be continued...got to go. Logabe
 

jerryjohnson

New Member
Nov 6, 2009
497
39
0
77
Nomad;75287 said:
The Dead Sea caves contain more than canonical scrolls. There are many other types of Jewish writings among the collection. The Jews did however recognize the difference. The importance of the canonical scrolls is simply found in the fact that before their discovery the oldest Hebrew manuscripts were from the 9th and 10th century AD copied by the Massoretes. The Dead Sea Scrolls are about 1000 years older than the text of the Massoretes and show the accuracy and care taken in the preservation of the Hebrew scriptures. The DSS are an extremely important find. The fact that canonical as well as non-canonical writings were store together doesn't detract from that. The following is a link to a site that provides info on the Scrolls as well as an inventory list at the bottom of the page.DSS Inventory
Part of the value of the DDS are the non-Scripture writings included in the collection. There are a number of words used only one time in the OT and finding some of these words in the non-Scripture portion gave translators a better idea how these words could be translated.
 

Nomad

Post Tenebras Lux
Aug 9, 2009
995
143
43
58
Philadelphia, PA.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
jerryjohnson;75290 said:
Part of the value of the DDS are the non-Scripture writings included in the collection. There are a number of words used only one time in the OT and finding some of these words in the non-Scripture portion gave translators a better idea how these words could be translated.
You're absolutely right. The value of the DSS should not be underestimated.