Recent content by cgneustar

The mark of the beast is paper money and fiat currency because it breaks the command of the Torah, "you shall have righteous weights and quantities", which paper money and fiat currency is not, because it is devalued, nor does it represent anything of value since it itself is also merely paper...

Noah is not a son of Abraham, and will therefore participate in the second resurrection, and attain aeonial life through the tree of life in the New Jerusalem. Inheriting the kingdom of God on this earth under the 1,000 year rulership of the Messiah pertains to only Israel. Ignorant and stubborn...

Only 144,000 will inherit the kingdom of God, plus Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Read my bible study on why only these will inherit the kingdom. The Identity of the 144,000 in the Book of Revelation | Wisdom of God . Also available in Spanish here La Identidad de los 144.000 en el Libro del...

The condemnation of the world will come through money, great and small and rich and poor, because by the fulfillment of paper money and fiat currency as the "mark of the beast" or Revelation the entire world has come under a curse by the following words, "whoever receives the mark will be...

Just as the the dragon, beast, and name the chosen of God receive on their foreheads in the book of Revelation are all symbols, so in likewise the mark of the beast is a symbol, referring to something that would come into existence that would break the command of God "you shall have righteous...

Clearly not, the right hand symbolizes authority, meaning having the authority to buy or sell once you have paper money and fiat currency, and the forehead symbolizes being owned, which symbolizes debt of paper money and fiat currency to buy or sell.

He didn't have to tell them, because the Gentiles then were taught by Jews, like Peter and Paul, and would've seen them wear tzitzit and naturally would've done the same. Yet what we have today is a complete abandonment of Torah, Gentiles teaching other Gentiles that the Torah is abolished, and...

If outward appearance did not matter, then Paul would not have commanded wives to cover their heads in obedience to the Torah, which says, "and he shall rule over you", by which the head covering is the sign of that submission that the Torah mentions. You greatly err in your understanding of the...

You are in error, the command to love our neighbor as ourselves did not come from the Messiah, it came from the Torah, "you shall love your neighbor as yourself", and we are commanded to love our enemies not because loving our enemies replaces or discards the commands of the Torah, but because...

Tell me, do you suppose that the anointing did not want to burden them with "you shall not murder" and "you shall not steal" mentioned in the Torah as well, which are clearly not mentioned in these "essentials" mentioned by the council of Jerusalem? It never ceases to amaze me how the blind...

It is you who needs to reread Acts 15, for the council of Jerusalem did not negate the truth that the Torah still needs to be obeyed, which is why they said, "for Moses has been proclaimed in every city from ancient times and is read in the synagogues", but the reason they only repeated certain...

This is where you err, because it is written, "there is only one Torah for the native and for the foreigner". Yet even so, the "grafting in" of the Gentiles, who were once foreigners of the promises of Abraham means to be "grafted in" into the citizenship of Israel, for Israel is the cultivated...

The shadows of the Torah are no longer required under the new covenant. All other commands are still binding, such as head coverings for wives, tefillin, mezuzah, tallit and tzitzit, a man shall not wear women's garments, and much more.

It truly saddens me that these people do not see the truth. They think I am arguing and nagging them because I am trying to condemn them, when in fact I am trying to do the opposite, to bring deliverance to them, with the truth, that the Torah has not been abolished. But so be it, let them...

The temple building does not need to exist for an "abomination of desolation" to be an "abomination of desolation", because Mount Moriah itself is set-apart ground, because that is where the temple building once stood that set that ground apart. That is why the abomination of desolation that was...