Recent content by doctrox

. I've heard all the varied and colorful excuses before. The Lord plainly states that he will give you the answer you've already decided you want! "Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices." (2 Cor. 2:11)

Again, you are publishing a falsehood. You add "to a good place." Nowhere in your "documentation" is such a phrase found. A liar is one who speaks against the truth. IOW, you lied - not by slur but by scriptural definition. Trusting corrupt Greek lex-icons adds insult to injury. Rather, it's...

Yes, again, which jab makes the body more receptive to not only external RF's. It also facilitates the existing self-assembling nanotech within the body to better transmit. IOW, you are a broadcaster and the nanotech (properly, neurotech, now fused to your body) is the power source. Tinnitus is...

"60 MINUTES" CBS News (25 seconds) This is why everyone’s ears are ringing… it’s not just 5G, it’s SkyNet mind control technology… planting thoughts and harvesting brain waves…

You have and you shouldn't (don't make me repost your voluminous pap).

. "For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing." (Acts 17) You shouldn't try to manipulate God or get his (or others') attention simply by rambling or reciting endless, empty phrases. .

Again, you're drawing a fallacious conclusion ala "Jesus condemned weaponry." You're consistently unable to prove that presumption with scripture. And your (A.I.-assisted) following screed is yet another non sequitur: The readers can clearly see that I "added" nothing to any verse. Rather, I...

Rather, why have you reduced yourself to gaslighting with the inflammatory sentence? I reverence and reference the word of God and not heretics or "early church fathers"

I already showed you with scripture where one can "kill in self defense or to protect others." You're attempting to pigeonhole again. Propaganda Techniques #9 Non sequitur: A type of logical fallacy, in which a conclusion is made out of an argument that does not justify it. All invalid...

. Two wrongs will never make a right. .

This falsehood is without scriptural support; it's recklessness born of a searing of the conscience and it compromises everything that follows it. From the OP: The entire "Left Behind" enterpri$e is based upon a perversion of Scripture: "Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken...

Your statement is a presumption. Rather, if someone is killed as a result of acting in self-defense, then there is no blood on one's hands. I'll show you one example: There is a specific legal and moral distinction between killing in self-defense during a break-in versus retaliatory killing...

and ...are a mix of historical fact and religious tradition - of history and myth. Origen was a heretic. And you've salted your strawman into various threads e.g.: In Mark 7 of the King James Version (KJV), Jesus sternly rebukes the religious leaders for allowing their man-made rules and...

Hustling at a gas station in Thailand.

A thermal drone takes a look (2½ minutes) at the above-mentioned Project Stargate A.I. data center.