Recent content by Ed McKee

The last part of 1 John 5:7 is spurious because it is not in any manuscript before 1500 which simply means it was added to the original writing. You can not simply add to the scriptures to try to prove a point or your point.

As I said before here a couple times what you or anyone else thinks matters no to me. What the Bible says does. If you are saying that Jesus didn't say what John said he did then you don't believe the Bible or John was lying, which is your privilege if you want. If Jesus said it and the Bible...

Which verse that I said was spurious do you think was not spurious?

Why are waiting till he returns??? I've had many many conversations with God. But of course, you know that Jesus said his Father was the only true God in John 17:3, so what kind of god then do you think Jesus is since nether Jesus or HS can be the true God. I didn't say it, Jesus did.

I doubt your father was born when Ike was elected. (:

I probably felt a little like you 40 or 50 years ago so I'm going to guess you are under 35 years old???

I have nothing against you or dislike you at all. In fact I appreciate your honesty. I just don't understand what or why you say things the way you do. Maybe you're just smarter than me. Don't know what it is but we seem to be interested in different aspects of our faith and you seem to value...

What do you think Dr. Brown would disagree with me about, the fact that spurious scriptures should be ignored? Why do you think your posts are being monitored?

Not sure why you wrote this or what you're implying. At first I thought we were seeing things similarly but you're losing me with the way you think. Sorry, but I don't think a conversation with you would benefit either one of us. Love and prayers to you. I wish you nothing but the best.

Hi Johann, I got an email saying you replied with this: "You reckon yourself a scholar? Or do you read your info from others and THEN critique as to what is, and what not, is fallible, or infallible? J.", but it sees to have disappeared. If you don't mind I'll respond here. I don't reckon...

You didn't quote any scriptures and as I have said before everyone has an opinion, but I would prefer to know what the Bible says instead of what someone says. That being said, being in God does not imply being God unless you think all Christians are God because of what Jesus said here in John...

Not trying to prove the fallibility of the Bible at all, but if something was added the holy scripture 900 years after it was written it doesn't belong in the Bible. That's why God said this in his holy scriptures: “And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God...

|I think the primary problem with the trinity doctrine is (beside the fact that now days everyone seems to have their own definition) that all the verses used to prove it come with a caveat. Such as with John 1:1, the caveat being that problem with the definite article and the fact that in both...

Wow! I think I have better things to do. Sorry. I like you and if that is a picture of you, you look like a nice guy too. I used to talk to a lot of people about these things years ago and always found that if you show them the facts in the scriptures the would just get mad. Their minds...