Recent content by Grailhunter

Agreed.

People have been play games with the word God for a long time. Here is an interesting fact for you. They took Yahweh name out of the Old Testament and replaced it with the word God. Around 6,800 modifications to the scriptures, they should burn in Hell for that. Actually, the Old Testament...

You keep quoting Old Testament. Yes, there was one God in the Old Testament. Three in the New Testament. To keep thing straight the Apostles would sometimes refer to Yahweh as God and Yeshua as Lord. But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord...

Mother of a God. I explained my objection to Mother of God in post 13.

Post 13 answers your question. Miriam gave birth to Yeshua. Can we call Him a person? Yes, He was flesh and blood, but He was also a full-fledged God. Can we explain the physical/Divine condition of Yeshua? I say 100% a God and 100% a human. But that does not make perfect sense. But it as close...

@Moonwood @rwb Not to confuse but I have a tendency to call biblical characters by their real name. Mary's real name is Miriam and Jesus' real name is Yeshua....Yeshua is a full-fledged God, but not all three Gods. Yahweh begot Yeshua, So Yeshua is the Son of God and He is the Son of Miriam...

The dislike between the Catholics and Protestants have been around a while. The Protestants link the Catholics to the harlot in Revelation and the Catholics link the Protestants to heretics. Both sets of Christians have saved Christians in their congregations. The ones you have to worry about...

Sure I know the difference but at both of them they are kneeling and praying and are for reverence and veneration of Mary. Dude if there is anyone here that does not know what it is to be a Catholic, it is you. I have said this ever since I met you, you are a horrible example of a Catholic...

Too much hate in your religion to be a follower of Yeshua.

As usual you are rude and silly. If you look the pictures I sent you they are captioned Mirian Altars. Now you can call them different things, but the fact is people are kneeling in front of them, hands folded and praying to Mary. Which is fine, I pray to Mary-Miriam. If you have something...

Like the other three, John's gospel first circulated without a name. This gospel includes a character referred to in the third person, 'the beloved disciple' as an intimate disciple of Jesus. During the 2nd century CE, the Church Fathers claimed that a man known as John the Elder in the...

The Gospel of John provides no explicit internal evidence concerning its author. John, the disciple, is nowhere identified by name. https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/who-wrote-the-gospel-of-john

We may never know for certain who wrote the Gospel of John, any more than we can know who wrote the books of Matthew, Mark and Luke. We do know that John is a gospel apart, however. Early Matthew, Mark and Luke are so alike in their telling that they are called the Synoptic Gospels, meaning...

Britannica Gospel According to John, fourth of the four New Testament narratives recounting the life and death of Jesus Christ. John’s is the only one of the four not considered among the Synoptic Gospels (i.e., those presenting a common view). Although the Gospel is ostensibly written by St...

I actually went to college on theology, I bet you did not. Most scholars agree that the Gospel of John was completed between 90–100 (AD).[6][7] It identifies an unnamed "disciple whom Jesus loved" as its source and, perhaps, author.[8][9][10] 20th-century scholarship interpreted the gospel...