Recent content by inchrist

Your doctrine has no commonality with the actual greek words used to support the nonsense of a rapture in Rev 7....nor does your doctrine have anything in common with hebrew eschatology nor does it even fit with the jewish wedding theme....nor do you have any evidence of a literal resurrection...

He never implied he was the only member of the body of Christ....you completely misread his intentions.....

Even the greek language is against you. The phrase in 7:14 they are these who have come , is not the original phrase. In the original language as John wrote it down, there is a present participle that means 'they are coming". In other words ......They came, they will come, they keep on...

Heres your barn The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord

Absolutly it is another possibility We expect to see more Christians slain Rev 6:11 until the full number of their fellow servants, their brothers and sisters, were killed just as they had been. Considering the multitude are in the process of coming out / slain of the Great Tribulation in...

Part 3 But the aorist tense is also used sufficiently often to very clearly :) refer to the present tense and to the future tense to demonstrate that it cannot be limited to the past tense. In the following scripture examples all the CAPITALIZED VERBS are in the aorist tense with the active...

Part 2 I'm afriad Marcus and prewraths share the same symptoms as those of pretribs. See pretribs fail to understand the difference between Tribulation and Wrath, like wise Marcus fails to understand the judgements in miniture of the two witnesses authorised by God to that of the Wrath of...

Well I'm sure the sadducees felt the exact same way when Christ destroyed their concept of no resurrection. Part 1 Well lets clearly test your position shall we :) Lets begin with this Prewrath opinion. Very opinionated statement there. See what Marcus and fellow prewraths dont understand...

You tell me because apparently its a "coincidence" to you. in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. Then you claim the following is a "coincidence" Just happens to be a "coincidence"...

Seems to have escaped you what the title of the thread is....you not terribly bright are you? I can read very well unlike yourself (cough - title of the thread) The script says come out, actually coming out, it does not say raptured out or resurrected out in a single event, but a continual...

Then do you not see your problem? Return back to zech 12 Explain why Jerusalem still exists and is protected by God and not utterly destroyed like Babylon? Thus with violence the great city Babylon shall be thrown down, and shall not be found anymore. Im still waiting for your second...

Im referring to the actual city. I see you still have not provided me scripture of a second witness Jerusalem has been called Babylon. Further no where in Zechariah 12 does it state New Jerualem Further if we go by the size of new Jerusalem, New Jerusalem of Revelation 21 is 2225 km. in...

Nope try again, i tell you what I believe your theory if you can find me a second witness as scripture calls for.... in the OT or any scripture besides john that Jerusalem was ever called babylon? Find that for me please.... Here is further proof which you have ignored Jerusalem still very...

The woman in Rev 12 is protected by God. The woman in Rev 17 is destroyed by God. They are not the same woman

And why do you keep bringing up Retrobyter?, he hasnt been part of this discussion nor is he here to defend himself in this discussion. Can you not defend yourself without ridiculing others who arnt here to defend themselves?