Nomad
Post Tenebras Lux
Ends justifying the means......
Not my God
Yes, we're well aware of the fact that God, as described by Holy Scripture, is not your God. Your god is a false god created in your own image. Good luck with that.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ends justifying the means......
Not my God
Actually it's not, there's notation there that it may not be inspired nor included in many early texts.You may as well take the maps in the back of the Bible to be scripture if take the second half of Mark 16 as inspired - yet it is presented in every Protestant Bible as if it were inspired.
Well said. Perfectly said.Your god is a false god created in your own image.
Yes, we're well aware of the fact that God, as described by Holy Scripture, is not your God. Your god is a false god created in your own image. Good luck with that.
Aspen said:
So you are redefining Good? to accommodation your small understanding of God? The fact is, your god cannot ever follow His own laws! This has nothing to do with me creating a law and demanding God to follow it - I am just assuming that a Good God would follow His own morality!
Is there anything in scripture that states these are Laws for both man and God? I don't believe there ARE any laws or rules for God....He just is.
It is not possible to call Him good if He does not follow His own laws. BTW, I appreciate that you have chosen not to ridicule me for my beliefs - it is nice to have an adult conversation on this board.
I would be very angry. I would have all the normal emotions that all humans have in those situations, but hopefully I would not react to them - I would learn to forgive. The Amish faced a similar situation and they made the Christian choice. I believe God will do the same.
Excellent post Rach. The problem with Aspen is that he/she rejects the notion of a Holy God dealing with his unholy, sinful, rebellious creatures according to strict justice. No, Aspen feels that God owes everyone grace and mercy. That's simply not the God of Scripture.
Aspen can speak for himself, Nomad.
Nope. It sounds like Mormonism is what it sounds like, where even the "worst" level of heaven is a better life.I just can't help but wonder what happens to heaven then? Do all get in? That would mean having to accept Jesus as savior means nothing. And it would also mean that the unrepentant rapists, murders and evil doers get into heaven. Doesn't sound much like heaven then.
I just can't help but wonder what happens to heaven then? Do all get in? That would mean having to accept Jesus as savior means nothing. And it would also mean that the unrepentant rapists, murders and evil doers get into heaven. Doesn't sound much like heaven then.
Nope. Hell exists and it will be filled with angels and people who are unredeemed. Of course, redeemed rapists, murders, and evil doers will be in Heaven.
There has to be a point where God, good and just as He is, steps in and says 'enough. I gave you a way out of your sins and you told me you wanted to be your own god. So fine, but that means you have no part of my mercy.' I think there's a quote by C.S Lewis that says it best....
I know this is difficult to understand, but God cannot be 'just' and let evil, unrepentant sinners go on their merry way. Think of what our society would be if the same happened. Murders, abusers, rapists, psychopaths, thieves...all free to continue in their behaviors. What would have happened to the world if Hitler had not been stopped by the nations of the world? Now try and imagine that on a level where God cannot let sin go unpunished. The very nature of being a good and just God means He cannot let sin go unpunished...and for Him to do so would be the same sort of betrayal as you are now imagining a wrathful God to be. You see justice, true justice is not always nice, but it is always good. How on earth could we worship and fully trust a God who only sits on high smiling at the good and ignoring the evil? How could we worship an almighty sovereign God who is bound by human laws and rules? How can we trust a God to make all right in the end if the evil walk free?
I totally agree - and I also agree will CS Lewis' ideas of Heaven and Hell in his book "the Great Divorce". An imaginary bus trip takes people from Hell to Heaven - the people do not know they are in Hell and do not know they are going to Heaven. All they know is when they arrive in Heaven, they are less solid, less real then Heaven and everyone in Heaven - they are so less real that everything hurts them - even the grass cuts them. They realize they cannot stand being in Heaven because it is too painful so they get back on the bus and go back to Hell.
I like the idea because it recognizes the condition of the unredeemed as a state of being - a wasting sickness that disqualifies citizens of Hell from Heaven. Jesus seems to recognize this as well when He says:
Matthew 9:11-13 [sup]11[/sup] When the Pharisees saw this, they asked his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?”[sup]12[/sup] On hearing this, Jesus said, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. [sup]13[/sup] But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’[sup][a][/sup] For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”
Honestly...which is more terrifying? The thought that God wiped evil from the face of the earth, or that the very God we put our souls in is ineffectual?
They both sound scary - what even sounds scarier is spending eternity with a God that is unpredictable because He doesn't follow His own rules and may simply wipe us all out whenever He feels like it
I don't like contemplating the death of every man, woman and child in those events. But it very much gives me comfort and joy to know that an all knowing and all powerful God....my heavenly Father, is in complete control. He's got it, so I just need to love and trust!
God is in control - and He is moral and trustworthy because He follows His own rules and shows mercy to the unredeemed by sending them to a place where He is not - due to the fact that they cannot tolerate being in His presence.
Nope. It sounds like Mormonism is what it sounds like, where even the "worst" level of heaven is a better life.
[sup]22[/sup]for these are[sup][/sup] days of[sup] [/sup]vengeance, to fulfill all that is written. [sup]23[/sup] Alas for women who are pregnant and for those who are nursing infants in those days! For there will be great distress upon the earth and wrath against this people. [sup]24[/sup]They will fall by the edge of the sword and[sup][/sup] be led captive among all nations, and Jerusalem will be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles,[sup][/sup] until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.(Luke 21:22-24 ESV)
[sup]36[/sup] Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life;[sup][/sup] whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him. (John 3:36 ESV)
God’s Wrath on Unrighteousness
[sup]18[/sup]For the wrath of God[sup][/sup] is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. (Romans 1:18 ESV)
[sup]4[/sup]By no means![sup][/sup] Let God be true though every one were a liar, as it is written,
[sup][/sup] "That you may be justified in your words,
and prevail when you[sup][/sup] are judged."
[sup]5[/sup]But if our unrighteousness serves to show the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unrighteous to inflict wrath on us? (I speak in a human way.) [sup]6[/sup]By no means! For then how could God judge the world? (Romans 3:4-6 ESV)
[sup]5[/sup]But because of your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up[sup][/sup] wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed. (Romans 2:5 ESV)
[sup]8[/sup]but for those who are self-seeking[sup][/sup] and[sup][/sup] do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. (Romans 2:8 ESV)
[sup]19[/sup]Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it[sup][/sup] to the wrath of God, for it is written,[sup][/sup] "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord." (Romans 12:19 ESV)
The earliest extant copies of the Septuagint come from the fourth century AD. None of these copies contain the same list of apocryphal/deuterocanonical books which only serves to demonstrate the in-fighting that took place over them. Once again, the 'custodians' of the OT Scriptures never accepted the apocryphal writings.
Jerome, who is responsible for the Vulgate, translated the apocrypha under duress. Like many before him, he recognized that the apocrypha was not canonical. Once again, this only serves to demonstrate the doubt that lingered around the apocryphal writings throughout Church history.
I totally understand the concern and implications for God's sovereignty. Here's the thing, God has already limited Himself - He is a Trinity. He doesn't have to be a Trinity - but He wills it. A moral God wills Himself to follow His own laws. If they were someone else's laws or the laws of the universe or whatever - it would take away from His sovereignty. If He chooses to follow His own laws, however, He is still sovereign.
There is certainly an urgency involved - we have the cure to a fatal illness and we need to share it with the world! This involves loving and sharing with people - we promote the most important relationship in our lives with people by developing deep and caring relationships with them. I really believe these relationships are the treasures we are storing up in Heaven.
Actually, St. Jerome recognized he apocrypha as canonical, which is why he included them in the Latin Vulgate.
"As the Church reads the books of Judith and Tobit and Maccabees but does not receive them among the canonical Scriptures, so also it reads Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus for the edification of the people, not for the authoritative confirmation of doctrine."
Jerome's preface to the books of Solomon
The influence of Origen's and Athanasius's restricted canon naturally spread to the West. St. Hilary of Poitiers and Rufinus followed their footsteps, excluding the deuteros from canonical rank in theory, but admitting them in practice. The latter styles them "ecclesiastical" books, but in authority unequal to the other Scriptures. St. Jerome cast his weighty suffrage on the side unfavourable to the disputed books.
New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia - Canon of the Old Testament
In his famous "Prologus Galeatus", or Preface to his translation of Samuel and Kings, he declares that everything not Hebrew should be classed with the apocrypha, and explicitly says that Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Tobias, and Judith are not on the Canon. These books, he adds, are read in the churches for the edification of the people, and not for the confirmation of revealed doctrine. An analysis of Jerome's expressions on the deuterocanonicals, in various letters and prefaces, yields the following results: first, he strongly doubted their inspiration; secondly, the fact that he occasionally quotes them, and translated some of them as a concession to ecclesiastical tradition, is an involuntary testimony on his part to the high standing these writings enjoyed in the Church at large, and to the strength of the practical tradition which prescribed their readings in public worship. Obviously, the inferior rank to which the deuteros were relegated by authorities like Origen, Athanasius, and Jerome, was due to too rigid a conception of canonicity, one demanding that a book, to be entitled to this supreme dignity, must be received by all, must have the sanction of Jewish antiquity, and must moreover be adapted not only to edification, but also to the "confirmation of the doctrine of the Church", to borrow Jerome's phrase.
New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia - Canon of the Old Testament
This period exhibits a curious exchange of opinions between the West and the East, while ecclesiastical usage remained unchanged, at least in the Latin Church. During this intermediate age the use of St. Jerome's new version of the Old Testament (the Vulgate) became widespread in the Occident. With its text went Jerome's prefaces disparaging the deuterocanonicals, and under the influence of his authority the West began to distrust these and to show the first symptoms of a current hostile to their canonicity. On the other hand, the Oriental Church imported a Western authority which had canonized the disputed books, viz., the decree of Carthage, and from this time there is an increasing tendency among the Greeks to place the deuteros on the same level with the others--a tendency, however, due more to forgetfulness of the old distinction than to deference to the Council of Carthage.
New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia - Canon of the Old Testament
Actually, like I said before, he didn't recognize the apocrypha as canonical.
There's more. Do I really need to post it?
I totally understand the concern and implications for God's sovereignty. Here's the thing, God has already limited Himself - He is a Trinity. He doesn't have to be a Trinity - but He wills it. A moral God wills Himself to follow His own laws. If they were someone else's laws or the laws of the universe or whatever - it would take away from His sovereignty. If He chooses to follow His own laws, however, He is still sovereign.
Hell is certainly real. Wrath is probably going to be sorrow. I really believe that one of the consequences of the Fall is that humans began having to deal with evil and the way we did it was to view the world dualistically. If God was not pleased, He must be totally mad. If the crops failed, God must be angry at our sin! Realistically, societies have always sinned - it is sort of like people speeding on the freeway - cops can pull anyone over at any time because everyone is speeding. Declaring God's wrath whenever things were not going there way was easy to do because sin was always present. There was always room to repent - and people did it when bad things happened. The OT is a valuable source to learn about God's sovereignty and to learn about how humans responded to it - often in sinful or awkward ways. The NT is God's respond to His own sovereignty - and an example to us. We are called to respond by loving ourselves because God loves us; loving God and loving our neighbors. If we respond to Christ's invitation, we receive the Holy Spirit and begin a life-long journey being sanctified, which requires practice and ends in a permanent citizenship in Heaven.