I met an odd atheist the other day. We started out talking about the validity of the Bible, and later on discussed the evidence supporting a finite universe. Shortly after he said something that most atheists never say and it was against our God. He stated simply that He doesn't exist. I told him that to claim an absolute was the height of arrogance because he cannot possibly search the entire universe, or beyond(because God is transcendant, too) and thus he cannot logically rule out God. He then went on to say the usual (blah blah then you can't rule out unicorns as god) and I told him why our God is more probable than unicorns or Allah. His intruiging statement was something like, "If God is omniscient, then why are you telling me I have to look everywhere for him? If he is everywhere, then shouldn't I have to look in one place, and if I don't see him, then he doesn't exist." Because I've never encountered such a question/statement I was naturally taken aback. I answered by telling him more about the teleogical argument, however he has valid objections to the argument. I was going to tell him that he has to take the leap of faith before seeing God, but I knew that wasn't going to fly well with him. This was today, and I'm still wondering what else I should have said. What do you think? :Sigh:Oh and I have another thought on my mind. It's about agnostic theism which is similar to Deism in a way. A feelow Christian was explaining to me the other day that agnostic is simply being honest about our faith and recognising that there is not much evidence for Him, and so this is where faith and the important aspect of doubt come into play. This makes sense to me. Because we can't be 100% certain that God exists can we? If we were 100% positive then where is the faith in that? Because only with faith we can please God, isn't it correct to say that all true Christian's are agnostic? :sigh: