Ferris Bueller
Well-Known Member
Continued believing IS resting in the gospel, lol.That was a GIFT—- Given to those who Trust Jesus Alone to Save them.....You have added to the Gospel which means that you do not REST in it.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Continued believing IS resting in the gospel, lol.That was a GIFT—- Given to those who Trust Jesus Alone to Save them.....You have added to the Gospel which means that you do not REST in it.
So you're saying continued believing is being disobedient and being guilty of unbelief? Seriously? Don't you think it's the person who turns his back on Christ and goes back to his sinning in unbelief is the one who is being disobedient and guilty of unbelief? Surely, you do.according to Hebrews 3 and 4 will have God calling you “ Disobedient” and Guilty Of “UNBELIEF”—— very serious stuff .....and I ain't letting up.....you are a VERY dangerous man.
No, it's your style, not your doctrine. Your doctrine doesn't mean anything to me, personally. I'm a born again, Spirit filled believer. I'm not living in the realm of your theoretical 'purposely living in sin and unbelief saved person'. So your doctrine doesn't hit any nerves with me personally, but your angry, impolite, judgmental ranting does.You think I am a “ jerk” because I constantly “ give you hell” .....Nah, that dog won’t hunt, Dude.....I just give you Scriptural Truth and you “ think” it’s Hell.
Again!?I suggest that you stop whining and try defeating me by using Scripture .
God as my witness, it's not that. It's your demeanor that's the problem.you are a defeated , frustrated , angry man that loathes me because you can’t prove me wrong using the Word Of God... .....all you can do is “ run and tell” ......lol......
Then why did the sinning man in the church at Corinth have to be turned over to satan "so that his spirit may be saved on the Day of the Lord" 1 Corinthians 5:5? If he's already saved and can't be unsaved why does he have to be turned over to satan so he might be saved when Jesus comes back? According to you he's already saved and always will be saved making that action to be saved unnecessary.We can agree that the Believer who sins with Willful abandon is “ treading on dangerous territory” —I will go even go farther than you! I believe that this guy is on VERY Dangerous Territory—- so dangerous that God just might take his life with an extremely premature death .....still a Saved man
God doesn't lose believers. He cuts unbelievers loose if they refuse to come back to him because they don't want to come back to him.If a child of God is yet lost, the failure is God's, according to Hebrews 12.
I think it is talking about water baptism. That would be consistent with the 'pledge of a good conscience' in the passage (1 Peter 3:21). When you get water baptized it is you, a disciple of Christ, publicly identifying yourself as a disciple of Christ and making a pledge to keep a clean conscience in obedience to Him.I am not saying that 1 peter 3:21 is referring to water Baptism. But the cleansing of the conscience by his Life.
Don't you understand the difference between the 'once saved always saved' from the 1500's and the new revised 'once saved always saved' of today? The old one is still around, but it is being replaced by the new 'once saved always saved'.You mean 'your new OSAS'. This thread is a great example of the Straw Man argument.
It really is interesting to me just how many logical fallacies present themselves in threads like this.
The new one does. It says even if you go back to unbelief you are still saved and a part of Christ's body, and that you will be saved when he returns. The old, original 'once saved always saved' taught that if you went back to unbelief that shows you were never really saved to begin with. It never taught that an unbeliever was saved. It also taught that if you are living in willful, unrepentant sin that also shows you were never really saved to begin with. I agree that living in sin is ultimately living in unbelief. I disagree that it means you were never a true believer. I believe a true believer can go back to sinning in unbelief. But that fundamental argument is not a life and death issue. Because it guards the issue that is life or death—the necessity for continued believing in order to be saved when Jesus comes back. That is what counts. It does not matter if believers will automatically do that, of if you have to make a conscious decision to do that. What counts is that you do that!But no, "OSAS" does not have Christ building His church with unbelievers.
The old Osas defines it one way, the new Osas defines it another. That's what this thread is about.Of course, "OSAS" is pretty much what you define it as, for the intents of this thread.
No one over the age of two or three is innocent. As soon as we say "no" or "I didn't do it" when we really did, we've transgressed the commandment and are condemned by the law, but God's grace is greater than the law. I sympathize with you and your anger over false gospels and distortions that have an evil impact on the hearers. I've struggled with the same issues for many years, but the scripture says " be angry and do not sin". Anger isn't a sin it's an emotion, but how we respond to the emotion can most definitely be sin as serious as murder.How “ gentle and respectful” were you when you declared my “ Damnation” for all to see? Can you say, “ Hypocrite! “ Believe it or not , it is my intention to be kind and light- hearted every time I come in here ( my main traits away from this place) and then I read stuff in here that I honestly believe has the potential to send innocent, poorly taught people to Hell ...sorry —- that’s when your pleas and my best wishes fly out the window....their is such a thing as “ Righteous Anger”.....I don’t try for it.....I don't enjoy it.....Sometimes, however, it is appropriate .....I think that perhaps it is appropriate to the extent that it is Akin to a Fruit Of The Spirit...If others in here aren’t as angry as me when they see the Blood Of Jesus Trampled on and hear “ Doctrines Of Demons” being espoused....maybe “ they” got the problem.....
No, the 'stones' won't crumble, or be burned up. Those members of the visible church in this age that are made of 'wood, hay, or straw' are the ones who will get burned up and purged from the people of God, the field and building of God, in the coming judgment of fire.It seems to me upon reflection that this idea of those who will "choose to stop believing" and go on into re-death would mean that Jesus is building His church with living stones that will later crumble.
Well, not to make light of sin, it was Paul who said that there is sin leading to death and that not all sin leads to death. We didn't get a menu though.Wow.You are Good....” REAL” Good.....I just thought that somebody should say it...God has Blessed you immensely.....may He continue to do so.... ( And of course, He will....)
You've mixed metaphors here and ignored context. The wood, hay, stubble that Paul was referring to was works (the passage says so in context) not people and he was specifically addressing the church, not the world. Every offering is salted with fire (you can look that one up yourself). Fire is cleansing, not simply destructive and its unwise to twist the meaning of scripture to win an argument.No, the 'stones' won't crumble, or be burned up. Those members of the visible church in this age that are made of 'wood, hay, or straw' are the ones who will get burned up and purged from the people of God, the field and building of God, in the coming judgment of fire.
"Surely they are like stubble; the fire will burn them up." Isaiah 47:14
"The peoples will be burned to ashes, like thorns cut down and set ablaze." Isaiah 33:12
"Not so the wicked! For they are like chaff driven off by the wind. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous." Psalm 1:4-5
It's a logical argument but just isn't entirely in agreement with scripture.No, lol. The argument is, you have to keep believing to be saved and stay saved. Willful, deliberate sinning is the result of rejecting the blood of Christ in unbelief. The unbelief is what separates you from the grace of God. And because you are separated from the grace of God your sinning will be held to your account, because you don't believe in Christ anymore for Christ to have it covered.
I think it is talking about water baptism. That would be consistent with the 'pledge of a good conscience' in the passage (1 Peter 3:21). When you get water baptized it is you, a disciple of Christ, publicly identifying yourself as a disciple of Christ and making a pledge to keep a clean conscience in obedience to Him.
How “ gentle and respectful” were you when you declared my “ Damnation” for all to see? Can you say, “ Hypocrite! “ Believe it or not , it is my intention to be kind and light- hearted every time I come in here ( my main traits away from this place) and then I read stuff in here that I honestly believe has the potential to send innocent, poorly taught people to Hell ...sorry —- that’s when your pleas and my best wishes fly out the window....their is such a thing as “ Righteous Anger”.....I don’t try for it.....I don't enjoy it.....Sometimes, however, it is appropriate .....I think that perhaps it is appropriate to the extent that it is Akin to a Fruit Of The Spirit...If others in here aren’t as angry as me when they see the Blood Of Jesus Trampled on and hear “ Doctrines Of Demons” being espoused....maybe “ they” got the problem.....
I don't add to the gospel. You just think I do. You keep accusing me of that and it's beginning to wear thin with me. Long suffering is just that...long, not forever.
The Spirit is identified in a person by how they act. I will leave no doubt in your mind that I do in fact have the Spirit of God in me in salvation. I ask you to do the same.