Women In Leadership In the Church?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

IanLC

Active Member
Encounter Team
Mar 22, 2011
862
80
28
North Carolina
What are your thoughts? I know this is a hotly debated issue in the church today so please keep your thoughts in the love of Christ and not anger and wrath please and thank you!

I personally beleive that God calls women to leadreship with in the church. My pastor is a woman and an ordained Elder in the United Holy Church Of America (UHCA). In the UHCA and many churches were I live and abroad there are many godly women serving as pastors and leaders. God has blessed their work in Christ. God calls both men and women to leadership. There are women in my own family who hold leadership positions in the church so I personally beleive that they can.
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
What are your thoughts? I know this is a hotly debated issue in the church today so please keep your thoughts in the love of Christ and not anger and wrath please and thank you!

I personally beleive that God calls women to leadreship with in the church. My pastor is a woman and an ordained Elder in the United Holy Church Of America (UHCA). In the UHCA and many churches were I live and abroad there are many godly women serving as pastors and leaders. God has blessed their work in Christ. God calls both men and women to leadership. There are women in my own family who hold leadership positions in the church so I personally beleive that they can.

Being a female, I would like to agree with this, but I cannot. Although Jesus had many disciples (among whom were many women), He did not choose any of the females to be His Apostles. All the bishops, priests, and deacons mentioned in the Bible were all men. The reason being is because men are the Head of the household just as Christ is the Head of the Church.

When Mary and Joseph were not yet married, the Angel Gabriel went to both Mary and Joseph. However, after they were married, the Angel Gabriel appeared only to Joseph. So, even the Angel recognized who the head of the household is. :D
 

Thankful 1

New Member
Dec 2, 2010
505
17
0
What are your thoughts? I know this is a hotly debated issue in the church today so please keep your thoughts in the love of Christ and not anger and wrath please and thank you!

I personally beleive that God calls women to leadreship with in the church. My pastor is a woman and an ordained Elder in the United Holy Church Of America (UHCA). In the UHCA and many churches were I live and abroad there are many godly women serving as pastors and leaders. God has blessed their work in Christ. God calls both men and women to leadership. There are women in my own family who hold leadership positions in the church so I personally beleive that they can.

I believe you know it is wrong for a woman to lead any church. You know it is wrong and that is why you posted your thread. You are looking for an excuse to not accept the written Word of God.



(1 Corinthians 14:34-44) “Women should remain silent in the churches.They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire aboutsomething, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgracefulfor a woman to speak in the church.Or did the word of God originate with you? Or are you the only people ithas reached? If anyone thinks they are a prophet or otherwise gifted bythe Spirit, let them acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord’s command. But if anyone ignores this, theywill themselves be ignored.”



Paul tells us what he said was the Lord’s command.



How can anyone who is trying to teach about God using the Bible ignorewhat Paul said in this verse?
 

IanLC

Active Member
Encounter Team
Mar 22, 2011
862
80
28
North Carolina
I believe you know it is wrong for a woman to lead any church. You know it is wrong and that is why you posted your thread. You are looking for an excuse to not accept the written Word of God.



(1 Corinthians 14:34-44) “Women should remain silent in the churches.They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire aboutsomething, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgracefulfor a woman to speak in the church.Or did the word of God originate with you? Or are you the only people ithas reached? If anyone thinks they are a prophet or otherwise gifted bythe Spirit, let them acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord’s command. But if anyone ignores this, theywill themselves be ignored.”



Paul tells us what he said was the Lord’s command.



How can anyone who is trying to teach about God using the Bible ignorewhat Paul said in this verse?


Im sorry you feel so heated but you need to live by your quote! I have asked God about this issue and he has confirmed it to me. My pastor teaches all the scripture! Paul was speaking to the church in Corinth for the women who were speaking out of turn and using the pagan acts with in the church! The women at this time they had just learned the word of God and were teaching falsely now they do know the word of God in more depth and can serve as leaders. God calls who he wants to call man just needs to subject themselves to his will. They are preaching and teaching Jesus Christ crucified and resurrected souls are being saved through the preaching of the women today. God is blessing their ministries through the word of God! Jesus said if you lift me up i will draw all men to me. If Jesus did not want women to serve in leadership he would have said so! If feel that the women who lead are doing God's will, He called them to ministry!
 

[email protected]

Choir Loft
Apr 2, 2009
1,635
127
63
West Central Florida
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
What are your thoughts? I know this is a hotly debated issue in the church today so please keep your thoughts in the love of Christ and not anger and wrath please and thank you!

I personally beleive that God calls women to leadreship with in the church. My pastor is a woman and an ordained Elder in the United Holy Church Of America (UHCA). In the UHCA and many churches were I live and abroad there are many godly women serving as pastors and leaders. God has blessed their work in Christ. God calls both men and women to leadership. There are women in my own family who hold leadership positions in the church so I personally beleive that they can.

The modern question is not whether the speaker wears pants or a skirt or both. The question is whether the word of God is being spoken, whether the name of Jesus is being given its proper prominence and whether the congregation really wants to hear it.

Today hard words are needed. They are needed desparately and they need to be spoken clearly.
The church has drifted away from God. Sermons filled with situational ethics, personal improvement, generic references to love and racial guilt trips don't cut it.
They are meaningless and result in more empty pews or chairs than full ones.

I was raised in the Episcopal church. For years we went along with the tradition until some women wanted to play priest. My mother refused to receive communion from a woman. Everybody fumed and tore at the issue. (She'd probably roll over in her grave if she knew that homosexuals were now in positions of leadership.)

Then one day a strange thing happened. A Holy Spirit inspired revival swept the country and even folks in the Episcopal church got excited about Jesus and the Holy Spirit. The top level leadership of the Episcopal Church decided to squash it, push it away and otherwise subvert the spriritual effect. I know because I attended meetings and decisions the laity weren't aware of. The leadership decided that the issues of greatest importance were female and gay leadership, NOT HOLY SPIRIT leadership ! Well, they got what they wanted. The Holy Spirit eventually left them alone with their issues. Today that's all they have left; issues. No God, just issues.

Are we being led of the Holy Spirit, or by religious politics? What is the Biblical pattern of leadership? There is a danger when one chooses to be modern.
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Jesus trusted women to spread the most important message of all - His resurrection! Women in the priesthood is long over due. Even Paul worked with female deacons!

Presbyterians and Episcopalians have this idea right!
 

WhiteKnuckle

New Member
Mar 29, 2009
866
42
0
47
I don't know that there's any timeline differences, but, for now, the word to me is black and white,

It says no, so that's what I go with. Until further revelation or education.
 

Templar81

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
854
17
0
UK
Well, our parish to come to a decision on women bishops to the diosian synod. I think it looks like we will be getting women bishops afterall and there is going to be more schism, just like when we took on women priests and rome is going to get a lot of new members

However, in the church of Engalnd a Parish can state that they will not have a female Priest and hopefully so will a diocese, so that even if women bishops are created then individual dioceses will be a ble to keep them out.

I'm in two minds about this; on the one hand women do the same jobs as men and they've proved to be good as priests so why not let them be bishops, it only seems logical.

But on the opther hand, will it compremise our apostallic succession, which was compremised already by having women priests. Then there is schism and only rome will benefit.

So I'm undecided but I would say that I lean towards being agaisnt women Bishops but I've accepted it as soemthing that is going to happen, so we've just got to get on with it. Or I could go to Rome.
 

WhiteKnuckle

New Member
Mar 29, 2009
866
42
0
47
Now that I've been thinking,,,,


We need to discuss roles of men and women.

There's a reason for these roles, either in the home or in the church. I might be a little chauvanistic (sp?) But, I believe that men are the "authority" in the home and in the church, or atleast should be.
Not that women shouldn't have their say, or be able to express their opinions or dispute ideals. Not that men are smarter or better. And I'm not talking about who should do the laundry, cook, or clean.

The point is, We each have a role. Much like, the gifts of the Spirit. We're each given a gift according to the way God sees fit. These gifts allow us to fit into our role in the Body of Christ.

One person is a finger, one is a thumb, etc etc. Most of us are happy to accept our role regardless of it's limitations, some are very happy that it's limited. Most of us are just plain happy to even have a role to play and a gift and a way to help someone.

Now, we move to those who aren't happy with their role and their gift. Some just plain flat out want more, or feel they can do so much more......... If only............

The reason I believe for the role of man as the "authority" is to stop rivalries betwen men and women. We shouldn't have to fight for who can do what. God set up what He did for a reason. God chose man to be the "authority" in the home and the church so no one will have to clamour for the top.

In today's society, it's wrong for the man to be the head of the house or the authority. We have this idea that if man is in charge, it makes women lesser beings. Alot of that is from men who view women that way, and then from women and some men, that just want more.

It's all just a way to keep things simple, and so we wont have to waste time bickering or debating subjects just like this.
 

Thankful 1

New Member
Dec 2, 2010
505
17
0
This question is a perfect reason one can’t use the bible as the way to God. People will read anything they want to read into what it says.



Did you people read what Paul said? He said: If anyone thinks they are a prophet or otherwise gifted by the Spirit, let them acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord’s command. But if anyone ignores this, they will themselves be ignored.”



Paul did not say that it was just for such and such church. But people who want to believe differently have to find a reason to be able to disregard what he or she does not like.



You all realize don’t you that Jesus never chose a woman to lead any church. No apostle was awoman.



If you ignore what Paul said about women, then you will be ignored.
 

tomwebster

New Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,041
107
0
76
I believe you know it is wrong for a woman to lead any church. You know it is wrong and that is why you posted your thread. You are looking for an excuse to not accept the written Word of God.



(1 Corinthians 14:34-44) “Women should remain silent in the churches.They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire aboutsomething, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgracefulfor a woman to speak in the church.Or did the word of God originate with you? Or are you the only people ithas reached? If anyone thinks they are a prophet or otherwise gifted bythe Spirit, let them acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord’s command. But if anyone ignores this, theywill themselves be ignored.”



Paul tells us what he said was the Lord’s command.



How can anyone who is trying to teach about God using the Bible ignorewhat Paul said in this verse?


What about what Paul wrote here:

Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Col 3:10 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:
Col 3:11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Maybe he just forgot what he had written in 1 Corinthians? OR maybe he was talking about something else in 1 Corinthians, like how to act in Church.
 

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
Why do Christian's find it necessary to be so mean and judgemental and say something like this to a fellow servant of Christ.

I believe you know it is wrong for a woman to lead any church. You know it is wrong and that is why you posted your thread. You are looking for an excuse to not accept the written Word of God.

Whiteknuckel said,

I don't know that there's any timeline differences, but, for now, the word to me is black and white,

It says no, so that's what I go with. Until further revelation or education.
This is probably one of the most controvercial issues in the church.

Women were ordained as deacons. The word servant is one word for deacon and minister.

Romans 16:1  ¶I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea:2  That ye receive her in the Lord, as becometh saints, and that ye assist her in whatsoever business she hath need of you: for she hath been a succourer of many, and of myself also.

Priscilla and her husband Aquila were workers in the church.

Romans 16:3-6  Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus: Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles. Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ. Greet Mary, who bestowed much labour on us.

Women were the first to go to the tomb and the first to see the resurrected Christ (John 20:11-18 and were also persecuted for their faith.

There was a wealthy unmarried woman named Lydia who had church services at her home not only with her household but also with 'the brethren'

Acts 16:14-15  And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul. And when she was baptized, and her household, she besought us, saying, If ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house, and abide there. And she constrained us.

Acts 16:40  And they went out of the prison, and entered into the house of Lydia: and when they had seen the brethren, they comforted them, and departed.

Women were also presecuted.

Acts 8:3  As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.

1 Corinthians 16:19  ¶The churches of Asia salute you. Aquila and Priscilla salute you much in the Lord, with the church that is in their house.

In the ancient world the place of women was low and the Jews had even a lower idea of them. In Jewish culture to teach the law to a women was to cast pearls before swine and it was forbidden to speak to a woman on the street. And the Corinthian church was mostly made up of Jewish believers who came out of the paganistic practices of the city of Corinth.

Paul mentions how he was taught in the Scriptures by Timothy's mother and grandmother.

Philippians 4:2-3 I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord.And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life.

Women were also able to receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

Acts 2:17  And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:

We need to remember that Paul was dealing with an infant church in a paganistic city whose influence infiltrated the church. So we shouldn't take this out of context from when or who it were written.
There were a host of problems in the Corinthian church including a host of sexual problems. It was filled with paganism and the city is best known for it's immorality. Much of these paganistic practices were brought into the church. Sexual sins of all kinds were commonly practiced and accepted. The city had a 1000 sacred prostitutes that would walk the streets at night. These were just some of the problems Paul had to deal with in the Corinthian church. We should not make this issue of women preachers a universal rule for the church. Women keeping their silence and usurping authority to men was more applicable to the Church at Corinth.

The gifts of the Spirit was not only avaliable to men but also to women.
Acts 2:17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: 18 And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy:
.

What seems to be prohibitted in the Corinthian church was women speaking. In the home, the teaching of men by women was prohibitted since men had authority over them in spiritual things. And this was largely influenced by Jewish culture and the background of the city of Corinth, and the condition of the church and all of it's problems. He is not prohibiting a woman from evangelizing or sharing with men since there are several instances of women having the brethren in their home. Women were responsible for bearing and teaching children and keeping the household. They had more responsibility than men at home. Couple that with the sexual issues of the Corinthian church one can understand why Paul found it fitting for women to keep silent in the Corinthian church.

Titus 2:1-5  ¶But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine: That the aged men be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience. The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

Paul's conception of the role of women in the Corinthian church was influenced by the background of the age, the low status Jews held toward women, and the paganism of the city of Corinth and how that infiltrated the church. It shouldn't be a universal teaching about women in the church.

Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Chuch Smith said,

Paul in writing to the Corinthians mentions the women praying or prophesying in a public assembly and he doesn't come down on them for that. He doesn't say that that's prohibited. And "he that prophesies speaks to the church for edification, for comfort, for exhortation" (I Corinthians 14:3), and I see these as areas where women can minister effectively.

 

Thankful 1

New Member
Dec 2, 2010
505
17
0
What about what Paul wrote here:

Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Col 3:10 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:
Col 3:11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Maybe he just forgot what he had written in 1 Corinthians? OR maybe he was talking about something else in 1 Corinthians, like how to act in Church.


Throwing many scripture at a question and hoping something sticks does not answer the question. Answer my previous post will you?





 

tomwebster

New Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,041
107
0
76
This question is a perfect reason one can’t use the bible as the way to God. People will read anything they want to read into what it says.

This part is true t1,


Did you people read what Paul said? He said: If anyone thinks they are a prophet or otherwise gifted by the Spirit, let them acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord’s command. But if anyone ignores this, they will themselves be ignored.”

So why are you ignoring Galations and Colossians?

Paul did not say that it was just for such and such church. But people who want to believe differently have to find a reason to be able to disregard what he or she does not like.





You all realize don’t you that Jesus never chose a woman to lead any church. No apostle was awoman.



If you ignore what Paul said about women, then you will be ignored.


But God did, This is only one place:

Ecc 1:1 The words of the Preacher (H6953), the son of David, king in Jerusalem.

H6953
קהלת
qôheleth
ko-heh'-leth
Feminine of active participle from H6950; a (female) assembler (that is, lecturer); abstractly preaching (used as a ‘nom de plume’, Koheleth): - preacher.

Your last statement will be followed!
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
What about what Paul wrote here:

Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


Col 3:10 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:
Col 3:11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Maybe he just forgot what he had written in 1 Corinthians? OR maybe he was talking about something else in 1 Corinthians, like how to act in Church.

What St. Paul says is that everyone is equal in God. We are equal as human beings in the eyes of God. In Genesis, Adam said to Eve, "you are bone of my bones, flesh of my flesh," meaning that Eve is equal to Adam as a human and deserves the same respect as any human being, but I agree with Whiteknuckle. God created men and women equal, but He also created them different. Men and women have different roles. Their different roles does not mean that one is superior to the other. Men were given the gift to be Head of the household, and women were given the gift of life for they have the ability to bear children. The gifts God gave to His children are not the same, but one gift is not greater than the other. Both men and women were given different roles to show that they need each other.
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
This part is true t1,




So why are you ignoring Galations and Colossians?




But God did, This is only one place:

Ecc 1:1 The words of the Preacher (H6953), the son of David, king in Jerusalem.

H6953
קהלת
qôheleth
ko-heh'-leth
Feminine of active participle from H6950; a (female) assembler (that is, lecturer); abstractly preaching (used as a ‘nom de plume’, Koheleth): - preacher.

Your last statement will be followed!

I'm sorry, my brother, but according to Strong's biblical translation, the part of speech for "preacher" in Ecc. 1:1 is a masculine noun. The same word is used in Ecc. 1:12: "I the Preacher (H6953) was king over Israel in Jerusalem." The king was not a female otherwise it would say "queen." None of the Apostles were women. And all the bishops, priests, and deacons in the Bible were men.

I am a female in the Catholic Church. I am also a Minister of the Word. But I cannot be a priest or bishop. A Minister of the Word is a lector who serves at the altar, but that is all.
 

tomwebster

New Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,041
107
0
76
I'm sorry, my brother, but according to Strong's biblical translation, the part of speech for "preacher" in Ecc. 1:1 is a masculine noun. The same word is used in Ecc. 1:12: "I the Preacher (H6953) was king over Israel in Jerusalem." The king was not a female otherwise it would say "queen." None of the Apostles were women. And all the bishops, priests, and deacons in the Bible were men.

I am a female in the Catholic Church. I am also a Minister of the Word. But I cannot be a priest or bishop. A Minister of the Word is a lector who serves at the altar, but that is all.


I don't know which Strong's you have but my Hendrickson edition of The Strong’s has H6953, קהלת, qôheleth is the feminine of active participle from H6950 קהל, qâhal; a (female) assembler (that is, lecturer)…

Also:
Barnes: it is strictly a feminine participle, and describes a person in the act of calling together an assembly of people ,

And
Clarke: The word קהלת Koheleth is a feminine noun, from the root קהל kahal, to collect, gather together, assemble; and means, she who assembles or collects a congregation.

 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
I don't know which Strong's you have but my Hendrickson edition of The Strong’s has H6953, קהלת, qôheleth is the feminine of active participle from H6950 קהל, qâhal; a (female) assembler (that is, lecturer)…

Also:
Barnes: it is strictly a feminine participle, and describes a person in the act of calling together an assembly of people ,

And
Clarke: The word קהלת Koheleth is a feminine noun, from the root קהל kahal, to collect, gather together, assemble; and means, she who assembles or collects a congregation.


The active particle is feminine, but the part of speech is masculine noun. Below is the weblink of the concordance of Strong's bilbical translation.

http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H6953&t=KJV

In Christ,
Selene
 

tomwebster

New Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,041
107
0
76

Robbie

New Member
Jan 4, 2011
1,125
59
0
Huntington Beeach
I'd rather listen to a woman who speaks truth than a man who speaks ignorance and lies... if they both speak truth... truth does not lose His power based on which gender proclaims Him... and truth is the authority... so which gender proclaims Him is irrelevant...
 
  • Like
Reactions: marchmum