n2thelight
Well-Known Member
What happened to man? What happened to Methuselah, the man as per scripture who came closest to attaining to that apparent ideal of 1000 years of carnal life?
Thinking he died at around the completion of the Ark
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What happened to man? What happened to Methuselah, the man as per scripture who came closest to attaining to that apparent ideal of 1000 years of carnal life?
Enoch and Methuselah were both children of Seth. I don't think it a stretch to believe there were other faithful servants of God in that same line.
Be encouraged my friend . Let us really look at the example in noahs days .Backlit said: Hi Mark. There's an idea that the flood is a type of the second coming, that the fit and able will be chosen to go through the final plagues etc but remain protected as was Noah, while the elderly and the inform will be taken to their rest beforehand as was Noah's immediate predecessors. It wouldn't have been an easy time even though they were in a large boat... Storms are never easy. And it won't be easy in the coming crisis either... God is merciful.
Those who are preserved unto the coming of the Lord will be those who are SPIRITUALLY FIT - Matthew 25: 1-13
Have you ever wondered why the unclean beasts were by twos and the clean by sevens .7 Seven 7!
"Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female:..." Gen 7:2
Such are men in their beastly way or even as the beasts that they are. Reading history and about the religions of men [not only directly tied to Christianity it may seem] often men who knew not Joseph, men who knew not Jesus, men who knew not Jehovah God, have engaged in some ways or beliefs or customs, which are similar to God's message through Jesus and the prophets. Lots of mixtures.In reading the early chapters of Genesis one may quite readily discern a dividing of the ways between the various descendants of Adam. The progeny of Seth and that of Cain. A little later we see how the sons of God (the line of Seth) became attracted to the daughter's of men (the line of Cain) and intermarried and began to apostatize from the truth.
This became a sad sorry habit for mankind particularly observed in that life of Israel that you quoted. An example of which we have in the evil work of the prophet Balaam in encouraging the men of Israel to mingle with the women of Moab. Interestingly we see this being repeated in the future in Revelation where the image to the beast entices the world (including most of those who claim membership to various churches... The harlot daughters) into an adulterous relationship with the Kings of the earth.
No one knows where the real book of Jasher is, so the widely distributed version is obviously fraudulent. The Bible only mentions one God-ordained priest who existed before the establishment of the Levitical priesthood, and that is Melchizedek. By process of elimination, it's safe to doubt that there is any truth to what those 2 fraudulent books say.according to the book of Enoch and the book of Jasher, Methuselah was named a Priest on this earth, and remained righteous till the end along with Noah. These are extra biblical accounts so I do not confirm or deny the veracity of them.
Josephus says Methuselah was a minister of God before the task eventually fell to Noah, so we can deduce that he certainly had a good relationship with God. From what i see, there was more to tell about Noah than Methuselah because God's warning work started with Noah. It seems Methuselah's work probably only consisted of teaching people God's way of life and being a living witness of the fact that the people around him were being immoral.Do you mean Noah? If you meant Methuselah, why would you have drawn that conclusion? The Bible does not say that much about the grandfather of Noah other than what is already posted on this thread. Other sources apparently do say more. Please elaborate.
faithful servants of God did not produce a monstrous offspring that so was defiled/corrupted spiritually and genetically that God had only one option - to wipe clean the earth with the Flood.
Had God not preserved Noah and his wife spiritually and genetically, satan would of been successful in preventing God's prophecy upon the Seed of the Woman and His crushing the Serpent's head (satan).
Satan would of Won.
That's why scripture showing the generations is important, as many put cains seed with Seth's . And notice most have similar names
All men by comparison to our stature after 5000 years of declining health and vitality, were giants. What your quote says is that they were still on earth during that time, both before and after the apostasy. Some of their descendants survived even to Noah's day. Throwbacks through DNA are still possible even after all this time, even to today.Now when men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they took as wives whomever they chose. So the LORD said, “My Spirit will not contend with man forever,a for he is mortal; his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and afterward as well—when the sons of God had relations with the daughters of men. And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown.
Genesis 6:1-4
All men by comparison to our stature after 5000 years of declining health and vitality, were giants. What your quote says is that they were still on earth during that time, both before and after the apostasy. Some of their descendants survived even to Noah's day. Throwbacks through DNA are still possible even after all this time, even to today.
I believe that Noah being on that ark had something to do with his relationship with God Genesis 6:9
And the theory that angels can procreate with women, is first am assumption that all angels are male, and second, that they have the prerequisite equipment. The entire theory is built on fabrications.Your first part is incorrect according to Scripture - your second, ending part is correct according to Scripture.
And the theory that angels can procreate with women, is first am assumption that all angels are male, and second, that they have the prerequisite equipment. The entire theory is built on fabrications.
All men by comparison to our stature after 5000 years of declining health and vitality, were giants. What your quote says is that they were still on earth during that time, both before and after the apostasy. Some of their descendants survived even to Noah's day. Throwbacks through DNA are still possible even after all this time, even to today.
Mmm. So in order to fit the popular myth, sons of God are fallen angels. Right. And that threat fallen angels left their first estate (in heaven) God still considers them His children.The sons of God from Genesis left their spiritual domain and came to earth. When they left their domain they took on flesh form.
They genetically polluted humankind made in the Image of God. They altered God's creation of man and thus came within 8 Souls of stopping God and a complete takeover.
Scripture cannot lie - the evidence is in Scripture
Mmm. So in order to fit the popular myth, sons of God are fallen angels. Right. And that threat fallen angels left their first estate (in heaven) God still considers them His children.
And they took on flesh form... That must be scriptural right? I mean, you wouldn't just say that expecting people to believe it without scripture saying so would you?
And although angels don't procreate with one another, they can do so by working a miracle upon their very nature and changing their species from one thing to another. I would imagine that is scriptural also of course. And naturally, if they didn't do it to themselves, then God did, right? Right?
I know precisely the point that the popular storytellers theorize regarding this topic. It's fanciful. It's gripping drama. It would make a terrific movie. And it's nonsense.You missing the point
I know precisely the point that the popular storytellers theorize regarding this topic. It's fanciful. It's gripping drama. It would make a terrific movie. And it's nonsense.
I know precisely the point that the popular storytellers theorize regarding this topic. It's fanciful. It's gripping drama. It would make a terrific movie. And it's nonsense.