Revelation 20:4 is not the Second Coming resurrection of Paul in 1 Thessalonians 4 and 1 Corinthians 15. Paul's resurrection is in the opening of the 5th and 6th Seal years before Armageddon and the resurrection of Revelation 20:4. Paul never mentions people being beheaded, and for a reason. Paul was not talking about their resurrection.
Paul and all of the elect were expected to be raised when Christ returned....no one at that stage knew when that was to be, and for good reason I think. It was expected “soon” if the words of the Bible writers are anything to go by. But “soon” it would still be, because those who were resurrected when Jesus returned had no knowledge of the passage of time as they “slept” in their graves. When they were raised back to life, it would seem like they had just closed their eyes but a moment ago.
Paul said of “those dead in Christ” that they would “rise first”. The “first resurrection” is for “the holy ones” who would be resurrected as spirits to heaven. This is how they are “born again”....you cannot enter the spirit realm in a fleshly body.
The soul is who you are, not your body nor spirit. So the soul can never die.
Since “souls” are breathers, they most certainly can die, as Ezekiel plainly stated. (Ezekiel 18:4)
Humans are mortals, which means that their lives can end. Animals and humans are both called “souls” in the scriptures, which prompted Solomon to lament that we had no superiority over the animals in death.....we breathe the same air, die the same death, and end up in the same place. (Ecclesiastes 3:19-20)
Before the Cross, the soul was in Abraham's bosom. Guess what? Jesus told us Lazarus went to Abraham's bosom, not heaven, so Lazarus' soul was not dragged out of Paradise away from heaven. God allowed his soul to leave Abraham's bosom and enter a restored incorruptible physical body, that would never die again. A few weeks later, all of Abraham's bosom were set free and given incorruptible permanent physical bodies. They are now in Paradise, as well as Lazarus and John the Baptist.
So you base this assumption on a parable that you clearly do not understand.
What is Abraham’s bosom? I am surprised by the ignorance demonstrated in the understanding of this reference. The term is used simply to identify the forepart of the human body. (male or female)
The bosom was designated in Hebrew by “chehq” (1 Kings 1:2), “choʹtsen” (Nehemiah 5:13) and the dual form of “dadh” (Ezekiel 23:3)
In Greek, it is “kolʹpos”. At the Last Supper, the apostle John was said to be reclining at Jesus bosom...a position of favour. (John 13:23)
A dearly beloved or cherished one would be held close to one’s bosom (Heb., chehq)
So, rather than some strange place designated for the “souls” of the faithful dead, the “bosom” is a actually nothing more than a position of favour. The parable of the rich man and Lazarus is just that...it is an illustration depicting the situation of the religious leaders of the day (Pharisees) pictured by the rich man, and the beggar (Lazarus) who was picturing the spiritually impoverished “lost sheep” to whom Jesus was sent.
Their deaths were symbolic of a change in their status...”hades” contrary to popular belief is not “Hell” but simply the common grave of all mankind....so being “in hades” was not being in a fiery hell because the Jews had no such belief.
The two groups actually swapped places.....the “bosom of Abraham” was a position of favour with God, which was previously held by the Jews as God’s people (sons of Abraham), but now with the coming of the Christ, the ‘beggars’ were given Jesus’ special attention and those who accepted him as Messiah were now in the favoured position. The Jewish leadership were cast off by God as incorrigible hypocrites. (Matthew 23) Jesus divided the Jews into two distinct camps....those who accepted him as Messiah, and those who rejected him and clung to the lies that the Pharisees told about him, but he gave the people ample time to change their course, because his disciples continued to preach to them as well as to the Gentiles after his death.
If this was a literal account, then heaven and hell are within speaking distance to each other and a drop of water on a man’s finger is going to cool off someone existing in flames.....utterly ridiculous!
Like the account of the thief hung alongside Jesus, much is assumed that is never said or meant.
Luke 23:42-43...
“
42 Then he said: “Jesus, remember me when you get into your Kingdom.” 43 And he said to him: “Truly I tell you today, you will be with me in Paradise.”
Do you see the placement of the comma in verse 43? There is no punctuation in Greek; translators place commas where they believe they need to be, according to their own understanding or bias.
In most cases the comma is placed after the first “you”, which changes the whole meaning of what Jesus said to this man in the Jewish understanding of what he meant.
Carefully consider what Jesus said if you place the comma after the word “you”....
“today you will be with me in paradise”.... did Jesus promise the man heaven? Where was the paradise that Jesus promised him? He was not one of the “elect” because these had to prove themselves faithful up
until their death, following Jesus and obeying his teachings, so where was the original paradise that humans enjoyed? It was right here on earth where God intended for us to live forever.
Jesus was promising this man a resurrection where he will bring back all the dead, righteous or unrighteous.....(John 5:28-29) Jesus calls all of them from their graves, not heaven. The thief will be among those whom Jesus, as the Fine Shepherd, will guide and feed throughout his 1,000 year reign, bringing all mankind back to sinless life...of the sort that Adam had before his defection. This is what Jesus gave his life to attain.
The other question is....did Jesus go anywhere
that day? Or was he in his tomb for three days awaiting his resurrection as he said he would be?
He actually remained on earth for 40 days before ascending to his Father. So it was impossible for this thief to be “with Jesus in heaven” if Jesus was not there himself?
There is so much that Christendom’s adherents accept without question.....but we should question everything.