Is Jesus God Himself or God the Son?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

BeyondET

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2022
1,494
392
83
56
Hampton Roads
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved...

...Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins,...

..... The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us....




LOL
Verse 16,38 God knows man doesn't know thus if you believe and it's with your whole heart. Many say they believe but
 

mailmandan

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2020
4,498
4,769
113
The Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved...
Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved (general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely essential to salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief, not on a lack of baptism. So salvation rests on belief. NOWHERE does the Bible say "baptized or condemned."

If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then why did Jesus not mention it in the following verses? (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26). What is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions NINE different times in each of these complete statements? *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.

*John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

...Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins,...
See post #119. In Acts 16:30, we read - And he brought them out and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, (and get water baptized? NO) and you will be saved, you and your household.”

..... The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us....
In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).

*Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved THROUGH water" as they were IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an ARK for the SAVING of his household). *The context reveals that ONLY the righteous (Noah and his family) were DRY and therefore SAFE. In contrast, only the wicked in Noah's day came in contact with the water and they all perished.

Perverting the gospel is no laughing matter. This is what happens when you surface read pet verses taken out of context and ignore the rest of scripture instead of properly harmonizing Scripture with Scripture before reaching your conclusion on doctrine.
 

Truther

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2019
10,295
1,479
113
62
Lodi
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved (general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely essential to salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief, not on a lack of baptism. So salvation rests on belief. NOWHERE does the Bible say "baptized or condemned."

If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then why did Jesus not mention it in the following verses? (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26). What is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions NINE different times in each of these complete statements? *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.

*John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

See post #119. In Acts 16:30, we read - And he brought them out and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, (and get water baptized? NO) and you will be saved, you and your household.”

In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).

*Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved THROUGH water" as they were IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an ARK for the SAVING of his household). *The context reveals that ONLY the righteous (Noah and his family) were DRY and therefore SAFE. In contrast, only the wicked in Noah's day came in contact with the water and they all perished.

Perverting the gospel is no laughing matter. This is what happens when you surface read pet verses taken out of context and ignore the rest of scripture instead of properly harmonizing Scripture with Scripture before reaching your conclusion on doctrine.
Redefine this one too....


38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,252
4,931
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"God The Father, Spoke To God The Son"

"Thy Throne OH "God", Case Settled!


Hebrews 1:8KJV
8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
KJV is not saying what you want it to say. In modern lingo, this throne of mine is yours forever.

Don’t forget, Hebrews is quoting Psalms, referring to David’s throne, anointed by God to last forever. The son is in the line of David, yes?
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
33,346
21,562
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
fc98b456bf3e120acc40e2af85319cce.jpg
And yet ANOTHER thread against Jesus' deity.

IDK

Much love!
 

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
23,212
39,717
113
52
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I’m serious, please explain what the verse (Acts 2:38)says. You keep saying that I’m reading it wrong, right?
My friend as is the adventist as is my friend . You keep hammering in the same thing .
I say tis time to expose the all inclusive false love agenda . So many are going under it and its end is and will be the SECOND death .
OF that i am fully persauded .
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,819
3,250
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
KJV is not saying what you want it to say. In modern lingo, this throne of mine is yours forever.

Don’t forget, Hebrews is quoting Psalms, referring to David’s throne, anointed by God to last forever. The son is in the line of David, yes?
The Father clearly states Jesus the Son is "God" with a big capital "G" for deity

Will you now be a Greek scholar, and tell the forums how the KJV translators were wrong?

Hebrews 1:8KJV
8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,819
3,250
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is amazing trinitarians continue to reference a very bad translation to justify their dogma.
Your now the resident Greek and Hebrew Scholar?

The 1611 King James Translators were Christian scholars uncompared, brilliant God fearing men

1611 King James.Org
INTRODUCTION
At least sixty men were directly involved in the translation of the King James Bible (hereinafter KJB). Most were Translators, while a few were project overseers, revisers and editors. Some served in several roles. Who were these men? What were their backgrounds? What did they share? In what ways were they different? They were a diverse group. While some were born in large cities and towns, most were from small villages scattered throughout England. Several were the children of university graduates, most were not. They were sons of mariners, farmers, school teachers, cordwainers (leather merchants), fletchers (makers of bows and arrows), ministers, brewers, tailors, and aristocrats. All were members of the Church of England, but their religious views ran the gamut. Some were ardent Puritans, others staunch defenders of the religious establishment. Some believed in pre-destination and limited salvation as taught by John Calvin, while others believed in self-determination and universal access to heaven as taught by Jacobus Arminius.

All of the Translators were university graduates. Oxford and Cambridge claimed nearly equal numbers of Translators as alumni. All of the Translators except one were ordained Church of England priests. While several of the Translators had traveled to the Continent, only one had ventured to the New World. Most of the Translators were married men (38 of 60) with families. Most of the Translators spent a significant portion of their career associated with their colleges and universities as fellows, involved in teaching and administration. As fellows, they were not allowed to marry. As a result many delayed marriage until they had established themselves in church office away from the university. When the translation commenced in 1604-1605, the majority of the Translators, 22, were in their forties, 16 men were in their thirties, 15 in their fifties, 3 in their sixties and 3 in their twenties.

One Translator died in his thirties, six in their forties, nineteen in their fifties, sixteen in their sixties, four in their seventies, three in their eighties and one, over one hundred. Nine of the Translators died before the KJB was published in the 1611.

Most of the Translators were in comfortable economic circumstances during and after their time involved in the translation. The association and friendships they developed during the translation project generally advanced their careers. Some of the Translators went on to high church and academic office. Five went on to serve as bishops and two as archbishops.

They all had a familiarity with the ancient languages of Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and often many more. They came on the historical scene at a time when the knowledge of early biblical texts and language was exploding. Such a flowering of interest and expertise was unique. Bible historian, Gordon Campbell, has observed:

The population from which scholars can now be drawn is much larger than in the seventeenth century, but it would be difficult now to bring together a group of more than fifty scholars with the range of languages and knowledge of other disciplines that characterized the KJB Translators. (Bible – The Story of the King James Version 1611-2011 Oxford, Gordon Campbell, Oxford University Press 2010.)
For such a diverse group, they worked together in harmony during a generally contentious time. They had disagreements, to be sure, but they labored on, year after year. There were no "tell all books" published after the fact. Miles Smith remarked in his preface to the KJB, the Translators "were greater in other men's eyes than in their own, and sought truth rather than their own praise". They approached the task of translation with humility, understanding they were standing on the shoulders of giants like William Tyndale. Believers all, the Translators, according to Smith "craved the assistance of God's Spirit by prayer" as they proceeded in their work.

Though almost all were well known within the religious and academic community of the time, their involvement in the translation went largely unnoticed by the public. Their individual and group effort was not the subject of historical inquiry until many years after the fact. As a result, little information about the process of translation survived. The lives of the Translators and sometimes their very identity became obscured with time. In certain instances, the place of their birth and burial is unknown, and their family circumstance in doubt. Until this anniversary year, few could name even one Translator, let alone sixty. The following brief biographies are written in the hope to shed further light on these men who contributed so much.
 
Last edited:

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,252
4,931
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Father clearly states Jesus the Son is "God" with a big capital "G" for deity

God is never called the son. You are deliberately misinterpreting half Millenia old language O’ God to fit your doctrine. Read more accurate translations made in the last 50 years to grasp a proper rendering of this one verse.

God says he is the only God over and over again. Scripture says God raised Jesus from the dead. This is how you know Jesus is not God. Jesus died.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,252
4,931
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The 1611 King James Translators were Christian scholars uncompared, brilliant God fearing men

praise worthy, to be sure but not infallible.

The problem with the KJV is the FROM and the TO. Fact is, we know more about older manuscripts and the ancient language than they did. And they had no knowledge of the 21st century American language we speak.

The KJV Bible is the greatest book ever written in the English language in terms of centuries of influence. It had it day in the sun and is now obsolete.
 

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
My friend as is the adventist as is my friend . You keep hammering in the same thing .
I say tis time to expose the all inclusive false love agenda . So many are going under it and its end is and will be the SECOND death .
OF that i am fully persauded .

You keep posting the same false logic over and over and over. It is, was, and always will be false.
 

McFearless

Active Member
Nov 16, 2021
249
211
43
Denmark(Copenhagen)
Faith
Christian
Country
Denmark
John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.


Is Jesus God Himself or God the Son??


For all of those who say that Jesus is God Himself or even God The Son, you first have to ask you self, Is God Capable of telling a lie?

Hebrews 6:18 “That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:”

Now John 1:1,14 are the two verses that are utilized in establishing that Jesus is God Himself.

Paul never once said that God called Jesus God. They use Hebrews 1:8 to establish this false fact…

Show me, in the Bible, where God ever told Jesus “But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.”

Reading the new testament, there is no such place where God ever said that to Jesus.. David does make this statement in Psalms 45:6 when David wrote it praising God, “Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre.”

Back to the capable of telling a lie…

Jesus said that he could do nothing of himself, yet you claim he is “God the Son” thereby God Himself…

Jesus said that he has not come to destroy the Laws or the Prophets, yet you claim he is God Himself and call him a liar if you do not keep the commandments of God as Jesus himself makes clear when he was asked directly what must be don to inherit eternal life…

If you loved Jesus at all, and claim him to be God Himself, then you would keep his commandments. John 14:15 “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”

Jesus never once said that he came down to do his own will, yet you claim him to be God Himself. John 6:38 “For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.”

Jesus clearly says who God is to him and to others when he spoke to Mary after his resurrection. John 20:17 “Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.”

Before that he made this statement explain that the one the Jews say is their God. John 8:54 “Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:”

False doctrine is false doctrine, the Bible does not teach a “Triune God anywhere in it.

I could list every single piece of scripture people use to establish Jesus as being God but, I won’t.

Before you post your scriptures make sure that they do not make Jesus nor God Himself out to be a liar.

I am sure that there will be a lot of you who will ignore what I have written, in fact I know you will. It will show in your defense of your False doctrine…

You will give me all kinds of theories of “How you believe the Bible says that Jesus is God Himself” but you will never not once Show me where the Bible explains how it is possible for God to tell a lie. Which will be ignored…

You claim that the Bible is God’s word, thereby calling God Himself a liar. John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Yet you ignore the very word of God…

Use Matthew-John to prove God is capable of telling a lie.. you cannot use You can use Peter, 1-3 John and James as well as they were with Jesus and were his disciples. Paul was not a disciple of Jesus did not walk with Jesus during his ministries on earth. And if you claim that Jesus spoke to him, Since you claim that Jesus is God Himself and that God only Speaks through Scripture, Remember Paul was on a road sleeping when he heard a voice and he looked up and seen him… Saul is commonly known as Paul… Acts 9:1-19, this tells the story of Paul’s Conversion and calling to preach…

According to the "Doctrine of the Trinity", it doesn't matter whom you refer to, you are always referring to God himself...

God is the The Father,
God is the Son,
God is the Holy Spirit.

John 6:38 "For I have come down from heaven not to do mine own will but the will of Him that sent me."

Whose will did God Himself come down from heaven to do, if not his own?

If you say that God the Son was doing the will of God the Father, you are still saying that God Himself was still doing his own will.

If you say that the Son was doing the will of the Father, you are still saying that God Himself was doing his own will....

The explanation of the Triune God/Doctrine of the Trinity, and yes the Doctrine of the trinity was developed by the Catholic church, the only thing Protestants, those who are not of the catholic church, did was remove "This is the Catholic Faith" and "So the Catholic religion" from the doctrine... other than that it is all the same and even the oneness believers utilize this same explanation in whole or in part..

"The Father is uncreated,
the Son is uncreated,
the Holy Spirit is uncreated.


The Father is immeasurable,
the Son is immeasurable,
the Holy Spirit is immeasurable.


The Father is eternal,
the Son is eternal,
the Holy Spirit is eternal.


And yet there are not three eternal beings;
there is but one eternal being.
So too there are not three uncreated or immeasurable beings;
there is but one uncreated and immeasurable being.


Similarly, the Father is almighty,
the Son is almighty,
the Holy Spirit is almighty.
Yet there are not three almighty beings;
there is but one almighty being.


Thus, the Father is God,
the Son is God,
the Holy Spirit is God.
Yet there are not three gods;
there is but one God.


Thus, the Father is Lord,
the Son is Lord,
the Holy Spirit is Lord.
Yet there are not three lords;
there is but one Lord.


Just as Christian truth compels us
to confess each person individually
as both God and Lord,
so catholic religion forbids us
to say that there are three gods or lords.


The Father was neither made nor created nor begotten from anyone.
The Son was neither made nor created;
he was begotten from the Father alone.
The Holy Spirit was neither made nor created nor begotten;
he proceeds from the Father and the Son.


Accordingly, there is one Father, not three fathers;
there is one Son, not three sons;
there is one Holy Spirit, not three holy spirits.


Nothing in this trinity is before or after,
nothing is greater or smaller;
in their entirety the three persons
are coeternal and coequal
with each other.

So, in everything, as was said earlier,
we must worship their trinity in their unity
and their unity in their trinity."
 
Last edited:

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.)" style="font-size: 0.625em; line-height: normal; position: relative; vertical-align: text-top; top: auto;">(
@McFearless Wonderfully sublime passage there........... :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: McFearless

McFearless

Active Member
Nov 16, 2021
249
211
43
Denmark(Copenhagen)
Faith
Christian
Country
Denmark
@McFearless Wonderfully sublime passage there........... :)

I just love the beginning

Genesis 1
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty,darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,819
3,250
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
God is never called the son. You are deliberately misinterpreting half Millenia old language O’ God to fit your doctrine. Read more accurate translations made in the last 50 years to grasp a proper rendering of this one verse.

God says he is the only God over and over again. Scripture says God raised Jesus from the dead. This is how you know Jesus is not God. Jesus died.
God is one, expressed in three different persons, get a grasp on scripture

1 John 5:7-8KJV
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,819
3,250
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
praise worthy, to be sure but not infallible.

The problem with the KJV is the FROM and the TO. Fact is, we know more about older manuscripts and the ancient language than they did. And they had no knowledge of the 21st century American language we speak.

The KJV Bible is the greatest book ever written in the English language in terms of centuries of influence. It had it day in the sun and is now obsolete.
The KJV is obsolete?

More like Sodom and Gomorrah in changing God's word is taking place

The Alexandrian Text was revived in 1881 by Westcott & Hort, a text from Egypt, the minority 1% of manuscript evidence, a text the church never used or received, with this foreign corrupt text supporting all new Bible Perversions, NIV, NASB, ESV, RSV, Etc