Biblical Marriage and Divorce

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
First of all, the entire claim that God allows divorce and remarriage is refuted by Jesus immediately when the Pharisees ask Him the question, because His answer was an unequivocal NO! The Pharisees then go on to question Him about the Old Covenant Law and an apparent “exception” offered there:

Matthew 19:7
They *said to Him, "Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?" 8 He *said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way. 9 "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for fornication, and marries another woman commits adultery."

The obvious fact that many people ignore when reading this passage, is that the context of the “exception” is in the Old Covenant Law for Old Covenant people. It is irrelevant therefore for New Covenant believers regardless of what it was referring to, but when we look at what it actually says, it is clear that even this provision was not for “divorce” as it is practiced today:

As you can see, the Law of Moses only allowed a man to divorce his wife if he found indecency in her, “WHEN HE MARRIED HER.” This means that she had fornicated prior to him marrying her, which is why Jesus said that the Old Covenant Law allowed “divorce” for the cause of “fornication.”

Actually, the Greek word used in Matthew 19:7 is ""porneia", not ""moicheia" (adultery). This Greek word "porneia" generally means unlawful sexual intercourse due to either blood relations (also called incest) or other unlawful sex acts such as homosexuality. You are correct that the Lord does not permit divorce for "moicheia" (adultery), but He is permitting divorce if one person in the marriage committed incest or homosexuality even while married.
 

SealedEternal

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
161
1
0
52
Actually, the Greek word used in Matthew 19:7 is ""porneia", not ""moicheia" (adultery).

I know that. That was my point.

This Greek word "porneia" generally means unlawful sexual intercourse due to either blood relations (also called incest) or other unlawful sex acts such as homosexuality. You are correct that the Lord does not permit divorce for "moicheia" (adultery), but He is permitting divorce if one person in the marriage committed incest or homosexuality even while married.

No, porneia is a general term for sexual immorality or fornication. My point however was that Jesus specifically said He was referring to a specific "porneia" in the Laws of Moses, so you must read the passages I quoted to get the context of the "porneia" being described. The Laws of Moses only permitted a man to divorce his wife if she was found to not be a virgin when he married her. There was no other cause allowed in the Law, so this is what Jesus was referring to.

You must understand that in those days, the family of the man would normally make a covenant with the family of the bride offering a dowry. If it was accepted the two were regarded as husband and wife from that day forward, but they still continued to live separately for a period of time called the “betrothal.” Therefore they were husband and wife because they made a binding covenant, but not yet “married” which means they lived as one flesh.

The Law as I posted earlier, stated that he could dissolve this covenant, if when he married her, he found that she had already fornicated with someone else. In other words, she had defrauded him of the virgin bride that he agreed to marry when the covenant was made, so he could dissolve the covenant and marry someone else, but he could not ever take her back if she married again. It also said that if she was a virgin then “she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days” which shows us that the Law of marriage for life was still in effect back then, unless he proved that she had fornicated prior to the marriage.

SealedEternal
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Just heard that married couples in the US are in the minority
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
No, porneia is a general term for sexual immorality or fornication. My point however was that Jesus specifically said He was referring to a specific "porneia" in the Laws of Moses, so you must read the passages I quoted to get the context of the "porneia" being described. The Laws of Moses only permitted a man to divorce his wife if she was found to not be a virgin when he married her. There was no other cause allowed in the Law, so this is what Jesus was referring to.

Jesus disagreed with the divorce law of Moses. Jesus said, "Moses gave you a bill of divorce because of your hardness of your hearts, but since the beginning this was not so." Moses permitted divorce only because of man's hardness of heart and that was all. But Jesus emphasized that this was not so since the very beginning. Porneia has always been understood to be any unlawful sex such as incest or homosexuality. Virginity was neither lawful nor unlawful. A single woman who was raped before she got married is not her fault.
 

SealedEternal

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
161
1
0
52
Jesus disagreed with the divorce law of Moses. Jesus said, "Moses gave you a bill of divorce because of your hardness of your hearts, but since the beginning this was not so."

God wrote that Law, so no Jesus didn't disagree with it. He permitted Old Covenant men to divorce their wives, if she wasn't a virgin when he married her, and did so because His people were hard hearted. The Law of Moses only had this one very limited cause for divorce, and there were no others, so this must be the "porneia" Jesus was referring to.

In the New Covenant however, Jesus says we are held to God's original standard, which is that there is no divorce whatsoever, and that anyone who attempts to and remarries is committing adultery. In other words, they are having an unlawful extramarital relationship with someone whom they are not married, while still joined to the one they supposedly "divorced":

Mark 10: 6-12 "But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. "FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Luke 16:18 "Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.”


Porneia has always been understood to be any unlawful sex such as incest or homosexuality.

It's a Greek term meaning sexual immorality. It includes those examples, along with any other sexual acts that are not permitted by God. You have to look at the context to determine what "porneia" is being referred to. In this case, it is referring to the Law of Moses, so you must look there to properly understand what He was refferring to:

The context of the verses that Jesus used the term, are of the Pharisees (Jewish law experts) asking “why did Moses command….” referring to the Jewish Moseic Law. In that context it is clear that we need to refer back to the Moseic Law in order to understand what is being taught here:

Deuteronomy 24:1-4 "When a man takes a wife and marries her..."

Here a man has taken a wife and married her which in Hebrew meant that he had literally taken lordship over her. If your not familiar with Jewish custom, sometime prior to this he would have made a betrothal covenant together, and they would have lived separately for a period of time, even though they were legally bound together by covenant. Now they have come together and officially consummated the marriage.

"... and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her..."

At the consummation of the marriage, he has found some sexual indecency in his wife. This situation was covered earlier in Deut 22:13-21.

Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and {then} turns against her, and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, 'I took this woman, {but} when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,' then the girl's father and her mother shall take and bring out the {evidence} of the girl's virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. "The girl's father shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, and they shall fine him a hundred {shekels} of silver and give it to the girl's father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel by playing the harlot in her father's house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you.

Originally God called for stoning to death when a woman was found to have committed sexual immorality during or before her betrothal to her husband. You'll notice that if she was a virgin at the consummation that he may not divorce her all his days.

Then in Deut 24 God says that a man may divorce her for sexual indecency rather than stoning, but can never take her back.

"..., and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts {it} in her hand and sends her out from his house, and she leaves his house and goes and becomes another man's {wife,} and if the latter husband turns against her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts {it} in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her to be his wife, {then} her former husband who sent her away is not allowed to take her again to be his wife, since she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the LORD, and you shall not bring sin on the land which the LORD your God gives you as an inheritance. "

This is exactly what the mother of Jesus was being accused of by the Pharisees:

John 8:41 "You are doing the deeds of your father." They said to Him, "We were not born of "porneia"; we have one Father: God."

In this text, the Pharisees give a bit of a back handed sneer at Jesus, claiming that the was born of "porneia." This claim could be made by anyone since it is obvious that Mary was pregnant before her and Joseph were married. Therefore they are accusing Jesus of being born by sexual promiscuity before his parents were married (in the betrothal period).


This is the only “divorce” that is allowed anywhere in the Bible, and you’ll notice that it is before the consummation of the marriage, or immediately after. Many people try to use the immorality clause to suggest that God tolerates divorce, but this was specific to the Jews, and only before the consummation or immediately after. Once a couple was betrothed, they were considered husband and wife, and they needed a bill of divorcement in order to depart from one another. One example of this is regarding Mary and Joseph. Scripture says Mary was Joseph's wife (Matthew 1:20,24, Luke 2:5). But at the same time, she was betrothed to him:

Matthew 1:18-19, "Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: when His mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit. And Joseph her husband, being a righteous man and not wanting to disgrace her, planned to send her away secretly.

Joseph thought Mary was guilty of "porneia" when he found out she was pregnant, and intended to divorce her according to this law. They were still betrothed at the time, which meant they were legally husband and wife, even though they lived separately, so they were not yet married. Of course he later realized she was a virgin and didn't go through with it.

This is the porneia Jesus was referring to, because there was no other provision in the Law of Moses. It wasn't a broad license to divorce as some assume, but a very specific cause which was actually at the moment they came together, for her lying about being a virgin. All of this is irrelevent to those under the New Covenant, for which Jesus said there is no divorce whatsoever, and whoever does and remarries is committing the sin of adultery.

SealedEternal
 

lawrance

New Member
Mar 30, 2011
738
19
0
Just heard that married couples in the US are in the minority
And by what sealedeternal justput forward we can see the so called Gay's can not be married at all and that is biblical is it not.

Also with an marriage it has to do with consummation that seals it (their children)? and Gays can't be commiserated can they.

And anyone who supports marrying Gay's is committing an offence to God. we are living in a world that is all upside down now days where people are pushing a lot of nonsense and our Christian forfathers would of been horrified to see the works of slandering the Bible and these day's we live under now being pushed by old mate Satan.

What is your point of saying that aspen ? as it comes across to me as you are pleased with it.

I think anyone who bastardises the truth of marriage is lost and must be on the side of Satan with this. and must clearly repent.
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
And by what sealedeternal justput forward we can see the so called Gay's can not be married at all and that is biblical is it not.

Also with an marriage it has to do with consummation that seals it (their children)? and Gays can't be commiserated can they.

And anyone who supports marrying Gay's is committing an offence to God. we are living in a world that is all upside down now days where people are pushing a lot of nonsense and our Christian forfathers would of been horrified to see the works of slandering the Bible and these day's we live under now being pushed by old mate Satan.

What is your point of saying that aspen ? as it comes across to me as you are pleased with it.

I think anyone who bastardises the truth of marriage is lost and must be on the side of Satan with this. and must clearly repent.

No I think it is horrible! I've struggled to keep my marriage over 20 years - I think it is a sacrament.
 

Foreigner

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
2,583
123
0
Just heard that married couples in the US are in the minority

-- Absolutely true.
Another sign that America is not living up to what God as called us to.
Another reason why He is slowing turning his back to us....we have turned ours to Him first.






.
 

lawrance

New Member
Mar 30, 2011
738
19
0
-- Absolutely true.
Another sign that America is not living up to what God as called us to.
Another reason why He is slowing turning his back to us....we have turned ours to Him first.






.
Just like the poor stupid damed Jews.

The gov has corrupted the people and the trash are pushing there PC utopia gods.
Christians should demand that anyone who is not a christian be thrown out of government office. as we did have christian countries once but they are not now and the mossies are set to win for sure and the stupid dumb atheist wont stop them because they are that stupid they can not see far ahead at all and have know idea of the past. so they have no hope!
 

THE Gypsy

New Member
Jul 27, 2011
732
31
0
Earth
Just like the poor stupid damed Jews.

The gov has corrupted the people and the trash are pushing there PC utopia gods.
Christians should demand that anyone who is not a christian be thrown out of government office. as we did have christian countries once but they are not now and the mossies are set to win for sure and the stupid dumb atheist wont stop them because they are that stupid they can not see far ahead at all and have know idea of the past. so they have no hope!

I do believe the people that wrote the Constitution just might disagree with you on that.

And I must admit...I have never met a "stupid dumb Atheist".
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
God wrote that Law, so no Jesus didn't disagree with it. He permitted Old Covenant men to divorce their wives, if she wasn't a virgin when he married her, and did so because His people were hard hearted. The Law of Moses only had this one very limited cause for divorce, and there were no others, so this must be the "porneia" Jesus was referring to.

In the New Covenant however, Jesus says we are held to God's original standard, which is that there is no divorce whatsoever, and that anyone who attempts to and remarries is committing adultery. In other words, they are having an unlawful extramarital relationship with someone whom they are not married, while still joined to the one they supposedly "divorced":

Mark 10: 6-12 "But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. "FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He *said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery."

Luke 16:18 "Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.”




It's a Greek term meaning sexual immorality. It includes those examples, along with any other sexual acts that are not permitted by God. You have to look at the context to determine what "porneia" is being referred to. In this case, it is referring to the Law of Moses, so you must look there to properly understand what He was refferring to:

The context of the verses that Jesus used the term, are of the Pharisees (Jewish law experts) asking “why did Moses command….” referring to the Jewish Moseic Law. In that context it is clear that we need to refer back to the Moseic Law in order to understand what is being taught here:

Deuteronomy 24:1-4 "When a man takes a wife and marries her..."

Here a man has taken a wife and married her which in Hebrew meant that he had literally taken lordship over her. If your not familiar with Jewish custom, sometime prior to this he would have made a betrothal covenant together, and they would have lived separately for a period of time, even though they were legally bound together by covenant. Now they have come together and officially consummated the marriage.

"... and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her..."

At the consummation of the marriage, he has found some sexual indecency in his wife. This situation was covered earlier in Deut 22:13-21.

Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and {then} turns against her, and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, 'I took this woman, {but} when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,' then the girl's father and her mother shall take and bring out the {evidence} of the girl's virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. "The girl's father shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, and they shall fine him a hundred {shekels} of silver and give it to the girl's father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel by playing the harlot in her father's house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you.

Originally God called for stoning to death when a woman was found to have committed sexual immorality during or before her betrothal to her husband. You'll notice that if she was a virgin at the consummation that he may not divorce her all his days.

The context of what the Pharisees asked Jesus was speaking about adultery when a couple was already married. This has nothing to do with Christ's birth or Mary's virginity because Christ was already a man when the Pharisees asked him that question. Look at the context of the story. The Pharisees was there to trap Christ in His own words rather than question Him about His birth.

Matthew 19:3 And there came to him the Pharisees tempting him, and saying: Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

Jesus responded by saying that what God has joined together, man cannot separate. And then the Pharisees asked "why then did Moses allow a bill of divorce?" It was ONLY Moses who allowed this bill of divorce. Jesus corrected Moses by saying that it was because of their hardened hearts, but since the beginning it was not so. Christ goes on to say that marriage is indisoluble except in the case of "pornia" (such as incest).
 

SealedEternal

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
161
1
0
52
The context of what the Pharisees asked Jesus was speaking about adultery when a couple was already married.

The Pharisees never mentioned adultery at any time in the conversation.

This has nothing to do with Christ's birth or Mary's virginity because Christ was already a man when the Pharisees asked him that question. Look at the context of the story. The Pharisees was there to trap Christ in His own words rather than question Him about His birth.

Read what I wrote more carefully. You missed the point completely.

Matthew 19:3 And there came to him the Pharisees tempting him, and saying: Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

Jesus responded by saying that what God has joined together, man cannot separate.


So far you are correct. Jesus unequivocally says there is no possible cause to legally separate a marriage.

And then the Pharisees asked "why then did Moses allow a bill of divorce?" It was ONLY Moses who allowed this bill of divorce.


Yes, but for one cause and one only. That's why I quoted the passages for you. Moses only permitted a man to divorce a woman who was proven to not be a virgin at the time of their marriage. That is the "fornication" that Jesus said the Law of Moses permitted a man to divorce over.

So first of all, it has nothing to do with the types of divorce that are being done today. Secondly, unless one is under the Law of Moses, this provision is irrelevent.

Jesus corrected Moses by saying that it was because of their hardened hearts, but since the beginning it was not so. Christ goes on to say that marriage is indisoluble except in the case of "pornia" (such as incest).

No, He never mentions incest either. He said that the only divorce God recognized was for women who were proven by their husbands to have committed fornication prior to the marriage, as the Law of Moses stated. Even this cause was only permitted due to the hard-heartedness of the Jewish people.

He also states that under the New Covenant there is no type of divorce whatsoever, that doesn't become adultery if either party remarries:

Luke 16:18
"Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery."

SealedEternal
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
The Pharisees never mentioned adultery at any time in the conversation.



Read what I wrote more carefully. You missed the point completely.

[/color][/color]

So far you are correct. Jesus unequivocally says there is no possible cause to legally separate a marriage.



Yes, but for one cause and one only. That's why I quoted the passages for you. Moses only permitted a man to divorce a woman who was proven to not be a virgin at the time of their marriage. That is the "fornication" that Jesus said the Law of Moses permitted a man to divorce over.

So first of all, it has nothing to do with the types of divorce that are being done today. Secondly, unless one is under the Law of Moses, this provision is irrelevent.



No, He never mentions incest either. He said that the only divorce God recognized was for women who were proven by their husbands to have committed fornication prior to the marriage, as the Law of Moses stated. Even this cause was only permitted due to the hard-heartedness of the Jewish people.

He also states that under the New Covenant there is no type of divorce whatsoever, that doesn't become adultery if either party remarries:

Luke 16:18
"Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery."

SealedEternal


SealedEternal, take a closer look at the Old Testament law.

Deuteronomy 24:1
When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give [it] in her hand, and send her out of his house.


The Hebrew word used here for uncleaness is "ervah". This same Hebrew word is used in Leviticus 20:19-20, which involved incest.
 

SealedEternal

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
161
1
0
52
SealedEternal, take a closer look at the Old Testament law.

Deuteronomy 24:1 [/color][/color]When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give [it] in her hand, and send her out of his house.


The Hebrew word used here for uncleaness is "ervah". This same Hebrew word is used in Leviticus 20:19-20, which involved incest.

I realize that. Just as in English and Greek, the Hebrew term is a general term for sexual immorality. So just as in English and Greek, you need to investigate the context to understand what type of "uncleanness" is being referred to. Fortunately, the Law in Deuteronomy provides it for us:

Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and {then} turns against her, and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, 'I took this woman, {but} when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,' then the girl's father and her mother shall take and bring out the {evidence} of the girl's virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. "The girl's father shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, and they shall fine him a hundred {shekels} of silver and give it to the girl's father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel by playing the harlot in her father's house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you.

It is very clear from scripture what type of "uncleanness" is in view in that verse, because scripture always defines scripture. Simply looking up a broad term and finding a context that suits our needs is no way to do serious Bible study.

SealedEternal
 

Selene

New Member
Apr 12, 2010
2,073
94
0
In my house
I realize that. Just as in English and Greek, the Hebrew term is a general term for sexual immorality. So just as in English and Greek, you need to investigate the context to understand what type of "uncleanness" is being referred to. Fortunately, the Law in Deuteronomy provides it for us:

Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and {then} turns against her, and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, 'I took this woman, {but} when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,' then the girl's father and her mother shall take and bring out the {evidence} of the girl's virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. "The girl's father shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, and they shall fine him a hundred {shekels} of silver and give it to the girl's father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel by playing the harlot in her father's house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you.

It is very clear from scripture what type of "uncleanness" is in view in that verse, because scripture always defines scripture. Simply looking up a broad term and finding a context that suits our needs is no way to do serious Bible study.

SealedEternal

SealEternal, that biblical scripture is stating that the husband falsely accused his wife of not being a virgin when he married her. The false accusation was proven. The Bible further states that if the man was telling the truth, the woman would be killed because of prostitution. Prostitution is an unlawful sex act just as incest and homosexuality. Prostitution is also worse than pre-marital sex because prostitution is viewed as sleeping with many men.

The Old Testament says that if a man seduces a virgin, he is to marry her. Read further into Deuteronomy 22:28-29 for that is what it says. In those days, women are highly protected and if a man seduces his daughter because he loves her and can't wait until after marriage, that man will be her husband according to Jewish law. So, a man cannot divorce his wife because of pre-marital sex because Jewish law dictates that if a woman loses her virginity to a man, the man whom she lost her virginity to will be her husband.
 

SealedEternal

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
161
1
0
52
SealEternal, that biblical scripture is stating that the husband falsely accused his wife of not being a virgin when he married her. The false accusation was proven. The Bible further states that if the man was telling the truth, the woman would be killed because of prostitution. Prostitution is an unlawful sex act just as incest and homosexuality. Prostitution is also worse than pre-marital sex because prostitution is viewed as sleeping with many men.

It doesn't say anything about prostitution. It says she was essentially an unchaste woman, and that he could have her stoned to death if he decided to. Then in Deuteronomy 24 it says he could divorce her if he preferred, but that if he did, he couldn't take her back.

The Old Testament says that if a man seduces a virgin, he is to marry her. Read further into Deuteronomy 22:28-29 for that is what it says. In those days, women are highly protected and if a man seduces his daughter because he loves her and can't wait until after marriage, that man will be her husband according to Jewish law. So, a man cannot divorce his wife because of pre-marital sex because Jewish law dictates that if a woman loses her virginity to a man, the man whom she lost her virginity to will be her husband.

I realize that, but that only applied if they were caught. There was no provision to retroactively try to determine who she fornicated with, and force them to marry years later.

SealedEternal