veteran
New Member
What I described is the main belief of the Pre-Wrath theology, the idea of Christ's coming and a rapture prior to His pouring out His wrath upon the earth on the "day of the Lord". That position involves belief of Christ's coming prior to the end of the tribulation.terry said:Veteran Wrote: " The specific point of a Pre-Wrath belief is that of a rapture of the Church to Heaven prior to the event of God's cup of wrath poured out upon the earth. The main problem with that idea is how the change at the twinkling of an eye event per Paul is to occur on the day of Christ's return, which is "day of the Lord" timing. That means a rapture is not possible until that "day of the Lord" timing, which is when our Lord Jesus returns "as a thief in the night," and also is when His wrath is poured out upon the earth. So the Pre-Wrath position is jumping the gun slightly, while the Pre-Trib position is jumping the gun way too early. "
As a Believer in "Pre Wrath" maybe I should first explain what I consider that wrath to be. The wrath requiring protection is Satan making the Mark of the Beast manditory. Is it a rapture of the Church? No... It is the rapture of those that could not deny the Beast's Mark for whatever reason. Is this rapture prior to God'scup of wrath... a very little undecided... but most likely not of consideration of God's wrath at all, only Satan's wrath as per the Beast's Mark. An so, the twinkling of an eye event creates no disturbance with any movement of God. It rains on the just and unjust alike... explains why God's wrath is not a reason for the rapture, Who the rapture is used explains why it is not the church.
Other, perhaps All Other pre-wrathers may fall into the category as you spelled out Veteran, I however, do not follow their beliefs and do not fall into their gategories. To be clear... I am not a pre-trib rapture believer either nor a post-trib believer.
Based on what you're saying about it shows you're confused about that theological position you claim to heed.