The proper and harmonious interpretation of Romans 11:25 [split from another topic]

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Arnie Manitoba

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2011
2,650
137
63
72
Manitoba Canada
Purity ..... interesting comparison you made between the Pharisees at Jesus 1st coming and a possible parallel with the apostate Christians at the 2nd coming .... makes a lot of sense to me.

Back to the topic of Israel for a minute ..... I am one of those folks who tries to make sense of some seemingly strange things God does

Here is an example of my speculation on the whole Israel situation ..... and one possible reason God will still use Israel in the future .... and it has to do with .... "All the other Nations"

God chose Israel as "His" people and "His" nation to provide the prophets and the scriptures and the Savior etc

But we must make note of the historical as well as modern day ... "hatred against Israel" ..... by ..... "all the other nations" .....

I feel that during the last days "all those other nations" will again pound on Israel like never before ..... and of course the winner that emerges is the same old "Lord God of Israel" just like in the olden days.

Once again He proves Himself to all the other nations by using Israel ..... ..... ..... instead of the Vatican or The American Baptist Convention :)

Just some thoughts and conjecture on my part .... thinking out loud etc.
 

HeRoseFromTheDead

Not So Advanced Member
Jan 6, 2012
1,727
62
48
Purity said:
I do believe this would breach the rules of the forum in one way or another.

You couldn't ask could you CRFTD - it had to be the path of insults.
There's that game again...

Purity said:
Rex, you see games but I see the art of asking the right questions to begin with and receiving a correct understanding, is the principle being employed. I appreciate this can become a little tedious at times but this does not detract from our need to seek the answers the Bible is waiting to provide. Bad forum habits - well I am not alone here am I? We all have them but rarely should they result in hurling insults at one another.
I think this would be better stated - 'I see the artifice of asking the right questions to begin with and receiving a correct understanding, is the principle being employed'.

It's not only tedious; it's arrogant and offensive. Simply put, it's manipulation.

Then when someone sees through your artifice, refuses to play your game and calls you on it. you call it 'bad forum habits' and 'hurling insults'.

dragonfly said:
Regarding Zion, and Sion, Zion is the place on earth, and Sion is the place in heaven.
Hi DF. It's good to see you back. Haven't seen you much in a while...

Umm... The difference is really only translational. One is from Hebrew, the other from Greek. The correct pronunciation of the first letter in the Hebrew spelling is 'ts'; there is no equivalent letter or pronunciation in Greek.

H6726 צִּיוֹן Tsiyown
1. Tsijon (as a permanent capital), a mountain of Jerusalem

G4622 Σιών Sion
1. Sion (i.e. Tsijon), a hill of Jerusalem

dragonfly said:
When Christ was 'cut off for sin but not His own', He was cut off from the whole nation of Israel. Turn that statement round, and you can easily see (I hope) that the whole nation of Israel was cut off from its Saviour, by His death.
And this is why all Jews have to be grafted back in. They completely broke and dis-annulled the old covenant by killing the one whom they were in covenant with.
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
Purity said:
Seven Kings - Verse please?
How many verses would be enough?

Luke 11:24-26 KJV
24. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out.
25. And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished.
26. Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first.


If indeed the prince of the power of the air was cast out of you to begin with then what makes you think that this passage does not apply to you? In fact it can only apply to disciples of Yeshua because the unbelievers of the world still have the same spirit of the world which now works in the sons of disobedience. Likewise if your old man scapegoat twin goes and takes to himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they return, then does that not make him "the eighth and of the seven"? Understand likewise that YOU are the former "HOUSE" from whence he came. Therefore we are forewarned to "test the spirits" and their doctrines to see whether they be of God or not.

Revelation 17:7-11 KJV
7. And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
8. The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
9. And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10. And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11. And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.


So you see we cannot possibly understand any of this without both Torah and the Testimony of Yeshua which interprets Torah. The one who comes back from the pit of Dudael in the desert is your own `Aza'zel scapegoat with all the sins upon his mortally wounded head, (with two horns like a lamb and speaking like a crafty dragon).

John 4:14-19 KJV
14. But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.
15. The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.
16. Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither.
17. The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband:
18. For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.
19. The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet.


I wonder just who was this woman at the well? Five had fallen, one was, and her current "king" was not her husband.

Mark 16:9 KJV
9. Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.

But where is "the eighth that is of the seven" in the case of Mary? Oh yea, "the other Mary" ~

Matthew 28:1-2 KJV
1. In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and
the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
2. And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.


There be plenty more in my thesauros-treasury: both old and new . . . :lol:
 

HeRoseFromTheDead

Not So Advanced Member
Jan 6, 2012
1,727
62
48
dragonfly said:
My understanding is the 'new covenant' was made between the Father and the Son, and we become partakers in it through faith in the Son, by whom we receive access to the Father, and through whom we become eligible to receive the Holy Spirit of promise.
This is the way I see it.

An exchange between two parties is the very nature of a blood covenant: one party receives everything the other party has, and vice versa. The new covenant is a blood covenant.

The root of the Greek word translated reconciliation (as well as the word itself) means exchange (see below). Man is reconciled to GOD through an exchange via the blood covenant, i.e., the everlasting covenant that was cut between GOD and Israel in the persons of 11 men in Christ's blood. Christ became sin. Sin was judged on the cross. We receive Christ's righteousness.

This covenant between these 11 men (true Israel) and GOD forms the foundation of salvation into which all are grafted through faith. If you study the history of blood covenants, you will see similarities between secular practices and the covenant meal at Passover.

Reconciliation
G2643 καταλλαγή katallage
1. an exchange
[from G2644]

G2644 καταλλάσσω katallasso
1. to change mutually
[from G2596 and G236]

G236 ἀλλάσσω allasso
1. to change, transform, make different
[from G243]

G243 ἄλλος allos
1. "else," i.e. different
[a primary word]

Arnie Manitoba said:
It is like if we had a rich old relative who mentioned he would leave us all his money ...... but we could not stand the guy and avoided him and rejected his calls our whole life .
Then when the old guy dies his will is opened and he indeed fulfilled His promise.
At that moment we say holy crap ..... he really meant it ...... I wish I had befriended him years ago.
I think it will be something like that for Israel when they receive their inheritance
The rich old guy keeps his word in spite of the rejection of the recipient .
Yet the principle behind this anecdote is witnessed nowhere in scripture...
Purity said:
The process of Acts 15:14 & Eph 2:11-13 is drawing to and end and when that purpose is completed, and "the fulness of the Gentiles be come in", there will follow "the fulness of Israel" which will see that nation become "the first dominion" throughout the earth (Mic 4:8). Paul refers to this latter manifestation of divine goodness in Rom 11:12.

Do the forum members accept the above as truth?
No I don't accept this at all. Blindness has happened in part until the fullness of the nations comes in, which means that Israel will remain partially blind until the last living stone is placed in the temple. Once that happens the mystery of GOD will be complete and Jesus returns. At that point only wrath is left for anyone who is not in the temple. Then messiah and his whole body will be "the first dominion" throughout the earth (Mic 4:8).

In other words, Israel will remain partially blind until the very end. There is nothing in scripture of substance to suggest otherwise.
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
ChristRoseFromTheDead said:
No I don't accept this at all. Blindness has happened in part until the fullness of the nations comes in, which means that Israel will remain partially blind until the last living stone is placed in the temple. Once that happens the mystery of GOD will be complete and Jesus returns. At that point only wrath is left for anyone who is not in the temple. Then messiah and his whole body will be "the first dominion" throughout the earth (Mic 4:8).

In other words, Israel will remain partially blind until the very end. There is nothing in scripture of substance to suggest otherwise.
You allow so many Scriptures to fall to the ground for a theory concerning stones placed in a temple?

Who has confused you concerning the those events which usher in the Kingdom of God on earth?

What Scripture do you draw on to lay down all these prophecies?

Purity
ChristRoseFromTheDead said:
There's that game again...

think this would be better stated - 'I see the artifice of asking the right questions to begin with and receiving a correct understanding, is the principle being employed'.

It's not only tedious; it's arrogant and offensive. Simply put, it's manipulation.

Then when someone sees through your artifice, refuses to play your game and calls you on it. you call it 'bad forum habits' and 'hurling insults'.
The embarrassing moment has past and hopefully the insults also.

I look forward to your response regarding the placement of stones in a temple.

Purity
Arnie Manitoba said:
Purity ..... interesting comparison you made between the Pharisees at Jesus 1st coming and a possible parallel with the apostate Christians at the 2nd coming .... makes a lot of sense to me.

Back to the topic of Israel for a minute ..... I am one of those folks who tries to make sense of some seemingly strange things God does

Here is an example of my speculation on the whole Israel situation ..... and one possible reason God will still use Israel in the future .... and it has to do with .... "All the other Nations"

God chose Israel as "His" people and "His" nation to provide the prophets and the scriptures and the Savior etc

But we must make note of the historical as well as modern day ... "hatred against Israel" ..... by ..... "all the other nations" .....

I feel that during the last days "all those other nations" will again pound on Israel like never before ..... and of course the winner that emerges is the same old "Lord God of Israel" just like in the olden days.

Once again He proves Himself to all the other nations by using Israel ..... ..... ..... instead of the Vatican or The American Baptist Convention :)

Just some thoughts and conjecture on my part .... thinking out loud etc.
Keep thinking out loud Arnie.

Lets begin with Zech 14:1,2,3,4 shall we?

A close friend of mine recently visited Israel and he said "The Mount of Olives is still in one piece!"

:)
 

HeRoseFromTheDead

Not So Advanced Member
Jan 6, 2012
1,727
62
48
Purity said:
You allow so many Scriptures to fall to the ground for a theory concerning stones placed in a temple?
Who has confused you concerning the those events which usher in the Kingdom of God on earth?
What Scripture do you draw on to lay down all these prophecies?
See, this is the game you play. I plainly stated what I believe:

In other words, Israel will remain partially blind until the very end. There is nothing in scripture of substance to suggest otherwise.
and the first thing you do is throw up a distraction by marginalizing me ('you allow so many Scriptures to fall to the ground', 'Who has confused you'), and then avoid demonstrating through scripture that my statement is false by trying to get me to demonstrate through scripture something that I say isn't in scripture.

It's absurd... and annoying.
Purity said:
Lets begin with Zech 14:1,2,3,4 shall we?

A close friend of mine recently visited Israel and he said "The Mount of Olives is still in one piece!"
You go there, you're not going to win. The Mt of Olives has very definitely 'split in two'. The translation of Zechariah 14:5 you are working from is false and based on a corruption of the Masoretic Text. Only the Septuagint has preserved the correct reading of this verse.

The valley between the hills will be filled in, yes, it will be blocked as far as Azal, it will be filled in as it was by the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah. Zechariah 14:5
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
ChristRoseFromTheDead said:
See, this is the game you play. I plainly stated what I believe:


and the first thing you do is throw up a distraction by marginalizing me ('you allow so many Scriptures to fall to the ground', 'Who has confused you'), and then avoid demonstrating through scripture that my statement is false by trying to get me to demonstrate through scripture something that I say isn't in scripture.

It's absurd... and annoying.
I can only take this as a definitive no.

If a person denies Bible prophecy having been tested and found to be teaching error its logical and reasonable to find out who has taught you these false doctrines? Who taught you to ignore whole sections of Scripture such as Jer 2,3,4 and many of the OT Prophets who foretold of God's work with Israel until the very end. And yes in my experience you do allow these Scriptures to drop to the ground 1. You wont even talk about them 2. When asked to accept their future fulfilment you retreat into insults, talk of games etc etc etc.

You are yet to acknowledge Jer 3:16 as being fulfilled after the return of the Lord Jesus Christ though it plainly teaches so.

It is was it is CRFTD.

ChristRoseFromTheDead said:
You go there, you're not going to win.
There is the problem.
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
Purity said:
Lets begin with Zech 14:1,2,3,4 shall we?

A close friend of mine recently visited Israel and he said "The Mount of Olives is still in one piece!"

:)
Did he visit Olivet Moriah where is Golgotha, the Place of the Skull, and the Garden Tomb?
Or did he visit the "decoy" mountain renamed Olive which is to the east across the Kidron valley? :lol:
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
daq said:
Did he visit Olivet Moriah where is Golgotha, the Place of the Skull, and the Garden Tomb?
Or did he visit the "decoy" mountain renamed Olive which is to the east across the Kidron valley? :lol:
Familiar :)

moriah-olivet3.gif
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, all.

LOL! Y'all are too funny!

It really is true that "Children ask questions to learn; adults ask questions to prove a point." Oh, that we all might be the "whosoever":



Matthew 18:4
4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
KJV


Even your pictures that "speak 1000 words" are in the form of questions!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purity

HeRoseFromTheDead

Not So Advanced Member
Jan 6, 2012
1,727
62
48
Purity said:
There is the problem.
It really is habitual with you isn't it? The first thing you do is distract by trying to find fault instead of addressing the issue.



Oh sure... They grew olive trees on Mount Moriah... Riiiiigght...

It's clearly written that David crossed the brook of Kidron east of Jerusalem going east toward the wilderness, then climbed the Mt of Olives.

And all the country wept with a loud voice, and all the people passed over: the king also himself passed over the brook Kidron, and all the people passed over, toward the way of the wilderness. ... And David went up by the ascent of mount Olivet, and wept as he went up, and had his head covered, and he went barefoot: and all the people that was with him covered every man his head, and they went up, weeping as they went up. 2 Samuel 15:23, 30
 

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
Purity said:
In relation to the later part of Romans 11:25 concerning the OP "The fulness of the Gentiles be come in"

Can we agree this is being accomplished during a period referred to as "the times of the Gentiles" (Luk 21:24)?

Also

In such time the Gospel has gone throughout Gentile lands Acts 13:46 ?

The process of Acts 15:14 & Eph 2:11-13 is drawing to and end and when that purpose is completed, and "the fulness of the Gentiles be come in", there will follow "the fulness of Israel" which will see that nation become "the first dominion" throughout the earth (Mic 4:8). Paul refers to this latter manifestation of divine goodness in Rom 11:12.

Do the forum members accept the above as truth?
No I don't agree, and right honestly it's one of the worst most veg explanations for what someones dose believe I've tried to decipher. I not so sure I completely understand the entirety of what you do believe, but just the same I disagree.

And where is your thumbnail sketch of of your position on salvation concerning Abraham's decedents and the nations you did say it was coming?
To be honest reading through your post and replies you move through scripture like a snake in the grass and most is only slightly touched on at best, you leave more questions than you provide answers.

You're crafty I'll give you that. At times it appears you believe one thing then move the other direction, I see now why you appear to agree with me yet lead right back into error, just the same I'm sure in the end you believe Israel of the flesh to be a special nation inspite of my last post pointing out.

Israel ---->> was a name given from heaven, it is not the line decedent from Jacob. So why don't you understand that born of flesh is flesh and that born from above is from heaven. So how is it that this man born of the flesh named Jacob can through his flesh give birth to heavenly men named Israel?

Veg little statements and questions for answers, I'm beginning to see why you repeat what I say as though I didn't say it, then curel around the truth and lead people away.

Another point from your book of questions, If Jacob called Israel did birth heavenly men why did they rebel through out the entire OT?
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, ChristRoseFromTheDead.

ChristRoseFromTheDead said:
...

Umm... The difference is really only translational. One is from Hebrew, the other from Greek. The correct pronunciation of the first letter in the Hebrew spelling is 'ts'; there is no equivalent letter or pronunciation in Greek.

H6726 צִּיוֹן Tsiyown
1. Tsijon (as a permanent capital), a mountain of Jerusalem

G4622 Σιών Sion
1. Sion (i.e. Tsijon), a hill of Jerusalem

Well said! I couldn't have said it better. See, there is some value to the Greek and Hebrew, isn't there? By the way, how did you acquire the fonts or did they come with the quotation of those definitions?

And this is why all Jews have to be grafted back in. They completely broke and dis-annulled the old covenant by killing the one whom they were in covenant with.
I would like to point back to Romans 11:17-26:


Romans 11:17-26
17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
19 Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in.
20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
KJV

You seem to think that there were only 11 men of Isra'el that were grafted in! Are you so quickly forgetting the other of the 120 disciples? Are you so quickly forgetting the THOUSANDS, all Isra'elites, no matter from where on earth they were dispersed?

Not only was this NOT a permanent condition, but it was not excluding "all Jews," let alone "all Isra'elites!" THERE ARE SOME BRANCHES WHICH WERE NEVER LOPPED OFF!

Shalom, Rex.

Just an honest question to clarify your post. I think you mean "vague" instead of "veg," am I right? Usually, I use the term "veg" as short for "vegetate," like, "When I sit on the couch, I veg out, watching TV."
 

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
So retro are you going to deny that Joesph was a shadow of the Christ to come? Who after seating his 11 brothers provided food to their table and then latter revealed himself. Are you going to deny that this to is a fulfilling of the scripture, and not simply sending Judas away from the last supper. Some know the true seed that sprouted and grew was Christ, both fulfilling the scriptures and bearing much fruit among the descendents of Abraham.

Did you catch my last post?
You may be interested in the red part


Rex said:
No I don't agree, and right honestly it's one of the worst most veg explanations for what someones dose believe I've tried to decipher. I not so sure I completely understand the entirety of what you do believe, but just the same I disagree.

And where is your thumbnail sketch of of your position on salvation concerning Abraham's decedents and the nations you did say it was coming?
To be honest reading through your post and replies you move through scripture like a snake in the grass and most is only slightly touched on at best, you leave more questions than you provide answers.

You're crafty I'll give you that. At times it appears you believe one thing then move the other direction, I see now why you appear to agree with me yet lead right back into error, just the same I'm sure in the end you believe Israel of the flesh to be a special nation inspite of my last post pointing out.

Israel ---->> was a name given from heaven, it is not the line decedent from Jacob. So why don't you understand that born of flesh is flesh and that born from above is from heaven. So how is it that this man born of the flesh named Jacob can through his flesh give birth to heavenly men named Israel?

Veg little statements and questions for answers, I'm beginning to see why you repeat what I say as though I didn't say it, then curel around the truth and lead people away.

Another point from your book of questions, If Jacob called Israel did birth heavenly men why did they rebel through out the entire OT?
I should mention the NT as well

I'll check in latter I have to work

The seed was spoken of long before God called Jacob Israel Gen 3:15 KJV

Rex said:
Thanks for the nice reply Arnie.

What I understand from Romans 9 what Paul is speaking about is that through Isaac, your offspring shall be named. One named Jacob and one named Esau. One he loved and the other he hated. The point is right from the beginning we see not all of those from Abraham are of the promise, the decedents from Abraham were of the promise not from Abram. Just as not all of those decedent from Jacob are Israel. Jacob being the flesh and Israel being the promise. The offspring of Isaac shall be named what? Esau and Jacob..... Jacob became ----->>> Israel. Abram being the flesh and Abraham being the promise. I hope you understand what it is I'm trying to say. We see the same event in Cain and Able except Able was killed and if you will, became ----> Seth, God purpose and promise marched forward just the same. And what promise is this? Why the same seed Paul talks about Gal 3:16 , the same seed that God said would bruise the head of the serpent Gen 3:15 KJV The same seed promised to Abraham Gen 22:18 KJV and named in Jacob -> Israel ,,, Romans 9:6 ,,,,,,,,, Gal 3:8

You may find that as you begin to realize the truth in this foundation, the Lord may change your opinion about the latter part of your post,
Walking in and understand what the Spirit is pointing towards can not be accomplished on a flawed foundation. I'm am very happy to here that you are looking more closely at your foot steps. The path is narrow and not well traveled, it's full of false signs, multiple intersections and dead ends, threw the years I've had to back up and look more closely as well. It's a wonderful adventure and the rewards are great. Proverbs 8:1-2
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
Purity said:

Yes that is quite familiar! :lol:


Retrobyter said:
Shalom, all.

LOL! Y'all are too funny!

It really is true that "Children ask questions to learn; adults ask questions to prove a point." Oh, that we all might be the "whosoever":



Matthew 18:4
4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
KJV


Even your pictures that "speak 1000 words" are in the form of questions!

Whoever drew that up seems to like positing answers in the form of questions doesn't he! :lol:


ChristRoseFromTheDead said:
It really is habitual with you isn't it? The first thing you do is distract by trying to find fault instead of addressing the issue.



Oh sure... They grew olive trees on Mount Moriah... Riiiiigght...

It's clearly written that David crossed the brook of Kidron east of Jerusalem going east toward the wilderness, then climbed the Mt of Olives.

And all the country wept with a loud voice, and all the people passed over: the king also himself passed over the brook Kidron, and all the people passed over, toward the way of the wilderness. ... And David went up by the ascent of mount Olivet, and wept as he went up, and had his head covered, and he went barefoot: and all the people that was with him covered every man his head, and they went up, weeping as they went up. 2 Samuel 15:23, 30
The Septuagint employs GSN#3899 "parapoeruomai" ("pareporeuonto") in the context of the passage which you have quoted:

2 Samuel 15:23 Greek OT: Septuagint - Transliterated
23 kai pasa ē gē eklaien phōnē megalē kai pas o laos pareporeuonto en tō cheimarrō kedrōn kai o basileus diebē ton cheimarroun kedrōn kai pas o laos kai o basileus pareporeuonto epi prosōpon odou tēn erēmon

http://biblehub.com/sept/2_samuel/15.htm

Original Strong's Ref. #3899
Romanized parapoeruomai
Pronounced par-ap-or-yoo'-om-ahee
from GSN3844 and GSN4198; to travel near:
KJV--go, pass (by).

The same word is employed in the Gospel accounts of Matthew and Mark meaning "to pass by" as shown in Matthew 27:39 below:

Matthew 27:38-39 KJV
38. Then were there two thieves crucified with him, one on the right hand, and another on the left.
39. And they that passed by (GSN#3899 parapoeruomai) reviled him, wagging their heads,


It might just as easily be saying that David and those with him "passed by" (along) the Kidron, or "passed through" and up the Kidron valley rather than across the brook or valley. At this point it would merely be speculation either way but I do not need to speculate; for unlike most instances, where the New Testament authors follow the Septuagint in their quotes, this instance makes a clarification on the matter. The only place Kidron is mentioned in the New Testament is John 18:1 and in this place Messiah takes the same route as did king David. However, the word employed is not "parapoeruomai" but rather "peran" which means "to pierce" like a needle going into a vein; as if going up river, through the river, as opposed to crossing over the river from one bank to the other bank of a river, stream, or brook.

John 18:1 KJV
1. When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over [GSN#4008 peran] the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.


Original Strong's Ref. #4008
Romanized peran
Pronounced per'-an
apparently the accusative case of an obsolete derivative of peiro (to "pierce"); through (as adverb or preposition), i.e. across:
KJV--beyond, farther (other) side, over.

Thus the New Testament clarifies what was not perfectly clear in 2 Samuel 15:23. This is the same exact path which king David likewise did take, (it is prophetic) and "the Ascent to Olivet" is therefore the pathway that in ancient times followed just north of where the Fortress of Antonia was later built; but a little more north of the tower location, along the outer perimeter of the old city wall. This "Way" to Olivet went up to the highest point on Moriah which is the same place where Abraham offered up his only son Isaac. The same is Golgotha; where Messiah was crucified, the Place of the Skull.
:)
moriah-olivet1.gif
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, Rex.

Hope you have (had, by the time you read this) a good day at work.

Rex said:
So, Retro, are you going to deny that Joseph was a shadow of the Christ to come, who, after seating his 11 brothers, provided food to their table and then later revealed himself? Are you going to deny that this, too, is a fulfilling of the scripture, and not simply sending Judas away from the last supper? Some know the true seed that sprouted and grew was Christ, both fulfilling the scriptures and bearing much fruit among the descendents of Abraham.

Did you catch my last post?
You may be interested in the red part.

(See below.)

I should mention the NT as well.

I'll check in later; I have to work.


Rex said:
No I don't agree, and right honestly it's one of the worst, most vague explanations for what someone does believe I've tried to decipher. I not so sure I completely understand the entirety of what you do believe, but just the same I disagree.

And where is your thumbnail sketch of your position on salvation concerning Abraham's decendents and the nations? You did say it was coming.
To be honest reading through your post and replies you move through scripture like a snake in the grass and most is only slightly touched on at best, you leave more questions than you provide answers.

You're crafty I'll give you that. At times it appears you believe one thing then move the other direction, I see now why you appear to agree with me yet lead right back into error, just the same I'm sure in the end you believe Israel of the flesh to be a special nation inspite of my last post pointing out.

Israel ---->> was a name given from heaven; it is not the line descendent from Jacob. So why don't you understand that born of flesh is flesh and that born from above is from heaven. So how is it that this man born of the flesh named Jacob can through his flesh give birth to heavenly men named Israel?

Vague, little statements and questions for answers. I'm beginning to see why you repeat what I say as though I didn't say it, then curl around the truth and lead people away.

Another point from your book of questions, If Jacob called Israel did birth heavenly men why did they rebel through out the entire OT?

SURE, I'm going to deny it! I hadn't even made such a quirky connection before! It's like trying to marry a snake with an aardvark to see what they'd produce! IT CAN'T BE DONE! IT SHOULDN'T BE DONE! Why would ANYONE take the 11 apostles and try to make some point about them with the 11 brothers of Yosef?! Just because they both use the number 11??!!! IT CAN'T BE DONE! IT SHOULDN'T BE DONE! That sounds like something Daq would say!

If I'm going to use Yosef, the father of Manasheh and Efrayim, as an example of the Messiah, it would ONLY be because Yeshua` is called the "Suffering Messiah, Messiah the son of Yosef." That phrase DOES draw from this person's example of self-sacrifice, and the body of prophecy that was recognized as about a suffering and dying Messiah was given this title, as opposed to the body of prophecy that was recognized as about a victorious and reigning Messiah, called "Messiah the son of David."

{Sigh.) You guys and your definitions of "Heaven" and "heavenly." They continue to screw you up every time you use the words! When are you EVER going to learn?

"Yisra'el" (Israel) simply means "a prince with God." "Ya`aqov" (Jacob) means a "heel-grabber" or a "substitution," a "replacement," an "alternate," or a "proxy." When God changed his name from "substitution" - a "heel-grabber" - to a "prince with God," it was a PROMOTION! He was no longer being compared to his older brother Esav (Esau, which by the way, means "rough" or "roughly handled," because even as a new-born, he came out "red all over like a hairy garment"). He had finally come into his own!

These names also ought not be confused with...


John 3:3-8
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
KJV

You need also to understand that one cannot be born of the Spirit without first being born of the flesh! Furthermore, Paul taught us that this will also be true in the resurrection:



1 Corinthians 15:35-57
35 But someone will ask, “In what manner are the dead raised? What sort of body do they have?” 36 Stupid! When you sow a seed, it doesn’t come alive unless it first dies. 37 Also, what you sow is not the body that will be, but a bare seed of, say, wheat or something else; 38 but God gives it the body he intended for it; and to each kind of seed he gives its own body. 39 Not all living matter is the same living matter; on the contrary, there is one kind for human beings, another kind of living matter for animals, another for birds and another for fish. 40 Further, there are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies; but the beauty of heavenly bodies is one thing, while the beauty of earthly bodies is something else. 41 The sun has one kind of beauty, the moon another, the stars yet another; indeed, each star has its own individual kind of beauty.
42 So it is with the resurrection of the dead. When the body is “sown,” it decays; when it is raised, it cannot decay. 43 When sown, it is without dignity; when raised, it will be beautiful. When sown, it is weak; when raised, it will be strong. 44 When sown, it is an ordinary human body; when raised, it will be a body controlled by the Spirit. If there is an ordinary human body, there is also a body controlled by the Spirit. 45 In fact, the Tanakh says so: Adam, the first man, became a living human being;m but the last “Adam” has become a life-giving Spirit. 46 Note, however, that the body from the Spirit did not come first, but the ordinary human one; the one from the Spirit comes afterwards. 47 The first man is from the earth, made of dust; the second man is from heaven. 48 People born of dust are like the man of dust, and people born from heaven are like the man from heaven; 49 and just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, so also we will bear the image of the man from heaven.
50 Let me say this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot share in the Kingdom of God, nor can something that decays share in what does not decay. 51 Look, I will tell you a secret — not all of us will die! But we will all be changed! 52 It will take but a moment, the blink of an eye, at the final shofar. For the shofar will sound, and the dead will be raised to live forever, and we too will be changed. 53 For this material which can decay must be clothed with imperishability, this which is mortal must be clothed with immortality. 54 When what decays puts on imperishability and what is mortal puts on immortality, then this passage in the Tanakh will be fulfilled:
“Death is swallowed up in victory.n
55 “Death, where is your victory?
Death, where is your sting?”o
56 The sting of death is sin; and sin draws its power from the Torah; 57 but thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Yeshua the Messiah!
CJB
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
The example of Joseph is how he was separated from his brethren, to a foreign land, and having been exalted by God. He represents what would happen to the ten tribes of the "house of Israel" established under The Gospel of Jesus Christ, as the prophecy to his son Ephraim was that he would become "a multutide of nations" (Gen.48). And thus it has been in Asia Minor and Europe when The Gospel went there after it was preached in the holy land.
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
Retrobyter said:
John 3:3-8
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
KJV

You need also to understand that one cannot be born of the Spirit without first being born of the flesh! Furthermore, Paul taught us that this will also be true in the resurrection:

Perhaps you and "veteran" both missed the full implications of the following:


daq said:
Perhaps you missed the full implications of the following:

Matthew 3:12 KJV
10. And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
11. I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
12. Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.


If you desire to adhere to what is written then it is necessary for you now to go and find the words of Yochanan the Immerser, (the greatest of all the prophets until Messiah) and be baptized also into that water immersion of the Word. And of course that one comes first, for the Master clearly states the Yochanan the Immerser is Eliyahu, (if you will receive it). And without the first immersion of water the second will not occur. :)
Scripture interpretation? Reply #63-81

I can be quite sure that veteran has not only missed what was said but chosen to ignore it. :)
It is difficult to understand why anyone would purposefully continue offering up rotting food to his brethren . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rex

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hi RB,

"Yisra'el" (Israel) simply means "a prince with God."
If this is the case, why does Strong's state that Israel means 'God prevails'? In the context of Peniel, Strong makes good sense.

You seem to think that there were only 11 men of Isra'el that were grafted in! Are you so quickly forgetting the other of the 120 disciples? Are you so quickly forgetting the THOUSANDS, all Isra'elites, no matter from where on earth they were dispersed?

Not only was this NOT a permanent condition, but it was not excluding "all Jews," let alone "all Isra'elites!" THERE ARE SOME BRANCHES WHICH WERE NEVER LOPPED OFF!
This is the mistake you have been making all along in your reckoning. You are not correctly computing the meaning of Jesus being in the grave. He was cut off from the entire house of Israel, including all those who had been watching for Messiah, like Andrew, Peter and John (to name but three).

Do you remember how they behaved when He was arrested? How Peter denied Him??? They were 'lopped off' all right, albeit for a very short time. Nevertheless, this is exactly what Jesus had talked to them about when He was preparing them for both His death and His ascension.

John 14:25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. 26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you... . 28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. 29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.

John 16:32 Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.


It is Jesus Christ who was planted in the ground - the Branch. It is into Him that every believer - regardless of ethnicity - must be grafted if they are to be counted dead with Him, and risen with Him as Paul defines in Romans 6.

Paul goes on to say that while his kinsmen in the flesh, of Israel (the one over whom God prevailed) have not experienced 'the adoption' (of sons), they are still going about to establish their own righteousness. Which means that they couldn't have any of God's righteousness. (Lopped off; see?)


The other point I'd like to bring to your attention, is that Paul says he can do all things through Christ who strengthens Him. Another way of understanding that, is that the victorious Messiah was already reigning in his life. He was not waiting for an external kingdom, although that will come.

Furthermore, whoever wrote Hebrews declares that Abraham 'got it', and then Moses 'got it'. They understood both the cost, and the fact that their course was set for a kingdom and a city which God was making, not man (not even the family from whom Messiah was revealed to the world).
Hi ChristRoseFromTheDead,

Hi DF. It's good to see you back. Haven't seen you much in a while...
Thanks. Been busy. Going to be busy. This visit is just an interlude.... :)

Thanks for the comments about Zion and Sion.

So.... why do you think 'Sion' has been used by translators in Deu 4:48, and Psalm 65:1, if not to indicate something readers should ponder and note?




Hi Purity,

Did you reply to my point about the difference between Isaiah 59:20, and Romans 11:26?


I cannot help but notice that you are not making a lot of sense with regard to the place of Israel after the flesh historically.

You do realise, don't you, that Abraham was never an Israelite or a Jew, yet the promise of Christ his descendant was given to him - before he was circumcised?

Do you also realise that although there probably are members of all the tribes living in the nation state of 'Israel' in the present day, there will be many who are not descendants of Jacob, physically. An example of this kind of 'Jew', would be Jesus' disciple mentioned in Matthew 10:4 Simon the Canaanite.

Of course, I guess you're aware that Israelite men could marry outside of Israel as well, and thus we have king David descended from Rahab of Jericho and Ruth the Moabitess, within five hundred years of Abraham. Likewise, there is the occasional Ishmaelite marriage into Israel, where the man is of Ishmael. In fact, God insisted right from the giving of the law, that purchased servants, and strangers who wished to partake of Passover had to be circumcised. Deuteronomy 12:44, 48. The notion that natural 'Israel' refers only to Jacob's descendants, was already obsolete, in the wilderness. Long, long, long before Jesus came, the gene pool of 'Israel' had been strengthened many times over by the addition of 'strangers' to its mix.

This is one of the reasons that those who used to claim a special relationship with God through their ancestry - back in Paul's day - got a verbal clip round the ear from the apostle. He said:

1 Timothy 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.

Titus 3:9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.


In fact, Ezekiel was given the revelation that when the land was being distributed (possibly in the new earth) the 'strangers' were to be included.

That wasn't yesterday; and Paul understood it 2000 years ago, so why cling on, today, for all you're worth, to unbiblical doctrine?
 

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
daq said:
I can be quite sure that veteran has not only missed what was said but chosen to ignore it. :)
It is difficult to understand why anyone would purposefully continue offering up rotting food to his brethren . . .
They both ignored the message and focused on the crumb I opened with, "in reguards to Retros comment to CRFTD".

I See you picked up on the John 3:6 quote I mentioned in pointing out that nether Abraham nor Jacob can possibly birth Gods Spirit, Blessing, Promise, Salvation ect ect ect. Another way to say it is Abraham and Jacob can not give birth to the promise they received from God, unless your teaching the same thing Catholics do.
Of course we know where that leaves the blood line. They also didn't comment about the seed, it is nothing new it's the first promise in the bible, Gen 3:15 KJV applying it to a group of people is nothing but vain selfish pride at its finest.

let me ask Purity, say Purity is the seed spoken of in Gen 3:15 the nation of Israel? :huh:

God never intended to keep this a secret he did say that from Abraham's loins he would come. He also spent a great deal of time prophesying about the time and place as well. He charged Gabriel with this task in both the old and NT. Now back to the nation, what did they receive from the Lord above and beyond everyone else? Why they were served first, after the seed Jesus came they were offered the complete package first then the Gentiles were served. The Lord doesn't owe the Nation of Israel one wooden nickel. The true Israel of God now that's a different story, and there are yet to come many blessings.

Men giving birth to Gods blessings, why that's no different than believing the pope hands out salvation LOLOLOLOLOLOOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: daq