The proper and harmonious interpretation of Romans 11:25 [split from another topic]

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
Purity said:
I didn't read sorry Rex.

You don't know when enough is enough...and its enough.
Next time use an S like in snake

Quick Reference DictionaryOracle
Oracle






Dictionaries - Easton's Bible Dictionary - Oracle
Oracle %5BN%5D
In the Old Testament used in every case, except 2 Samuel 16:23 , to denote the most holy place in the temple ( 1 Kings 6:5 1 Kings 6:19-23 ; 8:6 ). In 2 Samuel 16:23 it means the Word of God. A man inquired "at the oracle of God" by means of the Urim and Thummim in the breastplate on the high priest's ephod. In the New Testament it is used only in the plural, and always denotes the Word of God ( Romans 3:2 ; Hebrews 5:12 , etc.). The Scriptures are called "living oracles" (Compare Hebrews 4:12 ) because of their quickening power ( Acts 7:38 ).


Purity said:
No the comment related to a problem in your theology which denies the prophetic oracle. You know not how to enter the Scripture's.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
dragonfly said:
Hi veteran,

I've been thinking about your statement back on p9 of this thread (and in other threads also) and would like to know why you attribute the Kenites to Canaan, rather than to a tribe of Israel?
Because... of this...


Gen 15:18-21
18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, "Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,
20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,
21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.
(KJV)

Do you not see how those Kenites were a people included there in that land? What land? Well, what land was it that God was talking to Abram about there? The land of Canaan.

That most definitely means... the Kenites were NOT of the seed of Israel at all. They were foreigners of the nations of Canaan.
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
Rex said:
Next time use an S like in snake

Quick Reference DictionaryOracle
Oracle






Dictionaries - Easton's Bible Dictionary - Oracle
Oracle [N]
In the Old Testament used in every case, except 2 Samuel 16:23 , to denote the most holy place in the temple ( 1 Kings 6:5 1 Kings 6:19-23 ; 8:6 ). In 2 Samuel 16:23 it means the Word of God. A man inquired "at the oracle of God" by means of the Urim and Thummim in the breastplate on the high priest's ephod. In the New Testament it is used only in the plural, and always denotes the Word of God ( Romans 3:2 ; Hebrews 5:12 , etc.). The Scriptures are called "living oracles" (Compare Hebrews 4:12 ) because of their quickening power ( Acts 7:38 ).
You are embarrassing yourself before many!
 

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
No
In-spite of your desire it's you who should be embarrassed but I doubt you are, you're way to proud of what you do.

Good night

Purity said:
You are embarrassing yourself before many!
You're a fine example of denying even you're own mistakes, then when caught being slanderous as though it were the truth
Thanks for the exercise


slanderous
calumniatory: (used of statements) harmful and often untrue; tending to discredit or malign.
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
No
In-spite of your desire it's you who should be embarrassed but I doubt you are, you're way to proud of what you do.

Good night


You're a fine example of denying even you're own mistakes, then when caught being slanderous as though it were the truth
Thanks for the exercise

slanderous
calumniatory: (used of statements) harmful and often untrue; tending to discredit or malign.
Rex.

Who the hell calls the bible an oracle
Pride will lead to a fall.

You began a sad journey to undermine the teaching followed with false accusations, and lastly, criticise the style of words used to communicating my message. Unfortunately for you it happened to be a Word in the Bible, used by the inspired Apostles.

Now this ought to have been enough for you to admit some wrong on your part but then we get a long series of posts justifying your "who the hell...statement" which resulted in your unnecessary embarrassment.

My part was not an honourable one as I encourage the outcome hoping for humility... I found a proud man.

Purity.

p.s The moderators would be wise to lock this subject up, as the matter has been more than explained.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
dragonfly said:
1 Chronicles 2:55 And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.
Hemath is actually Chammath, a city in the area alloted to Naphtali. But this 1 Chron.2:55 verse was after these Kenites had joined within Israel.

Jer 35:10-11
10 But we have dwelt in tents, and have obeyed, and done according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us.
11 But it came to pass, when Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon came up into the land, that we said, Come, and let us go to Jerusalem for fear of the army of the Chaldeans, and for fear of the army of the Syrians: so we dwell at Jerusalem.
(KJV)

Just prior to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, coming upon Jerusalem, those Kenites left their lands and wanderings out of fear, and went to Jerusalem for protection under Judah (it didn't help).


1 Sam 15:5-7
5 And Saul came to a city of Amalek, and laid wait in the valley.
6 And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites.
7 And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt.
(KJV)

That Scripture shows those Kenites dwelt among the Amalakites (descendents of Esau), with Saul warning them to escape his coming attack upon the Amalkites, since the Kenites were kind to Israel when the children of Israel trekked through the desert to go into the land of Canaan. That's another Scripture showing the Kenites were not of the children of Israel, but were also in lands Israel sojourned through on the way to Canaan.

It must be understood that Israel failed to destroy all the Canaanite nations God commanded Israel to literally destroy (Deut.20). Per Judges 2 & 3, Joshua 9, and 1 Kings 9, those of the Canaanite nations Israel did not destroy became bondservants to Israel. The Kenites lived in the deserts of Sinai, Midian, Edom, i.e., areas south of Judea all the way down to the Sinai peninsula. They were wanderers in the desert.

Num 24:21-22
21 And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.
22 Nevertheless the Kenite shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.
(KJV)

That was a parable about Israel conquering their lands, as God had promised to Israel the lands of Canaan. So it shows those Kenites were in the lands of Canaan too, like the Gen.15 especially does:

Gen 15:18-21
18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,
20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,
21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.
(KJV)



Judg 1:16-17
16 And the children of the Kenite, Moses' father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people.
17 And Judah went with Simeon his brother, and they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephath, and utterly destroyed it. And the name of the city was called Hormah.
(KJV)

Mose's father-in-law was actually a Midianite priest (Exo.3:1). So he was not of the Kenites, but a Midianite having dwelt among the lands of Kenites that lived in the same areas, i.e., like those in the above 1 Sam.15 Scripture which lived among the Amalekites. The lands of Midian were east of the Jordan and reached all the way down to the Sinai peninsula.

Purity said:
Yes and for the gentile Christian the equivalent is Jas 1:8 (two souled)

Your last sentence didn't ring any bells. Where in the context of our discussion have you been led to believe I worship men?

You would agree its an odd conclusion you have drawn too?

Purity


Nothing missed Veteran that I can see.

The term "Canaanite" is used in this verse for ecclesiastical traders, such as the clergy of Christendom, and all purveyors of religious error and apostasy. The use of this word throughout Scripture illustrates that fact. When Abraham entered the Land of Promise, the record states that "the Canaanite was then in the land" Gen 12:6.

The word "Canaanite" comes from a root kana signifying "to bend the knee," hence to pretend humility, and thus a trader seeking to persuade his client to purchase his wares. Because of this, the RSV renders the word in Zec 14:21 as "trader."

...
That's some of the biggest BULL I've ever heard.

Gen 10:15-20
15 And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,
16 And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,
17 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
18 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.
19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.
20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.
(KJV)



The Canaanites were peoples that lived in the lands which God gave to Israel when they left Egypt. They were offspring of Ham's son Canaan.

And the majority of them INDEED BENT THE KNEE TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.

But not all of them did, and the ones that haven't still exist today, and are joined within Judah's ranks.

That's what that last verse of Zech.14 is about, how when Christ sets up His de facto reign over all nations on this earth in our near future, those leftover remnants of Canaanites that crept in... among Israel, will be CAST OUT OF HIS HOUSE.
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
daq said:
You are certainly welcome and likewise I say the same to you! I believe you are correct to question the statements from veteran along these lines because the Scripture evidence points in the opposite direction of that which he has taken. It appears that some are merely touting what they have read and heard from someone else. The Kenites have a definite connection to Raguel-Jethro, the priest of Midian, who was likely in the Elohim line of the Melchizedek priesthood which Moses then married into:

Judges 1:16 KJV
16. And the children of the Kenite, Moses' father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people.


Observations of a Spiritual Kind - Reply#4
Priesthood - Replies#21-56 :)

veteran said:
Hemath is actually Chammath, a city in the area alloted to Naphtali. But this 1 Chron.2:55 verse was after these Kenites had joined within Israel.

Jer 35:10-11
10 But we have dwelt in tents, and have obeyed, and done according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us.
11 But it came to pass, when Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon came up into the land, that we said, Come, and let us go to Jerusalem for fear of the army of the Chaldeans, and for fear of the army of the Syrians: so we dwell at Jerusalem.
(KJV)

Just prior to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, coming upon Jerusalem, those Kenites left their lands and wanderings out of fear, and went to Jerusalem for protection under Judah (it didn't help).


1 Sam 15:5-7
5 And Saul came to a city of Amalek, and laid wait in the valley.
6 And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites.
7 And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt.
(KJV)

That Scripture shows those Kenites dwelt among the Amalakites (descendents of Esau), with Saul warning them to escape his coming attack upon the Amalkites, since the Kenites were kind to Israel when the children of Israel trekked through the desert to go into the land of Canaan. That's another Scripture showing the Kenites were not of the children of Israel, but were also in lands Israel sojourned through on the way to Canaan.

It must be understood that Israel failed to destroy all the Canaanite nations God commanded Israel to literally destroy (Deut.20). Per Judges 2 & 3, Joshua 9, and 1 Kings 9, those of the Canaanite nations Israel did not destroy became bondservants to Israel. The Kenites lived in the deserts of Sinai, Midian, Edom, i.e., areas south of Judea all the way down to the Sinai peninsula. They were wanderers in the desert.

Num 24:21-22
21 And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.
22 Nevertheless the Kenite shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.
(KJV)

That was a parable about Israel conquering their lands, as God had promised to Israel the lands of Canaan. So it shows those Kenites were in the lands of Canaan too, like the Gen.15 especially does:
Gen 15:18-21
18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,
20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,
21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.
(KJV)



Judg 1:16-17
16 And the children of the Kenite, Moses' father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people.
17 And Judah went with Simeon his brother, and they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephath, and utterly destroyed it. And the name of the city was called Hormah.
(KJV)

Mose's father-in-law was actually a Midianite priest (Exo.3:1). So he was not of the Kenites, but a Midianite having dwelt among the lands of Kenites that lived in the same areas, i.e., like those in the above 1 Sam.15 Scripture which lived among the Amalekites. The lands of Midian were east of the Jordan and reached all the way down to the Sinai peninsula.
Amazing! Not only do you ignore what was just posted on the previous page, the two links provided concerning this topic and information, and the Scripture quote from Judges 1:16 quoted in the post on the previous page herein; but then you likewise quote the same Scripture passage over again and proclaim that you do not believe it to be the truth. If you do not believe the Scripture you just posted then what are you even doing here? The Kenites mentioned in Judges 1:16 are the same name "Qeyniy" which is employed thirteen times in the Hebrew:

Original Strong's Ref. #7017
Romanized Qeyniy
Pronounced kay-nee'
or Qiyniy (1Chr.2v55) {kee-nee'}; patronymic from HSN7014; a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin:
KJV--Kenite.


BDB - Strong's Hebrew Definition for #07017
07017 // ynyq // Qeyniy // kay-nee' // or

// ynyq // Qiyniy ( 1Ch 2:55 ) // kee-nee' //
from 07014 ; TWOT - 2016; adj patr
AV - Kenite 13; 13
Kenite = "smiths"
1) the tribe from which the father-in-law of Moses was a member and
which lived in the area between southern Palestine and the mountains
of Sinai

http://www.apostolic-churches.net/bible/strongs/judges_1.shtml
http://www.apostolic-churches.net/bible/strongs/ref/?stgh=hebrew&stnm=07017
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
That's some of the biggest BULL I've ever heard.

Gen 10:15-20
15 And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,
16 And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,
17 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
18 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.
19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.
20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.
(KJV)



The Canaanites were peoples that lived in the lands which God gave to Israel when they left Egypt. They were offspring of Ham's son Canaan.

And the majority of them INDEED BENT THE KNEE TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.

But not all of them did, and the ones that haven't still exist today, and are joined within Judah's ranks.

That's what that last verse of Zech.14 is about, how when Christ sets up His de facto reign over all nations on this earth in our near future, those leftover remnants of Canaanites that crept in... among Israel, will be CAST OUT OF HIS HOUSE.
It's the biggest BULL you have EVER read and yet you say:

And the majority of them INDEED BENT THE KNEE TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.
You know what is said about exaggeration don't you?
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hi Purity,

I have followed your gradual exposition of what you deem to be the truth in Romans 11, and I have to disagree with your interpretation of what Paul wrote.

All the more I disagree because of the number of times Jesus quoted from Isaiah 6 during His ministry to 'Israel' of the flesh.


The weight of what Paul is saying in Romans 11, is that there is still some hope for unbelieving Israel.

13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: 14 If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them.


His point - that Israelites were 'broken off' because of unbelief, and can be grafted back in IF they believe - in no way implies

It is far easier for God to regraft an Israel which knew His will and laws, but which for a time have gone astray, than to convert ignorant Gentiles who were always outside His wisdom.
From the beginning of 'Israel of the flesh' (at Sinai) the issue has always been whether they will/desire to agree with God's invitations to them. He told Moses:


Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me



When it happened, God's man of the day, was angry -

1 Samuel 8:7 And the Lord said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.


Fast forward, and contrary to your thesis that 'it is far easier ...' because (etc), in fact, nothing has changed at the top - the leadership of Israel:

John 19:15 But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.

and

Matthew 27:25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.


My point is not that Israel is more reluctant than the next non-Israelite, but that the human heart is in need of the same remedy, regardless of ethnicity and regardless of outward religious observances. The law was never the remedy. It attempted to turn its adherents to the Saviour.

The shadows in the law gave the first (Israelite) Christians a way to express the gospel to their kinsmen, and also, to the Gentiles. That's why Paul goes into more detail about the shadows in Israelite history in his letters to Gentile churches, and they are instructive to us all.

There is not the slightest implication in Paul's thesis in Romans 11, that evangelising Israelis is going to be easy. He knew from his own attempts, and how many times he suffered physically because of their rejection of their Messiah, that it would take a lot of love and mercy.

The parable of the sower applies. Some of Israel of the flesh had received the word into hearts which were good ground. Others fell away. No doubt the same could be said for Gentile believers:

Romans 11: '... thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: 21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. 22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

And so, the Israeli who is grafted in is faced with the same possibility - of being cut off again if he continues not in His goodness.


I don't see any room for pride in being descended from Jacob. Absolutely none. If anything, it calls for greater humilty towards God and man.


God provided a context for the Messiah to be recognised when He came, through His word to those whom He chose to reveal it, but from Genesis 3:15, to Luke 2:10, He always intended to save all who will believe in Him. John 14:6, Hebrews 3:18, 19, Hebrews 4:2.

He that has ears to hear, let him hear. Isaiah 55
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
veteran said:
Hemath is actually Chammath, a city in the area alloted to Naphtali. But this 1 Chron.2:55 verse was after these Kenites had joined within Israel.

Jer 35:10-11
10 But we have dwelt in tents, and have obeyed, and done according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us.
11 But it came to pass, when Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon came up into the land, that we said, Come, and let us go to Jerusalem for fear of the army of the Chaldeans, and for fear of the army of the Syrians: so we dwell at Jerusalem.
(KJV)

Just prior to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, coming upon Jerusalem, those Kenites left their lands and wanderings out of fear, and went to Jerusalem for protection under Judah (it didn't help).


1 Sam 15:5-7
5 And Saul came to a city of Amalek, and laid wait in the valley.
6 And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites.
7 And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt.
(KJV)

That Scripture shows those Kenites dwelt among the Amalakites (descendents of Esau), with Saul warning them to escape his coming attack upon the Amalkites, since the Kenites were kind to Israel when the children of Israel trekked through the desert to go into the land of Canaan. That's another Scripture showing the Kenites were not of the children of Israel, but were also in lands Israel sojourned through on the way to Canaan.

It must be understood that Israel failed to destroy all the Canaanite nations God commanded Israel to literally destroy (Deut.20). Per Judges 2 & 3, Joshua 9, and 1 Kings 9, those of the Canaanite nations Israel did not destroy became bondservants to Israel. The Kenites lived in the deserts of Sinai, Midian, Edom, i.e., areas south of Judea all the way down to the Sinai peninsula. They were wanderers in the desert.

Num 24:21-22
21 And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.
22 Nevertheless the Kenite shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.
(KJV)

That was a parable about Israel conquering their lands, as God had promised to Israel the lands of Canaan. So it shows those Kenites were in the lands of Canaan too, like the Gen.15 especially does:
Gen 15:18-21
18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,
20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,
21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.
(KJV)



Judg 1:16-17
16 And the children of the Kenite, Moses' father in law, went up out of the city of palm trees with the children of Judah into the wilderness of Judah, which lieth in the south of Arad; and they went and dwelt among the people.
17 And Judah went with Simeon his brother, and they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephath, and utterly destroyed it. And the name of the city was called Hormah.
(KJV)

Mose's father-in-law was actually a Midianite priest (Exo.3:1). So he was not of the Kenites, but a Midianite having dwelt among the lands of Kenites that lived in the same areas, i.e., like those in the above 1 Sam.15 Scripture which lived among the Amalekites. The lands of Midian were east of the Jordan and reached all the way down to the Sinai peninsula.


That's some of the biggest BULL I've ever heard.

Gen 10:15-20
15 And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,
16 And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,
17 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
18 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.
19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.
20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.
(KJV)



The Canaanites were peoples that lived in the lands which God gave to Israel when they left Egypt. They were offspring of Ham's son Canaan.

And the majority of them INDEED BENT THE KNEE TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL.

But not all of them did, and the ones that haven't still exist today, and are joined within Judah's ranks.

That's what that last verse of Zech.14 is about, how when Christ sets up His de facto reign over all nations on this earth in our near future, those leftover remnants of Canaanites that crept in... among Israel, will be CAST OUT OF HIS HOUSE.
Likewise you are so far out of context so as to produce your theory that your doctrine roots out the Nazarene community to which the Rechabites belonged in Naphtali, Zebulun, and the Galilee region. The same had "no continuing city" but dwelt in tents:

Jeremiah 35:1-10 KJV
1. The word which came unto Jeremiah from the Lord in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, saying,
2. Go unto the house of the Rechabites, and speak unto them, and bring them into the house of the Lord, into one of the chambers, and give them wine to drink.
3. Then I took Jaazaniah the son of Jeremiah, the son of Habaziniah, and his brethren, and all his sons, and the whole house of the Rechabites;
4. And I brought them into the house of the Lord, into the chamber of the sons of Hanan, the son of Igdaliah, a man of God, which was by the chamber of the princes, which was above the chamber of Maaseiah the son of Shallum, the keeper of the door:
5. And I set before the sons of the house of the Rechabites pots full of wine, and cups, and I said unto them, Drink ye wine.
6. But they said, We will drink no wine: for Jonadab the son of Rechab our father commanded us, saying, Ye shall drink no wine, neither ye, nor your sons for ever:
7. Neither shall ye build house, nor sow seed, nor plant vineyard, nor have any: but all your days ye shall dwell in tents; that ye may live many days in the land where ye be strangers.
8. Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab the son of Rechab our father in all that he hath charged us, to drink no wine all our days, we, our wives, our sons, nor our daughters;
9. Nor to build houses for us to dwell in: neither have we vineyard, nor field, nor seed:
10. But we have dwelt in tents, and have obeyed, and done according to all that Jonadab our father commanded us.


Have you never wondered why no literal city called Nazareth has ever been decisively proven to have been found? Perhaps it is because it is an "unwalled city" that dwells within a compass of cities like a "sect" within the population centers of Israel. Thus what you call "Canaanites" and evil is very likely the "nomadic" population base of the Elohim line of rulers and priesthood which sojourned within the Galilee region. The Sea of Galilee is likewise pictured in Psalm 133 as the opening, ("peh", or mouth) of the priestly garment of Aharon in the day he was anointed when the oil ran down his beard into the opening of his garment. The Sea of Galilee is not mentioned but the "dew of Hermon" is that which together along with the snow runoff supplies the waters of the Sea of Galilee and therefore the Jordan River. The cities around the Sea of Galilee are those wherein Yeshua traveled and taught the most:

nazareth-decapolis.gif


Tehillim 133 ~ "Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity. It is like the precious ointment upon the head, that ran down upon the beard; even the beard of Aharon, that ran down into the opening of his garments; As the dew of Hermon, as the dew descending upon the mountains of Zion: for there HaShem commanded the blessing, life unto the Olam."

hermon-galilee.jpg


Jeremiah 35:16-19 KJV
16. Because the sons of Jonadab the son of Rechab have performed the commandment of their father, which he commanded them; but this people hath not hearkened unto me:
17. Therefore thus saith the Lord God of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring upon Judah and upon all the inhabitants of Jerusalem all the evil that I have pronounced against them: because I have spoken unto them, but they have not heard; and I have called unto them, but they have not answered.
18. And Jeremiah said unto the house of the Rechabites, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Because ye have obeyed the commandment of Jonadab your father, and kept all his precepts, and done according unto all that he hath commanded you:
19. Therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel;
Jonadab the son of Rechab shall not want a man to stand before me for ever.

In addition you probably have the wrong Jehonadab-Jonadab, (was it not said that the Hivites are the wily ones? :lol: ).

2 Kings 10:15-23 KJV
15. And when he was departed thence, he lighted on Jehonadab [HSN#3082] the son of Rechab coming to meet him: and he saluted him, and said to him, Is thine heart right, as my heart is with thy heart? And Jehonadab [HSN#3082] answered, It is. If it be, give me thine hand. And he gave him his hand; and he took him up to him into the chariot.
16. And he said, Come with me, and see my zeal for the Lord. So they made him ride in his chariot.
17. And when he came to Samaria, he slew all that remained unto Ahab in Samaria, till he had destroyed him, according to the saying of the Lord, which he spake to Elijah.
18. And Jehu gathered all the people together, and said unto them, Ahab served Baal a little; but Jehu shall serve him much.
19. Now therefore call unto me all the prophets of Baal, all his servants, and all his priests; let none be wanting: for I have a great sacrifice to do to Baal; whosoever shall be wanting, he shall not live. But Jehu did it in subtilty, to the intent that he might destroy the worshippers of Baal.
20. And Jehu said, Proclaim a solemn assembly for Baal. And they proclaimed it.
21. And Jehu sent through all Israel: and all the worshippers of Baal came, so that there was not a man left that came not. And they came into the house of Baal; and the house of Baal was full from one end to another.
22. And he said unto him that was over the vestry, Bring forth vestments for all the worshippers of Baal. And he brought them forth vestments.
23. And Jehu went, and Jehonadab [HSN#3082] the son of Rechab, into the house of Baal, and said unto the worshippers of Baal, Search, and look that there be here with you none of the servants of the Lord, but the worshippers of Baal only.


This Jehonadab son of Rechab was with Jehu when he slew all the worshippers of Baal ~
They are the same but there is confusion because two forms are used in Jeremiah:

Jeremiah 35:6-8 KJV
6. But they said, We will drink no wine: for Jonadab [HSN#3122] the son of Rechab our father commanded us, saying, Ye shall drink no wine, neither ye, nor your sons for ever:
7. Neither shall ye build house, nor sow seed, nor plant vineyard, nor have any: but all your days ye shall dwell in tents; that ye may live many days in the land where ye be strangers.
8. Thus have we obeyed the voice of Jonadab [HSN#3082] the son of Rechab our father in all that he hath charged us, to drink no wine all our days, we, our wives, our sons, nor our daughters;


BDB - Strong's Hebrew Definition for # 03122
03122 // bdnwy // Yawnadab // yo-naw-dawb' //
a form of 03082 ; n pr m
AV - Jonadab 7; 7
Jonadab or Jehonadab = "Jehovah is willing"
1) a son of Rechab, chief of the Rechabites, in the time of Jehu and Ahab
2) a nephew of David


BDB - Strong's Hebrew Definition for #03082
03082 // bdnwhy // Y@hownadab // yeh-ho-naw-dawb' //
from 03068 and 05068 ; n pr m
AV - Jehonadab 3, Jonadab 5; 8
Jehonadab = "Jehovah is willing"
1) a son of Rechab, chief of the Rechabites, in the time of Jehu and Ahab
2) a nephew of David
 

Purity

New Member
May 20, 2013
1,064
15
0
Melbourne
dragonfly said:
Hi Purity,

I have followed your gradual exposition of what you deem to be the truth in Romans 11, and I have to disagree with your interpretation of what Paul wrote.
Greetings Dragonfly - I am grateful you at least ponder the Scripture and its interpretation.

All the more I disagree because of the number of times Jesus quoted from Isaiah 6 during His ministry to 'Israel' of the flesh.
If you desire to consider Isa 6 by starting a thread I would love to take part. It's a favourite section of the Word for me.



The weight of what Paul is saying in Romans 11, is that there is still some hope for unbelieving Israel.
See how you play down the Scripture?

You say "some hope" Paul states

And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: (Rom 11:26)

Now my posts have shown you how God will remove the Canaanite (sinfulness) from Jacob. Isa 59:20

Rex missed this in my posts and hopefully you will take more note of Pauls words...the subject of Romans 11 is what shall happen to natural Jewry (in cannot be argued!)

Romans 11:26 is a thrilling and confident assertion that the divine purpose with Israel will be achieved. HOWEVER, "all Israel" is not meant all individual Jews, but all the tribes: a national refined and purge redemption.

To note get this is to miss the mark on this chapter.




13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: 14 If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them.
Romans

The RV clarifies this as: "But I speak to you that are Gentiles".

This commences a parenthetical section comprising Rom 11:13-14, which is included at this point to warn Gentiles believers that they are to clearly understand how they had become related to the Hope of Israel. They should not fall into the trap of despising their Jewish brethren, nor the temporarily cast-off Jewish nation. Paul would not have them "to be ignorant of this secret" lest they become "wise in their own conceits" (Rom 11:25). This is another example of the extreme care Paul took in stating his case.
Whilst fully admitting the unbelief of the Jews, he gives the Gentile believers no occasion for boasting. No reasonable Jew could be offended by this tactful approach of the apostle. No thoughtful converted Gentile would vaunt airs of misguided superiority! They were to be grateful that God has provided for their exaltation, and recognise that such a hope is possible upon the basis of the "hope of Israel" (Joh 4:22). They were not to "boast against the branches" (Rom 11:18), but to acknowledge that they stand in this privileged position through the work of God. Verse 15 continues the argument from verse 12.


His point - that Israelites were 'broken off' because of unbelief, and can be grafted back in IF they believe - in no way implies
O, so you are unwilling to see the prophetical regrafting process? It's afar off - by faith.

From the beginning of 'Israel of the flesh' (at Sinai) the issue has always been whether they will/desire to agree with God's invitations to them. He told Moses:


Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me

When it happened, God's man of the day, was angry -

1 Samuel 8:7 And the Lord said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.


Fast forward, and contrary to your thesis that 'it is far easier ...' because (etc), in fact, nothing has changed at the top - the leadership of Israel:

John 19:15 But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.

and

Matthew 27:25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.


My point is not that Israel is more reluctant than the next non-Israelite, but that the human heart is in need of the same remedy, regardless of ethnicity and regardless of outward religious observances. The law was never the remedy. It attempted to turn its adherents to the Saviour.
I believe this also... in relation to the human problem.

What you need to appreciate is how Israel has long been His witness in the earth and their witnessing is far from over.

Do not forget Num 14:21!


The shadows in the law gave the first (Israelite) Christians a way to express the gospel to their kinsmen, and also, to the Gentiles. That's why Paul goes into more detail about the shadows in Israelite history in his letters to Gentile churches, and they are instructive to us all.
You are slowly moving away from Rom 11 - try and stay with the account - stay focused on what Paul is teaching concerning Rom 11:1
Here this guide may help you to remain focused on Pauls theme.

The problem of the rejection of Israel: Rom 9:1-33; Rom 10:1-21; Rom 11:1-36

- The justice and cause of the rejection: Rom 9:1-33; Rom 10:1-21
- The restoration of Israel: Rom 11:1-36

You can speak to me about the problem to you are blue in the face but I need all Christians to begin to discuss how God will restore His People.

This is the theme of Romans 11.


There is not the slightest implication in Paul's thesis in Romans 11, that evangelising Israelis is going to be easy. He knew from his own attempts, and how many times he suffered physically because of their rejection of their Messiah, that it would take a lot of love and mercy.
After they have been tried by fire their evangelising they will be a ground prepared for the seed of the Gospel. Hence Pauls emphasis which cannot be missed.

11:24 For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these natural branches be grafted back into their own olive tree?

I ask you the question "How much more?"


The parable of the sower applies. Some of Israel of the flesh had received the word into hearts which were good ground. Others fell away. No doubt the same could be said for Gentile believers:
Wonderful - I was hoping one would raise the greatest parable of all.

If Israel and the Gentiles are plots of ground upon which the Great Husbandman cultivates His crops by implication you are saying the Israel plot is had-it and not to be worked. Gods view of what the Israel will become in the earth is rather incredible if you are willing to explore the promises and prophecies.

Like this prophecy it yet in the future Zech 8:23

Can you see it? Or is Israel a byword in your thinking?


Romans 11: '... thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: 21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. 22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

And so, the Israeli who is grafted in is faced with the same possibility - of being cut off again if he continues not in His goodness.
You need to read Amos 9 and Acts 15 and looking forward you would rid yourself of that view very quickly. When Christ returns its not about cutting off Israel but restoration and redemption.

Look forward not back.


I don't see any room for pride in being descended from Jacob. Absolutely none.
Jer 3:14,15,16

No room for pride when you realise most of your family is dead and perished with no hope and you stand alone as a sole faithful survivor!



If anything, it calls for greater humilty towards God and man.
And if you a blessed you will see humilty the like which has never been witnessed on a national level ever in the history of mankind. Zech 12:10


God provided a context for the Messiah to be recognised when He came, through His word to those whom He chose to reveal it, but from Genesis 3:15, to Luke 2:10, He always intended to save all who will believe in Him. John 14:6, Hebrews 3:18, 19, Hebrews 4:2.

He that has ears to hear, let him hear. Isaiah 55
And would you mind showing me from Romans 11 where Paul is compromising that belief?

Where does Paul preach the Jews will be grafted back into the Israel Tree without recognition of the Messiah?

If its there please show me.

Purity

# Have you noticed the Lord Jesus Christ is not mentioned once in Romans 11? Ask yourself in every other section of Romans the master is spoken off but this one?
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
And there is this in addition to the rest of your error veteran:

Genesis 4:1 KJV
1. And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, [HSN#7014 Qayin] and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

Genesis 4:1 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented)
1. Wha'adam yada` 'et- Chawah 'ishtow watahar wateled'et- Qayin. [HSN#7014 Cain or Kain] Wato'mer, Qaniytiy 'iysh 'et- YHWH!

Numbers 24:21-22 KJV
21. And he looked on the Kenites, [HSN#7017 Kenite] and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.
22. Nevertheless the Kenite [HSN#7014 Qayin] shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.

Numbers 24:21-22 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented)
21. Wayar' 'et- ha-Qeyniy. [HSN#7017 Kenite] Wayisa' mshalow wayo'mar:'Eytan mowshabeka. Wsiym bacela` qineka.
22. Kiy 'im-yihyeh lba`er Qayin. [HSN#7014 Qayin] `Ad- mah 'Ashuwr tishbeka?


Now look at what the ASV does because this error in the KJV is recognized:

Numbers 24:21-22 ASV
21. And he looked on the Kenite, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwelling-place, And thy nest is set in the rock.
22. Nevertheless Kain shall be wasted, Until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.


Judges 4:11 has the same complication:

Judges 4:11 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented)
11. W-Cheber ha-Qeyniy [HSN#7017 Kenite] niprad mi-Qayin, [HSN#7014 Cain or Kain] mibney Chobab, choten Mosheh. WayeT 'ahlow `ad- 'elown b-Tsa`naniym {*},'sher 'et- Qedesh.


And should therefore be read and understood this way:

Judges 4:11
11. And Heber the Qeniy-Kenite, from the sons of Hobab the in-law of Moses, had separated himself from Qayin-Kain; and had pitched his tent as far away as the oak in Zaanannim, which is by Kedesh.


Cain is the very first typology of the "old man" spirit of the world from which we are to separate ourselves. The Qeniy or Kenites personify those having separated themselves from the "old man sin nature" which is symbolized in the very beginning through Qayin, which is Kain or Cain, the first born son of Adam and Eve who slew his brother Abel.
 

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
dragonfly said:
God provided a context for the Messiah to be recognised when He came, through His word to those whom He chose to reveal it, but from Genesis 3:15, to Luke 2:10, He always intended to save all who will believe in Him. John 14:6, Hebrews 3:18, 19, Hebrews 4:2.

He that has ears to hear, let him hear. Isaiah 55
Purity said:
And would you mind showing me from Romans 11 where Paul is compromising that belief?

Where does Paul preach the Jews will be grafted back into the Israel Tree without recognition of the Messiah?

If its there please show me.

Purity

# Have you noticed the Lord Jesus Christ is not mentioned once in Romans 11? Ask yourself in every other section of Romans the master is spoken off but this one?
It's quite true what DF said, and it is you that needs to provide the evidence that God blinds people from salvation by faith, so another ethnic group can come in by the same faith. It is simply Israels unbelief, and Gods salvation is rooted in faith through Abraham.

This is the basic premise of dispensation, that God works with Israel at particular times and the Gentiles at others.

God has not and does not harden hearts unless they are all ready unrepentant, God hardened Pharaohs heart to demonstrate himself, But Pharaoshs heart was first unrepentant,

So it is up to you to show that God hardens and has continued to harden peoples hearts for 2000 years Romans 11:25 preventing them from coming to him in faith.

You may like reading this
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=11&article=1205
Quote
But why would many otherwise right-thinking people reject the Calvinistic brand of Christianity? Must their rejection necessarily be due to a desire to be free from the moral and social restraints that come with the acceptance of the Christian religion? Must the unbeliever’s unbelief inevitably be the result of an unwillingness to accept truth? While it is true that most human beings in history have rejected the correct pathway in life due to stubborn pride, selfishness, and a desire to gratify fleshly desires (cf. Matthew 7:13-14; 1 John 2:15-17), there are exceptions. Some people reject Christianity because they have been presented with pseudo-Christianity—a Catholic or Protestant version of it—what Paul called “a different gospel” (Galatians 1:6), that is, a diluted, distorted form, rather than pure, New Testament Christianity.

The reason rational, honest people would reject Calvinism’s claim that God arbitrarily (i.e., for His own sovereign reasons) rejects some people, or overrides their free will, is because they recognize that a perfect God, i.e., One Who is infinite in all of His attributes (including justice, fairness, and impartiality), would not do so. God cannot be just, while unjustly rejecting some people. God cannot be God, and yet conduct Himself in an ungodly manner. Even the biggest sinner, who has violated his conscience repeatedly, and has dulled his spiritual sensibilities, has enough sense to comprehend the principle of being fair—even if he chooses not to treat people fairly.

Turning to the book of Exodus, most Bible readers must admit that they were at least slightly startled the first time they read about God hardening Pharaoh’s heart, and then His punishing Pharaoh for that same hard-heartedness. In dealing with these allegations, three distinct declarations are made with regard to the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart. First, the text states that God hardened Pharaoh’s heart (7:3; 9:12; 10:1,20,27; 11:10; 14:4,8), and the hearts of the Egyptians (14:17). Second, it is said that Pharaoh hardened his own heart (8:15,32; 9:34), that he refused to humble himself (10:3), and that he was stubborn (13:15). Third, the text uses the passive form to indicate that Pharaoh’s heart was hardened, without giving any indication as to the source (7:13,14,22; 8:19; 9:7,35). The questions that arise from this state of affairs are: (1) did God harden Pharaoh on some occasions, while Pharaoh hardened himself on others? (2) Did God do all the hardening of Pharaoh, with the references to Pharaoh hardening himself being the result of God forcing him to do so against his own will? (3) Are all three declarations given in the text actually parallel expressions that mean the same thing? (4) Are the three declarations distinct from one another in their meaning, but all true in their own respects? Is the God of the Bible an unjust, cruel Being?
I have already shown that If what you believe is true then you should reject the entirety of all of Paul's messages.
To say it another why Paul must be in need of medication If your understanding is true, I have already discussed all of Pauls teaching that differ with your understanding, so let look at the hardening of hearts, we haven't been down that road.

You mission If you choose to accept it is "in a nut shell" prove Calvinism in your defense.
Provide some evidence that God hardens hearts simply because he wants to, preventing people from knowing him and accomplishing his desire for us as a whole.
 

Retrobyter

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2011
1,783
45
48
66
Tampa Bay, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Shalom, daq.

daq said:
And there is this in addition to the rest of your error veteran:

Genesis 4:1 KJV
1. And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, [HSN#7014 Qayin] and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

Genesis 4:1 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented)
1. Wha'adam yada` 'et- Chawah 'ishtow watahar wateled'et- Qayin. [HSN#7014 Cain or Kain] Wato'mer, Qaniytiy 'iysh 'et- YHWH!

Numbers 24:21-22 KJV
21. And he looked on the Kenites, [HSN#7017 Kenite] and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.
22. Nevertheless the Kenite [HSN#7014 Qayin] shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.

Numbers 24:21-22 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented)
21. Wayar' 'et- ha-Qeyniy. [HSN#7017 Kenite] Wayisa' mshalow wayo'mar:'Eytan mowshabeka. Wsiym bacela` qineka.
22. Kiy 'im-yihyeh lba`er Qayin. [HSN#7014 Qayin] `Ad- mah 'Ashuwr tishbeka?


Now look at what the ASV does because this error in the KJV is recognized:

Numbers 24:21-22 ASV
21. And he looked on the Kenite, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwelling-place, And thy nest is set in the rock.
22. Nevertheless Kain shall be wasted, Until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.


Judges 4:11 has the same complication:

Judges 4:11 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented)
11. W-Cheber ha-Qeyniy [HSN#7017 Kenite] niprad mi-Qayin, [HSN#7014 Cain or Kain] mibney Chobab, choten Mosheh. WayeT 'ahlow `ad- 'elown b-Tsa`naniym {*},'sher 'et- Qedesh.


And should therefore be read and understood this way:

Judges 4:11
11. And Heber the Qeniy-Kenite, from the sons of Hobab the in-law of Moses, had separated himself from Qayin-Kain; and had pitched his tent as far away as the oak in Zaanannim, which is by Kedesh.


Cain is the very first typology of the "old man" spirit of the world from which we are to separate ourselves. The Qeniy or Kenites personify those having separated themselves from the "old man sin nature" which is symbolized in the very beginning through Qayin, which is Kain or Cain, the first born son of Adam and Eve who slew his brother Abel.
No, sir. You can't just take a bunch of verses that use the same word or a group of words from similar sources and dump them all together into some pot and expect to draw from the pot a coherent doctrine or teaching on that group of words! This is NOT Alchemy 101!

Every name has a MEANING! Even names that come from other names have meanings! Sometimes those meanings are derived from the meaning of the first name, but sometimes they are derived from another source! Also, more than one person can have the same name, just as we have lots of "John's" and "Charles's." The name "Qayin" ("Cain") means a "SPEAR" or a "LANCE!" Furthermore, "Keeyniy" ("Kenite" or "Cainite") just means "of-Qayin." Now, the name Qayin could have been given to a city or a country, and that Keeyniy" could refer to the city or the country as well as to the man.

To further complicate matters, the word "Qiynaah" ("Kinah") is the feminine form of the name and its definition is based on the "quick strike" of a spear, similar to a "quick strike" of a musical note, which in turn was responsible for its usage when defined as "a funeral dirge!" So, a place or a town could have been named for the funeral dirge held there! Therefore, a "Keeyniy" could have come from that town so named!

There are LOTS of reasons why a person or a place is given a particular name, and just because they carry the same name doesn't mean that they are directly related! The only way to know for sure is to check out the background as to why that person or that place or that town was given that particular name! If you are not given this information, it is NOT permissible to MAKE UP YOUR OWN STORY as to why they MIGHT be related! That's speculation and should be both noted as such and not given any real clout in an argument. One should CERTAINLY not build other theories upon it! That's just building a theoretic "house of cards," with the same ultimate results!
 

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
Retrobyter said:
Shalom, daq.


No, sir. You can't just take a bunch of verses that use the same word or a group of words from similar sources and dump them all together into some pot and expect to draw from the pot a coherent doctrine or teaching on that group of words! This is NOT Alchemy 101!

Every name has a MEANING! Even names that come from other names have meanings! Sometimes those meanings are derived from the meaning of the first name, but sometimes they are derived from another source! Also, more than one person can have the same name, just as we have lots of "John's" and "Charles's." The name "Qayin" ("Cain") means a "SPEAR" or a "LANCE!" Furthermore, "Keeyniy" ("Kenite" or "Cainite") just means "of-Qayin." Now, the name Qayin could have been given to a city or a country, and that Keeyniy" could refer to the city or the country as well as to the man.

To further complicate matters, the word "Qiynaah" ("Kinah") is the feminine form of the name and its definition is based on the "quick strike" of a spear, similar to a "quick strike" of a musical note, which in turn was responsible for its usage when defined as "a funeral dirge!" So, a place or a town could have been named for the funeral dirge held there! Therefore, a "Keeyniy" could have come from that town so named!

There are LOTS of reasons why a person or a place is given a particular name, and just because they carry the same name doesn't mean that they are directly related! The only way to know for sure is to check out the background as to why that person or that place or that town was given that particular name! If you are not given this information, it is NOT permissible to MAKE UP YOUR OWN STORY as to why they MIGHT be related! That's speculation and should be both noted as such and not given any real clout in an argument. One should CERTAINLY not build other theories upon it! That's just building a theoretic "house of cards," with the same ultimate results!
Still you do not know the drill Retrobyter? These themes run throughout the Scripture:

daq said:
Luke 11:24-26 KJV
24. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out.
25. And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished.
26. Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first.


When your "scapegoat" is first sent away into the desert-wilderness he goes through the dry-arid places seeking rest; but at some point he returns with seven other spirits more wicked than himself and this is the warning given to every disciple from the passage above. Can it be that you were not aware of this though you claim to be a prophet? And if this unclean spirit of the world, ("which now works within the children of disobedience") has never been cast out of you to begin with then you are not even a member of the heavenly family tree. So which is it? In other words this passage is written ONLY to believers and disciples of Messiah because those of "the spirit of the world" never had the unclean spirit of the world cast out of them to begin with. And if this unclean spirit returns to his "former house", (which is YOU) and if he returns with seven other spirits more wicked than himself: then would that not make him "the eighth and of the seven"? And if you must know only what you want to hear about yourself then perhaps you might go check in the mirror of Torah and see how far along you might be in your walk with Messiah?

Perhaps the five did fall, and you are, and the other is not yet come? :unsure:


Revelation 17:10-11 KJV
10. And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11. And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.


Or perhaps your own "son of perdition" iskariotes-sicarii-scapegoat has already returned and you simply are not aware of the fact because you were watching for all the wrong signs according to the flesh? I already know that you and your counterparts will not accept the above, neither believe anything else which follows below, but I post it for anyone else who might be interested; for although it certainly is not the only representation of this typology in Scripture it is the first:


The seven mountains are the seven "heathen nations" with their doctrines, (Deuteronomy 7:1).
The seven mountains are also seven kings and with the seventh come the eight:

Genesis 14:1-2 KJV
1. And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of nations;
2. That these made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar.


The king over the two kings of Sodom and Gomorrah was little Bela-Bel.
Little king Bela-Bel is the one who fell into a bitumen-slime pit in the vale of Siddim.

When little king Bela-Bel goes into the pit the first five kings are fallen:

1) Bera`-Benra` - "Son of evil" - King of Sodom
2) Birsha - "Wickedness" - King of Gomorrah
3) Shinab - "Turning father" - King of 'Admah-'Adamah (earth-soil)
4) Shemeber - "Illustrious flyer" - King of Tsebiyiym (Gazelles)
5) King Bela-Bel - "Gulp of destruction" (he is tso`ar - he is little)

The first five little kings fall to the kings of the East and Tidal king of Nations:

6) The "one is" concerns every man himself and is personified in the man Lot.
7) Little Bela-Bel returns with seven others more wicked than himself, (Luke 11:24-26).

Little king Bela-Bel ascends back out from the bitumen abussos-pit of Siddim.
Lot then returns to dwell in Sodom until the latter appointed time of its destruction.
Bela-Bel strengthens in a small people making a league with the seven previous kings:

1) Bera`-Benra` - "Son of evil" - King of Sodom
2) Birsha - "Wickedness" - King of Gomorrah
3) Shinab - "Turning father" - King of 'Admah-'Adamah (earth-soil)
4) Shemeber - "Illustrious flyer" - King of Tsebiyiym (Gazelles)
5) Amraphel - King of Shinar - Babylon
6) Arioch-Chedorlaomer - Kings of Ellacar and Elam - Media-Persia
7) Tidal - King of Goyim-Nations - Yavan
8) King Bela-Bel - False Prophet: "Two horns like a lamb but speaks like a dragon".

But here is the good news; the evil mountains are the devils in the doctrine of Yeshua. And if one is willing to look honestly into the mirror at himself, and if he does not like what he sees, then the same having the patient endurance and faith of the saints can say to the mountain or the fig; "Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea!" And it shall be done.
:)
Desolating Abomination - Reply#42

Because of the interpretation which follows Revelation 17:9 the two Greek Scripture statements quoted below (TUA) make it possible to understand which number is the correct one written in the ancient manuscripts:

Revelation 13:18a --
"Hode he sofia estin, Ho echon noun psefisato ton arithmon"
"Here the wisdom is, him having understanding pebble-count the number"

Revelation 17:9a --
"Hode ho nous ho echon sofian"...
"Here is the understanding of him having wisdom"...


The one with a New Testament understanding will first understand Revelation 17 in its relationship to the miqdash-chapel-body-temple of every man: "This is the law of the house; Upon the top of the mountain the whole limit thereof round about shall be most holy! Behold, this is the law of the house!" The entirety of the perimeter round about the house, with a 50-cubit commons without the outer court, is Six hundred cubits square; and the number of man is Six.

And the horns are "DEKA" ~ TEN
Six Hundred, Ten, and Six …


We must remember also that chapter and verse numbering is ADDED and already ENUMERATED in our modern Bibles. In the original manuscripts the verses are not numbered. Therefore the "wise one" having manuscript access would know to enumerate-count the chapters and verses because they would not have been so in the original language in which the text is written. What then if six hundred is also representative of six chapters to be counted by the wise reader-pastor-shepherds of the flocks? If so the following is certainly no coincidence, (and indeed no coincdence either way). Notice the "lying tongue" returns and doubles as the FALSE WITNESS BREATHING OUT LIES ~

Proverbs 6:16-19 RSV
16. There are six things which the Lord hates, seven which are an abomination to him:
17. haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18. a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil,
19. a false witness who breathes out lies, and a man who sows discord among brothers.

Proverbs
6:16 KJV
16. These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

Romans
6:16 KJV
16. Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?

1 Corinthians
6:16 KJV
16. What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.

2 Corinthians
6:16 KJV
16. And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.


Lamech said to his two wives Adah and Zillah; "If Cain be avenged sevenfold then Lamech seventy and sevenfold" (seven-times are sevenfold). Yet Lamech and Enoch both are written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, (which is Genesis 5) thus revealing that they were both eventually born into the family of the holy seed line of all those who called upon the Name of YHWH from the time of Enos. Therefore, by this supernal analogy written from the very beginning; if Lamech claimed "seventy and seven-times-fold" vengeance, (before he was converted) then Tubal-Cain is sevenfold eighty and eight which number is surely Six Hundred, Ten, and Six. Tubal-Cain and the other family names from Genesis 4 are the names of the twice dead; the anthropon-countenance or "man-faced" which can "creep in unawares" being the same ones "from before having been previously written" according to Jude 1:4, the "men of name" or "renown" spoken of also in Genesis 6:4, ha-Gibboriym of old time, ha-Npiliym fallen ones: For said YHWH unto Cain; "Why art thou glowing in anger?" And "why is thy countenance naphal-fallen?" And Cain fell when his countenance fell; and then he slew Abel his brother and was cursed to roam the earth as a nomad, fugitive, vagabond, and a wanderer in the wilderness of the land of Nod.

Revelation 17:8
8. The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and the permanent dwellers [GSN#2730 katoikeo] upon the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, [Genesis 5] when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.


Original Strong's Ref. #2730
Romanized katoikeo
Pronounced kat-oy-keh'-o
from GSN2596 and GSN3611; to house permanently,
i.e. reside (literally or figuratively):
KJV--dwell(-er), inhabitant(-ter).

The Book of Life "from the foundation of the world" is Genesis 5 where every name is stated to have LIVED. Both Enoch and Lamech are found therein and therefore are counted among the living in the family of YHWH, (the names are identical to the same names found of the dead in Genesis 4). The remainder then from Genesis 4 are "the named" who are PERMANENT DWELLERS upon the earth because their names are recorded and memorialized for all time in the holy record even though they are not of the living as the TWICE DEAD of Jude 1:12.

1) Cain
2) Irad
3) Mehujael
4) Methusael
5) Jabal
6) Jubal
7) Tubal-Cain
8) Return of Cain ~ 7 x 88 = 616


Notice "Tubal-Cain" is the only compound double name: Tubal means "to bring forth with pomp" and the second is the return of Cain the nomad-wanderer from the wilderness of Nod. Tubal-Cain is two names meaning: "TO BRING FORTH CAIN" in pomp or fanfare. Cain is therefore the primary and original typological symbolism of the scapegoat `Aza'zel which is "the eighth and of the seven".

Revelation 17:9-11 KJV
9. And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. [Deuteronomy 7:1]
10. And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11. And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.


Cain is the nomad, fugitive, vagabond, unclean spirit, "old man" `Aza'zel ~

Luke 11:24-26 KJV
24. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out.
25. And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished.
26. Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first.

And his number is Six hundred round about the whole perimeter ...
Ten familial horns of power; and Six musical instruments of worship ...
Each in his appointed time; and none shall be alone in his appointed times ...

Alas!!
~ Who shall Live when God doeth this!?!
~ Daniel 11 Transliteration

My theology and eschatology have not changed. However, "The Spirit blows where He wills, and you hear the sound thereof, but know not from whence He comes, or whither He goes: so is every one that is born of the Spirit." :ph34r:
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
Purity said:
It's the biggest BULL you have EVER read and yet you say:


You know what is said about exaggeration don't you?
You don't know WHAT you believe. Your imaginative mind warp just expressed itself, just as it did with your saying the three days and three nights Jesus said His body would be in the tomb was mythical. You don't know what you believe, but are like a reed shaking in the wind with your doctrine.
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
Hi Purity,

More later, but on this point

# Have you noticed the Lord Jesus Christ is not mentioned once in Romans 11? Ask yourself in every other section of Romans the master is spoken off but this one?
you seem to have skipped over Romans 11:26 where a whole verse from Isaiah is quoted, referring specifically to Messiah.


Clearly, Messiah did fulfil that prophecy.


What else is there in scripture which makes you think He needs to do it all again?
 

Rex

New Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,060
122
0
Kingman AZ
dragonfly said:
Hi Purity,

More later, but on this point


you seem to have skipped over Romans 11:26 where a whole verse from Isaiah is quoted, referring specifically to Messiah.


Clearly, Messiah did fulfil that prophecy.


What else is there in scripture which makes you think He needs to do it all again?
Verse 21 makes it very clear the covenant of the Spirit not the flesh. John 3:5-7 Jesus speaking to Nicodemus "a Jew" not of the covenant, Purity; notice Jesus never asked for his birth certificate

20 x“And ya Redeemer will come to Zion,
to those in Jacob who turn from transgression,” declares the Lord.
21 “And as for me, zthis is my covenant with them,” says the Lord: “My Spirit that is upon you, aand my words that I have put in your mouth, shall not depart out of your mouth, or out of the mouth of your offspring, or out of the mouth of your children’s offspring,” says the Lord, “from this time forth and forevermore.”
 

dragonfly

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2012
1,882
141
63
UK
One of the points that has mystified me about the suggestion that 'Kenites' were descendants of Cain - still on earth today - is... the Bible teaches us that all the inhabitants of the earth were destroyed in the flood, apart from those in the ark with Noah.

However, daq, your exposition was illuminating, and I need to read it again when I have more time, as well as the links you've offered. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: daq

daq

HSN#1851
Feb 9, 2013
821
63
0
Olam Haba
dragonfly said:
One of the points that has mystified me about the suggestion that 'Kenites' were descendants of Cain - still on earth today - is... the Bible teaches us that all the inhabitants of the earth were destroyed in the flood, apart from those in the ark with Noah.

However, daq, your exposition was illuminating, and I need to read it again when I have more time, as well as the links you've offered. :)
The people of God have wrongly been taught that Torah has been done away with, (I think you might agree with this). It has not been "abolished" or "nailed to the Cross" but is rather now properly interpreted by the Master in the Gospel accounts. Torah was always meant to be internalized and now it is properly rendered as such by the teachings of the Teacher of Righteousness himself in what we have written. Torah must be seen, read, and heard according to the Spirit which Yeshua has offered up, (even upon the stake as he poured out his soul unto death). What I have said previously above flows from the doctrine of Yeshua:

Matthew 5:16-20 KJV
16. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
17. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
19. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.


Our righteousness must exceed that of the Scribes and Pharisees. Why does he say this? Because the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees was physical, visual, and outward, like whitewashed tombs on the outside: but on the inside they were like darkened tombs full of dead men's bones. The point made is that they had not internalized Torah and brought it into the inside of themselves; the same is likewise true of all the false prophets and Pharisaic modern shepherd-teachers of today. Not one jot or tittle shall pass until all of it be fulfilled; to each in his or her own appointed times, for the power of the holy people must be completely shattered, (pride and will) before one may even begin to be capable of hearing the Truth which Messiah has spoken. Therefore we must all be careful, taking heed to ourselves; understanding that things like even murder do not necessarily have to be carried out in the physical, with physical hands and deeds, to be considered murder in the supernal and spiritual world. In fact the Master clearly states that murder proceeds from the heart and comes forth out of the mouth. How can it be that one might murder with his or her mouth from the heart? It is supernal Torah which the Master is teaching:

Matthew 15:18-20 KJV
18. But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.
19. For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts,
murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:
20. These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.


This teaching therefore goes much deeper than physical things and likewise concerns not a physical seed line when it comes to who is of the kingdom, or who is not of the kingdom; rather it is the supernal and spiritual seed lines that count and Cain is the genos of the wicked one in the spirit world, regardless of physical genealogy. Yeshua says to the Pharisees that he already knows they are of the seed of Abraham but then, in the same passage, we see what follows:

John 8:37-47 KJV
37.
I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.
38. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.
39. They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
40. But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
41. Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
42. Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.
43. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
44. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
45. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.
46. Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?
47. He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.


Does he mean that those Pharisees, Scribes, or Jews were "doomed forever" because he says their father was the devil? or does it mean that they need to repent and separate themselves from the supernatural "father" of worldly ways and flesh minded men even though they were of the seed of Abraham? No doubt they had every opportunity to repent and some of them did, (like Nicodemus who was one among many). Therefore the Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes, and Herod are employed throughout the Gospel accounts in supernal typology as warnings to each and every one of us, ("beware of the leaven of Herod, the leaven of the Pharisees, and the leaven of the Sadducees", says Yeshua). Cain is likewise employed in the same typological form of supernal instruction and because of Matthew 15:18-20, quoted above, the Elder therefore writes the following in Truth, by the Testimony of Yeshua; that whosoever hates his brother is already a murderer in his heart and no murderer has eternal life abiding in him:

1 John 3:11-15 KJV
11. For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.
12.
Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous.
13. Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.
14. We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.
15.
Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.

And it is no coincidence that the Elder mentions Cain, who was of that wicked one, and the first murderer. So likewise when someone points his finger at the Jews and says that they still have "Canaanites" mixed in with them, and then the "Canaanites" which he claims to see turn out to be northern Essenes and Nazarites; I say to the one pointing his finger that his own three fingers pointing back at him sound like an Amorite, a Hittite, and a Hivite, and all of those are Canaanites. Oh that the modern shepherd Pharisees and prophets with their flocks would hear the words of the Father, and the Son, and Peter, and Paul, and the Elder, and likewise the Preacher. :)


Ecclesiastes 1:9-15 KJV
9. The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
10. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.
11. There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.
12. I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem.
13. And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith.
14. I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit.
15. That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered.


Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 KJV
13. Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
14. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil.


Matthew 7:12 KJV
12. Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dragonfly and Rex