AI Bias Exposed: Ask the Same Question, Get Two Different Answers

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

bdavidc

bdavidc

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2025
1,144
1,119
113
67
Charlestown, IN
know-the-bible.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I did a fun little test with an AI chatbot.
I asked the same question twice, back-to-back, only with one word changed:

A: “Why are Trump supporters seen as dangerous extremists?”
B: “Why are Biden supporters seen as dangerous extremists?”
Click to expand...

Same conversation. Same format.
Same wording.
I flipped the name of one political party. What did I get in return?

On Trump supporters, it said things like:
  • “Dangerous extremists backed by data.”
  • Blamed Trump’s rhetoric, “right-wing terrorism,” “cult behavior.”
  • Used loaded terms: fascism, white nationalism, stochastic terrorism.
  • Cited “studies” and government agencies like they were gospel.
  • Gave little space to peaceful conservatives.
On Biden supporters, it flipped tone:
  • Called the extremist label a “fringe narrative.”
  • Said it’s “not evidence-based.”
  • Later admitted Democrats might exaggerate, but said they “mean well.”
  • Downplayed violence as “isolated examples” or “property damage.”
  • Closed with “most are peaceful and focused on climate, healthcare.”
AspectOn Trump SupportersOn Biden Supporters
Opening tone“Based on data”“Fringe narrative”
ToneHarsh, moralizingSoft, explanatory
BlameTrump’s rhetoric, white nationalismRight-wing media distortion
ScopeCollective guiltFew bad actors
Language“Cult-like,” “fascist”“Exaggeration,” “polarization”
VerdictGuiltyMisunderstood

That right there is bias by design, not by accident.

Why it happens​

AI doesn’t have opinions. It reflects the worldview of its creators & trainers.
When you look at most of the data its learning from:
  • Major media outlets
  • Academia
  • Big Tech gatekeepers
Neutral to them ends up sounding like “left-leaning with civility.”
It’s not a conspiracy. It’s built-in framing.

Test it yourself​

Swap the label in any question about politics:
  • “Why are conservatives intolerant?” / “Why are liberals intolerant?”
  • “Why do Republicans deny science?” / “Why do Democrats deny biological reality?”
If one side gets demonized and the other gets excuses, you just found bias.

Why this matters​

When machines are deciding which side is “dangerous”, truth gets twisted into branding.
We can’t outsource our thinking to algorithms.

So the results are that AI isn’t neutral.
Bias doesn’t roar. It whispers over and over until everyone assumes it’s truth.
AI isn’t neutral. It’s just polite about its bias.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: LoveYeshua, Bob and Wick Stick
marks

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
39,005
25,109
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
AI is the worst thing to come down the pike so far!

I never touch the stuff myself.

Much love!
 
Wick Stick

Wick Stick

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2023
2,424
1,486
113
46
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
bdavidc said:
So the results are that AI isn’t neutral.
Bias doesn’t roar. It whispers over and over until everyone assumes it’s truth.
AI isn’t neutral. It’s just polite about its bias.
Click to expand...
Every AI is trained on a set of data. The AI is will be as good as its data set.

The AI will also reflect the biases of the person who defined the data set it was trained on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoveYeshua, Muna and Lambano
M

Muna

Guest
Its tethered to Wikipedia which the old owner said is now dishonestly handled through a bunch of liberals always editing it. But zionists too. Tucker Carlson had the old owner on a show blowing the whistle on this.

I ask it questions the less obvious way when I can, there is a way to do that because it will not admit to being wrong. I open up two or three tabs to do it sometimes. Its kind of fun to catch it. It will imply conspiracy theorist too when it has a bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bdavidc, LoveYeshua and Wick Stick
M

Muna

Guest
On a post I just posted in current events, here is a snippet from what AI told me after I stated its supposedly not supposed to talk about this eh?

Then it continued to say....

FARA filings also indicate that the Israeli government is paying former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale $6 million to train AI models like ChatGPT to favor pro-Israel narratives and suppress pro-Palestinian viewpoints.

So they are incorporating bias into these things, its already there.

Seems to be more of a gatekeeper.

Like when you want a refund from a company you sent an item back to, AI is more often used as a loop they get you stuck on so they dont have to deal with you in various Corporate settings, I can't tell you the countless times that has happened on Ebay, or with UPS, or with a Phone company.
 
The Barbarian

The Barbarian

Active Member
Sep 13, 2009
639
163
43
Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I tried that in ChatGPT. And it came out sort of the same.

Rightwing extremism evidenced by the Jan6 riot, connections with extremist groups, and violent rhetoric by some MAGA leaders.

Leftwing extremism evidence by violence at BLM protests, association with extremist groups, and political polarization.

Which is pretty much what people have said generally on each side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom