Do you believe in biological evolution?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Barbarian

Active Member
Sep 13, 2009
553
126
43
Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
gen 1:1 In the beginning "SCIENCE" created the heavens and the earth...?

Ps 19:1 the heavens declare the glory of "SCIENCE"?

whatever!
See, that's the issue. Science assumes the universe exists, but doesn't say anything about how it started. That's a religious question. Science only deals with the universe as it is, and it can neither assert nor deny a creator. Science can't do that, but scientists can.
 
May 7, 2026
178
51
28
55
ok
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
See, that's the issue. Science assumes the universe exists, but doesn't say anything about how it started. That's a religious question. Science only deals with the universe as it is, and it can neither assert nor deny a creator. Science can't do that, but scientists can.
you right!

another problem is how often theoretical science has been wrong!

scientists now believe...

IOW they were wrong!

in the 1950's they were warning of a coming mini ice age by the 1970's OOPS!

thks
 

The Barbarian

Active Member
Sep 13, 2009
553
126
43
Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
in the 1950's they were warning of a coming mini ice age by the 1970's
Someone took advantage of your trust in them...

THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS

Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

Yep. It's especially good to check stories when you really want them to be true. Saves me a lot of embarrassment. It could work for you, too.
 
May 7, 2026
178
51
28
55
ok
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Someone took advantage of your trust in them...

THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS

Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.


Yep. It's especially good to check stories when you really want them to be true. Saves me a lot of embarrassment. It could work for you, too.
there was a scientist on the groucho show "you bet your life" in the 50's it was real! you can still get it on youtube
 

The Barbarian

Active Member
Sep 13, 2009
553
126
43
Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml


Yep. It's especially good to check stories when you really want them to be true. Saves me a lot of embarrassment. It could work for you, too.

there was a scientist on the groucho show "you bet your life" in the 50's it was real! you can still get it on youtube
Much as I admire Groucho Marx, I prefer to get my information from real climatologists. It is possible that Groucho found one of the few climatologist who actually thought cooling was a possible trend. More likely, it was a scientist from some other discipline, as there were few climatologists at the time. As the data I showed you indicates, even in the early 70s, there were still a few climate scientists who suspected cooling was coming.

Not very many though. And as the data accumulated, there were fewer and fewer of them. The fifties, when climatology was just developing, likely had less consensus. But you can see, by the early 70s, the consensus was for warming.

1779413791828.png
 
Last edited:
May 7, 2026
178
51
28
55
ok
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml


Yep. It's especially good to check stories when you really want them to be true. Saves me a lot of embarrassment. It could work for you, too.


Much as I admire Groucho Marx, I prefer to get my information from real climatologists. It is possible that Groucho found one of the few climatologist who actually thought cooling was a possible trend. More likely, it was a scientist from some other discipline, as there were few climatologists at the time. As the data I showed you indicates, even in the early 70s, there were still a few climate scientists who suspected cooling was coming.

Not very many though. And as the data accumulated, there were fewer and fewer of them. The fifties, when climatology was just developing, likely had less consensus. But you can see, by the early 70s, the consensus was for warming.

View attachment 84451
I did not say groucho was the source I said a scientist on his show
 

The Barbarian

Active Member
Sep 13, 2009
553
126
43
Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I did not say groucho was the source I said a scientist on his show
Yeah, I see that. And it's possible that Groucho just happened to find one of those very few climatologists who didn't predict today's warming. Thanks for pointing that out.
 

rockytopva

Mod
Staff member
Dec 31, 2010
6,524
3,389
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
IF E = mc2 then we can divide and conclude...

Mass (m) = Energy (E/c2) --- Making this eternal stuff... All mass is basically cooled plasma... It would take quite the mind to create living organisms out of plasma energy!

Atoms - Encapsulated forms of energy and light - C2 in the denominator makes for the potential of a lot of energy!
Cells - Trillions of atoms within a single cell
Body - Trillions of cells in a human body

How to explain the creation of the eye? In which is unique for every creature. Get the eye wrong and the poor creature is in for some major problems!

1779465290477.png
 

rockytopva

Mod
Staff member
Dec 31, 2010
6,524
3,389
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
IF E = mc2 then we can divide and conclude...

Mass (m) = Energy (E/c2) --- Making this eternal stuff... All mass is basically cooled plasma... It would take quite the mind to create living organisms out of plasma energy!

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. - Genesis 1:2-3

Noting God moved on the face of mass before giving the command to turn that mass into plasma (Let there be light!). My question is how long it took the plasma energy to cool into the known universe. Day one had not started before the morning and evening of the first day. Time as we know it was not measured. Could it have been what we call light years before the morning and evening of the first day?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armour of God