A View on Nato & End Times

JAVIER SOLANA AND THE END TIMES By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.September 6, 2006NewsWithViews.comTHE HOLY BIBLE makes it clear that no one knows for sure the hour or the day of Christ's return in the End Times, but the current convergence of events may be one of the signs we are in the latter days. Relevant to this, one might take note of the activities of Javier Solana de Madariaga of Spain, whom I recently described in a NewsWithViews column about the Dialectic. Solana's grandfather was Salvador de Madariaga, who was chief of the League of Nations' Disarmament Section, Spanish Ambassador to the U.S., and militated for a united and integrated Europe. As previously indicated, Rhodes scholars Bill Clinton, Strobe Talbott, and Richard Gardner were largely responsible for Solana's appointment as head of NATO in 1995. Currently, he is Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union (EU), and responsible for coordinating its military and foreign policy as well. On November 20, 1999, he also became Secretary-General of the Council of the Western European Union (WEU). According to attorney Constance Cumbey, an expert on Solana, the EU was pushed by the World Federalists beginning in the late 1940s as part of a movement toward regionalization leading to a world government. President Clinton in 1993 wrote a letter to the World Federalist Association supporting world government (see letter here). And on October 17, 1997, he stated to reporters in Buenos Aires: "What I'm trying to do is to promote a process of reorganization of the world so that human beings are organized in a way that takes advantage of the new opportunities of this era....If we can prove that you can merge integrated economies and integrated democracies, then we'll be more likely to build a global system of this kind." This "integration" of nations and their economies is an important part of Cecil Rhodes' plan "to take the government of the whole world," and Javier Solana has played a key role regarding European integration. He has also been a key player in the Middle Eastern peace process, with the "carrot" of a Mediterranean Free Trade Zone (including the availability of Libyan oil) by 2010 held out to participants. The year 2010 also happens to be when the North American Union (integrating the U.S., Canada and Mexico) is to come into existence with a new currency called the Amero. You are probably saying Americans would never allow our country to be absorbed into a Union with 2 other countries. Actually, you will have nothing to say about it. The Amero will be adopted when the U.S. currency goes in the tank. And if you don't believe that can happen, just look at Laurence Kotlikoff's paper, "Is the United States Bankrupt?", in the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis REVIEW (July/August 2006), which concludes "that countries can go broke" and "that the United States is going broke." When the dollar dives, it eventually will be replaced by the Amero, which will then be replaced by the new world currency called the Phoenix in 2018 (see this new currency on the cover of THE ECONOMIST, January 9, 1988). Regarding the current conflict in the Middle East, I have previously mentioned that according to a 1952 map, Sri Lankans are supposed to police this region when a world government is formed. And you may be interested to learn that 40% of the domestic servants in Lebanon today are Sri Lankans. At this point, you might be saying Israel will never compromise its national sovereignty and be brought under a world government. But do you really think Israel went as far as it wanted to go in its attack against Hezbollah in Lebanon? No, it didn't, and it was because of strong pressure for a cease fire brought to bear by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Solana, who have been traveling together recently. Just before Solana became head of NATO in December 1995, he structured the Barcelona conference for peace in the Middle East. According to Constance Cumbey, the resulting peace process goes into effect January 2007, and is a 7-year program which is reviewable midway (three years and six months). Does this sound Biblical? Remember that Daniel 9:27 foretold the breaking of a covenant with Israel in the middle of 7 weeks (symbolic of 7 years) with ensuing desolation in the End Times. In the early 1960s, Lincoln Bloomfield prepared Study Memorandum No. 7 for Rhodes scholar Secretary of State Dean Rusk saying that "if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government." Applying this to the Middle East today, the strategy is "if the radical Muslim dynamic was greatly abated, Israel might lose whatever incentive it has for world government." Could this be why Israel is being prevented from crushing Hezbollah? In the midst of the confrontations between Israel and radical Muslims (e.g., Hezbollah, Hamas, etc.), Javier Solana appeared, presenting himself to the Israelis as their friend. However, he was also quoted in the JERUSALEM POST (June 6, 2006) as remarking: "The EU continues to be the most important donor to the Palestinians....We will not let the Palestinians down." The Palestinians elected Hamas to lead their government. Solana played an important part in negotiating a cease fire between Israel and Hezbollah, but I predict the cease fire will not last. Remember that 1Thessalonians 5:3 states: "For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them." Solana's ambition is global, as he has also signed treaties with Argentina, Chile and Canada. The ultimate goal, as I have written many times before, is a World Socialist Government. And according to Constance Cumbey, many of Solana's planning sessions have occurred at the London School of Economics, which was founded by the Fabian Socialists. Cumbey also said Solana has made clear his rejection of the concept "In God We Trust." Is this relevant to the fact that the WEU, which Solana heads, has 10 nations, and Revelation 17: 12-14 reveals that in the End Times, 10 kings will give their power and strength to the beast, who makes war against The Lamb of God, Jesus Christ? more:http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis75.htm