hmm. Well, God has the truth, we assume that, and for all of our "the truth was given to the Apostles," i notice that Christ gave explicit instructions to the 12, and then to the 72, i can read where they are "passed down," yet no Christian i can talk to ever seems to have followed them; and we most likely cannot even agree on the definition of "Gospel," so i guess that depends upon one's pov. If one cannot follow Instruction #1, then i guess confusion is going to follow. The truth is right next to us, but i doubt anyone much wants to hear it lol. So no, i don't suggest any of those things, or i didn't mean to. Our present condition must be laid at the feet of those who purport to lead us, as Christians; our current and past leaders. That is the truth. You can know the truth, but of course you cannot state it from Scripture, in the form of a doctrine, was my point. The truth that there is an equally Scriptural, competing doctrine that is equally unassailable is the truth. And so we are provided a choice, to recognize that all truth is subjective, and that we have no "proof" for any pov that might take our fancy, because the truth is a moving target, alive, and is different in different situations--to soften our hearts, iow--or to insist that truth is objective, and the only correct way to perceive truth is to perceive it from our pov, making ourselves into God, by insisting that we know.
You make "Anarchist" into a curse, when God commands you to be an Anarchist, and to pledge allegiance to no earthly ruler. And this, this corrupting of your definition of the word "Anarchist," so that you do not even know what it means anymore, no offense, so that you can feel ok about ignoring 1Sam8--generally speaking, now, as i don't know you, of course, but your definition indicates this--and can more comfortably assure people that, what, in your case, i guess it goes something along the lines of "join the RCC or be doomed," perhaps, i don't know there. Join some group of blind people in some belief, that we know for a fact is the truth, because after all, we joined it. And look, we are "successful."
So, i find this characterization of truth as being already discovered by some people, and well known, who purport to have it straight from the Apostles, but cannot witness even following Instruction #1, to be mostly self-serving yack, that keeps blind people blind and fills offering plates, and little else, wadr. I know you mean well, and you might even have a better heart than i do, but if i am being invited to know truth, and to then declare how objective it is, then my question is which doctrine of yours do you find unassailable, when held up to Scripture that you insist has given you this truth? Let's see what the truth really is, as the Book illuminates it, and i'll let you pick the subject, ok. any doctrine that you like, any doctrine that you hold dear.