Thoughts on Church Unity

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

amadeus

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2008
22,464
31,590
113
80
Oklahoma
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Dear Pia,

What happens when the Holy Spirit teaches me something different then he teaches you?

Curious Mary
People do quench the Holy Spirit of God and for this reason sometimes draw conclusions which differ one from another while each claims to have received his teaching from God. The solution is not to argue or run each other down but to lay it before God. If an answer is really needed as God sees it, He will not fail to provide it.

"Quench not the Spirit." I Thess 5:19
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helen and Pisteuo

Marymog

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
11,397
1,672
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
People do quench the Holy Spirit of God and for this reason sometimes draw conclusions which differ one from another while each claims to have received his teaching from God. The solution is not to argue or run each other down but to lay it before God. If an answer is really needed as God sees it, He will not fail to provide it."Quench not the Spirit." I Thess 5:19

Hi Amadeus,

I have laid before God the teachings and what I have received is that He has said that Pia is wrong.

I am not arguing with her....I HAVE received His teaching and passed them to her. She just won't accept it.

What should I do?

Mary
 

amadeus

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2008
22,464
31,590
113
80
Oklahoma
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Hi Amadeus,

I have laid before God the teachings and what I have received is that He has said that Pia is wrong.

I am not arguing with her....I HAVE received His teaching and passed them to her. She just won't accept it.

What should I do?

Mary
If it did come from God and you have done what He told you do with it, why do you need to do anything else? Only God changes people when people allow it, it God sees that a change is needed. Perhaps then on this point it is simply time to move on to His next job for you..
 

Marymog

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
11,397
1,672
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If it did come from God and you have done what He told you do with it, why do you need to do anything else? Only God changes people when people allow it, it God sees that a change is needed. Perhaps then on this point it is simply time to move on to His next job for you..
Hi Amadeus,

There have been things that have come from God (Holy Spirit) to me that other Christians (including Pia) disagree with. How do I know who is right? Them or me?

They say that God has spoken to them and that I am wrong. I KNOW that God has spoken to me so I feel I am right.

Who is right? Them or me?

Mary
 

Job

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
2,664
1,309
113
somewhere
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are the one who said...


Yes Mary, I'm the one who said I would not discuss this..........and I meant it.



I don't' make the mistake of joining the wrong church.


Then you should go and watch all the videos I posted in the "Catholic" thread. If they don't deter you from joining the RCC, nothing will.


This is my final post on this issue.

Please respect that Mary.


k
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
do priests forgive sins? for whatever reason i can't seem to get an answer to this.

and history seems to be replete with examples of bad doctrine, too, doesn't it? It would so refreshing to hear a Catholic actually confront some of this. Where do you find confession of your sins to some guy in a closet and penance in Scripture? and in the same breath you want to assert infallible doctrine, essentially a demand for everyone else to believe it, too?

Great question. Confession to a priest has a couple of purposes.

1. It is based on Jesus's command to his disciples to go forth and heal the sick and forgive sins.
2. It is an imitation of Christ, who healed and forgave sins - see Mathew 9.
3. The Catholic Church teaches that we need to reconcile with the Body of Christ when we sin - in essence we are asking our brothers and sisters to forgive us and experiencing their forgiveness and acceptance. In the early church people confessed their sins in front of the whole church and asked for forgiveness - later, it was changed to private confession.
4. Catholics are taught to confess their sins to God before going to confession with a priest - the priest provides earthly confirmation of Gods and the Churches forgiveness and reconciliation.

Before I was Catholic, I thought confession would be awkward, uncomfortable and redundant. It is actually, an awesome experience to hear how much a God loves you and how much the church loves you. Many Protestants have recognized the benefits of having a prayer partner and confessing sins for accountability.
 

Helen

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
15,476
21,157
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I have laid before God the teachings and what I have received is that He has said that Pia is wrong.

That is quite amazing...because when ever I ask God about someone else, or what that person believes...He never ever says:- " They are wrong"...He always says to me. ." What is that to you, you follow ME."

So here we have another instant where God says one thing to one person and something else to another!!
 

Marymog

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
11,397
1,672
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes Mary, I'm the one who said I would not discuss this..........and I meant it.

Then you should go and watch all the videos I posted in the "Catholic" thread. If they don't deter you from joining the RCC, nothing will.

This is my final post on this issue.

Please respect that Mary.
I respect you and your final post.

I am just trying to find out these "strict policies" that u are taking about. You said they were there. I can't find them.

Mary
 
Last edited:

Marymog

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
11,397
1,672
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes Mary, I'm the one who said I would not discuss this..........and I meant it.

Then you should go and watch all the videos I posted in the "Catholic" thread. If they don't deter you from joining the RCC, nothing will.

This is my final post on this issue.

Please respect that Mary.
I respect you and your final post.

I am just trying to find out these "strict policies" that u are taking about. You said they are there, but I can't find them.

Mary
 

Armadillo

Well-Known Member
Aug 11, 2017
430
315
63
Ontario
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Marymog said, They say that God has spoken to them and that I am wrong. I KNOW that God has spoken to me so I feel I am right.

Who is right? Them or me?


A good rule of thumb, if you want to know God has spoken to you or not, is to ask yourself this question, "Did God speak to me out of the right Covenant?" You can know if what is said can be trusted and true if it came out of the right Covenant and you could also read 1 Corinthians 14 and John 16 to know who God likes to talk about to you.
 

amadeus

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2008
22,464
31,590
113
80
Oklahoma
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Hi Amadeus,

There have been things that have come from God (Holy Spirit) to me that other Christians (including Pia) disagree with. How do I know who is right? Them or me?

They say that God has spoken to them and that I am wrong. I KNOW that God has spoken to me so I feel I am right.

Who is right? Them or me?

Mary
You must go with what is in your heart. Our problem sometime is that we listen to God, but don't listen long enough. When we stopped listening, had He already finished talking?

As to who is right, consider that we, we believers that is, are all likely at different levels in our walk with Him. Our understanding of what He says is geared to where we are at the moment at what the situation is. Only God always knows all of the details about everyone. Consider the following conversation between the Lord and Ananias:

"Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem:
And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name.
But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake." Acts 9:13-16

Ananias was a faithful follower of the Lord, but he questioned God because he knew the history of Paul and what he knew was not good. God set him straight about how Paul was a chosen vessel of God. Ananias was a good man, but in this case he was partially blind and therefore wrong.

When we disagree with a brother or sister in the Lord on beliefs, we need to immerse ourselves in the most important thing, which Paul was later to clarify: charity [love] as per I Cor 13:4-7. That is to say we don't go for the arm twisting sessions to win another over to our way of thinking, but simply walk the walk as we are led by the Holy Spirit and don't worry so much about what appears to be wrong in the other guy. Pray for one another and God will handle the situation moving each one into his/her place within the Body of Christ. The key to that, I believe, is "charity" and "surrender".

Remember also the writing of Solomon here:

"Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts." Prov 21:2

So should we likewise seek to ponder the hearts of others more even than putting so much emphasis on their doctrines and beliefs that may differ from ours. Who has it all right all of the time? Jesus is the only one that I know who walked in flesh as a man and had it all right all of the time. We should be on the approach to where Jesus was as a man, but we are not yet at the end of our road. We are not yet finished growing in Him and toward Him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FHII and Helen

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
My roots are sin, and I do go and sin no more.
If all do not speak the same, we do not all speak the same. But those who speak the same, speak the same because they are One.
If you think you are one in doctrine, you are deluding yourself.
He did not say "unity" but "love" (one another), but I understand your point. What you describe is the world seeing the world as being lost, which it is. But the world within or without the church can still see the truth and the love among the remnants. "Seek and you shall find."
I never said you couldn't. I said division was anathema in the NT.
The Incarnation was the event in salvation history that raised matter to previously unknown heights. All created matter was “good” from the start (Gen 1:25), but was “glorified” by the Incarnation.

Ritual and “physicality” were not abolished by the coming of Christ. Quite the contrary: it was the Incarnation that fully established sacramentalism as a principle in the Christian religion. The latter may be defined as the belief that matter can convey grace. It’s really that simple, at bottom, or in essence. God uses matter both to help us live better lives (sanctification) and to ultimately save us (regeneration and justification), starting with baptism itself. So when you say "world", do you mean physicality or those whom you deem as unsaved?

Yes, and so we do. Therefore, we reject those whom chose to follow a man, instead of the spirit of God: the rock, instead of the Rock.
Pastors, priests and bishops are "man", aren't they?

Hebrews 13:17 "Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you."
Doers the Spirit of God, the Rock, tell you to ignore this verse?

So, then you protest the protesters, and do not even know that they/we rejected you first...which then became a movement in God's good time.
That makes no sense. For they/you to reject us first, you would have to be there from the beginning. So you play games with history to force fit it into your preconceptions.
We dispense of nothing, but have always been hidden in Christ, our Rock.
Does this mean you would accept the the Early Church Fathers general consensus on doctrinal issues before there was a Bible? What grounds do you claim they were not in Christ, the Rock, when the ECF canonized the Bible? After all, they were "men". What disturbs you is that none of them were Protestants.
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So, is it paramount for a person to have a correct understanding of Christian doctrine or are people allowed to pursue Christ and learn to love others, while understanding of doctrine grows over time?
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
in essence we are asking our brothers and sisters to forgive us and experiencing their forgiveness and acceptance.
in essence it seems to me that that is exactly what is being avoided though, with all due respect. Not that Protestants have exactly picked up a dropped torch there or anything either.
In the early church people confessed their sins in front of the whole church and asked for forgiveness - later, it was changed to private confession.
4. Catholics are taught to confess their sins to God before going to confession with a priest - the priest provides earthly confirmation of Gods and the Churches forgiveness and reconciliation.
ok, well none of these is "confess your sins to each other" much in my interp anyway, save perhaps the "in front of the whole congregation" thing that just warps the concept another direction imo.

Seems like a whole lot of contortions going on to spare peoples' pride, and the person who is wronged gets no remedy, seems to me? There is no directive to make it right with the offended party? Do some "penance" and God will forgive you? Where is this in the Book?
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Many Protestants have recognized the benefits of having a prayer partner and confessing sins for accountability.
imo they are in the same boat, and have no Scriptural backing for their position, actually going directly against Scripture @ "prayer partner" too, as well as "if your brother sins, first go to them in private," etc. even if that is from the pov of the offended.

And i notice that for the most part if an apology is ever offered--usually because the offense was so public as to make some gesture necessary, not that they want to do it--it comes out so syrupy-religious that the offended party feels they are attending a lecture instead of an act of contrition. I am reminded of nothing so much as a corporation settling without admitting guilt tbh.
 

ScottA

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2011
11,741
5,593
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you think you are one in doctrine, you are deluding yourself.
What doctrine? We do not believe only, but know the Truth.
I never said you couldn't. I said division was anathema in the NT.
The Incarnation was the event in salvation history that raised matter to previously unknown heights. All created matter was “good” from the start (Gen 1:25), but was “glorified” by the Incarnation.

Ritual and “physicality” were not abolished by the coming of Christ. Quite the contrary: it was the Incarnation that fully established sacramentalism as a principle in the Christian religion. The latter may be defined as the belief that matter can convey grace. It’s really that simple, at bottom, or in essence. God uses matter both to help us live better lives (sanctification) and to ultimately save us (regeneration and justification), starting with baptism itself. So when you say "world", do you mean physicality or those whom you deem as unsaved?
The flesh profits nothing.
Pastors, priests and bishops are "man", aren't they?

Hebrews 13:17 "Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you."
Doers the Spirit of God, the Rock, tell you to ignore this verse?
You misunderstand. This verse does not to be lead blindly, but rather to obey in spite of their error - that they will not use their misguided authority against you. It is a warning, and an insight of how to get by under the strong delusion of the flesh, which Paul also spoke of.
That makes no sense. For they/you to reject us first, you would have to be there from the beginning. So you play games with history to force fit it into your preconceptions.
Obviously, it makes no sense...because you have had it backwards.

"From the beginning?" These things have been so since before the foundation of the world.
Does this mean you would accept the the Early Church Fathers general consensus on doctrinal issues before there was a Bible? What grounds do you claim they were not in Christ, the Rock, when the ECF canonized the Bible? After all, they were "men". What disturbs you is that none of them were Protestants.
"Then Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to His disciples, 2 saying: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3 Therefore whatever they tell you to observe, that observe and do, but do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do. 4 For they bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. 5 But all their works they do to be seen by men. They make their phylacteries broad and enlarge the borders of their garments. 6 They love the best places at feasts, the best seats in the synagogues, 7 greetings in the marketplaces, and to be called by men, ‘Rabbi, Rabbi.’ 8 But you, do not be called ‘Rabbi’; for One is your Teacher, the Christ, and you are all brethren. 9 Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven. 10 And do not be called teachers; for One is your Teacher, the Christ. 11 But he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. 12 And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.

13 “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither go in yourselves,nor do you allow those who are entering to go in. 14 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation.
"
 

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
52
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
E
in essence it seems to me that that is exactly what is being avoided though, with all due respect. Not that Protestants have exactly picked up a dropped torch there or anything either.
ok, well none of these is "confess your sins to each other" much in my interp anyway, save perhaps the "in front of the whole congregation" thing that just warps the concept another direction imo.

Seems like a whole lot of contortions going on to spare peoples' pride, and the person who is wronged gets no remedy, seems to me? There is no directive to make it right with the offended party? Do some "penance" and God will forgive you? Where is this in the Book?

God forgives our sins if we ask Him for forgiveness. Yes, we are supposed to ask forgiveness from the people we have hurt and offer forgiveness to those who have hurt us. Often in confession, the priest will prompt this type of interaction between the confessor and victim.

John 20:22-24
22 And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive anyone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”

Do you see these verses as only applicable to the disciples?

As far as penance is concerned, I see the point of it, but I think it has a history of being poorly taught and poorly applied. Starting with the council of Trent and extending through Vactican I, the Catholic Church, in response to the Reformation, doubled down on all the differences between Protestants and the Catholic Church; one of the differences was confession. Over time, instead of penance acting as a confirmation of forgiveness and encouraging reconciliation between injured parties; it got warped into a weird, unrelated transaction - 'say ten Hail Marys and twenty our fathers and you will receive forgiveness'. After the reforms of Vatican II, good priests make efforts to relate penance to reconciliation between confessor and the Body of Christ and seeking forgiveness from the injuries party if it is not likely to cause more harm. Sometimes seeking forgiveness can be abused - intending to easy the offenders conscious rather than seeking healthing and reconciliation so it can lead to further injury.

I get a lot out of confession, but I know God forgave my sins before I was Catholic, as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bbyrd009

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
What doctrine? We do not believe only, but know the Truth.
The flesh profits nothing.
I am not talking about the flesh. I am talking about the unbiblical disdain you guys have for physical matter.
Matter conveys grace all over the place in Scripture: baptism confers regeneration (Acts 2:38; 22:16; 1 Pet 3:21; cf. Mk 16:16; Rom 6:3-4; 1 Cor 6:11; Titus 3:5). Paul’s “handkerchiefs” healed the sick (Acts 19:12), as did even Peter’s shadow (Acts 5:15), and of course, Jesus’ garment (Mt 9:20-22) and saliva mixed with dirt (Jn 9:5 ff.; Mk 8:22-25), as well as water from the pool of Siloam (Jn 9:7)...and lots more.
Anointing with oil for healing is encouraged (Jas 5:14). We also observe in Scripture the laying on of hands for the purpose of ordination and commissioning (Acts 6:6; 1 Tim 4:14; 2 Tim 1:6) to facilitate the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:17-19; 13:3; 19:6), and for healing (Mk 6:5; Lk 13:13; Acts 9:17-18). Even under the old covenant, a dead man was raised simply by coming in contact with the bones of the prophet Elisha (2 Kings 13:21) — which is also one of the direct evidences for the Catholic practice of the veneration of relics (itself an extension of the sacramental principle)
You guys reject the incarnation principle, and don't even allow art of any kind. You are on the border of Manichaenism, a 3rd century heresy that pits matter (flesh) against spirit. It's a mindset revealed in your reply. "the flesh profits nothing" has absolutely NOTHING to do with what I said.
You misunderstand. This verse does not to be lead blindly, but rather to obey in spite of their error - that they will not use their misguided authority against you. It is a warning, and an insight of how to get by under the strong delusion of the flesh, which Paul also spoke of.
No, you misunderstand. "Obey your leaders..." means there are leaders in the first place. Individuals with private interpretation is not leadership. it's chaos, the very foundation of non-denoms, a pillar of sand. You are your own leader, borrowing a little from Calvinism and a little from Baptist theology, and a little from Luther, here, there...
Obviously, it makes no sense...because you have had it backwards.
No, I have the witness of history, you are forced the re-write history to make it fit your preconceptions and man made traditions. Whatever authentic "truth" you have came from the Catholic Church you despise, including the Bible itself.

"From the beginning?" These things have been so since before the foundation of the world.
You can't carry on a rational discussion. From the beginning, in the context of what I said, means from the beginning of the Church. You claim it was your church from the beginning, but have no evidence beyond "the Bible alone", which is burring your head in the sand and denying truckloads of evidence it was Catholic "from the beginning"".
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Matthew 23: 1-14
Typical fundamentalist non-sequitur. Because we call our priests "father", they must be hypocrites. It doesn't follow. That's what a non-sequitur means.

Matt. 23:9 – Jesus says, “call no man father.” But ScottA uses this verse in an attempt to prove that it is wrong for Catholics to call priests “father.” This is an example of “eisegesis” (imposing one’s views upon a passage) as opposed to “exegesis” (drawing out the meaning of the passage from its context). In this verse, Jesus was discouraging His followers from elevating the scribes and Pharisees to the titles of “fathers” and “rabbis” because they were hypocrites. Jesus warns us not to elevate anyone to the level of our heavenly Father, THAT JUST DOESN'T HAPPEN!!! IT'S A HUGE FUNDAMENTALIST FALSEHOOD!

Matt. 23:8 – in this teaching, Jesus also says not to call anyone teacher or rabbi as well. But don’t Protestants call their teachers “teacher?” What about this commandment of Jesus? When Protestants say “call no man father,” they must also argue that we cannot call any man teacher either.

Judges 17:10; 18:19 – priesthood and fatherhood have always been identified together. Fatherhood literally means “communicating one’s nature,” and just as biological fathers communicate their nature to their children, so do spiritual fathers communicate the nature of God to us, their children, through (hopefully) teaching and example.

Acts 7:2; 22:1,1 John 2:13 – elders of the Church are called “fathers.” Therefore, we should ask the question, “Why don’t Protestants call their pastors “father?” Does ScottA even have a pastor?

1 Cor. 4:15 – Paul writes, “I became your father in Christ Jesus.” Didn't anybody tell Paul he can't do that???:confused:


quote-i-believe-in-god-not-in-a-catholic-god-there-is-no-catholic-god-there-is-god-and-i-believe-in-pope-francis-388028.jpg