(bluestarwizard;5042)
You may need to explain your exact meaning here a bit further for me, even with the help of the Latin you provided, I guess I'm just not getting it.
Be encouraged, at least you found the correct context this time! If there are any statements of mine that you wish to query, please do likewise again and use the quote facility, without alteration, of course. (Doing that can save a great deal of difficulty and indeed suspicion.)
This is the church being referred to here, in case anyone didn't know
Is it? It does not say so. In any case, how does anyone know what or who the church is?
so from Christ's perspective, correct doctrine is only to be found with the minority.
But Christ is not here to tell us who the minority is. Almost every group is a minority in some respect.
Now, as for book referrals, please forgive me Pointer for recommending a great book by a well respected historian, I thought that since he is considered a world renowned expert his views might prove useful as a quide to the feasibility of the ideas we were discussing.
You really are an addict of my posts! Of course a one world government is feasible, and has been mooted for a very long time now, but we need more than feasibility. Refer to all the books you like, poster, but don't expect to get anywhere until you do as I advised you.
However, the recommendation of Guigley's book was not the only discourse in my post, so your remark about a book referral in your experience being an "advertisement for an argument that is a failure from the start", and it's insinuation of my having nothing substantive of my own to offer on the subject is without merit.
For all your words you have not yet made any substantive contribution whatever, Chris. We are still discussing little more than your forum etiquette, unfortunately. You have not proved or given direct evidence that a single world government is planned; you mentioned Cain's descendants, but have not proved that these people are an identifiable group. Even if you succeed with both projects, you need to make a connexion between that group and the proposed one world government. Then you need to show that it would be a bad thing. And of course this minority idea is a bit like asking how long a piece of string is.
After browsing through a few threads I see that this has been discussed before, so I consider it doubtful any argument or amount of documentation I could provide would do anything other than fill pages with posts, it most certainly would not change your opinion on the subject as you're already convinced of your position.
I have not contributed to any threads on eschatology. What is my position? I'd be very interested to know!