Dead Bread, once again, you confuse reality with "fiction" due to your sad devotion to what the Bible has identified as the Antichrist of prophecy. There are thousands of good Catholics who have come to an understanding of why for over 300 years Protestants taught exclusively that this is so, and have renounced their allegiance to Mystery, Babylon the Great, the MOTHER CHURCH of harlots, and have come to a knowledge of a grace-saving relationship with Jesus Christ (which relationship pope Frannie says is "dangerous"). You would do well to do the same, I think.
Amen! For non-Catholics to tolerate pro-RCC threads and posts which promote the idea that Peter was the first pope, that the RCC traces its roots back to apostolic times, that there is virtue in the "dead bread" of the Eucharist, etc., but get bent out of shape when someone posts simple matters of history that expose the RCC for what it is, is just pure asininity on their part.
More unproven lies and hate from phony man. This is the best phony man can do because he knows he can never win a debate guided with rules. It's called "forum anarchy" where cowards think they can thrive.Especially when the RCC'S leadership openly acknowledges this position which has remained unchanged since its satanic inception:
"The Catholic Church is a respecter of conscience and liberty...Nevertheless, when confronted by heresy SHE HAS RECOURSE TO FORCE, TO CORPORAL PUNISHMENT, TO TORTURE...SHE LIT IN ITALY...THE FUNERAL PILES OF THE INQUISTION."
Last edited: