Only The Pope And Roman Catholicism, Has The Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Only The Pope And Roman Catholicism, Has The Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture?

VaticanWebsite

Roman Catholic Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Only The Pope And Roman Catholicism, Has The Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture?

VaticanWebsite

Roman Catholic Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
My Holy Bible Teaches Otherwise!

The Pope Nor Roman Catholicism Has A Monopoly On The Interpretation Of Scripture, As Is Clearly Show Below.

2 Peter 1:20-21KJV
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

John 14:26KJV
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring allthings to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScottA

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Only The Pope And Roman Catholicism, Has The Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture?

VaticanWebsite

Roman Catholic Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
The Catholic Cheer Is Pretty Quiet Out There, What Are You Gonna Do With The Claim In the OP?

Does The Pope And Roman Catholicism Have The Only Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture As Claimed In The Catechism (100)?

VaticanWebsite

Roman Catholic Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.


My Holy Bible Teaches Otherwise!

The Pope Nor Roman Catholicism Has A Monopoly On The Interpretation Of Scripture, As Is Clearly Show Below.

2 Peter 1:20-21KJV
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

John 14:26KJV
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring allthings to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
 
Last edited:

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
20,940
3,389
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why you keep referring to the "Roman" Catholic Catechism is beyond me.
Only an extremely ignorant or dishonest person would make this claim.

Now - you've been schooled on what "Roman" Catholic is, so I suggest you use it correctly - lest you sound even more foolish that you already do . . .
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why you keep referring to the "Roman" Catholic Catechism is beyond me.
Only an extremely ignorant or dishonest person would make this claim.

Now - you've been schooled on what "Roman" Catholic is, so I suggest you use it correctly - lest you sound even more foolish that you already do . . .
No ignorance or dishonesty, straight from the Vatican Website And Catholic Catechism.

The fact is you can't refute the fact the RCC Catechism (100) claims exactly what is stated, as you wander away from the OP with distracting false claims.

Does The Pope And Roman Catholicism Have The Only Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture As Claimed In The Catechism (100)?

VaticanWebsite

Roman Catholic Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.


My Holy Bible Teaches Otherwise!

The Pope Nor Roman Catholicism Has A Monopoly On The Interpretation Of Scripture, As Is Clearly Show Below.

2 Peter 1:20-21KJV
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

John 14:26KJV
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring allthings to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
20,940
3,389
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No ignorance or dishonesty, straight from the Vatican Website And Catholic Catechism.
Does The Pope And Roman Catholicism Have The Only Authentic Interpretation Of Scripture As Claimed In The Catechism (100)?
VaticanWebsite
Roman Catholic Catechism (100)
100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.


My Holy Bible Teaches Otherwise!

The Pope Nor Roman Catholicism Has A Monopoly On The Interpretation Of Scripture, As Is Clearly Show Below.

2 Peter 1:20-21KJV
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

John 14:26KJV
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring allthings to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Why do you keep lying when you KNOW I'm going to publicly expose you for it??

Why do you keep insisting that the Vatican website refers to it as the "Roman Catholic Catechism??
There is NO such document. There is only "The Catechism of the Catholic Church".

As for the verses you provided - let's take a look, shall we?

2 Peter 1:20-21
20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

This is a CLASSIC example of why YOUR personal interpretations are invalid. Peter is telling his readers NOT to privately interpret Scripture. This is a matter for the Church.

John 14:26
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Jesus is speaking to the Apostles ALONE. When Jesus instructs the Apostles - He is instructing the leaders of His Church. When He instructs the crowds - He is speaking to ALL of us.
This was during the Last Supper - where He ALSO told them:

John 16:12-15
“I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear it now.
But when he comes, the Spirit of truth, he will guide YOU to ALL TRUTH. He will not speak on his own, but he will speak what he hears, and will declare to YOU the things that are coming.
He will glorify me, because he will take from what is mine and declare it to YOU.
Everything that the Father has is mine; for this reason I told YOU that he will take from what is mine and declare it to YOU.


Finally - as to the following verses you quoted . . .
1 John 2:26-27
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.


This passage is NOT saying that we are not to be taught by the Church. The Church is Christ's representative on earth. Jesus told His Apostles:

Matt. 28:19-20
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and TEACHING them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

Paul writes about the Church:
1 Cor. 12: 27-28

Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it. And God has placed in the church first of all apostles, second prophets, third TEACHERS, then miracles, then gifts of healing, of helping, of guidance, and of different kinds of tongues.

Learn how to discern and properly divide Scripture . . .
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
John 2:26-27
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.


This passage is NOT saying that we are not to be taught by the Church. The Church is Christ's representative on earth. Jesus told His Apostles:
1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

The verse above clearly teaches the CCC (100) is false, as the individual believer by the anointing of the Holy Spirit has the authority to "Interpret Scripture Authentically" :)

No Pope, Bishop, or Roman Catholic Church Is Needed, Praise Jesus!

The CCC (100) Below, Is A 100% False Claim, Doctrine, And Teaching.

VaticanWebsite

Catholic Church Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LC627

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
20,940
3,389
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no li[/COLOR]e, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
The verse above clearly teaches the CCC (100) is false, as the individual believer by the anointing of the Holy Spirit has the authority to "Interpret Scripture Authentically" :)
No Pope, Bishop, or Roman Catholic Church Is Needed, Praise Jesus!
The CCC (100) Below, Is A 100% False Claim, Doctrine, And Teaching.

VaticanWebsite
Catholic Church Catechism (100)
100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
No - the only thing that is "false" here is YOUR lie regarding the incorrect title of "Roman" Catholic Catechism.
No such publication even exists . . .

Interpret the following verse:
2 Thess. 2:15
So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, EITHER BY our spoken word - OR BY our letter.

 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

The verse above clearly teaches the CCC (100) is false, as the individual believer has the authority to interpret scripture authentically, no Pope, Bishop, or Roman Catholic Church Is Needed.

VaticanWebsite

Roman Catholic Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
First, you have paragraph 100 taken out of context. So it doesn't say what you are forcing it to say.
Second, you skipped the word "authentically". If everybody interpreted scripture AUTHENTICALLY there wound't be 40,000 unauthentic interpretations.
Third, the historic Church has interpreted very few verses, that would freeze dry the Living Word.
Fourth, we don't treat the Bible the same as Muslims treat the Koran. Do you?
Fifth, what if there is an obscure passage whose difficult meaning was causing problems, and not easily resolved? This has happened several times in history. So the Pope steps in and settles the matter, the same as Peter stepped in: Acts 15. He listed to the debates before standing up, where everyone fell silent. The Pope listens to scripture scholars and theologians before making a ruling, he is not a dictator.

CONTEXT

109 In Sacred Scripture, God speaks to man in a human way. To interpret Scripture correctly, the reader must be attentive to what the human authors truly wanted to affirm, and to what God wanted to reveal to us by their words.75

(it says the reader, it does not say only the pope)

110 In order to discover the sacred authors' intention, the reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at that time, and the modes of feeling, speaking and narrating then current. "For the fact is that truth is differently presented and expressed in the various types of historical writing, in prophetical and poetical texts, and in other forms of literary expression."76
(the reader)

111 But since Sacred Scripture is inspired, there is another and no less important principle of correct interpretation, without which Scripture would remain a dead letter. "Sacred Scripture must be read and interpreted in the light of the same Spirit by whom it was written."77
(the pope did not write them)

The Second Vatican Council indicates three criteria for interpreting Scripture in accordance with the Spirit who inspired it.78

112 1. Be especially attentive "to the content and unity of the whole Scripture". Different as the books which compose it may be, Scripture is a unity by reason of the unity of God's plan, of which Christ Jesus is the center and heart, open since his Passover.79
The phrase "heart of Christ" can refer to Sacred Scripture, which makes known his heart, closed before the Passion, as the Scripture was obscure. But the Scripture has been opened since the Passion; since those who from then on have understood it, consider and discern in what way the prophecies must be interpreted.80
113 2. Read the Scripture within "the living Tradition of the whole Church". According to a saying of the Fathers, Sacred Scripture is written principally in the Church's heart rather than in documents and records, for the Church carries in her Tradition the living memorial of God's Word, and it is the Holy Spirit who gives her the spiritual interpretation of the Scripture (". . . according to the spiritual meaning which the Spirit grants to the Church"81).
(The magisterium, Pope and Bishops, cannot interpret scripture apart from the Holy Spirit)
Footnotes:

76 DV 12 § 2.
77 DV 12 § 3.
78 Cf. DV 12 § 4.
79 Cf. Lk 24:25-27,44-46.
80 St. Thomas Aquinas, Expos. in Ps. 21,11; cf. Ps 22:14.
81 Origen, Hom. in Lev. 5,5:pG 12,454D.v
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p1s1c2a3.htm
Because one paragraph briefly touches on one function of the Magisterium, you automatically assume that the Church teaches no one but the Pope can interpret scripture. This is typical false dichotomous thinking; either/or, not both/and. "Individual believers" also rose up false teachings, like Arius, Nestorius, Apollinarius and a legion of heretics all challenging the identity of Christ, using "Scripture alone".
If you are going to quote the catechism, please do it properly.

 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Further debunking the anti-Catholic myth that no one but the pope can interpret scripture:

11. Those divinely revealed realities which are contained and presented in Sacred Scripture have been committed to writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. For holy mother Church, relying on the belief of the Apostles (see John 20:31; 2 Tim. 3:16; 2 Peter 1:19-20, 3:15-16), holds that the books of both the Old and New Testaments in their entirety, with all their parts, are sacred and canonical because written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God as their author and have been handed on as such to the Church herself.(1) In composing the sacred books, God chose men and while employed by Him (2) they made use of their powers and abilities, so that with Him acting in them and through them, (3) they, as true authors, consigned to writing everything and only those things which He wanted. (4)

Therefore, since everything asserted by the inspired authors or sacred writers must be held to be asserted by the Holy Spirit, it follows that the books of Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings (5) for the sake of salvation. Therefore "all Scripture is divinely inspired and has its use for teaching the truth and refuting error, for reformation of manners and discipline in right living, so that the man who belongs to God may be efficient and equipped for good work of every kind" (2 Tim. 3:16-17, Greek text).

12. However, since God speaks in Sacred Scripture through men in human fashion, (6) the interpreter of Sacred Scripture, in order to see clearly what God wanted to communicate to us, should carefully investigate what meaning the sacred writers really intended, and what God wanted to manifest by means of their words.

To search out the intention of the sacred writers, attention should be given, among other things, to "literary forms." For truth is set forth and expressed differently in texts which are variously historical, prophetic, poetic, or of other forms of discourse. The interpreter must investigate what meaning the sacred writer intended to express and actually expressed in particular circumstances by using contemporary literary forms in accordance with the situation of his own time and culture. (7) For the correct understanding of what the sacred author wanted to assert, due attention must be paid to the customary and characteristic styles of feeling, speaking and narrating which prevailed at the time of the sacred writer, and to the patterns men normally employed at that period in their everyday dealings with one another. (8)

But, since Holy Scripture must be read and interpreted in the sacred spirit in which it was written, (9) no less serious attention must be given to the content and unity of the whole of Scripture if the meaning of the sacred texts is to be correctly worked out. The living tradition of the whole Church must be taken into account along with the harmony which exists between elements of the faith. It is the task of exegetes to work according to these rules toward a better understanding and explanation of the meaning of Sacred Scripture, so that through preparatory study the judgment of the Church may mature. For all of what has been said about the way of interpreting Scripture is subject finally to the judgment of the Church, which carries out the divine commission and ministry of guarding and interpreting the word of God. (10)
(It is the task of exegetes, any student of exegesis, not just the pope)

13. In Sacred Scripture, therefore, while the truth and holiness of God always remains intact, the marvelous "condescension" of eternal wisdom is clearly shown, "that we may learn the gentle kindness of God, which words cannot express, and how far He has gone in adapting His language with thoughtful concern for our weak human nature." (11) For the words of God, expressed in human language, have been made like human discourse, just as the word of the eternal Father, when He took to Himself the flesh of human weakness, was in every way made like men.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_...ents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html
Don't scour the catechism looking for weapons to attack the Church with. The Bible doesn't do that, you do it because it is a Protestant tradition.
See also http://www.themichigancatholic.org/2016/04/catholic-bible-interpretation-debunking-myths/
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
First, you have paragraph 100 taken out of context. So it doesn't say what you are forcing it to say.
Second, you skipped the word "authentically". If everybody interpreted scripture AUTHENTICALLY there wound't be 40,000 unauthentic interpretations.
Third, the historic Church has interpreted very few verses, that would freeze dry the Living Word.
Fourth, we don't treat the Bible the same as Muslims treat the Koran. Do you?
Fifth, what if there is an obscure passage whose difficult meaning was causing problems, and not easily resolved? This has happened several times in history. So the Pope steps in and settles the matter, the same as Peter stepped in: Acts 15. He listed to the debates before standing up, where everyone fell silent. The Pope listens to scripture scholars and theologians before making a ruling, he is not a dictator.

CONTEXT

109 In Sacred Scripture, God speaks to man in a human way. To interpret Scripture correctly, the reader must be attentive to what the human authors truly wanted to affirm, and to what God wanted to reveal to us by their words.75

(it says the reader, it does not say only the pope)

110 In order to discover the sacred authors' intention, the reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at that time, and the modes of feeling, speaking and narrating then current. "For the fact is that truth is differently presented and expressed in the various types of historical writing, in prophetical and poetical texts, and in other forms of literary expression."76
(the reader)

111 But since Sacred Scripture is inspired, there is another and no less important principle of correct interpretation, without which Scripture would remain a dead letter. "Sacred Scripture must be read and interpreted in the light of the same Spirit by whom it was written."77
(the pope did not write them)

The Second Vatican Council indicates three criteria for interpreting Scripture in accordance with the Spirit who inspired it.78

112 1. Be especially attentive "to the content and unity of the whole Scripture". Different as the books which compose it may be, Scripture is a unity by reason of the unity of God's plan, of which Christ Jesus is the center and heart, open since his Passover.79
The phrase "heart of Christ" can refer to Sacred Scripture, which makes known his heart, closed before the Passion, as the Scripture was obscure. But the Scripture has been opened since the Passion; since those who from then on have understood it, consider and discern in what way the prophecies must be interpreted.80
113 2. Read the Scripture within "the living Tradition of the whole Church". According to a saying of the Fathers, Sacred Scripture is written principally in the Church's heart rather than in documents and records, for the Church carries in her Tradition the living memorial of God's Word, and it is the Holy Spirit who gives her the spiritual interpretation of the Scripture (". . . according to the spiritual meaning which the Spirit grants to the Church"81).
(The magisterium, Pope and Bishops, cannot interpret scripture apart from the Holy Spirit)
Footnotes:

76 DV 12 § 2.
77 DV 12 § 3.
78 Cf. DV 12 § 4.
79 Cf. Lk 24:25-27,44-46.
80 St. Thomas Aquinas, Expos. in Ps. 21,11; cf. Ps 22:14.
81 Origen, Hom. in Lev. 5,5:pG 12,454D.v
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p1s1c2a3.htm
Because one paragraph briefly touches on one function of the Magisterium, you automatically assume that the Church teaches no one but the Pope can interpret scripture. This is typical false dichotomous thinking; either/or, not both/and. "Individual believers" also rose up false teachings, like Arius, Nestorius, Apollinarius and a legion of heretics all challenging the identity of Christ, using "Scripture alone".
If you are going to quote the catechism, please do it properly.
Not one word you have presented refutes the fact, the catechism teaches the pope, bishops of the Catholic Church are "Solely" the authentic interpreters of scripture.

Why do you deny this fact, you think myself and other forum participants are blind to this fact as seen in CCC (100) below ?

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

The verse above clearly teaches the CCC (100) is false, as the individual believer by the anointing of the Holy Spirit has the authority to "Interpret Scripture Authentically" :)

No Pope, Bishop, or Roman Catholic Church Is Needed, Praise Jesus!

The CCC (100) Below, Is A 100% False Claim, Doctrine, And Teaching.

"Solely"

VaticanWebsite

Catholic Church Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScottA

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Not one word you have presented refutes the fact, the catechism teaches the pope, bishops of the Catholic Church are "Solely" the authentic interpreters of scripture.

Why do you deny this fact, you think myself and othher forum participants are blind to this fact as seen in CCC (100) below ?
What I deny is your grossly false interpretation of paragraph 100. If you refuse to read post 10 and 11, I am not the one in denial. You are having a monologue, repeating the same nonsense as your last post. You are so blinded by prejudice you can't even see my response.

I find it hard to believe you studied the catechism and stopped at paragraph 100. You most likely gleaned it from Matt Slick, the biggest abuser of the catechism on the internet. Or you got it from some Bible-Christian hate site, bent on bashing Catholicism with other falsehoods. There is about a billion of those. That stuff will rot your mind; blindness to post #10 and 11 is ample evidence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
MORE EVIDENCE OF TRUTH7T7 REFUSAL TO HAVE A CIVILIZED DISCUSSION

Contrary to the claims of some, Catholics actually have a wide freedom to read and interpret the Bible (provided, of course, they read with the intention of abiding by Church doctrines).

We’re also free to read different versions of Holy Scripture, though normally, Catholic versions are given high priority. My own preferred translation is the Revised Standard Version (RSV), which has been approved in a Catholic edition with just a few clarifications.

Ven. Pope Pius XII, in his 1943 papal encyclical, Divino Afflante Spiritu, wrote:

“Nor is it forbidden by the decree of the Council of Trent to make translations into the vulgar tongue, even directly from the original texts themselves … Being thoroughly prepared by the knowledge of the ancient languages and by the aids afforded by the art of criticism, let the Catholic exegete (not just the pope)undertake the task, of all those imposed on him the greatest, that, namely of discovering and expounding the genuine meaning of the Sacred Books. In the performance of this task let the interpreters (not just the pope) bear in mind that their foremost and greatest endeavor should be to discern and define clearly that sense of the biblical words which is called literal.” (sections 22, end, and 23, beginning)

The Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on Divine Revelation (Dei Verbum), concurred:

“Access to sacred Scripture ought to be wide open to the Christian faithful … the Church, with motherly concern, sees to it that suitable and correct translations are made into various languages, especially from the original texts of the sacred books. If it should happen that … these translations are made in a joint effort with the separated brethren, they may be used by all Christians.” (ch. 6, sec. 22)

“When Pius XII issued his encyclical ‘Divino Afflante Spiritu’ in 1943, the door was opened for new Catholic translations that were not dependent on St. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate. Because of the great increase in the knowledge of the ancient biblical languages, official translations directly from them were encouraged … The Revised Standard Version is the least interpretative of all … The Jerusalem Bible and the New English Bible strive for even more contemporary language … The New American Bible … is the first American Catholic translation to have been based on the original languages, or on the earliest existing form of the text, rather than on the Vulgate.”

Catholics are not required to interpret every verse of the Bible according to some dogmatic proclamation of the Church. This is another common myth we often hear from our esteemed Protestant friends (and many Catholics, too, not knowing any better). Indeed, the orthodox, faithful Catholic must interpret doctrines he derives from Scripture in accordance with the Church and tradition. But is that such a radical and controversial notion?

In fact, Protestants believe largely the same. Every Protestant acts the same way within their own denominational tradition. No five-point Calvinist can claim — against their own tradition — that a verse in the Bible proves apostasy or falling away, or God’s desire for universal, rather than limited atonement (though in fact there are many such passages). He can’t deny total depravity by use of any text, or irresistible grace. This is not allowed. Calvinist (Reformed / Presbyterian) tradition dictates that those doctrines, and those only, are found in Scripture.

Thus, in effect, it requires a certain interpretation of Bible verses that have been historically used to bolster Calvinist teachings. Ironically, this is the very charge Protestants often use to accuse their Catholic brethren: being told by the Church “how to think” about biblical interpretation.

Pretty much all Christians have orthodox and dogmatic boundaries by which they abide. The Catholic exegete is bound by very little, and has virtually as much freedom of inquiry as the Protestant. The 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia article on “Biblical Exegesis” states:

“The Catholic commentator is bound to adhere to the interpretation of texts which the Church has defined either expressly or implicitly. The number of these texts is small, so that the commentator can easily avoid any transgression of this principle.”

Catholics are allowed to translate from the Greek, according to the latest textual and archaeological knowledge, to use different translations, and to even cooperate in ecumenical translation projects, such as the RSV and NEB. And you and I are allowed to freely interpret almost any text on its own, provided we don’t go against a dogma of the Church (I couldn’t, for example, claim that John 1:1 does not teach the divinity and Godhood of Jesus).

Only very few biblical verses have been strictly defined by the Church, and even then, only in specific applications (mostly in a negative sense: i.e., the passage cannot mean X as regards doctrine Y). These include Matthew 18:18 (priests forgiving sins / absolution), Luke 22:19 (Eucharist), John 3:5 (baptism), John 20:22-23 (priests forgiving sins / absolution), Romans 5:12 (original sin), 1 Corinthians 11:24 (Eucharist), James 6:14 (the institution of the sacrament of anointing of the sick).

Also, in almost, but not quite the category of such passages is Matthew 16:16 and John 1:42, with regard to St. Peter being the head of the Church.

Unfortunately, many people erroneously contend that because Catholics are required to believe the teachings of their Church, they “must,” therefore, be non-rational “robotic-like” readers who can’t simply read the Bible for what it is, and think for themselves (a misguided stereotype known as sola ecclesia: “Church Alone”). This may be dismissed as an example of fallacious “either/or” thinking.

No Catholic is required to “blindly” follow authority. We’re allowed to think and exercise reason like any other Christians, and we must resist and refute cartoon-like caricatures of our Church.

Will truth7t7 stop his psychotic screeching?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What I deny is your grossly false interpretation of paragraph 100. If you refuse to read post 10 and 11, I am not the one in denial. You are having a monologue, repeating the same nonsense as your last post. You are so blinded by prejudice you can't even see my response.

I find it hard to believe you studied the catechism and stopped at paragraph 100. You most likely gleaned it from Matt Slick, the biggest abuser of the catechism on the internet. Or you got it from some Bible-Christian hate site, bent on bashing Catholicism with other falsehoods. There is about a billion of those. That stuff will rot your mind; blindness to post #10 and 11 is ample evidence.
100% In The Love Of Jesus Christ :)

"Entrusted Solely" to the Pope And Bishops of the Catholic Church?

I'm not blind or ignorant on what CCC 100 states below, I don't need to look elsewhere, It's before the forums eyes.

A prime example in denial of presented truth, pretty hard to deny when It's right before our eyes.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

The verse above clearly teaches the CCC (100) is false, as the individual believer by the anointing of the Holy Spirit has the authority to "Interpret Scripture Authentically" :)

No Pope, Bishop, or Roman Catholic Church Is Needed, Praise Jesus!

The CCC (100) Below, Is A 100% False Claim, Doctrine, And Teaching.

No bashing, no hatred towards you or catholics, just presented truth in the CCC 100 and Catholic Doctrine.

"Entrusted Solely"

VaticanWebsite

Catholic Church Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
 
Last edited:

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
100% In The Love Of Jesus Christ :)

"Entrusted Solely" to the Pope And Bishops of the Catholic Church?

I'm not blind or ignorant on what CCC 100 states below, I don't need to look elsewhere, It's before the forums eyes.

A prime example in denial of presented truth, pretty hard to deny when It's right before our eyes.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.

The verse above clearly teaches the CCC (100) is false, as the individual believer by the anointing of the Holy Spirit has the authority to "Interpret Scripture Authentically" :)

No Pope, Bishop, or Roman Catholic Church Is Needed, Praise Jesus!

The CCC (100) Below, Is A 100% False Claim, Doctrine, And Teaching.

No bashing, no hatred towards you or catholics, just presented truth in the CCC 100 and Catholic Doctrine.

"Entrusted Solely"

VaticanWebsite

Catholic Church Catechism (100)

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.
Which "individual believer" has the authority to interpret scripture? You?
Which "individual believer" out of millions of Protestants, has the authority to interpret scripture consistently?
The "individual believer" has more authority than the Church that gave us the Bible in the first place?
Your church (if you have one) has no authority to set boundaries for interpreting scripture, and the individual can make any false interpretation they like, because you have deified the individual believers opinions???
Who gave you the authority to interpret the catechism totally out of context? Your private opinion?
Please tell me why the Pentecostal church, each member having the Holy Spirit, has fragmented into 100 denominations in a few short years of its existence.
All Protestant denominations have doctrinal boundaries for interpreting scripture, and you think the historic Church doesn't have the right to do what every Protestant denomination does. What hypocrisy!!!

The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically in accordance with Catholic teaching, and you are saying the Church, that gave us the Bible in the first place, doesn't have the right? No church has the right to set boundaries if it doesn't square with your private opinions??? Do you give any credibility to 2000 of consistent teaching at all? When did your private opinion trump the canon of Scripture?

Because one paragraph you take out of content that doesn't present the entire teaching on interpretation DOES NOT MAKE YOU AN AUTHORITY ON THE CATECHISM. Do you abuse scripture the same way? If something is absent in one verse does that mean it is non-existent?

We don't read the catechism the way you read the Bible. You read the catechism the way a Muslim reads the Koran!

You post over top of #10 11, and 13, ignoring everything I say, and delude yourself into thinking this is a civilized discussion. It is not. There is nothing "Christian" about your abuse and constant Catholic bashing over 1 paragraph you rip out of context.

Go find a Protestant who follows their church's boundaries and bash them instead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
10,847
3,266
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Which "individual believer" has the authority to interpret scripture? You?
Which "individual believer" out of millions of Protestants, has the authority to interpret scripture consistently?
The "individual believer" has more authority than the Church that gave us the Bible in the first place?
Your church (if you have one) has no authority to set boundaries for interpreting scripture, and the individual can make any false interpretation they like, because you have deified the individual believers opinions???
Who gave you the authority to interpret the catechism totally out of context? Your private opinion?
Please tell me why the Pentecostal church, each member having the Holy Spirit, has fragmented into 100 denominations in a few short years of its existence.
All Protestant denominations have doctrinal boundaries for interpreting scripture, and so do we.
The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically in accordance with Catholic teaching, and you are saying the Church, that gave us the Bible in the first place, doesn't have the right?

Because one paragraph you take out of content doesn't present the entire teaching on interpretation DOES NOT MAKE YOU AN AUTHORITY ON THE CATECHISM. Do you abuse scripture the same way? If something is absent in one verse does that mean it is non-existent?
The Pope nor the Bishops of the Catholic Church, have been "Entrusted Solely" with the authentic interpretation of God's word.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
 

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
2 Timothy 1:13-14 Follow the pattern of the sound words which you have heard from me, in the faith and love which are in Christ Jesus;
[14] guard the truth that has been entrusted to you by the Holy Spirit who dwells within us.

2 Timothy 2:2 and what you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.

Where in scripture is anything entrusted to individuals? Oh, I forgot, truth7t7 doesn't answer questions, he just repeats the same bashing lunacies and calls it a discussion.

"Entrusted" is not a dirty word, contrary to truth7t7's arrogant Catholic bashing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
The Pope nor the Bishops of the Catholic Church, have been "Entrusted Solely" with the authentic interpretation of God's word.
That's right, the interpretation is for Catholics. not for ignorant anti-Catholics to mock. For the 10th time, you are taking it out of context. The catechism is useful reading for anyone who wants to know, but paragraph 100 is not for anti-Catholics to remove it from its context. It is not to be used as an arsenal of weapons to attack the Church with. Even the Bible doesn't attack the Church, NOWHERE.

1 John 2:26-27KJV
26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.
27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Is that what the Holy Spirit taught you?"...not that any man teach you..." means divine revelation goes from the Father to Jesus to the Apostles. That's what "...not that any man teach you..." means because it is impossible 'for any man', to teach divine revelation apart from the Apostles, unless they are individual believers with private opinions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

epostle1

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2012
3,326
507
113
72
Essex
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Every church has the right to set boundaries and establish guidelines for interpreting scripture, but according to lies7t7, the pope and bishops have no right to interpret scripture according to Catholic teaching. Sorry lies6t6, your private interpretation of one paragraph taken out of context really stinks.

"The Trinity can be proven from Scripture, indeed (material sufficiency), but Scripture Alone as a principle was not formally sufficient to prevent the Arian crisis from occurring. In other words, the decisive factor in these controversies was the appeal to apostolic succession and Tradition, which showed that the Church had always been trinitarian."

According to lies6t6, Arius, as an individual, had every right to teach his opinions of scripture. Jehovah's Witlesses are modern day Arians. Following lies6t6 guidelines, we would all be Jehovah's Witlesses, because acccording to him, the individual's interpretation trumps that of the historic Church..

Matt Slick cannot tell the difference between material sufficiency and sole sufficiency. I tried to explain it to him, along with the proper way to use the catechism, and he deleted my posts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.