Man made Bible

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jenn4God

New Member
Nov 28, 2006
54
0
0
44
(skeptik;4410)
At least the first one says: if a woman is not a virgin when she marries she should be stoned. Looks pretty general to me.You may be right on the second one. Still, dosen't quite fit the bill of an all loving g*d does it?
Again, that was meant for the jews, not the gentiles. To this day, jews still believe that way.
 

skeptik

New Member
Nov 26, 2006
37
0
0
39
(Jenn4God;4415)
Again, that was meant for the jews, not the gentiles. To this day, jews still believe that way.
And why is it in the christian bible?Please...
rolleyes.gif
 

Jenn4God

New Member
Nov 28, 2006
54
0
0
44
Because God wants us to learn from it. If you continue to ask dumb questions, I will have to insist that you find your own answers.
 

skeptik

New Member
Nov 26, 2006
37
0
0
39
(SwampFox;4414)
That is, of course, if you follow the relevance of these obscure books found in locations such as the deserts of Egypt. The books that are in the Bible have found their way in there for a reason - the very same reason that sent Christ to die on the cross for us. Frankly speaking, I just don't see how you can believe the part and not the whole. Again, why would God send us his only begotten son and then not ensure the protection of everything he stood for? I'm using the same loving, caring God definition that you're using and it's just not adding up.
The books are obscure because the committee that compiled the bible didn't like them. I think that g*d pretty much left us alone to do as we wish a long, long time ago. What's to stop humanity from making an abomination like the bible? Why didn't christ leave a gospel himself? Why trust us feeble humans capable of the worst atrocities to do this if it was so important? It was important enough for him to come live among us. Why not write a book in the process? (SwampFox;4414)
"Blind faith" is a misnomer IMHO, though we do use it often; how you can be blind to what you cannot see anyway? Your opinion of blind faith may differ greatly from mine and your use of it based solely on your opinion. We can argue all day long about that.
Well, I could agree with it. Though I cannot comprehend why logic and reason cannot go hand in hand with faith.(SwampFox;4414)
*snip*The so called "law of love" is often employed to mean, frankly speaking, that as long as I "love" I can do whatever the heck I want.
Au contraire brother. If you let yourself love everything and everyone then you can do no harm. At least intentionally.(SwampFox;4414)
The problem with the law, before Christ, was that people became so obssessed with following it that they got away from a relationship with God and were more concerned about carrying the law out.
Then why be so concerned about following just a few laws and leaving the other ones to rot? (SwampFox;4414)
Nope. We have the ability to be forgiven when we do break them; God is the judge of us on that. The entire object is that you do your best to follow them and as God acknowledges, we're not perfect and we have Christ for that.
And what I am saying is that IF _that_ is the law, then no christian I know does his best to follow it. I've already given quite a few examples of pretty explicit laws in the bible that nobody in his right mind would attempt to follow. (SwampFox;4414)
Salvation is a personal matter.
One thing we can agree with.
 

skeptik

New Member
Nov 26, 2006
37
0
0
39
(Jenn4God;4431)
Because God wants us to learn from it. If you continue to ask dumb questions, I will have to insist that you find your own answers.
I am done with this. I do not wish to start a flame war here, its pretty clear that you have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about and are degrading this discussion to name calling. Carry on with your closed mind and hatred towards those who do not share your views. Your "know it all" and "holier than thou" attitude will be duly noted.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
And why is it in the christian bible?IT JUST ISN'T A CHRISTIAN BIBLE!!!! its the word of God Old testament is the same basic thing as its been from the beginning and was handed down by mouth from Jew to Jew Generation to Generation still in effect still Gods word only New Testament added after Christ the anointed of God brought New Covenant Christianity has all its beginnings and roots in Judaism Christ was a Jew the apostles were Jews raised in Judaism Christianity is a branch,shoot off of Judaism its is called Judeo-Christian same God same book New Testament added the New covenant made it possible, opened the door for all gentiles.The new testament confirms and reveals the old testament why do you not get that ? Think of it as tree Judaism is the root Christianity is a branch on the tree the branch can't be without the root the branch can't turn into a different kind of tree than the root.It may get more sun and look different than the root but inside they are the same.Because it is the time of the gentiles the Jews didn't recognize Christ as their anointed one so they are expecting him to come any day for the first time the christian accepts Christ as the anointed one and is waiting for him to return a second time same anointed one sent by same God
 

skeptik

New Member
Nov 26, 2006
37
0
0
39
(kriss;4437)
And why is it in the christian bible?IT JUST ISN'T A CHRISTIAN BIBLE!!!! its the word of God Old testament is the same basic thing as its been from the beginning and was handed down by mouth from Jew to Jew Generation to Generation still in effect still Gods word only New Testament added after Christ the anointed of God brought New Covenant Christianity has all its beginnings and roots in Judaism Christ was a Jew the apostles were Jews raised in Judaism Christianity is a branch,shoot off of Judaism its is called Judeo-Christian same God same book New Testament added the New covenant made it possible, opened the door for all gentiles.The new testament confirms and reveals the old testament why do you not get that ? Think of it as tree Judaism is the root Christianity is a branch on the tree the branch can't be without the root the branch can't turn into a different kind of tree than the root.It may get more sun and look different than the root but inside they are the same.Because it is the time of the gentiles the Jews didn't recognize Christ as their anointed one so they are expecting him to come any day for the first time the christian accepts Christ as the anointed one and is waiting for him to return a second time same anointed one sent by same God
Whoa, first of all. Punctuation marks! I know I can be a little annoying and a rant is in order. At least you're not calling me names yet! Thank you.Second. I would wholeheartedly agree with you IF what you are saying is that those laws are not meant for us gentiles. The point I've been trying to make throughout my posts is that it just seems hypocritical to me that people would take a subset of these laws and just disregard them as they wish, all the while they're condemning others who break a different set of laws written in the very same books. Sometimes separated by just a few verses.
 

HammerStone

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Feb 12, 2006
5,113
279
83
36
South Carolina
prayerforums.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The books are obscure because the committee that compiled the bible didn't like them. I think that g*d pretty much left us alone to do as we wish a long, long time ago. What's to stop humanity from making an abomination like the bible? Why didn't christ leave a gospel himself? Why trust us feeble humans capable of the worst atrocities to do this if it was so important? It was important enough for him to come live among us. Why not write a book in the process?
So this loving, caring God that gave us the law of God has now left us alone to do what we want. He sent his son simply to die while we take and corrupt what his son was sent for in the first place? Sorry, but when you speak of logic this just doesn't hold water for me. Why trust us humans? Because he is God, afterall and there are countless examples of him working through those same corrupt souls to save them!
Au contraire brother. If you let yourself love everything and everyone then you can do no harm. At least intentionally.
I disagree - homosexuals invoke the law of love; even pedophiles say the very same thing...ever heard of NAMBLA? I love God but I make mistakes daily. We're not perfect and will never be, we sin. We all have faults but that doesn't mean there isn't good within us. However, much of what you have quoted in previous threads is directed at Israel in the wilderness. Take, for instance, the man found above in the wilderness on Sabbath - this is obviously a specific case for that particular time. The same works for the rule that is addressed to the people Israel. That's instructing this particular people. I've addressed some of your other concerns in the other in thread.
Then why be so concerned about following just a few laws and leaving the other ones to rot?
I cannot judge someone and will not judge someone. Period. I do my best to follow the law, though I fail. I am human.
And what I am saying is that IF _that_ is the law, then no christian I know does his best to follow it. I've already given quite a few examples of pretty explicit laws in the bible that nobody in his right mind would attempt to follow.
With all due respect, that is not a judgment for you to make, nor is it mine. God is the judge and this illustrates the exact "problem" with following the law and why Jesus was sacrificed on the cross. We become to judgmental in saying: "that person isn't following the law, they broke..." But then again, you believe the Bible to be one big lie, so I don't know if there's anymore to discuss.
 

skeptik

New Member
Nov 26, 2006
37
0
0
39
(SwampFox;4448)
So this loving, caring God that gave us the law of God has now left us alone to do what we want. He sent his son simply to die while we take and corrupt what his son was sent for in the first place? Sorry, but when you speak of logic this just doesn't hold water for me. Why trust us humans? Because he is God, afterall and there are countless examples of him working through those same corrupt souls to save them!
No, he sent his son as a last ditch effort to try and point us in the right direction. (SwampFox;4448)
I disagree - homosexuals invoke the law of love; even pedophiles say the very same thing...ever heard of NAMBLA? I love God but I make mistakes daily. We're not perfect and will never be, we sin. We all have faults but that doesn't mean there isn't good within us.
Well, NAMBLA is why we have secular laws prohibiting it. Back in those days it was perfectly common for a man to marry a 12 or 13 year old girl. No mention of pedophilia in the bible is there? I know we're not perfect. I am the first to admit it. And you still talk of homosexuals as the abomination that the bible describes, when, in the next paragraph you say: (SwampFox;4448)
However, much of what you have quoted in previous threads is directed at Israel in the wilderness. Take, for instance, the man found above in the wilderness on Sabbath - this is obviously a specific case for that particular time. The same works for the rule that is addressed to the people Israel. That's instructing this particular people. I've addressed some of your other concerns in the other in thread.
So the homosexuality is an abomination law was just meant for the people of Israel? Please, we need to reconcile these beliefs. Either you believe that the laws of the old testament were meant for the people of Israel and a christian can safely disregard those laws based on the fact that Christ died for our sins, Or you believe that the laws are there for us to follow and hence, you have to make your best effort to follow every law to the letter. (SwampFox;4448)
I cannot judge someone and will not judge someone. Period. I do my best to follow the law, though I fail. I am human.
Again, see above. Is the law to be followed or not? (SwampFox;4448)
But then again, you believe the Bible to be one big lie, so I don't know if there's anymore to discuss.
I think we're past the big lie part, and more into "do we follow the laws" part.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
Whoa, first of all. Punctuation marks! I know I can be a little annoying and a rant is in order. At least you're not calling me names yet! Thank you.
Punctuation was my way of getting your attention. I have no intention of ever calling you names. Now that doesn't mean I won't ever think them (LOL)
smile.gif
lastly I may get a little frustrated I'm not getting my messages across at times but I don't mind a healthy bit of skepticism I prefer it to some who think they Know everything and really know very little and have an arrogant judgemental attitude to boot. I've run across several of those in the past.
Second. I would wholeheartedly agree with you IF what you are saying is that those laws are not meant for us gentiles.
Let me take one more stab at this from another directionIt is not that they are all not meant for gentiles its that the penalty for gentiles breaking a law is payed differently. And some Ordinance Laws were fulfilled in Christ so the penalty is voided out.(like animal sacrifice)First Christ said he came not to change one iota of the law.Secondly There are two different types of laws, Ordinances and Laws there is a difference Christ death on the cross fulfilled many of the Ordinances (for example the having to sacrifice a lamb to atone for sin )Third If you are a gentile and break the law the New penalty is to repent in Christ name and if you are to be forgiven (another words if you commit a stoning offence under the New Covenant you must repent for your sin instead of being stoned to death the laws the same the penalty is different, and open to all who have accepted that Christ was the anointed one, son of God.The Jews haven't accepted this so technically they could still, if they chose to, stone someone. New Covenant states "let him who is without sin cast the first stone" it is saying in essence that such a human does NOT exist because no one is without sin. So you would be committing a sin if you tried to claim stoning was the penalty by law(Old Covenant Law) because upon accepting Christ you can't now go back and claim you didn't know about repentance being the New penalty(requirement)to pay(atone) for sin.I hope that makes sense to you I'm trying to make a complicated subject as understandable as I can