WHY ARE MANY OF US STILL HERE?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
You are doing violence to the Scriptures when you take statements out of context. The first is Luke 17:21. Jesus is there speaking to the Pharisees and a group of His followers. The Pharisees ask Him when will the Kingdom of God come? The expression, "Kingdom of Heaven" is used exclusively in the gospel of Matthew, by the way. The other three gospels refer to the Kingdom of God. He replies that the Kingdom of God is already among them, (in their midst) meaning Himself as the King--but they do not recognize Him.

The next is John 3:13. Jesus is speaking to Nicodemus, who had come to Him, under cover of darkness, because he feared the Jewish authorities. Nicodemus was a Pharisee who almost certainly would have believed that the righteous dead went to be with Abraham in a beautiful Edenic paradise--one of two sections of sheol (Hebrew for "the place of the dead"--our New Testament translates the original Greek hades as "hell" but it instead, would have been equivalent to sheol--the "place of the dead"). The other section of hades/sheol was the "place of punishment"--the place for the unrighteous dead.

There are two main interpretations of the John 3:13 statement. One has a more Jewish theological cast to it. Jews of Jesus' day, believed that the souls of the righteous dead would have needed to wait for "Messiah ben Joseph" to take them into the presence of God Almighty in heaven (the place where He dwells) when He (the Messiah) was raised from the dead after three days. The writings of a few Talmudic scholars in the centuries preceding Jesus' birth indicate that there would be two Messiahs (instead of one who would come to them twice): Messiah ben Joseph--the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53 and Messiah ben David--the Conquering King. Two Israeli archeologists recently (at the turn of the 21st century) discovered a stone (they called it the stone of "Gabriel's Revelation") which seems to validate that this was a common belief of Jews prior to Jesus' advent. This is, in my opinion, the main thrust of Jesus' tale of the Rich Man and "the other Lazarus" of Luke 16.

The second, more conventionally Christian, interpretation is that Jesus was saying that none of Nicodemus' teachers have been up to heaven and come back to teach him about it, but that He, had been there. It is preceded by Jesus' rebuke of Nicodemus for not knowing about the "born again" teaching and He says, "...if you don't believe me when I tell you about earthly things, how can you possibly believe if I tell you about heavenly things?" Either interpretation works in the context.

Your third cited statement is, I assume, your rendering of 1 Timothy 6:16. God Almighty (also known as God the Father) is an [immortal] Spirit (cited by Jesus in John 4:24) but humans, since the Fall, are spiritually dead. That is why they must be "born again" (spiritually) "from on high". Some atheist critics have pointed out that Satan was correct--that Adam and Eve did not die the day that they disobeyed God. But, the fact that, when they sinned, they were no longer innocent and realized that they were shamefully naked, means that something spiritual had transpired--their spiritual death--as their bodies and souls were still intact.
The phrase 'kingdom of heaven' is often understood as the totality of those who profess - similar to the use of 'Christendom' today. These phrases really denote entities which contain a huge doctrinal and spiritual mixture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waiting on him

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
What does that mean?
ah, prolly better if you ask your pastor that. Maybe. Being as how you couldn't hear what he was saying while you were under, and maybe what he said when you were coming up didn't register or something? Or maybe the best answer here is "that was meaningless for you, and meant for someone else" I dunno, sometimes posts are like that I guess?
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
33,346
21,562
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
ah, prolly better if you ask your pastor that. Maybe. Being as how you couldn't hear what he was saying while you were under, and maybe what he said when you were coming up didn't register or something? Or maybe the best answer here is "that was meaningless for you, and meant for someone else" I dunno, sometimes posts are like that I guess?

I'm thinking that "another baptism bites the dust" is something disparaging. The above comes across that way to me. But I'm sure that's not what you meant!

Much love!
Mark
 

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
I'm thinking that "another baptism bites the dust" is something disparaging. The above comes across that way to me. But I'm sure that's not what you meant!

Much love!
Mark
Might have been someone else who said this; I don't know.

Though I do have strong views about baptism...(Acts 2.41...)
 

Waiting on him

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2018
11,674
6,096
113
56
North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't understand half the posts in this thread!

???
Their are some here that wish to bring others under bondage.
Maybe to glory in their flesh?
The beginning of knowledge is to fear God. To fear God is to hate evil. To enter back into the Mosaic law makes the Cross of Christ of none effect. The flesh profits nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marks

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
Their are some here that wish to bring others under bondage.
Maybe to glory in their flesh?
The beginning of knowledge is to fear God. To fear God is to hate evil. To enter back into the Mosaic law makes the Cross of Christ of none effect. The flesh profits nothing.
Galatians is a very pivotal Epistle in this respect. The New Testament believer is truly under grace, not law.
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
33,346
21,562
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Their are some here that wish to bring others under bondage.
Maybe to glory in their flesh?
The beginning of knowledge is to fear God. To fear God is to hate evil. To enter back into the Mosaic law makes the Cross of Christ of none effect. The flesh profits nothing.

Even with that in mind . . .

But yes, I think that's what this kind of thinking is about. Those who think they keep the law rely on themselves, that's my take. And those who try to bring others into the bondage of Law are trying to notch their belts. At least that's the way Paul looked at it.

Much love!
Mark
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
33,346
21,562
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Galatians is a very pivotal Epistle in this respect. The New Testament believer is truly under grace, not law.

I can't imagine a more detailed explanation of how we're not under the Law. Well, except for Romans, and Colossians, and 1 John, and . . .
 

Waiting on him

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2018
11,674
6,096
113
56
North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Even with that in mind . . .

But yes, I think that's what this kind of thinking is about. Those who think they keep the law rely on themselves, that's my take. And those who try to bring others into the bondage of Law are trying to notch their belts. At least that's the way Paul looked at it.

Much love!
Mark
I’m sure that Jesus has circumcised many new believers into his fold today.
 

Lady Crosstalk

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2019
2,069
1,114
113
49
Ontario
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
@Lady Crosstalk I just cannot understand professing Christians who seem to want to set aside the glorious, comforting truth of the Rapture of the church, merely because it's not something fashionable perhaps.

Yes--it is the "Blessed Hope". I think their objections have to do with two things: First, it is likely the belief of many Christians that the Church has always been persecuted--so why would we believe that, in this one instance, the Church would be spared? To that, I say, yes, the Church has always been persecuted by those who belong to Satan, but the Book of Revelation makes it clear that the Tribulation is the time that God's wrath and that of the Lamb, will be poured out on an evil and worldly populace. After the removal of the Church, some will make a choice to be sheep instead of goats and will pay the price with their martyrdom. And the Church is NOT appointed to the wrath of God. (Some wag has expressed it as, "Jesus is not a wife-abuser.")

The Second objection is that the Pre-Tribulation Rapture is tied to Dispensationalism, which, in turn supports the idea of a Millennial Kingdom overseen by Jewish believers in Jesus--which many Christians have been taught to despise. Antisemitism has always been a VERY serious problem in the Church since its early days.
 

Lady Crosstalk

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2019
2,069
1,114
113
49
Ontario
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
In my opinion the wrath of God has been fully exhausted

When did THAT happen?? I think I missed it. If you mean that His wrath was poured out on Jesus on the Cross, I would say that you are correct in a spiritual sense--that is how we in the Church are cleansed. But, the physical wrath of God is yet to come. He did exercise it in the Flood but it looks like a cleansing of the earth is required again. The first was with water. Peter said the next cleansing would come as fire.
 

bbyrd009

Groper
Nov 30, 2016
33,943
12,081
113
Ute City, COLO
www.facebook.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States Minor Outlying Islands
I'm thinking that "another baptism bites the dust" is something disparaging. The above comes across that way to me. But I'm sure that's not what you meant!

Much love!
Mark
Well, i know this is maybe a radical suggestion, but being how this is nominally what is usually deemed a "conversation," maybe you could reply to the post? But I did my best to make that rhetorical-ish too, in case you prefer to go that route; there at the end? As I'm not sure how you were ritually baptised, and let's be honest prolly like no one really pays attention in that moment I guess.

I'm retarded, which makes me hyper-aware I guess, so I just asked him what he said lol. Duh.