He said that if we continue in His word.... What is His word? Isn't it what He said that is recorded in the Bible?You think He was talking about a book?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
He said that if we continue in His word.... What is His word? Isn't it what He said that is recorded in the Bible?You think He was talking about a book?
I need to. Sorry.You want to call it night? I will talk to you anytime.
The Jews had Christ killed because He was not what they were expecting.
Christian have an idea how Revelation is going it occur. If Christ does not return how people expect him to, how Revelation tells it or their understanding of Revelation,will they reject Him, again?
Seriously?
Of course God is perfect; of course God is Love
Like said, WE were created to love and we became imperfect after the Fall and now, we are called to glorify God by learning with the Holy Spirit, to love neighbor and God perfectly.
This is our sanctification
You think people love perfectly? If they did, sin would not exist.
No one 'killed' Christ. He laid His life down. I know that this may seem like I am being a bit strict, but He made quite a big deal of this fact or difference. It seems this point was very important to Him. So it is important to me.
I, too, have a concern that if events do not unfold in a specific manner of some pet theory then they may have a crisis of faith. Personally, I had my first crisis in 1988. Not proud of that. Live and learn. Or just live...
However, when considering the Rapture or the Second Coming, the notion that folks are going to be able to sit around and make plodding decisions escapes me. These events are described in lightning quick terms. If you are Raptured then the likely experience will be typing away in the forums one moment and on some rapidly moving mechanism headed for Glory the next. Perhaps a gentle floating upward, but largely involuntary at that juncture with the Leavers and Remainers already all settled. The second Coming is similar isn't it? Either people are so hardened that they won't possibly even be able to chose and curse Him to his face but the redeemed saints of the Great Tribulation are likely to already be fully onboard. They probably won't care exactly how He is choosing to accomplish this feat.
Much in contrast to the first incarnation when Christ came and peached and healed and ministered. Took time to build human relationships. I think the two sets of context are incomparable. It will be goats and sheep time. All over except for the crying.
and 2000 years after Mary died. If protestants knew and understood the scriptures, they could confidently state that Mary is dead, so whatever people see in visions, it cannot be Mary. And the evidence that Mary was raised from the dead and assumed into heaven? Well, the visions of Mary of course. No greater evidence for her assumption than if people saw visions of Pol Pot. I've read numerous quotes from the supposed Mary, and they are all encouraging idolatry. And the RCC only accepts those visions that suits. And the ones they do not accept? What are they. Fake? Lies by a few over excited souls? Not Mary but sometime else? Who else? What else?what are they going to say to all those that have seen Mary? 1500 hundred years after Christ,
and 2000 years after Mary died. If protestants knew and understood the scriptures, they could confidently state that Mary is dead, so whatever people see in visions, it cannot be Mary. And the evidence that Mary was raised from the dead and assumed into heaven? Well, the visions of Mary of course. No greater evidence for her assumption than if people saw visions of Pol Pot. I've read numerous quotes from the supposed Mary, and they are all encouraging idolatry. And the RCC only accepts those visions that suits. And the ones they do not accept? What are they. Fake? Lies by a few over excited souls? Not Mary but sometime else? Who else? What else?
Couldn't agree more. The history of the last 2000 years though had been so distorted and revised by the powers that be.. The victors... That the truth of history is buried under mounds of rubbish. It takes some digging and some discernment to pry apart the truth from fiction.The scriptures are 2000 year ago....God did not die. Christian history did not stop. God did not stop interacting with us. Christian history did not stop at the end of the Bible. and someone that stands up after 1500 years after the fact is not the expert on Christianity or the Bible. Historically speaking youngsters in understanding.
He said that if we continue in His word.... What is His word? Isn't it what He said that is recorded in the Bible?
Just a book?? Just any old book???
I write books. I would never call the books I write "the truth;" although, they contain truth.
Understanding God's grace and how it works in the life of the believer is a doctrinal issue. And our eternal destiny depends on that understanding. For example, grace in the Catholic vernacular is quite different to the grace in the Protestant. Protestants don't receive "merit" stored up by the excess of riches of past Saints. Nor do they receive grace through attending mass, stations of the cross, receiving extreme unction, or confessing sins to an earthly priesthood.
Eventually, yes. But Protestants did not start with replacing our swapping traditions.And yet, the Bible itself, tells us that the existence of God is self evident in nature.
So are you now calling yourself a Protestant? Protestants simply replaced Catholic Tradition with their own - you know that
Mining for gold was never for the half heartedGood grief
Your posts take a huge commitment to read
I am not going for another advanced degree tonight.
I will try to spend the weekend getting through it and get back to you
Mining for gold was never for the half hearted
Lol. I'll cut back a little on the humility thing then so as not to make you feel as if you cannot cope.Your humility is overwhelming
Would you be comfortable telling what is you denomination?In the OP I stated that Mormonism is "based on what Paul called unsubstantiated 'myths.'"
The following excerpt is from Chapter 21 of Unveiling Grace: the Story of How We Found Our Way out of the Mormon Church by Dr. Lynn Wilder:
In 2012, Michael and I traveled to the land of Israel and into the West Bank. There we saw the ruins of Shechem, Samaria, Dan, the City of David, Jerusalem, and the walls of Jericho. We saw pottery, swords, utensils, coins, furniture, clothing, homes, scrolls, columns, streets, and ancient synagogues and “high places.” The mountains, valleys, bodies of water, and geography of the Bible are accurate. More than five thousand existing manuscripts have been found throughout Europe, Asia, and Africa that corroborate the historicity and accuracy of the Bible.
In contrast, Joseph Smith “translated” the Book of Mormon from one set of “gold plates,” and those plates no longer exist where one can see them. The geography of the Book of Mormon has not been located, at least the Mormon Church has no official position. There is no DNA evidence that ties Book of Mormon descendants with Israelites as the Book of Mormon teaches. Historical, physical, and geographical evidence does not exist. Mormons are asked by their leaders to believe the authenticity of the Book of Mormon by faith, not by scientific evidence.
Wilder, Lynn K.. Unveiling Grace (pp. 324-325). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.