Is water baptism necessary for salvation?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

OzSpen

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2015
3,728
795
113
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
spencer.gear.dyndns.org
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
They looked forward to the cross, we look back. Its all by faith. Read Heb 11. If water baptism is necessary for us, it would have been necessary for them. God is not a God of confusion.

However, the Scriptures can be confusing at times: 'Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ' (1 Pet 3:21 NIV).
 

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2019
7,784
3,150
113
76
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
CL,

I don't think so. Throughout 1 John it speaks of those who are believers: 'and the word of God abides in you, and you have overcome the evil one' (1 Jn 2:`4 NIV).

Oz

That's what I said. So what don't you agree with if we have overcome the evil one.
 

historyb

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2011
2,990
2,701
113
52
in a house
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
historyb,

So is your view the only one which is correct?

Making accusation about 'false Christianity' on this forum - without providing - exegesis from the biblical text is irresponsible and will stir trouble.

Can you imagine Jesus saying to the thief on the cross, 'Repent and be baptized'? But he went to Paradise at death.

I affirm believers' baptism as taught in the NT, but the NT formula for salvation is: '8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith – and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God – 9 not by works, so that no one can boast' (Eph 2:8-9 NIV).

It does not confirm grace by faith + baptism for salvation.

Oz

Believers baptism is an evangelical fantasy. Baptism is a Grace from God. I actually commented on the thief on the cross you need to read my post better, all of them he was baptized with the baptism of desire. St. Peter said when ask what to do to be saved "repent and be baptized"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mungo

historyb

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2011
2,990
2,701
113
52
in a house
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It is the *Traditionalist Churches* who hate the truth. Otherwise there would have been no Counter-Reformation.

Here's someone calling Bible-believing Christians pagans, when it was the Roman Catholic Church which incorporated all the pagan ideas into its False Christianity (including the cult of the Queen of Heaven)!

The Five Solas were meant to put all Christians on the same track, but the Reformers did not go far enough regarding baptism. They should have followed the lead of the Anabaptists instead of persecuting and killing them.

I am not Catholic get it right. I am not even sure you are a christian but just pretending and you don't believe the Bible but your own ideas using the Bible. The five solas are the greatest perversion since paganism ruled rome
 

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2019
7,784
3,150
113
76
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Believers baptism is an evangelical fantasy. Baptism is a Grace from God. I actually commented on the thief on the cross you need to read my post better, all of them he was baptized with the baptism of desire. St. Peter said when ask what to do to be saved "repent and be baptized"

So did you think thief was already baptized before being crucified, or wasn't? He knew too much to not already be a follower.
 

amadeus

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2008
22,464
31,590
113
80
Oklahoma
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Its funny you used the term 'bosses' which to me carries negative overtones.
I used the word, boss, on purpose for precisely that reason. That is man's typical meaning and usage... with negative overtones. God is the Head of all. Jesus is the Head of the Church [the Body] which is us... but we are simply to submit. God will not twist our arm to make us be what He wants us to be. He wants us to want to be that. People who run cold or worse ride the fence are in trouble.

Are we to submit to our pastor? If we are, it is to be exactly as a freely surrendered self. How hard would it be for us to submit to God as Jesus did, allowing ourselves to be killed when we had the power to prevent it? With Jesus we must always be saying, "...nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt."

The problem of course lies in how we perceive and excerise authority.

If our brother has been given authority over us do we envy his position? Do we look for excuses to reject or disobey that authority?
The children of Israel did this with Moses which means that they did it with God who put Moses in that position. The problem occurs from both directions. There is the man who usurps power that is not his to take or the men who fail to yield themselves to those who God has put has over them.

Are we truly willing to submit to our brethren? Do we rejoice for and with them when they are called to serve?

If we have been given authority over another, do we exercise it in service to them or do we abuse our positon to serve ourselves?
Even so my friend. Give God the glory even when we are not getting what we think that we should. Doesn't matter that we believe we are better qualified than the one to whom God has given the authority. We are not to decide! We are not to be as the politicians who do climb up over anyone standing our way. The lowest room is the place to always begin and let God lift up who He will.

I won't pressume to guess how the Lord will use us in eternity but I am quite sure that no one will have a problem with how He delegates authority and neither will their be a problem with how we excercise any authority that He gives us, for all will know the Fathers will.

Beloved, we are God's children now; what we shall be has not yet been revealed. We do know that when it is revealed we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.

Peace be with you!
Thank you friend! Give God the glory and let Him always be the One who leads.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Philip James

Nondenom40

Active Member
May 21, 2019
493
246
43
Illinois
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
However, the Scriptures can be confusing at times: 'Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ' (1 Pet 3:21 NIV).
Nothing confusing here.
A. The water in Noah's flood didn't save anyone. It killed everyone in it.
B. The ark saved all those inside. A type of Christ..
C. ...not as a removal of dirt from the body...i.e. water.
D. ...an appeal to God for a good conscience..i.e. your public declaration for Jesus at your water baptism which happens AFTER you are saved.
 

FHII

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2011
4,833
2,494
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
With 225 messages to date at this time, I am not going to even try reading them all. But here's my take:

Bottom line:. No, water Babistim isn't necessary.it isn't wrong to do, and itit butis an admirable thing, but is not necessary.

1. Most of the verses which speak of baptism don't mention water.
2. Water Baptism was John's. Jesus baptized with fire. Why not do that instead?
3. Jesus was baptized in water, but why? Scripture says for the remission of sins.

Whose sins, if Jesus didn't have any? So, was Jesus's baptism not good enough?
4. Would you rather be baptized into Christ and his death or the river Jordan?

5. Peter or Paul (I forget) found desciples of John who received the same Baptism Jesus did, but they were ignorant. They hadn't even heard of the Holy Ghost (although John preached it) and I hey we're rebaptized into Christ (water was not mentioned).

6. "Baptized" means to be immersed. The Strings definition says, "as in water". It does not say, "in water". Again, Jesus baptized with fire... I'd rather go through Jesus's fire than John's water
7. Isn't it funny how so many note the spiritual meaning of Jesus's words, except when it comes to this?
8. Paul expressed he wasn't that concerned about literal baptism.

In conclusion, there is nothing wrong with literal water baptism. It is edifying. But not necessary. You must be baptized (immersed) in Christ. That is, being in him every day.

Jesus talked to a woman at a well once. A Semaritan. He asked for water. Jesus said if she asked, he would give her water that would make her never thirst again.

He was saying he and his Word was that water. Had she drank from the well, she would be thirsty again soon. If I were baptized in the Jordan River, or any other body of water, I would eventually dry off.

Jesus has water that doesn't dry off.

That's the water baptism we need.
 

Nondenom40

Active Member
May 21, 2019
493
246
43
Illinois
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I am not Catholic get it right. I am not even sure you are a christian but just pretending and you don't believe the Bible but your own ideas using the Bible. The five solas are the greatest perversion since paganism ruled rome
The solas are a preversion? Placing Gods written word as the highest standard is a perversion? Believing that faith alone saves is a perversion. In other words God does it all is a perversion? Think about it.
 

Nondenom40

Active Member
May 21, 2019
493
246
43
Illinois
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So did you think thief was already baptized before being crucified, or wasn't? He knew too much to not already be a follower.
How so? Even Peters confession in Matt 16 Jesus said wasn't of his own doing but God the Father revealed it. When the Father draws us He makes His son known to us.
 

FHII

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2011
4,833
2,494
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I said baptism - noun, not baptised - verb.

And I don't believe it is a trivial difference.
I believe it is a trivial difference, and with this I agree with charistmiclady.

1 Corinthians 12:13 KJV
For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
 

CovenantPromise

Active Member
Sep 14, 2019
718
135
43
52
Northeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
In another thread, the subject of water baptism has intervened into the subject of the thread, and threatens to divert (The Hope Of The World). This subject can be a contentious one, but I hope it can be approached with love on all sides.

On the side of the necessity for water baptism for salvation, certain verses were quoted in that thread by a participant, which could provide a starting point.

John 3:5, Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, 1 Peter 3:21

Of course it is. Even the thief on the cross was baptized by Christ's Word which like the rain and snow comes back to him fruit. Those whom the graves gave up too were baptized at Christ's crucifixion. I had a intense debate with a brother who disagrees with me. I disagree with the doctrine of the "Baptism of Desire".

I believe God reveals exactly how His Word goes forth. In Isaiah 55. Many disagree with the scriptures. Protestants deny the obvious language of
John 3:5
5Jesus answered,, “Truly, truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.
And many Catholics deny the necessity of Doctrine devised, needing to line up with the language of scripture.
2Tim.3 Verses 16 to 17

[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

These maxims always need to be applied by Christians. Men's doctrines, when formulated must align with what scripture says. Things like (a priest can be in mortal sin and serve at God's altar), and (the Baptism of Desire), do not lend themselves to being aligned with the Holy Word.
Baptism of Desire:
Baptism of desire (Latin: Baptismus flaminis) is a teaching of the Anglican Communion, Lutheran Church and Roman Catholic Church explaining that those who desire baptism, but are not baptized with water through the Christian Sacrament because of death, nevertheless receive the fruits of Baptism at the moment of death ...

It is just this simple: When looking to create a doctrine one must look at the equation and sum of the written WORD first. Then ask himself does this doctrine I am devising gel with what is Christ's clear message. If the equation of Christ's message is TRULY, TRULY ,VERILY,VERILY most assuredly ,a“Timeless truth I am telling you: “ then that is a clear equation that "The Baptism of Desire " does not align with. (You will see what I am saying as you read further on). Clearly Christ means what He says. That is a timeless truth, very simply -at no period IN TIME , which death and ALL UNFORTUNATE circumstance come about during, will change His MAXIMS. Therefore , one can easily dismiss this doctrine called "The Baptism of Desire".

Why would the sum be, the thief on the cross WAS NOT BAPTIZED, when it contradicts the obvious equation? It is clear, the thief was baptized based on Christ's language and PROMISE, which truly, truly, verily, verily, a timeless truth means. So it is as the prophet Isaiah reveals from God, for God spoke through Him:
Isaiah 55:10-11
10For just as rain and snow fall from heaven
and do not return without watering the earth,
making it bud and sprout,
and providing seed to sow and food to eat,
11so My word that proceeds from My mouth
will not return to Me empty,
but it will accomplish what I please,
and it will prosper where I send it.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English John 3:5
Yeshua answered and said to him: “Timeless truth I am telling you: “If a person is not born from water and The Spirit, it is impossible that he shall enter the Kingdom of God.
John 3:5
5Jesus answered,, “Truly, truly, I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.

Truly , truly means He promises and means what He says. He would have to make good on His own words because of who He is. If he says something, He must do it. Certain Catholics disagree with that. I think it is because they do not want to admit they are wrong . They would rather forgo truth for denominational pride. That's a shame. They should be more like Peter and accept their admonishment. Peter was very humble. Too bad those who claim to be built on that very rock do not follow His lead.

Numbers 23:
19God is not a man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind. Does He speak and not act? Does He promise and not fulfill?
Does he promise and not fulfill?
John 3:5
5Jesus answered,, “Truly, truly,( means I promise you) I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.

Hebrews 13:
Christ's Unchanging Nature

…7Remember your leaders who spoke the word of God to you (LIKE ISAIAH and ALL THE PROPHETS AND APOSTLES AND FRIENDS OF). Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith. 8Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. 9Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace and not by foods of no value to those devoted to them.…

I am 100% correct about the "Baptism of Desire " just as I am correct in knowing, water baptism is a necessity for salvation.

Mathew 5:18
18For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

Certain people need to get off their high horses and start riding into discussions meek and humble on a donkey.

God Bless!
 
Last edited:

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2019
7,784
3,150
113
76
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
With 225 messages to date at this time, I am not going to even try reading them all. But here's my take:

Bottom line:. No, water Babistim isn't necessary.it isn't wrong to do, and itit butis an admirable thing, but is not necessary.

1. Most of the verses which speak of baptism don't mention water.
2. Water Baptism was John's. Jesus baptized with fire. Why not do that instead?
3. Jesus was baptized in water, but why? Scripture says for the remission of sins.

Whose sins, if Jesus didn't have any? So, was Jesus's baptism not good enough?
4. Would you rather be baptized into Christ and his death or the river Jordan?

5. Peter or Paul (I forget) found desciples of John who received the same Baptism Jesus did, but they were ignorant. They hadn't even heard of the Holy Ghost (although John preached it) and I hey we're rebaptized into Christ (water was not mentioned).

6. "Baptized" means to be immersed. The Strings definition says, "as in water". It does not say, "in water". Again, Jesus baptized with fire... I'd rather go through Jesus's fire than John's water
7. Isn't it funny how so many note the spiritual meaning of Jesus's words, except when it comes to this?
8. Paul expressed he wasn't that concerned about literal baptism.

In conclusion, there is nothing wrong with literal water baptism. It is edifying. But not necessary. You must be baptized (immersed) in Christ. That is, being in him every day.

Jesus talked to a woman at a well once. A Semaritan. He asked for water. Jesus said if she asked, he would give her water that would make her never thirst again.

He was saying he and his Word was that water. Had she drank from the well, she would be thirsty again soon. If I were baptized in the Jordan River, or any other body of water, I would eventually dry off.

Jesus has water that doesn't dry off.
Here's one:

Acts 8:
34 So the eunuch answered Philip and said, “I ask you, of whom does the prophet say this, of himself or of some other man?” 35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning at this Scripture, preached Jesus to him. 36 Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, “See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?”

37 Then Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.”

And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”

38 So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him.
 

FHII

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2011
4,833
2,494
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Here's one:

Acts 8:
34 So the eunuch answered Philip and said, “I ask you, of whom does the prophet say this, of himself or of some other man?” 35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning at this Scripture, preached Jesus to him. 36 Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, “See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?”

37 Then Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.”

And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”

38 So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him.
Like I said, it isn't wrong. It was done, but not always. My point is that it is more important to be emmersed in Christ than in water.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willie T

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2019
7,784
3,150
113
76
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Like I said, it isn't wrong. It was done, but not always. My point is that it is more important to be emmersed in Christ than in water.

What I didn't understand, is why there was no mention of the eunuch getting the Holy Spirit.
 

CovenantPromise

Active Member
Sep 14, 2019
718
135
43
52
Northeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
How poetic of you! But I didn't seperate his doctrine from him.[/QUOTE
Like I said, it isn't wrong. It was done, but not always. My point is that it is more important to be emmersed in Christ than in water.

CovenantPromise said:
If you are immersed in His doctrine you are immersed in Him. If you are immersed in His name you are not just simply immersed in water but in His commandment. If baptism were simply to be immersed in water then He would be emphasizing the importance of taking baths. However, since His word prospers where he sends it, when He says water baptism is essential to cleanse the flesh of the filth of sin then it is and you are raised up in Christ when it is done . This is a nod to the flood and those saved through the waters which separated the righteous from that which is unrighteous. This goes along side with baptism in the Fire of the Holy Spirit which fills the soul. Both are Holy Spirit purposed. And both are NEEDED to enter heaven just as HE SAID. I did not coin anything He said , I simply believe every word He says without question. God Bless!