Nephilim

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (Christina @ Feb 23 2009, 12:00 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69702
QUOTE (Lookin'4wardtoHeaven @ Feb 22 2009, 11:53 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69700
Christina,This makes me think of the story David and Goliath.Wasn't Goliath a Giant ? Sorry if I am off topic.
No you are right on topic and yes Goliath was a giant (the off spring of fallen angels and woman ) there are other referances but Goliath is by far the most well known he was from the second influx after the floodAh, more truth is showing... it travels me back to Genesis 6:2-4, where the babies are born as a giant. In fact it travels me back to Genesis 3 except that Cain wasn't a giant. o_O
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
there is also Num 13:33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, [which come] of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TLHKAJ

shepherdsword

New Member
Feb 12, 2009
39
3
0
QUOTE (Jordan @ Feb 23 2009, 12:34 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69698
What part of the scriptures do you base these ideas on? Jesus clearly had a flesh and blood body after he was resurrected. So will we.There is a gnostic theory(docetic) that makes this claim. Of course it also claims that Jesus never came in the flesh as well and I don't think you are saying that.Are you getting the idea that all souls were created at the same time from the Kabbalah's statements about the "guf of souls? If so that source is spurious at best and dangerous at worst.No she ain't. Either Christ had a flesh body after death or He doesn't.Scriptures say these things and they don't contradict each other.I Corinthians 15:50 - Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
It's not the flesh and blood that are inheriting the kingdom.The FACT that Jesus had a flesh and blood body is proven by this statement. It doesn't depend upon a spurious interpretation of one verse. The other verses you cited were irrelevant Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. You do understand that he was very clearly stating that he had a flesh and blood body don't you?QUOTE
Tell me shepherdsword, can a single human walk through walls, doors and glass?
No but one transformed by the resurrection can. Although a number of resurrections where recorded prior to Jesus's his is still known as the "firstborn among many"This is the body with which we shall be clothed when we are transformed at the second coming. A body that can eat and drink and yet walk through doors and walls. just like Jesus did after his resurrection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TLHKAJ

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (shepherdsword @ Feb 23 2009, 01:04 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69706
QUOTE (Jordan @ Feb 22 2009, 11:34 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69698
What part of the scriptures do you base these ideas on? Jesus clearly had a flesh and blood body after he was resurrected. So will we.There is a gnostic theory(docetic) that makes this claim. Of course it also claims that Jesus never came in the flesh as well and I don't think you are saying that.Are you getting the idea that all souls were created at the same time from the Kabbalah's statements about the "guf of souls? If so that source is spurious at best and dangerous at worst.No she ain't. Either Christ had a flesh body after death or He doesn't.Scriptures say these things and they don't contradict each other.I Corinthians 15:50 - Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
It's not the flesh and blood that are inheriting the kingdom.The FACT that Jesus had a flesh and blood body is proven by this statement. It doesn't depend upon a spurious interpretation of one verse. The other verses you cited were irrelevant Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. You do understand that he was very clearly stating that he had a flesh and blood body don't you?QUOTE (Jordan @ Feb 22 2009, 11:34 PM) [url="index.php?act=findpost&pid=69698][/url]
Tell me shepherdsword, can a single human walk through walls, doors and glass?
No but one transformed by the resurrection can. Although a number of resurrections where recorded prior to Jesus's his is still known as the "firstborn among many"This is the body with which we shall be clothed when we are transformed at the second coming. A body that can eat and drink and yet walk through doors and walls. just like Jesus did after his resurrection.And do you realize what you are saying clearly contradicts scriptures? I want scriptures to say that the Lord still have flesh and blood after His death. You clearly ignored...Ecclesiastes 12:7 - Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.Genesis 3:19 - In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.Our human body and our blood goes back to the ground... God has no used to bring back a human body... Especially He also has no use to bring back His human body. Christ can't return to His Father... can't return to Heaven when He is in His human body, but He can do that after His death in His non-human body. Which the scriptures call it the spiritual body. Scriptures clearly says we have two bodies.I Corinthians 15:44 - It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.In our non-human body, we can do the same thing that Christ did... walk through walls, doors etc. Before we were born, our original body is our non-human body. AKA: our spiritual body.
 

shepherdsword

New Member
Feb 12, 2009
39
3
0
QUOTE (Jordan @ Feb 23 2009, 12:47 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69726
And do you realize what you are saying clearly contradicts scriptures?
Jesus said this AFTER his resurrection: Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. Wow, what do you know. There it is right in the bible! It seems what you are saying is what is contradicting the bible. QUOTE
I want scriptures to say that the Lord still have flesh and blood after His death.
Laffo. What do you think Luke 24:39 is saying? And then you claim that I'm the one ignoring verses? I ignored them because any first year bible student knows that do not apply to a resurrected body. Come on, Jordon! I haven't read enough of your posts to know where you stand on classic christian doctrines but I have read enough to know you have the knowledge to do better than that.QUOTE
You clearly ignored...Ecclesiastes 12:7 - Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
Are you taking this to mean that it can never be resurrected? Lets see what Job had to say about it:Job 19:2626 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:Even Job with his limited revelation from the Spirit knew he would have a resurrected body of flesh and blood.QUOTE
Genesis 3:19 - In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.Our human body and our blood goes back to the ground... God has no used to bring back a human body... Especially He also has no use to bring back His human body. Christ can't return to His Father... can't return to Heaven when He is in His human body, but He can do that after His death in His non-human body. Which the scriptures call it the spiritual body. Scriptures clearly says we have two bodies.
You are a bit confused. They do go back into the ground. God resurrects them when you are judged. The body is glorified and changed but it still a body that can eat and drink just as Jesus stated he would in the kingdom of his father.Mat 26:29 But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdomOnly a body of flesh and blood can eat and drink.QUOTE
I Corinthians 15:44 - It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.In our non-human body, we can do the same thing that Christ did... walk through walls, doors etc. Before we were born, our original body is our non-human body. AKA: our spiritual body.
In proper hermeneutical exegesis we let scripture interpret scripture. In light of the other verses I posted that clearly proves my point , this verse means that the flesh and blood body we are resurrected with has qualities that make it a spiritual one as well.This was the why Jesus could pass through walls and why we will not reproduce and get married in the age to come. I suggest if you want to continue this discussion than you deal with the scriptures I posted as I have done with yours. The only reason I am continuing is that I suspect you have a belief that most would find unorthodox that hinges on it. You do believe in the classic positions that most Christians take on blood atonement and salvation don't you? I am only asking because I don't know you. It isn't meant as an insult if you do. I have had debates with others on matters like this and have later found that they would have been called docetic gnostics by the early church fathers. I am not saying that's where you are at but it would be cool to see a statement of faith that you agree with so I could know best how to approach you.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
QUOTE (shepherdsword @ Feb 23 2009, 09:54 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69779
Jesus said this AFTER his resurrection: Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. Wow, what do you know. There it is right in the bible! It seems what you are saying is what is contradicting the bible. Laffo. What do you think Luke 24:39 is saying? And then you claim that I'm the one ignoring verses? I ignored them because any first year bible student knows that do not apply to a resurrected body. Come on, Jordon! I haven't read enough of your posts to know where you stand on classic christian doctrines but I have read enough to know you have the knowledge to do better than that. Are you taking this to mean that it can never be resurrected? Lets see what Job had to say about it:Job 19:2626 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:Even Job with his limited revelation from the Spirit knew he would have a resurrected body of flesh and blood.You are a bit confused. They do go back into the ground. God resurrects them when you are judged. The body is glorified and changed but it still a body that can eat and drink just as Jesus stated he would in the kingdom of his father.Mat 26:29 But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdomOnly a body of flesh and blood can eat and drink.In proper hermeneutical exegesis we let scripture interpret scripture. In light of the other verses I posted that clearly proves my point , this verse means that the flesh and blood body we are resurrected with has qualities that make it a spiritual one as well.This was the why Jesus could pass through walls and why we will not reproduce and get married in the age to come. I suggest if you want to continue this discussion than you deal with the scriptures I posted as I have done with yours. The only reason I am continuing is that I suspect you have a belief that most would find unorthodox that hinges on it. You do believe in the classic positions that most Christians take on blood atonement and salvation don't you? I am only asking because I don't know you. It isn't meant as an insult if you do. I have had debates with others on matters like this and have later found that they would have been called docetic gnostics by the early church fathers. I am not saying that's where you are at but it would be cool to see a statement of faith that you agree with so I could know best how to approach you.
Again it is not flesh and blood it is incoruptable new body we call it a spirit body because it is not subject to the sins of flesh again I never said it was without substance but it is not flesh either .... t can walk through walls it eat we will live on earth in cities and have nations and Christ is king but God fore knew us before we were born some are pre destined by this for knowing we have no flesh and blood body we have a new body 1 Cor 15 we are all changed flesh and Blood can not enter heaven ...
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (Christina @ Feb 24 2009, 08:54 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69834
QUOTE (shepherdsword @ Feb 23 2009, 11:54 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69779
Jesus said this AFTER his resurrection: Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. Wow, what do you know. There it is right in the bible! It seems what you are saying is what is contradicting the bible. Laffo. What do you think Luke 24:39 is saying? And then you claim that I'm the one ignoring verses? I ignored them because any first year bible student knows that do not apply to a resurrected body. Come on, Jordon! I haven't read enough of your posts to know where you stand on classic christian doctrines but I have read enough to know you have the knowledge to do better than that. Are you taking this to mean that it can never be resurrected? Lets see what Job had to say about it:Job 19:2626 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:Even Job with his limited revelation from the Spirit knew he would have a resurrected body of flesh and blood.You are a bit confused. They do go back into the ground. God resurrects them when you are judged. The body is glorified and changed but it still a body that can eat and drink just as Jesus stated he would in the kingdom of his father.Mat 26:29 But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdomOnly a body of flesh and blood can eat and drink.In proper hermeneutical exegesis we let scripture interpret scripture. In light of the other verses I posted that clearly proves my point , this verse means that the flesh and blood body we are resurrected with has qualities that make it a spiritual one as well.This was the why Jesus could pass through walls and why we will not reproduce and get married in the age to come. I suggest if you want to continue this discussion than you deal with the scriptures I posted as I have done with yours. The only reason I am continuing is that I suspect you have a belief that most would find unorthodox that hinges on it. You do believe in the classic positions that most Christians take on blood atonement and salvation don't you? I am only asking because I don't know you. It isn't meant as an insult if you do. I have had debates with others on matters like this and have later found that they would have been called docetic gnostics by the early church fathers. I am not saying that's where you are at but it would be cool to see a statement of faith that you agree with so I could know best how to approach you.
Again it is not flesh and blood it is incoruptable new body we call it a spirit body because it is not subject to the sins of flesh again I never said it was without substance but it is not flesh either .... t can walk through walls it eat we will live on earth in cities and have nations and Christ is king but God fore knew us before we were born some are pre destined by this for knowing we have no flesh and blood body we have a new body 1 Cor 15 we are all changed flesh and Blood can not enter heaven ...Thanks for the help Christina. I owe you one.
smile.gif
I was a bit worned out by people who can't believe such a simple truth, that was clearly written in black and white.I Corinthians 15:50 - Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. ...Ecclesiastes 12:7 - Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.Genesis 3:19 - In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return....I Corinthians 15:44 - It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.Like it or not. Scriptures say we have two bodies. God does not ever need a wicked, sinful, yielded to temptation body ever again after we are transformed back to our original body. And I am so glad and can't wait to see this again... (too bad, we have no memory in the first Earth Age)
 

shepherdsword

New Member
Feb 12, 2009
39
3
0
QUOTE (Christina @ Feb 24 2009, 09:54 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69834
Again it is not flesh and blood it is incoruptable new body we call it a spirit body because it is not subject to the sins of flesh again I never said it was without substance but it is not flesh either .... t can walk through walls it eat we will live on earth in cities and have nations and Christ is king but God fore knew us before we were born some are pre destined by this for knowing we have no flesh and blood body we have a new body 1 Cor 15 we are all changed flesh and Blood can not enter heaven ...
You are saying something the bible doesn't say. Jesus said he had flesh after the resurrection. Job said that after worms destroyed his body in his FLESH he would see God. There isn't any way around these verses so I guess that's why you guys are ignoring them. I haven't ignored any verses that you or Jordan have presented in regard to this. Whatever
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (shepherdsword @ Feb 26 2009, 02:46 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69939
QUOTE (Christina @ Feb 24 2009, 08:54 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=69834
Again it is not flesh and blood it is incoruptable new body we call it a spirit body because it is not subject to the sins of flesh again I never said it was without substance but it is not flesh either .... t can walk through walls it eat we will live on earth in cities and have nations and Christ is king but God fore knew us before we were born some are pre destined by this for knowing we have no flesh and blood body we have a new body 1 Cor 15 we are all changed flesh and Blood can not enter heaven ...
You are saying something the bible doesn't say. Jesus said he had flesh after the resurrection. Job said that after worms destroyed his body in his FLESH he would see God. There isn't any way around these verses so I guess that's why you guys are ignoring them. I haven't ignored any verses that you or Jordan have presented in regard to this. WhateverNo, what you are doing is going by the surface of the text only. The surface of the text is Level 1. The Milk. Sure, everybody who was and who is starts as the Milk, because as a "newborn" baby, we desire the Milk. (I Peter 2:2) God wants us to get past the Milk and learn the Meat of God's Words. (Hebrews 5:13-14) The Milk is more "easy believe-ism". You are not understanding what God is saying. You are relying on the surface of the text. To rely on the surface of the text only is dangerous and can lead one to mislead people... and that will get one in trouble.If God says everybody has two bodies, then I will take His Words for it. What good does God needs Christ's "sinful" nature... as His body is also tempted like as we are? (Hebrews 4:15)Hey if you are more comfortable living by the Milk only, that is your very choice. You are free to believe whatever you want.
 

jules

New Member
Feb 24, 2009
16
0
0
Interesting subject.If God has no use of human's physical body, how then do these scriptures fit?- 2 Kings 2:11; Elija's removal from earth in the chariot of fire. Did his body miraculously change from physical to supernatural?- Gen 5:24; And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.- Mark 9:4; And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: And they were talking with Jesus.And 'resurrection' and 'raising from the dead' are not the same:- Matt 27: 52-53; And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose; And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.- 1 Kings 17:21-22; And he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, I pray thee, let this child’s soul come into him again. And the LORD heard the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived. As a 'side': Has anyone investigated claims regarding 'Giants of India', which frequently pop up on various websites. Some sincere, others claiming CG-technology .... what about the 'six degrees of separation', also called the 'human web'? Has anyone got connections to the fringes of archaeology?thanksJules
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (jules @ Feb 27 2009, 12:44 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70002
Interesting subject.If God has no use of human's physical body, how then do these scriptures fit?- 2 Kings 2:11; Elija's removal from earth in the chariot of fire. Did his body miraculously change from physical to supernatural?- Gen 5:24; And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.- Mark 9:4; And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: And they were talking with Jesus.And 'resurrection' and 'raising from the dead' are not the same:- Matt 27: 52-53; And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose; And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.- 1 Kings 17:21-22; And he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried unto the LORD, and said, O LORD my God, I pray thee, let this child’s soul come into him again. And the LORD heard the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived. As a 'side': Has anyone investigated claims regarding 'Giants of India', which frequently pop up on various websites. Some sincere, others claiming CG-technology .... what about the 'six degrees of separation', also called the 'human web'? Has anyone got connections to the fringes of archaeology?thanksJules
Jules, we are talking about a certain subject in the bible. We are currently talking about the Resurrection. There are no human bodies at the Resurrection. It's obvious that anything before Resurrection (which obviously did not happen) .. God uses human for His plan.
 

shepherdsword

New Member
Feb 12, 2009
39
3
0
QUOTE (Jordan @ Feb 27 2009, 02:10 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70003
Jules, we are talking about a certain subject in the bible. We are currently talking about the Resurrection. There are no human bodies at the Resurrection. It's obvious that anything before Resurrection (which obviously did not happen) .. God uses human for His plan.
I am amazed that you continue in this error when I have proved you wrong with the scripture. You seem to have the uncanny ability to dent a clear scripture presented right before your face. There ARE human bodies at the resurrection. Job had more revelation from the Spirit on this in the OT than you have now.Let me show you once again. Job 19:26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God: No way to spin this verse. it clearly shows that what you are saying is deception. I also pointed out these verses which I believe someone did make a somewhat sophomoric attempt to deal with .Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. 40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. 41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? 42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. 43 And he took it, and did eat before them. You need a flesh and blood body in order to consume food. We know he had blood because:Lev 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. Every time I hear one of you make this erroneous statement about no physical bodies at the resurrection I am going to post these verses. Until a) you deal with them in an acceptable manner
cool.gif
I get banned,at which point I have no responsibility to contend on this forum for the faith once delivered to the saints
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
And I am amazed that you can not see you are creating a contradiction .... And there are none in Gods Word When we create one by our understanding of something we have something wrong ...Sense Christ is obviously in Heaven and God says Flesh and Blood can not enter heaven you have a problem. the fact you have chosen to accept some verse causing one to deny others ...Is the proof something is amiss in one understanding as the Whole of the Word is Gods truth ...not just want one can make fit. I Corinthians 15:50 "Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption."Paul is saying that you can count on this for a fact. Flesh and blood cannot be part of the Kingdom of God. Your flesh body is going to drive you to sin and that is its nature. When you are under the nature of your flesh body, it will not allow your inner man to control you. There is no way that flesh and blood can become part of the kingdom of God. As long as you are in your flesh body, you simply cannot keep from breaking part of the laws of God. Your mind is incapable of retaining all the law, and applying it to every moment of your life. This is why we have repentance, and it is also why flesh and blood will not be here when Jesus Christ's kingdom is established here on earth for the Millennium kingdom. I Corinthians 15:51 "Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,"Paul is now going to show us a mystery that deals with our generation, for a mystery is something that cannot be understood. However, when the details and clues of the mystery are know, then it is no longer a mystery. This mystery deals with a time when something is going to happen all over the earth to all flesh bodies, when these flesh bodies are not die anymore. Why will this be? Because all people living in their flesh bodies will be changed instantly from their flesh bodies, into their new incorruptible bodies. We have already established that each of us have two bodies, one is of the flesh, and the other body is a spiritual body that is within our flesh body. The spiritual body is not made alive or freed from the flesh body until the flesh body is done away with. I Corinthians 15:52 "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed."The time that it will take to change all the physical or natural bodies on this earth into their spiritual bodies will be faster than you can wink your eye. It is instant. Paul is telling us that this change will come "at the last trump", and that is when there are no more trumps. He identifies that trumpet as the seventh trumpet,
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (shepherdsword @ Mar 2 2009, 09:43 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70111
QUOTE (Jordan @ Feb 27 2009, 01:10 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70003
Jules, we are talking about a certain subject in the bible. We are currently talking about the Resurrection. There are no human bodies at the Resurrection. It's obvious that anything before Resurrection (which obviously did not happen) .. God uses human for His plan.
I am amazed that you continue in this error when I have proved you wrong with the scripture. You seem to have the uncanny ability to dent a clear scripture presented right before your face. There ARE human bodies at the resurrection. Job had more revelation from the Spirit on this in the OT than you have now.Let me show you once again. Job 19:26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God: No way to spin this verse. it clearly shows that what you are saying is deception. I also pointed out these verses which I believe someone did make a somewhat sophomoric attempt to deal with .Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. 40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. 41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? 42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. 43 And he took it, and did eat before them. You need a flesh and blood body in order to consume food. We know he had blood because:Lev 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. Every time I hear one of you make this erroneous statement about no physical bodies at the resurrection I am going to post these verses. Until a) you deal with them in an acceptable manner
cool.gif
I get banned,at which point I have no responsibility to contend on this forum for the faith once delivered to the saintsThe problem is not with me, but it is you that are creating a contradiction here. Secondly I have not yet hear anyone saying "There is no physical bodies". The reality is, There will be physical bodies, just not human bodies like we have now.
 

shepherdsword

New Member
Feb 12, 2009
39
3
0
QUOTE (Christina @ Mar 2 2009, 02:47 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70116
And I am amazed that you can not see you are creating a contradiction .... And there are none in Gods Word When we create one by our understanding of something we have something wrong ...Sense Christ is obviously in Heaven and God says Flesh and Blood can not enter heaven you have a problem. the fact you have chosen to accept some verse causing one to deny others ...Is the proof something is amiss in one understanding as the Whole of the Word is Gods truth ...not just want one can make fit. I Corinthians 15:50 "Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption."Paul is saying that you can count on this for a fact. Flesh and blood cannot be part of the Kingdom of God. Your flesh body is going to drive you to sin and that is its nature. When you are under the nature of your flesh body, it will not allow your inner man to control you. There is no way that flesh and blood can become part of the kingdom of God. As long as you are in your flesh body, you simply cannot keep from breaking part of the laws of God. Your mind is incapable of retaining all the law, and applying it to every moment of your life. This is why we have repentance, and it is also why flesh and blood will not be here when Jesus Christ's kingdom is established here on earth for the Millennium kingdom. I Corinthians 15:51 "Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,"Paul is now going to show us a mystery that deals with our generation, for a mystery is something that cannot be understood. However, when the details and clues of the mystery are know, then it is no longer a mystery. This mystery deals with a time when something is going to happen all over the earth to all flesh bodies, when these flesh bodies are not die anymore. Why will this be? Because all people living in their flesh bodies will be changed instantly from their flesh bodies, into their new incorruptible bodies. We have already established that each of us have two bodies, one is of the flesh, and the other body is a spiritual body that is within our flesh body. The spiritual body is not made alive or freed from the flesh body until the flesh body is done away with. I Corinthians 15:52 "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed."The time that it will take to change all the physical or natural bodies on this earth into their spiritual bodies will be faster than you can wink your eye. It is instant. Paul is telling us that this change will come "at the last trump", and that is when there are no more trumps. He identifies that trumpet as the seventh trumpet,
There is no contradiction on my part. That's laughable. I have already dealt with these verses and proven that they do not mean what you say they do. Go back and try to rebutt my interpretation of them. THEN try to deal with the verses I posted. You have been proven wrong. Posting verses that I have already dealt with is ad nausem and a waste of time. In fact the contradiction is on YOUR part. You haven't properly dealt with the verses I presented.QUOTE (Jordan @ Mar 2 2009, 10:22 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70123
I am amazed that you continue in this error when I have proved you wrong with the scripture. You seem to have the uncanny ability to dent a clear scripture presented right before your face. There ARE human bodies at the resurrection. Job had more revelation from the Spirit on this in the OT than you have now.Let me show you once again. Job 19:26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God: No way to spin this verse. it clearly shows that what you are saying is deception. I also pointed out these verses which I believe someone did make a somewhat sophomoric attempt to deal with .Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. 40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. 41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? 42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. 43 And he took it, and did eat before them. You need a flesh and blood body in order to consume food. We know he had blood because:Lev 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. Every time I hear one of you make this erroneous statement about no physical bodies at the resurrection I am going to post these verses. Until a) you deal with them in an acceptable manner
cool.gif
I get banned,at which point I have no responsibility to contend on this forum for the faith once delivered to the saintsThe problem is not with me, but it is you that are creating a contradiction here. Secondly I have not yet hear anyone saying "There is no physical bodies". The reality is, There will be physical bodies, just not human bodies like we have now.
Ok, I'll get out of the way while you backpeddle.
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
QUOTE (shepherdsword @ Mar 3 2009, 05:48 AM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70128
QUOTE (Christina @ Mar 2 2009, 01:47 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70116
And I am amazed that you can not see you are creating a contradiction .... And there are none in Gods Word When we create one by our understanding of something we have something wrong ...Sense Christ is obviously in Heaven and God says Flesh and Blood can not enter heaven you have a problem. the fact you have chosen to accept some verse causing one to deny others ...Is the proof something is amiss in one understanding as the Whole of the Word is Gods truth ...not just want one can make fit. I Corinthians 15:50 "Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption."Paul is saying that you can count on this for a fact. Flesh and blood cannot be part of the Kingdom of God. Your flesh body is going to drive you to sin and that is its nature. When you are under the nature of your flesh body, it will not allow your inner man to control you. There is no way that flesh and blood can become part of the kingdom of God. As long as you are in your flesh body, you simply cannot keep from breaking part of the laws of God. Your mind is incapable of retaining all the law, and applying it to every moment of your life. This is why we have repentance, and it is also why flesh and blood will not be here when Jesus Christ's kingdom is established here on earth for the Millennium kingdom. I Corinthians 15:51 "Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,"Paul is now going to show us a mystery that deals with our generation, for a mystery is something that cannot be understood. However, when the details and clues of the mystery are know, then it is no longer a mystery. This mystery deals with a time when something is going to happen all over the earth to all flesh bodies, when these flesh bodies are not die anymore. Why will this be? Because all people living in their flesh bodies will be changed instantly from their flesh bodies, into their new incorruptible bodies. We have already established that each of us have two bodies, one is of the flesh, and the other body is a spiritual body that is within our flesh body. The spiritual body is not made alive or freed from the flesh body until the flesh body is done away with. I Corinthians 15:52 "In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed."The time that it will take to change all the physical or natural bodies on this earth into their spiritual bodies will be faster than you can wink your eye. It is instant. Paul is telling us that this change will come "at the last trump", and that is when there are no more trumps. He identifies that trumpet as the seventh trumpet,
There is no contradiction on my part. That's laughable. I have already dealt with these verses and proven that they do not mean what you say they do. Go back and try to rebutt my interpretation of them. THEN try to deal with the verses I posted. You have been proven wrong. Posting verses that I have already dealt with is ad nausem and a waste of time. In fact the contradiction is on YOUR part. You haven't properly dealt with the verses I presented.QUOTE (Jordan @ Mar 2 2009, 09:22 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70123
The problem is not with me, but it is you that are creating a contradiction here. Secondly I have not yet hear anyone saying "There is no physical bodies". The reality is, There will be physical bodies, just not human bodies like we have now.
Ok, I'll get out of the way while you backpeddle.Hey, if you feel that I'm a liar and want to falsely accused me, that's your choice. If you feel that Paul is lying as he is the apostle of Lord Jesus Christ, that's your choice. And if you feel that you have to pick and choose which scripture(s) to choose what you believe and ignore and deny other scriptures that contradicts you, that's your choice as it is fine by me. Means nothing to me.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
There is NO SIN No FLESH as we know flesh... Flesh and blood can not enter heaven...Heaven is where Christ is and that will be here on earth ...Even Elijah was transformed... The flesh body returns to the clay/dust it was made of dust to dust We have new bodies call them what you will.... We call them spirit/soul bodies because they are not flesh the do not reproduce they do not rot they do not have a nature to sin IT IS A NEW incorubtable body it is your soul/spirit body ..It eats it lives in cities amoung Nations ect ect... but it is not flesh as we know flesh ... That is Gods Word .Your does cause a contradiction ... What is it you think you are going to be changed into ??? from flesh to flesh ??? Whats the point?? And if Flesh and Blood can not enter heaven where is Christ Now ??? Could he have been killed again ??? Or was he imortal ??.... What of the Angels that appear as flesh men are they flesh also ?? If so how do they go to heaven ...Why are we Told we have more than one body ...if flesh is all we are ...
 

shutin45

New Member
Feb 18, 2009
102
1
0
61
QUOTE (Christina @ Feb 5 2009, 05:21 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=68839
In the book of Genesis we read the blunt, categorical statement: "And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God [angels] saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. . . .There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men [had sexual relations with them], that they bare CHILDREN to them, the same became MIGHTY MEN which were of old, men of renown" (Gen.6:1-4). Who were these "giants" and men of "renown"? What does the Bible tell us about them? This is a fascinating story -- one that needs to be told! What happens when a spirit being appears as flesh, and unites with a mortal woman, and their two seeds join -- the sperm of the male and the egg of the female? This was a union which God had forbidden -- for good reason. The offspring which resulted, were not only proud, insolent, arrogant, and self-centered -- they were also extremely cunning in some cases -- and they were sometimes GIGANTIC in stature! They disrupted the entire ecology and balance of life of the world before the Flood. Admits the Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary "Who, or what, then, were the Nephilim? In the only other passage where the word occurs (Num.13:32-33), it clearly means giants, being derived . . . from the mutually related roots of three verbs, yielding the fundamental idea of HUGE, EXTRAORDINARY SIZE. Nor can it be deemed incredible that in the antediluvian age, when, from the remains of quadrupeds and other inferior animals, we see that they were of an immensely larger type than the existing race of them exhibits . . . . "Archaeology, too, show, from the traditionary fables of the classical poets, as well as from the colossal monuments that are extant, that there were people in remote times of CYCLOPEAN STRENGTH; and whether this . . . was the characteristic percularity of a certain class only, various circumstances contribute to warrant the conclusion, that in the world before the Flood there were Titans distinguished by corporeal stature and energies far above the present scale. But although the idea of GIGANTIC POWER does underlie the language of the sacred historian, the term Nephilim seems to bear a deeper significance; and if etymology may guide us, it describes a class of men of worthless and at the same time of violent character. . . intimating that the Nephilim were marauding nomads -- men of a violent, overbearing, lawless character -- who abused their bodily powers to obtain their selfish ends; who were constantly roving from place to place in quest of plunder, and, emerging suddenly from their retreat, made attacks both on the property and the lives of men" (Critical Experimental Commentary, vol.1, p. 89). Giants AFTER the Flood, Too! Men of gigantic stature are also mentioned as existing after the Flood of Noah's time. When the children of Israel sent spies into the land of Canaan, preparatory to invading the land, they were appalled to find giants dwelling in the land. They gave to Moses and the people a frightening, dismaying report: "Nevertheless the people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there. . . . We be not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we. And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of great stature. And there we saw the GIANTS, the sons of Anak, which come of the GIANTS: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so were we in their sight" (Numbers 13:28-33). The word for "giants" here is the same word used in Genesis 6:4 -- the Nephilim. Obviously, therefore, some of them lived after the Flood. A Second Irruption of Giants Where did these giants come from? Since all the Pre-Flood giants were destroyed by each other, or before the Flood, these must have been born to disobedient angels who sinned by cohabiting with women soon after the Deluge. Says the Companion Bible: "But we read of the Nephilim again in Num.13:33: 'there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, which come of the Nephilim.' How, it may be asked, could this be, if they were all destroyed in the Flood? The answer is contained in Gen.6:4, where we read: 'There were Nephilim in the earth in those days (i.e., in the days of Noah); and also AFTER THAT, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children unto them, the same became the mighty men (Heb. gibbor, the heroes) which were of old, men of renown' (lit. men of the name, i.e. who got a name and were renowned for their ungodliness). "So that 'after that,' i.e. after the Flood, there was a second irruption of these fallen angels, evidently smaller in number and more limited in area, for they were for the most part confined in Canaan, and were in fact known as the 'nations of Canaan.' It was for the destruction of these, that the sword of Israel was necessary, as the Flood had been before. "As to the date of this second irruption, it was evidently soon after it became known that the seed was to come through Abraham; for, when he came out from Haran (Gen. 12:6) and entered Canaan, the significant fact is stated: ' The Canaanite was then (i.e. already) in the land.' And in Gen.14:5 they were already known as 'Rephaim' and 'Emim,' and had established themselves at Ashteroth Karnaim and Shaveh Kiria- thaim" (Appendix 25). Satan knew that the promised Messiah would come through the descendants of Abraham. Satan adopted a pre-emptive strategy and bred more "giants" to occupy the Promised Land to prevent the Israelites from being able to occupy it. His plan aborted, however, when the Israelites under Moses and later Joshua conquered the inhabitants of the land, and destroyed the remaining Anakim. Another Race of Giants -- the Rephaim In the book of Deuteronomy, Moses writes of the land of Moab, "The Emims dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; which also were accounted giants, as the Anakims" (Deut.2:10-11). The word for "giant" here is Raphah, which means "giant." Interestingly, the same word also means "ghost, dead, deceased." The Rephaim were another of the lines of giants which existed after the Flood. Moses tells us of the land of Moab, "That also was accounted a land of giants; GIANTS dwelt therein in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims; a people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims; but the LORD destroyed them before them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead" (v.20-21). Og, the king of Bashan, conquered by Moses and the Israelites on their entrance into the Promised Land, was one of the giants. "For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? nine cubits [approximately 14 feet!] was the length thereof, and four cubits [6 feet] the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man [i.e., a normal man -- the normal cubit measured 18 inches]" (Deut.3:11). Bashan, the land of Og, was called "the land of giants"(v.13; see also Josh.12:4, 13:12). The valley of Hinnom, the refuse dump for Jerusalem, a type of the final Gehenna fire, lay eastward of the "valley of the giants" (Josh.15:8; 18:16). Joshua 17:15 mentions the "Rephaim," another branch of the "giants." These dwelt in the region near Sodom and Gomorrah in the time of Abraham (Gen.14:5; 15:20; see also II Sam.5:18,22; 23:13). In an ancient text of the Jews, we read an astonishing description of some of these gigantic Amorites whom the Israelites conquered. In Buber's Tanhuma, Devarim 7, the text tells us of a Rabbi Johnanan ben Zakkai's encounter with the Roman Emperor Hadrian. This event occurred in about A.D. 135, soon after the Roman victory in the Bar Kochba war, when the Jews rebelled against the Romans. The text reads: "The wicked emperor Hadrian, who conquered Jerusalem, boasted, 'I have conquered Jerusalem with great power.' Rabbi Johanan ben Zakkai said to him, 'Do not boast. Had it not been the will of Heaven, you would not have conquered it.' Rabbi Johanan then took Hadrian into a cave and showed him the bodies of Amorites who were buried there. One of them measured eighteen cubits [approximately 30 feet] in height. He said, 'When we were deserving, such men were defeated by us, but now, because of our sins, you have defeated us'" (quoted in Judaism, edited by Arthur Hertzberg, p.155-156, George Braziller, New York: 1962). Thirty feet tall! The bones of these men were still in existence during the time of Josephus, the Jewish historian of the first century!
Thanks for that interesting topic and the discourse Christina.I saw where archeologists had found giants remains. Their "conclusion/theory" was that they couldn't/didn't survive because they had inadequate skin surface area to radiate the heat of their large bodies. Uh huh. THAT'S why.I just smiled to myself. I remembered the Flood. I also found it interesting that there were giants after the flood. I had always assumed Goliath was just a mutant.Thanks again for the post
smile.gif
. In Christ,Jim
 
  • Like
Reactions: TLHKAJ

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
QUOTE (shutin45 @ Mar 3 2009, 02:51 PM) index.php?act=findpost&pid=70149
Thanks for that interesting topic and the discourse Christina.I saw where archeologists had found giants remains. Their "conclusion/theory" was that they couldn't/didn't survive because they had inadequate skin surface area to radiate the heat of their large bodies. Uh huh. THAT'S why.I just smiled to myself. I remembered the Flood. I also found it interesting that there were giants after the flood. I had always assumed Goliath was just a mutant.Thanks again for the post
smile.gif
. In Christ,Jim
You are most welcome Ive never heard that explanation by science before ...I fiind that pretty amusing
smile.gif
There is said to be quite a collection held by the Smithsonian but they keep it the basement I guess ..It doesnt fit into their evoulution theroy anywhere so most prefer not to discuss it ... But I too find it a fascinating topic ...
 

SummaScriptura

New Member
Dec 12, 2008
32
3
0
68
It's not the flesh and blood that are inheriting the kingdom.The FACT that Jesus had a flesh and blood body is proven by this statement. It doesn't depend upon a spurious interpretation of one verse. The other verses you cited were irrelevant.
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. Luke 24:39-40
You do understand that he was very clearly stating that he had a flesh and blood body don't you?
No. Christ did not say that. Christ said he had a flesh and bone body. The blood is gone. Leviticus tells us "the life is in the blood". In the resurrection, the life of the body is no longer in the blood. Its source has changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TLHKAJ