So am I to assume the Space/Time continuum has gone on all these years completely uninterrupted by the Hand of God?
No assumption necessary, God told us in the word that time has been constant. Jesus knew exactly what time it was, even after 4,000 years:
Mar_1:15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
Did the Tower of Babel incident occur without altering the timeline?
Genesis 11:9
"Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth"
Yes, an event, does not alter "time". Language doesn't change "time", it only changes how one states the "time". There is also a present listing of the worlds languages, which shows that the 7th day is "sabbath" in those languages the world over.
Paul knew exactly what "time" it was, just as the children of Issachar did in the OT:
1Ch_12:32 And of the children of Issachar, which were men that had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do; the heads of them were two hundred; and all their brethren were at their commandment.
Rom_13:11 And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.
... Can anyone prove that all of the above happened without altering Earth's geology? ...
Earth's geology was altered by the flood, even before Babel. See Genesis 6-9, and Noah still knew the time, even down to months and days:
Gen 8:14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
That "geology" (landmass, water level, desertification, ice sheets, etc, etc) continued to change after the flood, doesn't affect "time". It affects location/position on earth.
... Don't forget this verse...
1 Chronicles 1:19
"And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother’s name was Joktan"
Why would it be forgotten? More importantly, what does the text have to do with "time"? Nothing. Time remains unchanged. That persons can be separated by water (oceans), mountain, swamp, desert, ice sheet, etc, doesn't affect the days of the week - at all. Time was still moving in Genesis 1-2, in that day 1 existed before mountains/hill even existed, and time flowed onward as it became day 2, day 3, etc and hills, etc were made by God (even Jesus by command of the Father).
Did God divide the Continents?
Surely, but again, it is non-sequitur in regards to "time". The day passes (time moves forward) whether a man is alive on this or that piece of land.
Totally global.
What if time passed normally inside of the Ark, yet passed differently outside of it?
"What if ..." is not scripture, not "thus saith the Lord", not "It is written." It is mere faulty conjecture and denial of the word written, for as shown above, Noah kept track of time out of the Ark, in the Ark, and out of the Ark again, and God was present in the Ark the entire "time" (Genesis 7:16).
What if Noah experienced 360 days with the LORD, yet the Earth aged 360,000 years?
The flood actually lasted about 375 days (Genesis 7:11, 8:14) not counting the 7 days inside before it rained. God was in the Ark with Noah, see Genesis 7:16). So, according to your confusion and wresting of 2 Peter 3:8, it would be the other way round (Noah would be 375+,000 days old (which, of course, is just nonsense), while outside would be just the 375 regular days), and so even according to your own eisegesis of 2 Peter 3:8 you are in error.
2 Peter 3:8
"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day"
2 Peter 3:8 is in the context of the days of Creation, see the previous verses, in which the normal 24hr consecutive days there, take on a secondary meaning, in that as God created in the 6 days, and rested the 7th day (His sabbath; Genesis 2:1-3; Exodus 20:8-11; Mark 2:27; Revelation 1:10, etc), so too is the entire span of this worlds history to be, as repeated (Ecclesiastes 1:9, 3:15, etc), in 6000 years with the 7th, 1000 year (millennium, of Revelation 20; Isaiah 24, etc), which then comes in the New Heavens, New Earth, in the new everlasting cycle.
Can anyone prove that this did NOT happen?
Just did, by context. First of all, it is your assertion, and you would have to prove your points validity. Your assertion is not granted as foundational truth.
You made no point, but you did make something of yourself though.
... is that no one ever considers Supernatural occurrences that can throw a monkey wrench into these calculations.
The Flood was supernatural. It was accounted for, by scripture, even according to "time". The Birth, Life, Death, Burial, Resurrection and Ascension of Jesus were all according to "time", right on "time". All of it "supernatural".
Oh and isn't it funny that Scientists
Scripture warned:
1Ti_6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
It truly is "folly". They (false scientists) mock at scripture, as surely as those mocked at Noah right before it flooded.
... say the first so called 'modern' Humans arrived between 300,000 and 400,000 years ago?
All based upon misrepresentation of the data, facts, and some dates just picked out of the thin aether.
Feel free to study more here: