No one can see the Kingdom of God unless...

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Can you see the Kingdom of God in your midst?

  • Yes I can

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • No I cant

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • I dont understand the question

    Votes: 3 23.1%
  • The kingdom has not fully come in yet

    Votes: 2 15.4%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .

amadeus

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2008
22,464
31,590
113
80
Oklahoma
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It's from the Bible that you find Christ. Discard the Bible, and you risk finding another christ.
But, if a person is one of His sheep hearing His voice and follows Him, what risk is there?

"And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice." John 10:4
 
Last edited:

amadeus

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2008
22,464
31,590
113
80
Oklahoma
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You're talking about very different things. You didn't resolve how MJR was transported in time to 30CE +-. Especially the utter nonsense that ensued?
Sorry, Jesus did not roam the earth before he was born. In other words, he wasn't even alive before he was born.
Heart2Soul, you're entering a mystical realm that you'll never be able to comprehend, explain, or apply in any manner. It's absolutely flaky nonsense that you're professing.
I don't think that you're flaky, or nonsensical, but the rationale that you're expressing at this point, is too implausible, and thus, incomprehensible. Who can make sense of it, and therefore, become edified?
And your way, the way of the mind of a man of flesh, has figured it all out? Do you not believe that the Pharisees and Sadducees who opposed Jesus so strongly knew what was written in scripture as well any other men? Yet... you will certainly admit they did not really know God. They were like Saul of Tarsis before he met Jesus on the road to Damascus... the very man later called Paul who wrote most of the NT.

"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Prov 14:12

And what was they said about Jesus?

"And when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself.
And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils." Mark 3:21-22
 
Last edited:

Heart2Soul

Spiritual Warrior
Staff member
May 10, 2018
9,863
14,508
113
65
Tulsa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You're talking about very different things. You didn't resolve how MJR was transported in time to 30CE +-. Especially the utter nonsense that ensued?
Sorry, Jesus did not roam the earth before he was born. In other words, he wasn't even alive before he was born.
Heart2Soul, you're entering a mystical realm that you'll never be able to comprehend, explain, or apply in any manner. It's absolutely flaky nonsense that you're professing.

Wow....hard to conceive that you said He wasn't even alive before He was born. But here are the verses that says He was....
John 1 King James Version (KJV)
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. (Reference Genesis 1)
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

So these first 5 verses establish Jesus as being present from the beginning.....verse 14 is where we come to understand that the Word was made flesh.

6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

Notice verse 10....He was in the world from the beginning of creation.

11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

How interesting this verse was for me.....as many as received him, to them gave he power to become sons of God.
Jesus appearance in the OT in the fiery pit with Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego is referred to as like a son of God ......
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego are figures from chapter 3 of the Book of Daniel, three Hebrew men thrown into a fiery furnace by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, when they refuse to bow down to the king's image; the three are preserved from harm and the king sees four men walking in the flames......Look! he answered, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire; and they are not hurt, and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God (Daniel 3:25).

Heart2Soul, you're entering a mystical realm that you'll never be able to comprehend, explain, or apply in any manner. It's absolutely flaky nonsense that you're professing.[/QUOTE]

If it wasn't for the fact that I have pity on you for your unbelief I would be offended, however I am not taking offense.....but I do pray that you will seek a deeper truth....and I pray the the Spirit of Truth (the Holy Spirit) will come to you and open your eyes to see, your ears to hear, and your heart to receive by faith.





 

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
And your way, the way of the mind of a man of flesh, has figured it all out? Do you not believe that the Pharisees and Sadducees who opposed Jesus so strongly knew what was written in scripture as well any other men? Yet... you will certainly admit they did not really know God. They were like Saul of Tarsis before he met Jesus on the road to Damascus... the very man then called Paul who wrote most of the NT.

"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Prov 14:12

And what was they said about Jesus?

"And when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself.
And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils." Mark 3:21-22
The Gospel of Christ, including Paul's conversion, are rational events. We all understand the purpose and the significance behind their message & occurrences, and each one of us can explain it enough, to lead one to salvation. Although Paul's conversion was a phenomenal event, there is no question that it was Christ who spoke to him, and we see the purpose behind it, and what it led to. Paul had a dramatic turn-around, and became the most effective Apostle of them all. Thus, glory all around for God & Christ. No ambiguity, no mystery, no subjective interpretation.
I believe in all the miracles, dreams, visions and prophecies of the Bible, and I believe that these gifts are still available today, to the devout, humble and faithful.
BUT, people, stop fantasizing. Stop interpreting every thought that passes through your mind, every single whimsical or stressful dream that occurs, as a sign from God. You're not as blessed as you like to think that you are. ...but I wish that you were, for if God is communicating with you as much as you say that he is, I have got a lot of Biblical questions that I'd like to ask you, so that I can finally get some doctrinal issues resolved.
Can anyone affirm that much for me?
 

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
no ones picking on Thomas, just making a statement, I do doubt he would care except he is a good example.
...well, i doubt that he would appreciate the constant comparison between me & him, how's that?
 

ScottA

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2011
11,741
5,593
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well, now it gets controversial. I don't believe that anyone is in heaven until after Judgement Day.
So, therefore, outside of the solely personal message, which i have an extreme problem with, the logistics are completely unbiblical to me.
So, unequivocally, i would say that it was derived from your own imagination.
If I may interject.

@marks

"That day", that Judgement Day, if it is of God it is not of the world, and therefore not within the times of the world. So...of course, you are correct, no one is in heaven until after. But that does not mean that the whole matter is therefore within the times of this world...not at all. It means that, as Paul said, "that day" referred to all throughout the scriptures, comes to each person, "each in his own order", meaning, in his own time. But that does not mean that "that day" is the point of entering into heaven...but rather, the exiting from the world.

So, we can look to the times of the world, or to the events of God not within the realm of time, but in the realm and kingdom of God; but to mix them is to mix darkness with light, which have no communion. This is what is biblical, which is what is meant by "rightly dividing the word of truth."

In that light then...all things in the world that point to or are visions or revelations of heaven and the kingdom of God; where it seems reasonable to consider that these things proceed Judgement, they do not, for the kingdom was before the world, and God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Therefore, in the only reality that can be defended biblically, time is merely an act of revelation, and we are last to know. Or, properly stated: all of this (including visions)...is the reading of the will, the opening of the books.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Wow....hard to conceive that you said He wasn't even alive before He was born. But here are the verses that says He was....

So these first 5 verses establish Jesus as being present from the beginning.....verse 14 is where we come to understand that the Word was made flesh.

Notice verse 10....He was in the world from the beginning of creation.

How interesting this verse was for me.....as many as received him, to them gave he power to become sons of God.
Jesus appearance in the OT in the fiery pit with Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego is referred to as like a son of God ......
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego are figures from chapter 3 of the Book of Daniel, three Hebrew men thrown into a fiery furnace by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, when they refuse to bow down to the king's image; the three are preserved from harm and the king sees four men walking in the flames......Look! he answered, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire; and they are not hurt, and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God (Daniel 3:25).

If it wasn't for the fact that I have pity on you for your unbelief I would be offended, however I am not taking offense.....but I do pray that you will seek a deeper truth....and I pray the the Spirit of Truth (the Holy Spirit) will come to you and open your eyes to see, your ears to hear, and your heart to receive by faith.
That's fine H2S, but again, I wasn't calling you flaky or full of nonsense, I like most of your posts, but this eternal Jesus nonsense is completely unacceptable. As far as John 1 goes, look up the word antanaclasis, this you should've discerned on your own. The literary convention being used in John's 1st chapter is quite clear.
Son of man is used throughout the Bible, how many times was Ezekial or Daniel called the Son of Man? Again, you should know this already and not make wild conjectures about pre-existent humans. This type of talk gives Christians a bad name, this is why the Jews & Muslims won't convert, they think that we're all a bunch of mystics and blasphemers.
Hyper-literal exegesis always leads to incompatible or implausible doctrine. You've entered a realm that you'll never be able to resolve, or glorify God with.
 

ScottA

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2011
11,741
5,593
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That's fine H2S, but again, I wasn't calling you flaky or full of nonsense, I like most of your posts, but this eternal Jesus nonsense is completely unacceptable. As far as John 1 goes, look up the word antanaclasis, this you should've discerned on your own. The literary convention being used in John's 1st chapter is quite clear.
Son of man is used throughout the Bible, how many times was Ezekial or Daniel called the Son of Man? Again, you should know this already and not make wild conjectures about pre-existent humans. This type of talk gives Christians a bad name, this is why the Jews & Muslims won't convert, they think that we're all a bunch of mystics and blasphemers.
Hyper-literal exegesis always leads to incompatible or implausible doctrine. You've entered a realm that you'll never be able to resolve, or glorify God with.
No...this is wrong, not biblical. You are categorically denying the "I am" of Christ, who was "before" Abraham.
 

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
No...this is wrong, not biblical. You are categorically denying the "I am" of Christ, who was "before" Abraham.
You will have to do much better than that if you want to postulate the existence of an eternal human. Much, much better. Do you not understand biblical hermeneutics or sound exegesis? You take this one awkward phrase, and come up with an unprecedented and implausible notion, just like that? Again, the Jews & Muslims are mocking this incompetence and irreverence.
 

mjrhealth

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2009
11,810
4,090
113
Australia
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
If I may interject.

@marks

"That day", that Judgement Day, if it is of God it is not of the world, and therefore not within the times of the world. So...of course, you are correct, no one is in heaven until after. But that does not mean that the whole matter is therefore within the times of this world...not at all. It means that, as Paul said, "that day" referred to all throughout the scriptures, comes to each person, "each in his own order", meaning, in his own time. But that does not mean that "that day" is the point of entering into heaven...but rather, the exiting from the world.

So, we can look to the times of the world, or to the events of God not within the realm of time, but in the realm and kingdom of God; but to mix them is to mix darkness with light, which have no communion. This is what is biblical, which is what is meant by "rightly dividing the word of truth."

In that light then...all things in the world that point to or are visions or revelations of heaven and the kingdom of God; where it seems reasonable to consider that these thing proceed Judgement, they do not, for the kingdom was before the world, and God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Therefore, in the only reality that can be defended biblically, time is merely an act of revelation, and we are last to know. Or, properly stated: all of this (including visions)...is the reading of the will, the opening of the books.
Its very much like a movie editor, already filmed it all, seeing the beginning and the end, now just doing the final cut to reveal it all. And to through a spanner in the works, that is why I know i am saved, because He has already seeing it. As far as God is concerned it is already done, i just have to wit till my part in the movie is over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus and ScottA

stunnedbygrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
12,397
12,048
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Could be argued, ...but, my reply was in regard to the fact that MJR told me that I was leaving out Jesus.

Could be argued by who, and for what purpose...? If you say you don't have the Holy Spirit, I believe you...
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

Waiting on him

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2018
11,674
6,096
113
56
North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Kingdom of God means the rule of God, with Christ as King of kings. As Jesus said to those who believe, the Kingdom of God is within you, which means Christ rules in the hearts of those who belong to Him. And only those who have been born again can enter and see the Kingdom of God.

But no one can see the literal, visible, physical (and spiritual), tangible Kingdom of God on earth as yet, for the simple reason that it will be established AFTER the second coming of Christ.

What we see around us is Christendom -- the wheat and the tares growing together while apostasy increases within the denominations until the Antichrist is revealed.
1 Corinthians 4:18-21 KJV
[18] Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come to you. [19] But I will come to you shortly, if the Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the power. [20] For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power. [21] What will ye? shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love, and in the spirit of meekness?

Paul says it’s something he can know, you can witness this power within someone.

What do you believe this power is?
Tecarta Bible
 

Waiting on him

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2018
11,674
6,096
113
56
North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Psalm 145:11-13 KJV
[11] They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, and talk of thy power; [12] To make known to the sons of men his mighty acts, and the glorious majesty of his kingdom. [13] Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and thy dominion endureth throughout all generations.


Tecarta Bible
 

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Could be argued by who, and for what purpose...? If you say you don't have the Holy Spirit, I believe you...
Yes, you're right, it was just an expression. But, you're right, I affirmed that I didn't have the Holy Spirit, therefore, nothing to argue, ...unless, someone knows better (difficult Biblical passages about this)?
 

Heart2Soul

Spiritual Warrior
Staff member
May 10, 2018
9,863
14,508
113
65
Tulsa
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That's fine H2S, but again, I wasn't calling you flaky or full of nonsense, I like most of your posts, but this eternal Jesus nonsense is completely unacceptable. As far as John 1 goes, look up the word antanaclasis, this you should've discerned on your own. The literary convention being used in John's 1st chapter is quite clear.
Son of man is used throughout the Bible, how many times was Ezekial or Daniel called the Son of Man? Again, you should know this already and not make wild conjectures about pre-existent humans. This type of talk gives Christians a bad name, this is why the Jews & Muslims won't convert, they think that we're all a bunch of mystics and blasphemers.
Hyper-literal exegesis always leads to incompatible or implausible doctrine. You've entered a realm that you'll never be able to resolve, or glorify God with.
If you read again it says Son of God not son of man.
 

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
If you read again it says Son of God not son of man.
That's true, it doesn't say 'Son of Man', but it neither says, reliably, 'Son of God'.
Only KJV, and a few others, says 'Son of God'. The majority of translations say otherwise, they give it a more generic sense which it deserves.
Because, this is Nebuchadnezzar speaking, he's describing something that he doesn't fully understand, therefore, his opinion is not definitive as to what he saw. What he saw was angelic in appearance, thus his description elicits loosely a spiritual entity, as opposed to a secular one.
You're being very frivolous with your exegesis, thus eisegesis.
If you want to start professing an eternal human, or that someone lived before they were born, do you not feel it incumbent upon yourself to do better than to quote a single verse or two? Plus, to offer verses that are more didactic and explicit in nature, rather than these ambiguous and isolated texts?

New International Version
He said, "Look! I see four men walking around in the fire, unbound and unharmed, and the fourth looks like a son of the gods."
English Standard Version
He answered and said, “But I see four men unbound, walking in the midst of the fire, and they are not hurt; and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods.”
New American Standard Bible
He said, "Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!"
International Standard Version
"Look!" he told them, "I see four men walking untied and unharmed in the middle of the fire, and the appearance of the fourth resembles a divine being."
NET Bible
He answered, "But I see four men, untied and walking around in the midst of the fire! No harm has come to them! And the appearance of the fourth is like that of a god!"
Good News Translation
"Then why do I see four men walking around in the fire?" he asked. "They are not tied up, and they show no sign of being hurt--and the fourth one looks like an angel."
 

ScottA

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2011
11,741
5,593
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You will have to do much better than that if you want to postulate the existence of an eternal human. Much, much better. Do you not understand biblical hermeneutics or sound exegesis? You take this one awkward phrase, and come up with an unprecedented and implausible notion, just like that? Again, the Jews & Muslims are mocking this incompetence and irreverence.
Your own plausible notions are obviously human logic, the study and teachings of men. "The Jews & Muslims" probably deny that Jesus came to and appeared to men behind locked doors too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Your own plausible notions are obviously human logic, the study and teachings of men. "The Jews & Muslims" probably deny that Jesus came to and appeared to men behind locked doors too.
But my views are not, I believe in miracles and Christ's messianic fulfillment, but i feel an obligation to justify this view with substantial Biblical testimony, and explanation. You, on the other hand, are talking about something so esoteric, that you can't even understand it, and you bring a single, non-definitive verse, to qualify your position?
Please appreciate why I think that you're being irresponsible and incompetent right now?