It is not inferred. It is taught. We see clearly the Father as God, the Son as God, and the Spirit as God. That's not an inference.
well thatks for the reply that the Father as God, the son as God, and the Spirit as God. lets see if this concept is TRUE.
LETS COMPARE DOCTRINE AND SEE. Lets see who is the FATHER.
The 1st. comparison is right in the beginning. Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth”. the very first error of the trinity doctrine is right here in Genesis 1:1. what do we mean? many believe that the Father and the son, “both”, was at, and active in creation, with the Spirit, by the Son creating everything through the Father. this is a deadly mistake on behalf of the trinity doctrine. they say the son was before the foundation of the world. and they use scriptures to prove their point by citing scriptures like, Hebrews 1:10 "And, Thou, Lord,
in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands”. or this one, John 17:5 "And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory
which I had with thee before the world was”. these scriptures seem to suggest that the Lord Jesus, (as son), was before the world was, which is correct, but with incorrect understanding. let’s look at this with one more scripture which states the same thing but give us the correct understanding, listen. 1 Peter 1:19 "But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
1 Peter 1:20 "
Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world,
but was manifest in these last times for you”.
did one see the very last part of the scripture, “but was
manifest in these last times for you”. what are all theses verse saying? that the Son who is God is to be MANIFESTED in flesh to come, (meaning the last times). not that the Son existed, no, but that he was
not to come into existence in this world until the appointed time.
which means that the Son is the “entity” to come, diversified in flesh. so at Genesis 1:1 he God, JESUS was not in a “diversified” state of himself, because flesh has not yet been made, which is his IMAGE
to come in. so in the OT JESUS was only “ONE” Spirit. and this ONE Spirit made “all things”. this is why John 1:3 identifies the Word as the Creator who
made all thing, and Isaiah 44:24 who said that he was “ALONE”, and “BY HIMSELF”, for he had not yet “diversified” himself in flesh yet, nor yet come into the world. this is why no trinity believer can reconcile John 1:3 and Isaiah 44:24. but Diversified Oneness can, and plainly reconcile the two.
the 2nd. comparison is easy to understand when one understand the first comparison. knowing the “diversity” of God is yet to Come in flesh, when he, God, the Spirit, JESUS said in Genesis 1:26 "And God said, Let
us make man in
our image, after
our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth”. God, JESUS, the Spirit, is speaking of himself to come as a man, but how can he come as a man if a man do not yet exist. so “he” God, JESUS
made a man. notice “he” … God made man. that’s the reason why in the very next verse after Genesis 1:26 we read in Genesis 1:27 God said, “HE” made man, not US or OUR, but "HE", meaning a single person, listen. Genesis 1:27 "So God created man in
his own image, in the image of God created
he him; male and female created
he them”. Hold it his own IMAGE, but was it not the Image to come? there is something one need to know about God and time, listen, Isaiah 46:10 "
Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure". that's how the Image of man is before he was even made."
God, who is a Single PERSON, (alone, and by himself), made man in his Image
to come, (which is from the end times). and the term Man/Adam itself tells us what is God’s IMAGE, listen
Man/Adam: H120 אָדָם 'adam (aw-dawm') n-m.
ruddy i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.).
[from H119]
KJV:
X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.
Root(s): H119
there it is, “
ANOTHER” of One -self in flesh, (that is to come). the “Son” who is God in flesh is to come as the “ANOTHER” of himself in flesh. supportive scripture, Romans 5:14 "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression
, who is the figure of him that was to come”. BINGO. so at creation all things was MADE by HIM, and that HIM is God without flesh and bone. this is why Jesus, the “entity”,
distinct, and
independent,
or self-contained, said “HE” made all things, in reference to his Spirit self, because now he is “shared” in flesh and blood. that’s why it’s so important to understand and to know the separation of the FLESH/Son of God, from the Spirit of Jesus, Son of man.
NOW, the "FATHER", who is the Holy Spirit, Jesus himself.
knowing that it was the Spirit, and ONLY the Holy Spirit who was here that laid the foundation of the world, and Made man. and the when the fullness of time came, God/Jesus shared himself in flesh, which is called the Offspring, or the diversity of the Holy Spirit in flesh. supportive scripture, Matthew 1:20 "But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife:
for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost”.
Now people think for just a second, if the Holy Spirit conceived the Child in Mary, who is the Father of the Child? answer the Holy Spirit. BINGO… listen, if 101G conceived the child in Mary, then 101G is the father … right. for the conceiver of a child is the father of that child. and the scriptures plainly and clearly states that the HOLY GHOST is the conceiver of that child. now do anyone say the scriptures is wrong or in error? I hope not, then the FATHER of that child born of Mary is of the Holy Ghost. so
the Holy Ghost is the “FATHER”. BINGO. the trinity doctrine says the Holy Ghost is a third Person. well the scriptures don’t say that . but we challenge anyone to find a scripture that states the Holy Ghost is called the third PERSON in the Godhead…. well, if one do I’ll repent, but until then Diversified Oneness rules.
so the HOLY SPIRIT is the FATHER, and the FIRST and ONLY PERSON in the Godhead. so RE-NEW your minds.
NOW if anyone have scripture that refutes that the Holy Spirit is not the conceiver of the child found in Mary, then the trinity has a "BIG" problem as to who is the "FATHER".
what a good way to start off.
PICJAG.