A Univeral, Multilingual, God?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

wayofthespirit

More often partly wrong than wholly right
Feb 16, 2010
84
8
0
89
North Norfolk, UK
This should put a cat amongst pigeons and get me a few minus marks.



The Gospels were written by newly converted Jews to whom nothing existed much beyond Judaism, the Gospel Message, and the immediate surrounds to their Mediterranean horizon.

In that context John wrote:

“God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16 KJV)



Paul however, was appointed to preach the Gospel somewhat further a field and, considering those who might never even hear the Gospel Message, he wrote

“The righteousness of God is revealed in all forms of faith: as it is written, the just shall live by faith.

However God’s wrath is against the unrighteousness of men who are shown truth, yet reject faith;

Because, in all instances, that which may be known of God is evident; for God has showed it to all men in the message of creation.

For the invisible things of him, even his eternal power and Godhead, are clearly seen from the creation of the world; so then all men are without excuse:

If, when they see God’s message of creation, men glorify him not as God, neither are thankful; but become vain in their imaginations; their foolish heart being darkened;

And professing themselves to be wise, they worship images made like to corruptible man, birds, four-footed beasts, and creeping things, instead of worshipping the incorruptible Creator, (plus worshipping things made by corruptible man such as Televisions, Cars, Houses, etc.) they become fools.” (Romans 1:17-23 MSV)



Assuming such teaching could be extrapolated to embrace those who never get the chance to respond to the gospel message by reasons other that geographical isolation e.g. premature death, mental incapacity etc., one could therefore justifiably expand John 3:16 to read:

“God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believes in such as God reveals to them, and whosoever never gets the chance to reject any form of revelation, should not perish but have everlasting life”



Not that I am a Universal Reconciliationist, I hasten to add,



But I am a bit of an annihilationist in that I believe everlasting torture in the Lake of Fire is the sole fate of the Devil, the Beast, and the False Prophet, notwithstanding it also being the place where those who have not been given ‘everlasting life’ will ‘perish’ (John 3:16 again) and where those who have been guilty of degrees of evil may well suffer a period of ‘punishment’ as part of their process of ‘perishing’.



So, back to the thread title….. who believes in a God who has no time for the grunt only Amazon Forest Dweller, or others who die never having spoken any of the languages into which the Bible had been translated, and/or who die never having heard the message of the Gospel?



Mike.
 

whirlwind

New Member
Nov 8, 2007
1,286
31
0
78
This should but a cat amongst pigeons and get me a few minus marks.


So, back to the thread title….. who believes in a God who has no time for the grunt only Amazon Forest Dweller, or others who die never having spoken any of the languages into which the Bible had been translated, and/or who die never having heard the message of the Gospel?



Mike.


Meow.....++++++

You'll get no - - - marks from this kitten on this side of the pond with that message! . :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammerStone

HammerStone

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Feb 12, 2006
5,113
279
83
36
South Carolina
prayerforums.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You might just find more agreement here than you think. I will caution for less mature believers that Christ is the one and only way to universal salvation (John 14:6). With that being said, what about the tribes of the earth (the ethnos)? I think there is the primarily cynical and perhaps even ego-centric view that God has placed everyone where they are for a reason. The idea is that he chose Israel and later the church because they'll make the best Christians. I suppose you could say it's the doctrine of absolute predestination. (IE: God appointed everyone, knowing what they'd do and so the poor "savages" in the Amazon are Godless unfortunates who will just never see it...)

Then you have the view of choice aka free will. Why did it take Christ striking Paul down to get him to see the light when the disciples simply got up and walked after him? What about the thief of the cross, was he appointed a life of sin to find salvation at the last hour? Or is there something more to the Word of God - perhaps the evidence of a Creator who deeply loves his creation and whose heart is revealed through careful study? Maybe he strikes some because they need it, yet others can see it on their own. He gives the grace quite freely given our state, but it is conditional in that whosoever believes!

II Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.

If we listen to this verse, what does it say about our Father YHVH? Does it not make sense that any soul anywhere on this Earth will have a fair chance at his or her salvation prior to the second death, which is indeed annihilation?

I think careful study lets us in on the knowledge that there is a time of great teaching where everyone will have that chance.

Paul alludes to this in Romans:

Romans 11:7-8
What then? Israel failed to obtain what it was seeking. The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened, as it is written, "God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears that would not hear, down to this very day."

There are those who have the spirit of slumber as the KJV king's English puts it.
 

write2witness

New Member
Nov 30, 2009
25
0
0
63
Michigan
So, back to the thread title….. who believes in a God who has no time for the grunt only Amazon Forest Dweller, or others who die never having spoken any of the languages into which the Bible had been translated, and/or who die never having heard the message of the Gospel?

Well, I don't know about you, but my God has time for everyone. Just keep in mind that He knows all things and there are people who will reject Him no matter how many chances He may give them to repent. Everyone is given a chance to repent and accept the Lord's gift of eternal life. Even the grunt in the Amazon.
 

gregg

New Member
Oct 16, 2009
321
37
0
arab
WAY OF THE SPIRIT. heres what i think. during the 1,000 year rein who will we be teaching? everyone must except christ and i believe everyone will have a chance. aborted babies, children that die before they could know, etc..this 1,000 years with JESUS HAS A PURPOSE.
 

wayofthespirit

More often partly wrong than wholly right
Feb 16, 2010
84
8
0
89
North Norfolk, UK
You might just find more agreement here than you think. I will caution for less mature believers that Christ is the one and only way to universal salvation (John 14:6). -

We're told that sin cannot enter the presence of God, and that the only remedy acceptable to God was the Sacrifice of the Sinless Lamb as propitiation for sin.
If therefore those that never hear the Gospel message are "excused" on the basis of their faith in the Creator God as revealed by Creation, it follows that Christ's sacrifice must have been efficacious without them having known about it.
For those that do hear the Gospel message however, their destiny is dependant on their response to that knowledge. (the ability to respond being a gift to the elect is another issue)

Do you not think that we tend to jump to what may not be the right conclusion in interpreting "I am the way and no man cometh to the Father but by me" as meaning "No man cometh to the father but by knowing that they do so by me"?

Maybe I'm not being too clever at explaining what I'm trying to say but I'm sure you can work it out .......if indeed it isn't already within your consideration.

Wadya think?

Mike.

WAY OF THE SPIRIT. heres what i think. during the 1,000 year rein who will we be teaching? everyone must except christ and i believe everyone will have a chance. aborted babies, children that die before they could know, etc..this 1,000 years with JESUS HAS A PURPOSE.

I've never thought of 'teaching' as being an element of 'reigning' but it's an interesting thought.....do you want to back it up?
Or have you already done so and, as a newbie, I have some catching up to do?

Mike.
 

jiggyfly

New Member
Nov 27, 2009
2,750
86
0
63
North Carolina
We're told that sin cannot enter the presence of God, and that the only remedy acceptable to God was the Sacrifice of the Sinless Lamb as propitiation for sin.
If therefore those that never hear the Gospel message are "excused" on the basis of their faith in the Creator God as revealed by Creation, it follows that Christ's sacrifice must have been efficacious without them having known about it.
For those that do hear the Gospel message however, their destiny is dependant on their response to that knowledge. (the ability to respond being a gift to the elect is another issue)

Do you not think that we tend to jump to what may not be the right conclusion in interpreting "I am the way and no man cometh to the Father but by me" as meaning "No man cometh to the father but by knowing that they do so by me"?

Maybe I'm not being too clever at explaining what I'm trying to say but I'm sure you can work it out .......if indeed it isn't already within your consideration.

Wadya think?

Mike.



I've never thought of 'teaching' as being an element of 'reigning' but it's an interesting thought.....do you want to back it up?
Or have you already done so and, as a newbie, I have some catching up to do?

Mike.

Nice thought provoking post Mike. I believe in universal reconciliation and that it can only happen through Christ and not through Muhammad, Buddah, or L.Ron Hubbard. But knowing Christ is much different than knowing about Christ (propagation of the christian religious institution) Tis the difference between spiritual realities and religious fantasies.
 

wayofthespirit

More often partly wrong than wholly right
Feb 16, 2010
84
8
0
89
North Norfolk, UK
Nice thought provoking post Mike. I believe in universal reconciliation and that it can only happen through Christ and not through Muhammad, Buddah, or L.Ron Hubbard. But knowing Christ is much different than knowing about Christ (propagation of the christian religious institution) Tis the difference between spiritual realities and religious fantasies.

Well hi there jiggyfly,

I have a deeply revered friend on True2Ourselves who's a Universal Reconcilliationist so I've learned to live with that.

Mike.