John 6:66 - Why did many disciples stop following Jesus?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Episkopos

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2011
12,824
19,301
113
65
Montreal
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
We read the bible as a religious fait accompli. My thought is that most believers today would have abandoned Jesus also...given the far out spiritual teachings ...in the face of a very understandable set of laws.

So we are taught an interpretation of the truth that leaves out the controversial and difficult passages. And then we wonder why Jesus was seen as so scandalous in His day.

Very few believers will make it into the life that Jesus was preaching...kingdom life. Jesus Himself said it is very hard and few will find it. But many consider that as wrong...especially in their own regard. These have not understood the teachings of Jesus or the gospel but have accepted a human religious interpretation of it that declaws the truth so as to make it easy and palatable.

But today the state of unreality is so great that most will never know that they are actually NOT in sync with Jesus and His teachings...at all.
 
Last edited:

Hidden In Him

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
10,600
10,883
113
59
Lafayette, LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I created the website below. The Bread of Life Discourse is a stumbling block for protestants, which has to do with eternal life.

Many seek to be right, and as a result, they fail to seek the truth!


Truth Campaign | Gospel of John Chapter 6 | Always Seek The Truth!

God Bless!

LoL. For starters, I think you need to present more actual teaching instead of an endless stream of questions. I clicked your site pages, and it's nothing but continual questions throughout, now matter how far one seems to dig.

But if you'll forgive my bluntness here, the following is an extremely poorly constructed "argument," disguised as a question:

Your argument presumes that the reason so many left Him that day was because He had in effect communicated, "I am going to be crucified and raised from the dead on the third day, and before My crucifixion I will institute the practice of communion, and literally become the wafer and the wine supernaturally."

Nowhere in this text is ANY of that stated. In fact, the dating of this passage precedes any mention whatsoever by the Lord of him dying, or of the sign of Jonah being given, or any other reference to His crucifixion, let alone literally becoming a wafer.

This is the epitome of what is called "reading into" a Biblical text.

Your site is clean-looking and attractive. Your "teaching", however, leaves a great deal to be desired. You are relying way too much on the teachings of your church at the expense of actually teaching the word of God .

God bless, and I wish you the best.
Hidden In Him
 

Randy Kluth

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2020
7,706
2,406
113
Pacific NW
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't know that the Bread of Life Discourse is a "stumblingblock to Protestants?" What makes you think so? What it is is a stumblingblock to those who don't believe Jesus is at the core of our faith, that we must draw upon his life in order to produce life ourselves.

Even the battle between agnostics and believers is predicated on the denial, by agnostics, of a spiritual experience that actually transforms us into something more righteous than we can be without Jesus. That "righteousness" is denied by the unbelieving world, because it condemns their own lack of spiritual life, which Christ has offered to all.
 
Sep 12, 2020
182
22
18
47
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
LoL. For starters, I think you need to present more actual teaching instead of an endless stream of questions. I clicked your site pages, and it's nothing but continual questions throughout, now matter how far one seems to dig.

But if you'll forgive my bluntness here, the following is an extremely poorly constructed "argument," disguised as a question:

Your argument presumes that the reason so many left Him that day was because He had in effect communicated, "I am going to be crucified and raised from the dead on the third day, and before My crucifixion I will institute the practice of communion, and literally become the wafer and the wine supernaturally."

Nowhere in this text is ANY of that stated. In fact, the dating of this passage precedes any mention whatsoever by the Lord of him dying, or of the sign of Jonah being given, or any other reference to His crucifixion, let alone literally becoming a wafer.

This is the epitome of what is called "reading into" a Biblical text.

Your site is clean-looking and attractive. Your "teaching", however, leaves a great deal to be desired. You are relying way too much on the teachings of your church at the expense of actually teaching the word of God .

God bless, and I wish you the best.

Many seek to be right, and as a result, they fail to seek the truth! Your logical is foolish. The disciples left because they were not believing the Lord and his teachings, just like you.
Hidden In Him

Maybe the Lord had pity on those disciples that didn't have the full story at the time, or maybe not since they stood before the Son of God and rejected Him. He let them walk away due to their lack of faith in His teaching. For you, He might not have pity on since you know the complete story. Many try to convince their minds that they are right, but they don't open their "hearts" to what is the truth. God Bless you on your journey!
 
Sep 12, 2020
182
22
18
47
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't know that the Bread of Life Discourse is a "stumblingblock to Protestants?" What makes you think so? What it is is a stumblingblock to those who don't believe Jesus is at the core of our faith, that we must draw upon his life in order to produce life ourselves.

Even the battle between agnostics and believers is predicated on the denial, by agnostics, of a spiritual experience that actually transforms us into something more righteous than we can be without Jesus. That "righteousness" is denied by the unbelieving world, because it condemns their own lack of spiritual life, which Christ has offered to all.

This is what it means to believe. To believe in everything He said, including what He spoke about when it comes to having eternal life! God bless you on your journey!

https://truthcampaign.org/truth-campaign-12/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randy Kluth
Sep 12, 2020
182
22
18
47
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
LoL. For starters, I think you need to present more actual teaching instead of an endless stream of questions. I clicked your site pages, and it's nothing but continual questions throughout, now matter how far one seems to dig.

But if you'll forgive my bluntness here, the following is an extremely poorly constructed "argument," disguised as a question:

Your argument presumes that the reason so many left Him that day was because He had in effect communicated, "I am going to be crucified and raised from the dead on the third day, and before My crucifixion I will institute the practice of communion, and literally become the wafer and the wine supernaturally."

Nowhere in this text is ANY of that stated. In fact, the dating of this passage precedes any mention whatsoever by the Lord of him dying, or of the sign of Jonah being given, or any other reference to His crucifixion, let alone literally becoming a wafer.

This is the epitome of what is called "reading into" a Biblical text.

Your site is clean-looking and attractive. Your "teaching", however, leaves a great deal to be desired. You are relying way too much on the teachings of your church at the expense of actually teaching the word of God .

God bless, and I wish you the best.
Hidden In Him

Furthermore, what is the actually teaching of the word of God? Your interpretation or the interpretation of the Church that Jesus started? Keep in mind my friend, the Bible was compiled by the Church. Believing in what you want does get you into heaven. Believing in the truth that Jesus taught, does!

Council of Rome - Wikipedia
 
Sep 12, 2020
182
22
18
47
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Furthermore, what is the actually teaching of the word of God? Your interpretation or the interpretation of the Church that Jesus started? Keep in mind my friend, the Bible was compiled by the Church. Believing in what you want does get you into heaven. Believing in the truth that Jesus taught, does!

Council of Rome - Wikipedia

doesn't get you into heaven :)
 

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
John 6.37: "All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out."

John 6.44: "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day."

The Lord Jesus had been making some strong, man-humbling and God-glorifying statements which it would seem that some so called disciples found too humbling for them.

Then we read:

"Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away?

68 Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.

69 And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God."
 

Hidden In Him

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
10,600
10,883
113
59
Lafayette, LA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Furthermore, what is the actually teaching of the word of God? Your interpretation or the interpretation of the Church that Jesus started?

Catholics, LoL. Anything you answer with is immediately invalid, yet they insist on having a conversation you didn't ask for anyway.

I suppose that ends our conversation, but it was "educational" while it lasted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nancy

Enoch111

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2018
17,688
15,996
113
Alberta
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
John 6:66 - Why did many disciples stop following Jesus?
I do not watch videos, but let's focus on the question. And the answer is found in John 6:60: Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?... From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

Jesus was presenting Himself to the Jews as the Bread of Life -- the Bread which would give eternal life as opposed the the manna in the wilderness which simply sustained life in the wilderness. Jesus said that unless one eats His flesh and drinks His blood, one cannot have eternal life. And the Jews took this literally to mean cannibalism. Hence they were offended, and said "This is an hard saying". But was Jesus teaching cannibalism, or was He speaking about spiritual realities? The answer is found in verse 63: It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are Spirit, and they are Life.

In other words, to partake of the body and blood of Christ is to spiritually receive Him within the soul (Rev 3:20), and when that happens the Holy Spirit "quickeneth" (or brings to life) the dead spirit of the sinner. And at the same time the one who receives Christ as Lord and Savior receives the gift of eternal life.

And at the Lord's Supper, believers partake symbolically of the body and blood of Christ. But the Catholic Church has changed the Lord's Supper into the Mass, which is a totally different idea.
 

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I created the website below. The Bread of Life Discourse is a stumbling block for protestants, which has to do with eternal life.

Many seek to be right, and as a result, they fail to seek the truth!


Truth Campaign | Gospel of John Chapter 6 | Always Seek The Truth!

God Bless!
Like @Hidden In Him said, your website was more confusing, rather than provocative or elucidating. To the point, I barely know how to reply meaningfully to your OP?
Either way, ....as to why Jesus' discourse in chapter 6 created such a polarization between his audience, and without going into an exegetical exposition, I believe that various clues are clearly within the discourse itself.
1. Their drawing unto him from the beginning, was misguided
2. They were expecting a more superficial and elaborate testimony than what he was professing at the time.
3. Christ's words were too profound for them.
4. Many are called, few are chosen (not directly in Chapter 6)
5. Those that do become convicted of Christ's message, have been lead accordingly

26. Jesus answered them and said, "Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled.

30. So they said to Him, "What then do You do for a sign, so that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform?

41. Therefore the Jews were grumbling about Him, because He said, "I am the bread that came down out of heaven."
52. Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, "How can this man give us His flesh to eat?"
60. Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, "This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?"

44. "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.
64. "But there are some of you who do not believe." For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who it was that would betray Him.
65. And He was saying, "For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father."
 
Sep 12, 2020
182
22
18
47
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I do not watch videos, but let's focus on the question. And the answer is found in John 6:60: Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?... From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

Jesus was presenting Himself to the Jews as the Bread of Life -- the Bread which would give eternal life as opposed the the manna in the wilderness which simply sustained life in the wilderness. Jesus said that unless one eats His flesh and drinks His blood, one cannot have eternal life. And the Jews took this literally to mean cannibalism. Hence they were offended, and said "This is an hard saying". But was Jesus teaching cannibalism, or was He speaking about spiritual realities? The answer is found in verse 63: It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are Spirit, and they are Life.

In other words, to partake of the body and blood of Christ is to spiritually receive Him within the soul (Rev 3:20), and when that happens the Holy Spirit "quickeneth" (or brings to life) the dead spirit of the sinner. And at the same time the one who receives Christ as Lord and Savior receives the gift of eternal life.

And at the Lord's Supper, believers partake symbolically of the body and blood of Christ. But the Catholic Church has changed the Lord's Supper into the Mass, which is a totally different idea.

Was Jesus speaking symbolically in John chapter 6:63? If so, why did the disciples stop following Jesus?

Some say this verse confirms that Jesus was speaking symbolically with regard to the Bread of Life Discourse in John chapter 6. Does this verse confirm that Jesus in fact was speaking symbolically?


Verse 63: “It is the spirit that gives life, while “the” flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

  • What are the words he just spoke? Several times Jesus spoke, eat my flesh (7) and drink my blood (3) to obtain eternal life.
  • What does “no avail” mean? It means “no help or benefit.”
  • Did Jesus say “my” flesh is of no avail? No, he said “the” flesh is of no avail.
  • Is Jesus’ flesh of no avail? No!
  • The Lord is perfect and sinless. His flesh is holy and pure. His flesh and spirit rose from the dead. Was his flesh on the cross of no help or benefit? Jesus is referring to “our” sinful flesh. The Lord is saying, it is no help or benefit to feed “our” flesh that dies and withers away. “His” resurrected flesh and blood feeds our spirit (soul), which gives life.
  • Consuming his flesh and blood feeds our spirit (soul) which gives life, not our sinful flesh which is of no avail. We transform into the Body of Christ by spiritually being fed, so we too rise from the dead.

https://truthcampaign.org/truth-campaign-2/
 
Sep 12, 2020
182
22
18
47
Los Angeles
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Like @Hidden In Him said, your website was more confusing, rather than provocative or elucidating. To the point, I barely know how to reply meaningfully to your OP?
Either way, ....as to why Jesus' discourse in chapter 6 created such a polarization between his audience, and without going into an exegetical exposition, I believe that various clues are clearly within the discourse itself.
1. Their drawing unto him from the beginning, was misguided
2. They were expecting a more superficial and elaborate testimony than what he was professing at the time.
3. Christ's words were too profound for them.
4. Many are called, few are chosen (not directly in Chapter 6)
5. Those that do become convicted of Christ's message, have been lead accordingly

26. Jesus answered them and said, "Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled.

30. So they said to Him, "What then do You do for a sign, so that we may see, and believe You? What work do You perform?

41. Therefore the Jews were grumbling about Him, because He said, "I am the bread that came down out of heaven."
52. Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, "How can this man give us His flesh to eat?"
60. Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, "This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?"

44. "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.
64. "But there are some of you who do not believe." For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who it was that would betray Him.
65. And He was saying, "For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father."

Many seek to be right, and as a result, they fail to seek the truth!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Episkopos

DNB

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2019
4,199
1,370
113
Toronto
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Was Jesus speaking symbolically in John chapter 6:63? If so, why did the disciples stop following Jesus?

Some say this verse confirms that Jesus was speaking symbolically with regard to the Bread of Life Discourse in John chapter 6. Does this verse confirm that Jesus in fact was speaking symbolically?


Verse 63: “It is the spirit that gives life, while “the” flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

  • What are the words he just spoke? Several times Jesus spoke, eat my flesh (7) and drink my blood (3) to obtain eternal life.
  • What does “no avail” mean? It means “no help or benefit.”
  • Did Jesus say “my” flesh is of no avail? No, he said “the” flesh is of no avail.
  • Is Jesus’ flesh of no avail? No!
  • The Lord is perfect and sinless. His flesh is holy and pure. His flesh and spirit rose from the dead. Was his flesh on the cross of no help or benefit? Jesus is referring to “our” sinful flesh. The Lord is saying, it is no help or benefit to feed “our” flesh that dies and withers away. “His” resurrected flesh and blood feeds our spirit (soul), which gives life.
  • Consuming his flesh and blood feeds our spirit (soul) which gives life, not our sinful flesh which is of no avail. We transform into the Body of Christ by spiritually being fed, so we too rise from the dead.
https://truthcampaign.org/truth-campaign-2/
What are you professing here TC, transubstantiation?
If so, you are entirely out of your mind - what goes into a man's mouth neither defiles or edifies him, but only what comes from his heart i.e. wisdom.
The eucharist has never, ever, sanctified a single person who ate of it, who ever lived under the sun - for only wisdom edifies. I challenge anyone who says otherwise to eat 50 wafers a day, for a year, and then come back and show us your growth and maturity.
 

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2020
14,525
8,216
113
58
Columbus, ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I do not watch videos, but let's focus on the question. And the answer is found in John 6:60: Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?... From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

Jesus was presenting Himself to the Jews as the Bread of Life -- the Bread which would give eternal life as opposed the the manna in the wilderness which simply sustained life in the wilderness. Jesus said that unless one eats His flesh and drinks His blood, one cannot have eternal life. And the Jews took this literally to mean cannibalism. Hence they were offended, and said "This is an hard saying". But was Jesus teaching cannibalism, or was He speaking about spiritual realities? The answer is found in verse 63: It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are Spirit, and they are Life.

In other words, to partake of the body and blood of Christ is to spiritually receive Him within the soul (Rev 3:20), and when that happens the Holy Spirit "quickeneth" (or brings to life) the dead spirit of the sinner. And at the same time the one who receives Christ as Lord and Savior receives the gift of eternal life.

And at the Lord's Supper, believers partake symbolically of the body and blood of Christ. But the Catholic Church has changed the Lord's Supper into the Mass, which is a totally different idea.
Amen,

John 6 is a stumbling block to catholic and other Eucharistic churches.
Sadly, like these disciples it is what Jesus said, you can not see because you do not believe, and one of you is the devil

jesus spoke that way to weed out the true believers, not institute some pagan ritual that does not even give those who take what Jesus promised

it’s amazing

the jews ate manna, and are dead

Catholics eat the Eucharist for many years, and still die, and are not even assured eternal life, even though Jesus said whoever eats will never die

who is decieved?
 

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2020
14,525
8,216
113
58
Columbus, ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Was Jesus speaking symbolically in John chapter 6:63? If so, why did the disciples stop following Jesus?

Some say this verse confirms that Jesus was speaking symbolically with regard to the Bread of Life Discourse in John chapter 6. Does this verse confirm that Jesus in fact was speaking symbolically?


Verse 63: “It is the spirit that gives life, while “the” flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

  • What are the words he just spoke? Several times Jesus spoke, eat my flesh (7) and drink my blood (3) to obtain eternal life.
  • What does “no avail” mean? It means “no help or benefit.”
  • Did Jesus say “my” flesh is of no avail? No, he said “the” flesh is of no avail.
  • Is Jesus’ flesh of no avail? No!
  • The Lord is perfect and sinless. His flesh is holy and pure. His flesh and spirit rose from the dead. Was his flesh on the cross of no help or benefit? Jesus is referring to “our” sinful flesh. The Lord is saying, it is no help or benefit to feed “our” flesh that dies and withers away. “His” resurrected flesh and blood feeds our spirit (soul), which gives life.
  • Consuming his flesh and blood feeds our spirit (soul) which gives life, not our sinful flesh which is of no avail. We transform into the Body of Christ by spiritually being fed, so we too rise from the dead.
https://truthcampaign.org/truth-campaign-2/
Jesus told them why

They did not believe (in him)

they were looking for free food, a handout, not the truth.

pits amazing how you skip half the passage yet yell at those who have actually studied the passage as if they are clueless
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan