Who founded your church?

Renniks said:

So you do the Seder?

Click to expand...

?

Truther said:

Yes, this FEAST.

Not a chalk wafer.

I can show you the feast passage if you even care to see it....

Click to expand...

Which church consumes a chalk wafer?

Marymog said:

Which church consumes a chalk wafer?

Click to expand...

The RCC and some of her daughters(protestants).

Jane_Doe22 said:

This is all definitions according the the Catholic Church. It doesn’t hold much water for non-Catholics.

Click to expand...

"non-Catholic" is too broad a term to have any relevance. The definitions are according to what is observable, they are not "Catholic definitions" and you haven't provided any "correct definitions". Trinitarian Christians are "tied to the dock" by virtue of their valid baptism and you just don't like it. The only way around this truth is to deny the Trinity which is universal to all Christians.

Illuminator said:

"non-Catholic" is too broad a term to have any relevance. The definitions are according to what is observable, they are not "Catholic definitions" and you haven't provided any "correct definitions". Trinitarian Christians are "tied to the dock" by virtue of their valid baptism and you just don't like it. The only way around this truth is to deny the Trinity which is universal to all Christians.

Click to expand...

He believes in alot of unbiblical stuff he isn't mentioning.

The title of this thread . WHO Founded your church . well it sure wasnt rome or joel olstein , nor rick warren , nor todd white .
IT was JESUS . Now let all leap up and praise the KING .

Illuminator said:

"non-Catholic" is too broad a term to have any relevance. The definitions are according to what is observable, they are not "Catholic definitions" and you haven't provided any "correct definitions". Trinitarian Christians are "tied to the dock" by virtue of their valid baptism and you just don't like it. The only way around this truth is to deny the Trinity which is universal to all Christians.

Click to expand...

That man is highly dangerous . He preaches another jesus . one that allows muslims and any other religoin to follow its own religoin .
Scary times we live in . Everyone , take a peek at that face . THEN ensure your church nor anyone wants unity with that . Very dangerous that man is . very dangerous .

Truther said:

?

Click to expand...

The passover feast is the Seder, the Jewish Passover feast. Some Messianic Christians also take it. If you understand a bit about the Seder you would understand how Jesus fulfilled what it looked forward to. Yes, I've only taken the Seder once myself. But Communion fulfills the essence of the Seder IMO. Jesus changed the script and instituted a new " feast". Yes, we have abbreviated the original. It should not be taken lightly, but I don't remember Jesus saying we have to recreate the entire Passover feast.

Truther said:

The RCC and some of her daughters(protestants).

Click to expand...

Chalk? No, it's a cracker or bread. The original bread was unleavened. Pretty much a hard cracker.

Illuminator said:

"non-Catholic" is too broad a term to have any relevance. The definitions are according to what is observable, they are not "Catholic definitions" and you haven't provided any "correct definitions". Trinitarian Christians are "tied to the dock" by virtue of their valid baptism and you just don't like it. The only way around this truth is to deny the Trinity which is universal to all Christians.

Click to expand...

Again, according to the Catholic Church. Doesn’t hold any revelance to non-Catholics.

Truther said:

The RCC and some of her daughters(protestants).

Click to expand...

Ummm....I have been to both Protestant and Catholic churches that served "wafers" for communion. Neither of them where chalk wafers.

What denomination did you go to that served a chalk wafer?

Renniks said:

The passover feast is the Seder, the Jewish Passover feast. Some Messianic Christians also take it. If you understand a bit about the Seder you would understand how Jesus fulfilled what it looked forward to. Yes, I've only taken the Seder once myself. But Communion fulfills the essence of the Seder IMO. Jesus changed the script and instituted a new " feast". Yes, we have abbreviated the original. It should not be taken lightly, but I don't remember Jesus saying we have to recreate the entire Passover feast.

Click to expand...

Im a Gentile.

The Jews had a feast and it meant something in particular(Pascha).

The Christians had a simultaneous feast and it meant the fulfillment of the Jews feast .

The latter is the commemoration feast that evolved unscripturally into "communion" via the RCC.

Renniks said:

Chalk? No, it's a cracker or bread. The original bread was unleavened. Pretty much a hard cracker.

Click to expand...

The RCC gives you chalk. It tastes just like it. Disgusting.

Marymog said:

Ummm....I have been to both Protestant and Catholic churches that served "wafers" for communion. Neither of them where chalk wafers.

What denomination did you go to that served a chalk wafer?

Click to expand...

When I was an RCC congregant.

That wafer was ghastly.

It needs to be thrown out.

Get back to the 1st century feast, okay?

Truther said:

The Christians had a simultaneous feast and it meant the fulfillment of the Jews feast .

Click to expand...

Aren't you a Christian? Why don't you partake then?

Renniks said:

Aren't you a Christian? Why don't you partake then?

Click to expand...

Sure, I appreciate a feast in commemoration of the death of Christ.

I hate those phony chalk wafers that the RCC give out, though.

Truther said:

Sure, I appreciate a feast in commemoration of the death of Christ.

I hate those phony chalk wafers that the RCC give out, though.

Click to expand...

At the Methodist Church they use real bread. But I don't see why the kind of bread matters. Or the kind of wine and such. It's symbolism after all.

Truther said:

Sure, I appreciate a feast in commemoration of the death of Christ.

I hate those phony chalk wafers that the RCC give out, though.

Click to expand...

I can stomach the wafers , its much of their doctrine i cannot swallow . Dangerous times we live in . Mama rome
has made a very broad road . very broad . As for me , JESUS ONLYS SAVES . Ye must believe From the heart
that God has raised him from the dead and confess Him by the mouth to be saved .
But that aint what pope francis had to say . He is highly dangerous . OH i wish not his death , but He is dangerously deceptive .
And the lambs gotta hold onto the one true gospel and firm to the end . Budda dont save , muslim god dont either .
ONLY JESUS .

Truther said:

When did you commit your first sin, then take it to the priest?

8 days old?

1 year old?

12 years old?

Well?

Are gays born that way or do they become that way?

Click to expand...

My first confession was at about 8 years old.
I was born again at about 30 days old when I was Baptized.

Truther said:

Catholic. What is the name of the son?

Click to expand...

Another idiotic question because you refuse to admit that you're wrong.
I already obliterated your weak literalist argument by showing you the scholarly linguistic evidence about what "In the name of" actually means.

Go back and study posts 2572 and 2631.