Search results

The only apostles were the ones we read in the Bible. Therefore those men are who Paul MUST be referring to. Notice what Pau says, 2Thessalonians 2:15, - therefore brethren stand fast and hold the traditions which ye have been taught... Paul says these traditions, those who taught them. Who...

I'm not teaching that everyone will understand the Scriptures if they read them without any guidance from a mature Christian. Take a Chinese man who was never allowed to read the Bible his whole life. Then he getscaccess to the word. Is he going to understand what he reads all by himself? I...

2Thessalonians 2:15, - therefore brethren stand fast and hold the traditions which ye have been taught whether by word( oral) or by letter(written) nice to meet you RedFan

Biblical tradition. You are trying to include uninspired men that came after the completion of Gods holy book.The passages I already quoted DOES NOT ALLOW NOR INCLUDE "TRADITIONS FROM UNINSPIRED MEN. You do out of ignorance. You try to add to the traditions of the new testament church by...

I agree, take my word read and know I use it as study or meditate. Amen Amen Amen, preach it!! Amen Ephesians 3:1-5, - whereby when ye read(to know certainly, discern) ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ

Deut. 4:2, - You shall not add to the  word which I am commanding you, nor take  away from it So that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God

Traditions I'm not against. You try to claim tradition is catholic tradition. Paul never said catholic tradition. Paul said to keep the traditions of the APOSTLES. Acts 2:42, - and they continued steadfastly in the apostles doctrine and fellowship in the breaking of bread and in prayers Not...

God has given everyone the free will to choose Jesus. If not mankind is not guilty for his unbelief God is guilty for withholding faith. No err or contradiction. Sir you are contradicting the word, Romans 10:17, - Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God Sir, our faith only comes...

Ephesians 3:1-5, - how that by revelation He made known unto me the mystery as I wrote afore in few words - Whereby when ye(You, not someone else) read ye(You, not someone else) may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ Paul is telling You, that what was once a mystery God has...

Translated, Scripture and catholic church tradition never contradict one another. That's funny

Love you Holy999, You have a good heart

This is all uninspired men!!! You catholics always try to prove your unbiblical interpretations NOT WITH BOOK, CHAPTER AND VERSE BUT WITH OUTSIDE SOURCES APART FROM THE BIBLE. This entire post PROVES NOTHING Commentaries are nothing but MANS OPINIONS

I could care less what protestant's think. I'm not a protestant I am a member the the Lords church, the one in the new testament. The only church that came before the great harlot. I go by what Inspired men teach. That is only the apostles doctrine, Acts 2:42, - and the Christians continued...

That has absolutely nothing to do with those scholars books. The reason those sources were posted is to prove that Jesus and the Jews in the 1st, century SPOKE GREEK, TAUGHT IN GREEK AND WROTE IN GREEK. BreadofLife claimed none of the apostles or Jews spoke Greek in the 1st. Century. An...

I've made some errors in the above post, Peter is Greek petros not petra Greek word for rock is used twice in Matthew 16:18-19 -thou art Peter(petros) and on this rock(petra) Sorry for the confusion. I have no idea how I made such a mess. Regardless the mistakes omitted is Biblically sound

Exactly, that's why catholic interpretation of Matthew 16:18-19 has nothing to do with Peter being appointed Head of the church. Matthew 16:18-19, - I also say to you that you are Peter(petros, large rock) and on this rock( Peter's confession that was a revelation that Jesus is God) and on...

catholic history and catholic theology says it, and therefore it must be true Perverting the word is quite annoying Matthew 16:18-19, Not once did Jesus say Peter is the Head of the church only catholics made it up. You do replace Jesus, WITH PETER AS THE HEAD OF CHRISTS CHURCH!!! You dont...

No man is reigning, governing on earth in Jesus' place currently over His church!!! Matthew 28:18, - and Jesus came up and spoke to them saying ALL AUTHORITY has been given to ME in heaven and on earth Ephesians 1:20-23, - this Power He exercised in Christ when He raised Him from the dead and...

Above is the basis of your argument. Not one Scripture teaches the KING OF KINGS has a second little weakling of a finite physical man!!! Comparing physical kings and kingdoms to God the King over His spiritual Kingdom CANNOT BE COMPARED AT ALL!!! Totally incompatable! You are claiming the...

Sir, you are full of beans. Your argument is we(catholics) say so, therefore we're right. NO SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE FOR YOUR INTERPRETATION