Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    Blue Lives Matter is not a racial slur. Especially when you’re just sitting there trying to study And I bet you just made that up anyway.
  2. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    Because white people are not welcome
  3. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    The colleges have already brought it back with their safe spaces and BIPOC only areas
  4. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    You know what it is if you would just be honest. But you believe that someone can become a woman just by claiming to be one
  5. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    This is a cause I would support for LGBTQ people. No one should be denied medical treatment. The State of Colorado means politicians who wanted to score political points. They should put that much energy into making sure everyone has access to healthcare
  6. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    Yes you can. It’s only recently that this has become an issue
  7. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    There are laws protecting religious beliefs but there are limitations and the applications are not as broad as you would like everyone to believe Maybe people that share your interests should focus on changing things like this instead of suing cake bakers
  8. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    If you can’t define what a woman is how can they have equal protection under the law?
  9. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    Everyone should have equal access to medical care no matter who they are or what race, religion or sexual orientation they are. Anyone discriminating against them should be sued and forced out of business.
  10. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    So the problem is with transgender people, not homosexuals ?
  11. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    In the real world yes. It’s not 1950 anymore
  12. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    Her lawyer said she received the order however she may have been trolled. The person she named said he never made the request and he has been married to a woman for 15 years
  13. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    I’ve been asked if I’m married but not whether to a man or woman. Never been asked about children or sexual activity. Someone who is gay can tell their Doctor. There is no way to confirm your statistics since it is merely based on people responding to a question. (btw can’t gay people be married...
  14. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    I didn’t say anything about hiding anything. I said I have never been asked my sexual orientation when trying to get medical treatment. I don’t go in and announce “Hey I am straight “ Again how would the provider know whether someone is a homosexual or not?
  15. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    You have to put words in my mouth because you can’t refute what I actually said
  16. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    How would the provider even know if someone is gay? I’ve never been asked my sexual orientation when seeking treatment. The transgender people yes, they would know. But they could have been turned down because of the particular treatment they were seeking.
  17. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    The ADA protects handicapped individuals from such discrimination
  18. RLT63

    US supreme court strikes blow against LGBTQ+ rights with Colorado ruling

    The court “affirmed today that Colorado can’t force me or anyone to say something we don’t believe, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf