Search results

If you cannot understand what I have written and the fact that I have not spoken about the Second temple being built, then this conversation is pointless as you cannot be trusted with the truth in any form or way. I apparently am not the only one who has experienced your twisting of what has...

But Daniel does write about a four facetted beast which is an amalgamation of the four beasts described in Daniel 7:1-12, which comes on the scene after a 1,000 years has past after all of the beasts were judged at the time of Armageddon. You just have all of the facts out of order.

Do not pat yourself on the back yet because your understanding is still all screwed up. The four horns that grew up in place of the notable horn did so while pointing to the four winds of heaven. Why did they the rise upwards towards the four winds of heaven? Oh, the four winds of heaven are...

Fulfilment of OT prophecies does not upset me. What upsets me is the misunderstanding that so called experts want to convey which is misleading. Goodbye

As usual you are grasping at straws again to justify your peculiar truth. Let us quote more verses to see what the context is: - Zechariah: 1:18-2:7: - Vision of the Horns 18 Then I raised my eyes and looked, and there were four horns. 19 And I said to the angel who talked with me...

Get a life and be truthful in what you post. Silence is often the best solution in providing an answer to someone who does not listen or understand the significance of what has been posted. Goodbye. Please stop wasting my time.

I was going to congratulate you on your understanding, but I then realised that you are still trapped in the false understanding that the Beasts of Daniel 7:1-12 as human beings instead of being wicked fallen heavenly angels. Clinging to this flawed understanding means that your eyes are...

What is it that people do not understand? The Roman Empire did not have dominion over the land of Babylon. The Statue Prophecy was given to Neb so that He would know what was to befall the Land of Babylon. From the Book of Daniel we know the first three empires that had dominion over the Land...

Again, you have cooky cut out one verse out of the context in which it was written to justify your arguments. In quoting Romans 11:26 where it clearly states in the Greek that "all" of Israel will be saved after the Armageddon judgement of the Kings of the earth, I am not disagreeing with the...

Then do you have eyes to see, if you cannot see that Jesus was speaking to an Israelite audience and his comments and parables were addressed to them. Again, you are cooky cutting the scripture and losing the context of the passage that the cooky cut verse is found in. Here is the extended...

If you knew the scriptures then you would have recognised the passages that I was quoting in abbreviated form. The second paragraph is taken from Ezekiel 34 and Zechariah 8. Were these paraphrases from these two Prophetic chapters not known to you? In the Third and fourth Paragraphs I was...

Seems like that is your issue as well as you have lowered yourself to their level as well and not only in this thread. Just an observation, on my part.

It's been a while . . . ????????? To cryptic to be clear as to what you mean. As for your claim to consider 70 AD, God did not take His Kingdom from them, but rather allowed the iniquities of the fathers from the first and second ages of the existence of Abraham's descendants to be visited...

If all you can do is claim that I am a Christian Zionist then you are sadly mistaken. Why does God tell us through the Prophet Ezekiel that He will gather Israel to Himself and plant them in His fertile field and teach them the Basis required of them in their worship where they are living...

^^^ Isaiah 29

Yes, there are.

So, what is the time frame for God taking the Kingdom of God from Israel? Does God have any plans to restore Israel to the Kingdom of God so that Israel can be a part of it? As I said above, Peter was writing to the "Christian" Jews in His letters so making reference to Jer 31:31ff is not out...

In the NT, where we see the English word "Earthquake" the wrong context is being presented. In Matt when it describes the angel coming down from heaven to roll the stone away from the entrance of the tomb that an earthquake occurred, the Greek Word "seismos" actually has the meaning of...

What I am questioning is the context in which you are using 1 Peter 2 to justify that the Covenantal Promise of God to Israel is no longer valid, and that "Christians" have displaced Israel during God's Summer Harvest Time during the unfolding of the Seventh Age. You have taken just one passage...

I am not sure that that is the case, but you are welcome to believe as you please. However, I will not be moved based on your flimsy justification about what Peter believes. It is a stretch to say the least.