Search results

Sadly Keraz, you are changing the scripture to support your mistaken belief, by rewriting them without any understanding of the scriptures themselves.

Yea! Scott! you are still speaking gobbledygook in post #21 and making no sense at all.

I have not problems with being wrong in my understanding of God's Prophetic words, however, there are many who "preach" their understanding of the truth who are wrong in their understanding. In certain understanding that I have held to I have been wrong. Sadly, many, who have tried to correct...

Again, you are accepting the errors in our translations. In Deu 32:41-43 it actually says this is verse 43: - 41 If I whet My glittering sword, And My hand takes hold on judgment, I will render vengeance to My enemies, And repay those who hate Me. 42 I will make My arrows drunk with blood, And...

But there is mentioned of a war, in heaven, that lasts for around 2,000 years in Daniel 9:26b. Daniel 9:26b: - And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined...

Ah Scotta, I am not the one who is confused. Satan is very good at hiding himself in full view and you are helping Satan to do so with your comment. Christ did not come to make a covenant with the peoples of the earth. He came to refurbish the Salvation Covenant, that God has had from the...

Keraz, your contextual understanding of God gathering the Israelites to Himself, does not mean that God is going to gather the Israelites to the Land of Canaan as you are suggesting. Other passages in Ezekiel speak of Gathering the Israelites to God and that they will remain in the places where...

That is your opinion. In my opinion Keraz, because of his inability to understand the Hebrew Text, he does not covey the actual context of the verses written which he quotes/references in his own paraphrases. For example, Ezekiel 20:41-42, I would paraphrase in this manner: - 41 I will...

Daniel 9:27 is pointing to the Anti-Christ/Satan and not the Messiah as is suggested in the quote above. It is understanding the context that is important to understand. Too many Christians want to put/place Christ into many prophecies where the key figure in the Prophecy is Satan or one of...

My Dreams, it seems that you have not read my post at all to understand what I had posted. I had said that King David's initial sin was his turning away from God. I made no reference to Kiing David's bedding of Bathsheba. That sin of adulterer was as a consequence of his turning away from God...

Ah, My dreams, prison can be a great place for you to be in to grow in God. Our sins and iniquities all have consequences, that must be faced even if the sins and iniquities have been forgiven by God. King David's primary sin was turning away from God, and he did those three times, at the...

That has been my experience. So often people already have determined their "own solution" and if they are "christian" they prefer the puppeteer's pathway where they are still in control and their backlash is often their means of retaining control over what happens to them.

Are you doing anything different? Is what you are presenting supported by scripture? Where does scripture point to the Roman Empire as having had dominion over the land of Babylon? Let me present a tapestry of God's prophetic word with respect to the End Times. Enjoy. Now the first three...

Ah Enoch111, your personal attack on my character does you more harm that I could ever achieve. As a person who does not live in North America, I have no real interest in who is burnt at the stake with Trump. The question I posed is, "who would you not burn at the stake with Trump?" I am sure...

You are very touchy, very, very touchy. LOL

It is my opinion that the question should be: - "Who would you not burn at the Stake with Trump?" This is a more appropriate question.

"Let it go, let it go, let it go, . . " Davy. Davy, you are now presenting false arguments to justify your position by attacking the person rather than the content of what they post. As such it is not a good look for you. Now can we simply agree to disagree with each other. Now goodbye...

You comment is inappropriate and not necessary. That is your opinion based on your feelings. It may not be God's opinion with respect to myself. I would take God's opinion over yours with respect to your quoted claim. Goodbye

Ah Davy, what you have expressed is your opinion as to the order in which the Bowl Judgements will occur in. Your opinion has been formed because of the order that the Bowl Judgements have been presented, but the reality is that a list of events that will occur does not provide any information...

Ah Johnann, you are very lucky that I am not a moderator. If I was, I would frog march you out the door for a time until you learnt some forum etiquette as to what appropriate behaviour on this forum, or any other forum, is. Stirring may be okay with other members for a time, but when you...