Search results

Nope. It's part of your Christian history. But you ignore Christian history because it doesn't fit what YOU have been taught.

I already answered your question in post #102. Here is my answer AGAIN: I NEVER told you to blindly follow your elders! I quoted Scripture.

That is true. You have never flat out said that you were right. You have STRONGLY implied it thought. Here is what you have said: You equated a commandment in a personal letter from Paul to Timothy as a commandment to you: Be diligent to present yourself (EG) approved to God, a worker who does...

I did ignore you. Because you are accusing me of something that didn't happen. How can I address something that didn't happen?????? :contemplate: I NEVER told you to blindly follow your elders! I quoted Scripture. I get it EG!! You will not adhere to the parts of Scripture that you don't...

I know....that is why YOU will always be right and everyone else will ALWAYS be wrong.

Ok...you are right. That letter to Timothy was meant for YOU. ;) No, we are not to blindly follow men. Read the passages from Scripture that I quoted. I never said and Scripture never says, "blindly follow men". It does say men twist Scripture to their own destruction. I get it EG. You have...

NOPE....I didn't give you my opinion. I gave you passages from Scripture that put "until" in perspective. I gave you Christian history. I dissected the conversation between Mary and the angel to show how your opinion does not match up with Scripture. I hit you with 3 FACTS that you have yet to...

Let's be honest with each other EG. You don't listen to anyone but yourself!! If you want to throw away passages from Scripture that don't fit what you believe, then that is on YOU. I don't recommend you do it....but hey, to each their own!

2Timothy is a pastoral letter from Paul to his student, Timothy. Now that I have taught you that FACT here is what that passage would look like IN CONTEXT in modern form: Dear Timothy my son. Be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. 2 And the things that you have heard from me among...

Dear EG, Yes, I can say that you didn't prove your point. Your Protestant teaching has been debunked and you are regurgitating a 500-year-old teaching. It's nothing new. Scripture’s statement that Joseph “knew [Mary] not until she brought forth her firstborn” would not necessarily mean they...

You should read all of Scripture instead of the parts that fit what YOU believe: Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you. So I exhort...

Yes, many on this forum have repeated the words and opinions of other Protestant men. You are ok with that. But when we repeat the words and opinions of The Church, you are not ok with that. Weird! Using Scripture, linguistics and Christian history I and others on here have shown them AND YOU...

Ok EG....lets delve into your opinion. Some men started to oppose the "roman church because they started to study the word. After those men started to study the word, they denied long held teachings and came up with their own teachings........DOZENS of different teachings. So now we have the...

Nothing in Scripture says she had other children. You say it's "Not true". Give your evidence instead of your opinion please.

Nope, not past tense. Luke 1 calls Mary a virgin AND she said she does not know man. Show me in Scripture where that is rescinded, and I will join you and your ilk.

Dear EG, From our past conversations you have revealed that you do not know your own Christian history. That's ok. Most Christians don't. After you learn your own Christian history.....we can talk. Mary

YES, it is in dispute. That is what we are doing right now o_O Your Protestant men started disputing it about 500 years ago. YOU don't dispute it because you reject the 2,000-year teaching of Christianity and accept a 500 year teaching. AND you reject what Scripture says when properly...

@BlessedPeace can't show you because it's not in Scripture. IF they do, I look forward to their evidence.

See post #32 and #44 from @Sigma

Jesus didn't have brothers.