Search results

ah that reads Luk 1:43 And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? when Lord is referring to God in KJV its capitalized LORD also in the new American bible posted by the Vatican website: Luk 1:43 And how does this happen to me, that the mother of my Lord should...

bottom line on James v Paul if you think there is a controversy between the two then you're saying James was aganst the works of Peter and Paul because the law says according to Peter : Act 10:28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep...

the law says what must be fulfilled, and so does prophecy, what's your point? that's not a Paul v James concept at all.

you didn't even use the whole verse and that statement was Peter's: Act 10:28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean...

just because the Lord established the church to accommodate the Ministry of Grace doesn't mean the message is limited to the confines of the church. you forget Paul was independent of the ministry and preaching the gospel years before he was invited to join the Ministry of grace. and in the...

ok then wouldn't that be in your own judgement though. if one has a job in this world one keeps company with all types. i do believe Jesus was accused of the same, wasn't He? though i understand your point, but consider how many here might be as you say.

thanks, that's a excellent point, in the case with James though it seems seeing he walked with the Lord and is the brother of John I'd say his point of view is more of, you know a tree by its fruits. also one must remember Paul wasn't against the law, he was against man's requirement to fulfill...

its simple enough to understand that there is no works acceptable to the Lord God, unless they are or the faith that is acceptable to the Lord God. the constant rhetoric that works are required for salvation is butkus because without the Grace (favor) of God to accept the repentance needed to...

quoting dooms dayer Hal Lindsey eh. he's been going on since the early 70's putting out books theorizing the end of days or the Lord's day. the world is simply returning to what it was before Christianity spread through out and most of the world. the longevity is because the Lord gave the...

i would suspect that applies to those who call themselves christain and have churches that are definitely of the same you quoted in Rev 2

thing is, what did John say of Jesus? full of grace and truth, right? hence full of the favor of God and Truth of God. the favor (grace) was so prevalent that when the woman dived in to touch the hem of the Lord's garment He told her it was her faith that healed her didn't He. hence the grace...

that's the problem you thought, why don't you read it again its not by faith alone its by grace through faith or through grace by faith. faith is belief and or trust. the devil believes the Word of God, but he has not God's favor (grace). hence the acceptance of repentance. where does it say...

and? what's you point? and what are the works?

its not by faith alone its by grace through faith or through grace by faith. faith is belief and or trust. the devil believes the Word of God, but he has not God's favor (grace). hence the acceptance of repentance. without the Lord God's favor, it don't matter what your statues is, or what you...

na, if you have already agreed to give your liver then you would be morally obligated, otherwise no, God knows what's reasonable. one could consider it between you and the Lord, on what you ought to do, i don't think you're supposed to harm yourself because some one wants. because in this...

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump