Search results

You've been duped and deceived by the fantasies and fallacies of Darby/Scofield dispensational futurism. Try getting back to the faith "once for all time handed down to the saints". (Jude 1:3 NASB)

Only if you flunked kindergarten grammar. The grammatical referent of the prince in verse 26 is Messiah the Prince in verse 25.

Read to verse 25. You'll see Him. Then read to verse 26. You'll see Him again. Then read to verse 27. You'll see Him again.

From the original 1611 KJV: Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weekes, shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himselfe, and the people of the Prince that shall come, shall destroy the citie, and the Sanctuarie, and the ende thereof shall be with a flood, and vnto the ende of the warre...

And who does "the prince" in Daniel 9:26 refer to?

Everything to do with Daniel 9, which is everything to do with Messiah the Prince.

True. He confirmed His Eternal Covenant in His Blood with Israel via His Ministry on earth for the first 3.5 years of the 70th week, and after His Death, Resurrection, and Ascension, He confirmed His Eternal Covenant in His Blood with Israel via His Disciples' ministry on earth for the...

The answer to your question appears further below. Your translation: "All names which in the Scriptures are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope." -On the Authority of the Councils, book 2, chapter 17 My...

It would help if you'd learn how to read. "...he shall make it desolate..." He grammatically refers back to the prince, and the prince back to Messiah the Prince. Messiah was the Desolator. The Roman commander Titus testified to God's assistance in winning the war. Christ was not...

They were all both physical and spiritual, including the destruction of Jerusalem.

Imagination. The birth, ministry, death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ were all physical and spiritual events. So was the destruction of Jerusalem.

Big Prince Messiah.

The people who destroyed the city and sanctuary were the Roman armies (Luke 21:20), who served as Prince Messiah's people to accomplish His purposes of judgment and desolation upon Jerusalem and Israel. Scripturally and historically. Success.

It makes complete sense. Grammatically, Scripturally, and historically. Success.

And He did come. Some 535 years after Daniel's prophecy.

The prince that shall come is Messiah the Prince, who did come. Messiah is the only individual identified as a prince in the passage.

So find the accurate actual original, translate it, and post it. What's so difficult about that?

The prince that shall come is Messiah the Prince, who did come. Messiah is the only individual identified as a prince in the passage.

Yeah, beyond absurd.

What can't you find?