Search results

@Matthias

you claim to be jewish monotheist. jewish monotheists don't teach that Jesus is God. they claim He is not.

you don't even identify as Christian. do you claim to have a better understanding of their religion and their Bible? I'll keep my questions super easy so there's no misunderstanding. we're talking building-block-basics of the Bible now. ready? what people are responsible for killing Jesus?

so ... what lies do those verses contradict?

there's nothing antisemitic about understanding the Bible exactly as it is written. I presented plain scripture to support my case. I don't have to hate anybody at all to see clearly what the Bible teaches. I don't even have to have an opinion. the Bible clearly states things and that's the...

the only scriptures that appear to support the Millennium doctrine are found in one single chapter of the Bible in Revelation. the rest of the Bible utterly contradicts it. maybe the title of the thread should've been 'Share your favorite Revelation 20 verse.'

your second statement here is relying on the first statement being some proven, undebatable fact. did you want to make an attempt to prove that first statement with scripture or something to bolster your credibility? because they're both incorrect.

what you're presenting still doesn't add up within the idea of Jesus being Himself a jew. just because the nation is tired of the evangelical crowds doesn't make sense that they would then outlaw the very speaking of Jesus' name if they believe that He was/is a jew. the fact is that Jesus is...

1 John 3:9 doesn't contradict 1 John 3:4 in the least. 3:4 defines sin as the breaking of the Commandments of God. your claim is that Christians are not capable of breaking the Commandments of God while most professed Christians break them every day. that means they sin every day according to...

obviously there was. just because the Bible doesn't specifically speak about that, doesn't make a very good case that it didn't exist - nor that God didn't have the same opinions of right and wrong at that time. the Commandments define God's nature. breaking them is going against that nature...

because you're building doctrine upon minimal verses of scripture when the majority of scripture contradicts that doctrine. therein lies the problem.

and what percentage would you surmise make up those categories? 99.9% don't believe Jesus was/is the Messiah 00.1% do and it's the 99.9% that HATE Jesus so passionately that they wish to outlaw His name from even being spoken in their entire country, right? but Jesus is a jew, right? go figure.

clearly God doesn't want these men to be saved: And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. Matthew 13:10-11 some...

so since 1 John 3:4 is the only clearly defined definition of sin in the Bible (that I know of), it appears that sin is the breaking of the Commandments of God. so now that we've arrived here, why doesn't God hold it against us anymore if we break His Commandments? and why did He inspire John...

and so since there's so many jews in Israel, why would they outlaw speaking Jesus name? I thought Jesus is a jew??? that doesn't add up.

and how exactly does one rebel against God's righteousness? where does one draw the line of rebellion by thought, word or deed? God wouldn't leave that up to any and all to define for themselves. surely the Bible defines sin somewhere so there is no misunderstanding.

contrary to their prideful belief, it's not their decision to make. it's God's decision. "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him ..." John 6:44

what is sin?

I was under the impression that Israel was mostly comprised of jews??? aren't the Palestinians the minority now?

so you're saying we can sin, but it's not counted against us as sin .... or are you saying we are incapable of committing sin?