Search results

May I suggest that we all ignore Stan B as he is determined to defend abortion and the lies that go with it. Apart from the fact that he always invades someone else threads rather than start his own so he is, to say the least, a coward as he does not have the courage of his convictions.

So we can throw Spurgeon, Finney, Whitfield, Colson, Strong, Prince, Green, Wallis, Pawson, Rushdoony, Morris all in the bin because they are not two thousand years old.

My apologies. I do not speak in KJV lingo. I have to use Queens English as I was an English teacher at the last school I taught at.

So you don't need to read a book you are commenting on. If that is not arrogance I don't know what is. So you have read the 700 original sources which the author quoted from? You are getting more ridiculous by the minute.

FACT NUMBER 7 Aspiration (Suction D&C), First Trimester – The abortionist will begin by dilating the woman’s cervix in order to gain entry to the uterus. Then, a suction catheter will be inserted into the uterus and used as a vacuum to remove the child. The abortionist will then use a curette...

I guess you are in denial and can't entertain anything other than your rigid philosophy and religious way of life. (LITV) And indeed He gave some to be apostles; and some prophets; and some evangelists; and some pastors (shepherds) and teachers; Ephesians 4:11 So what you are saying is that...

It was compiled to attempt to debunk the KJV. ??????? How does a book that lists all the words in the bible and tells you where to find them debunk anything? In all honesty, a remark like yours makes me think that you are in bondage to an ideology and a religious way of life that is so rigid...

I said it doesn't and what is a trow?

I am not visually impaired.

So, you have read the book then?

You are to be commended. Too many people take one verse and say "There you are the bible proves it." That is known as proof-texting and one can use that to make the bible say anything they want it to. One cannot speak with authority on anything until they have first investigated the scripture...

And your post points out in detail the barbarity of it all.

What has all that got to with Strongs Concordance?

That is right and I know that I am where I am today because I listened to others. One of the reasons I attended Bible College was because I wanted to mine the riches available there.

You have forgotten one thing. The word baptism means to be fully wet. How does one get fully wet by reading the bible?

So is Strongs Concordance of the Bible commentary(Biased professional opinion) or a lexicon or both?

Wow, I must meet this person who is so perfect and knowledgeable and has got God down pat so he doesn't need any ministry from the body of Christ that Jesus has annointed.

I don't know because I don't build a doctrine on one verse of scripture and you're sarcastic response does not merit consideration.

I have never said that is not the case and it is not an office, it is a ministry.

Yes, I agree and I get annoyed when people make the scripture say what it does not say because they are too lazy to study what it does say. One. That passage says when you come together it is not to eat the Lord's Supper. ergo. Two. No where does Jesus say you are to go through the ritual...