Search results

In their minds, it actually says it.

Bc there are verses that seem to say what they believe, so they think they're believing God accurately.

It couldn't be, or else they couldn't know God, but they do know God. It's a justifiable misunderstanding--and, interestingly, it hits upon aspects of truth that obtain grace.

I don't worry for their souls, I just want to adhere to truth, and discuss the truth.

The fact that they're saved, and have grace to live for God, to me, is an example of God's kindness and flexibility. If God gave concessions under the Old Covenant, why wouldn't He also be flexible under the New? Paul became all things to all men so that some might be saved. It may be a...

I mean, it's good news, it's just, like, slightly skewed, but I wouldn't call it "damnable"--obviously, they're saved, and they have grace, and aim to please God, and have confidence in God, they just don't have every detail correct. My gripe with them is I don't appreciate them not having...

Right, I'd assume his answer would be the same we've heard a million times from Calvinists : Jesus died for the sins of His people, and if you believe, you will be saved by God, which would prove that you were foreknown and predestined by God to be saved, and God will never lose you, but keep...

I'm not sure why you are asking him that--he's a Monergist who respects John Calvin. That's basically where he's coming from.

The statement "the one who has sinned against Me I will blot out of My Book" has context : Moses asked to be blotted out in stead of blotting Israel out (God said "you didn’t do anything--it's these other people who did"). Why did God want to blot Israel out? Because of just any sin? No, this...

Yup, God works in us, which is God's righteousness, and we are told to obey that working (Php 2:12,13), and those works are "fine linen bright and clean", not "filthy rags". Already answered. You have nothing but gobbledygook to offer. Au revoir!

OK Cool I think I'm done demonstrating how foolish your position is. Ignored!

What a sloppy argument. "There's no difference at all between what Jesus told Judas to do and what Jesus told Peter was true about God." Maybe you need some coffee. Hahahaha

Oh, my mistake--you agree that God can forgive debts, and, thereafter, rescind forgiveness, based on whether or not the forgiven person forgives others (ie, that salvation can be lost). OK Thanks for agreeing.

Will those who are forgiven, but who do not do the good of forgiving others, remain forgiven, or will they have that forgiveness, the righteousness of faith (Ro 4:6-8), rescinded?

@ChristianSoldier Why are you still engaging in the conversation? You've spent all your ammunition, you've accomplished precisely nothing (except humiliating yourself by outing yourself as a rebel against God's Word, the parables), yet you're still wasting resources here. I'm satisfied with how...

Already answered :

Tell everyone the "true" meaning of the parable of the unforgiving servant--which you've said you're not beholden to, anyway (???)--if you want to insist I got it "wrong"... or were you planning on arguing, "Hah! You got it wrong! I got the TRUE meaning! I won't tell you, though!" Hahaha

OK Explain to everyone what the parable, which you've said you're not beholden to, means to you.

Nope, "filthy rags" are "a righteousness of my own", but when God works in someone, and they obey (Php 2:12,13), that's "fine linen bright and clean" (Rev 19:7,8), because it's "God's righteousness"--and, again, you have no answer for Matthew 18, where only doers of good remain, which good...

Irrelevant--the point is they contain truth, and the truth they contain you reject.