Search results

The subtext of which, is that they are physically imposing. What I am saying that what is sufficient, can never outdo what is necessary. You can say "no sometimes what is sufficient is enough" but that still doesn't make it equal to what is necessary.

Hi there, So the Lord inspired a brilliant quote, in me - and I'm dying to share! You know the Golden Rule, right? What about the Golden proverb? What do you think? Is there longevity in these words? Do they agree with your soul? The power of it, is that this proverb looks at the Golden Rule...

Hi there, So, listen, I will be upfront with you, my faith has wavered a lot and I still have a taste for the controversial, and sometimes I dream something up, that I think I know that it will get a reaction. Here's something like that: I really don't know what to say up front, I would prefer...

Yes, fine: but it was not a priority to find a short guy - they didn't stop looking for taller guys because they found a short guy. You keep twisting the norm, as if an outlier defies the group. You might think its clever, to eschew the norm, but the norm is the norm (and for a reason)!

More than that: the babies have a right to be adopted!

Ok, but if there was someone with the same talent, but taller, they would have got first pick.

Here's a new concept: Shunting Evolution in, ahead of its momentum, within range, can lead to a double-Evolution. What is Evolution, if it is doubled? That's for you to find out, and for you to share!

Which is precisely the right that members of government enjoy tolerance for - they are not expected to welcome allegiance that is bi-party. Well, if government doesn't have to listen to the opposition, why do we?

That requires negotiation of beliefs, which in turn requires wisdom. Ok sure, but he wasn't the first pick. Many more things than Government, work when it has to be debated. Perfection requires a standard, that the Devil can't interfere with (selah)

I said "no need" (to look for 'other' culprits), Justice may require a greater sacrifice to defend those who have been affected.

I think there is a glaring problem with Evolutionists' version of Evolution: they want to evolve, but there is no way they will do it for the Name of God. Jesus will do it for the Name of God, and that gives them a sense of slight peace, but they are too afraid to stand for it and they are only...

It was the Devil's work - no need to look for other culprits.

The world will mourn Jesus in relation to the mark of the anti-Christ - once they see it brings 'death'.

Yes, Jesus says "God will shorten the days".

The point is a caterpillar will never transform into a frog, no matter how close to water it stays.

I know that and you know that, but the world refuses to know that. The problem is that potential for change, is only communicated if the parents and their seed and the young are compatible. It's called being "irreducibly complex", but (in this case) it applies to the entire family.

The reality is that the way it is described is delusional. However, it is a delusion that God tolerates, therefore we must also learn to live with God's tolerance. The point is if you describe it properly, there is still a remnant of strength left to sustain.

Say you, imposing your will. So a woman has a right to rape the nation, but people who want to care for the children of the nation have no right? Look again, if a woman asks to have a man and conceives, it is not her sole choice what should happen to the child - it is for the father also...

It has been ages, but I finally understood the subtext behind "Evolution": Evolution supposes that if you believe it, the potential you pass on to your offspring is the greatest. This isn't true, necessarily. It's quite possible to pass on the greatest potential, without realising a change of...

Yes, but the Mark will not be world-wide - God promises to shorten the days and Revelation promises those who take the mark will suffer.