Search results

Rosh ha-Shannah is on the 1st of Tishri. It is the only two-day "Holy Day" in the Hebrew calendar. Yom Kippur is on the 10th of Tishri. It closes the ten days of repentance. The eight days in between are what I, and others, call the Days of Awe. They are not formally celebrated as is Rosh...

Sorry atin-christ. The best word-for-word translation we have differs on this point, as the word has more than one application. Christ means Anointed and is used for the title: King. Jesus is not prince to the Kings, but ruler over them: He is the King of KIngs. Rev 1:5 and from Jesus...

I think you're misappropriating Millennial passages for the Jews to us - which IS part and parcel with Replacement Theology - which is what you accuse me of doing! LOL

One: rabbi keras represents Replacement Theology. I favor progressive dispensationalism to explain not only the schism which separates Jew from Christian, the Jew's future status as the Remnant, and the ultimate reason for the Millennium in the first place - but the difference in how God...

No, you can rely absolutely on anything atin-christ says, right? This reminds me of the Wizard of Oz: "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtains!" Hahaha. No, we're not supposed to read what Paul wrote in inspired text as meaning what it says. No, we're only supposed to follow the...

Oh, dear! You're right! Daniel 9:26 says ON THE ORDER OF THE COMMANDER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE PRINCE WHO SHALL COME - ...oh wait... it doesn't say that at all. No, Gabriel gave Daniel a bit of prophecy unknown even at the later date critics would assign the writing of the book of Daniel in the...

No, another vapid non-rebuttal, in fact, it is a lie; a complete falsehood, "spin" as the modern parlance in political terms makes it out to be, untrue with the intent to deceive. Such a person cannot be trusted to handle God's Word reliably with any credibility. You might as well malign the...

One: we have a lie. atin-christ has been caught giving a false definition to the word 'am which means people. Two: we have a fallacy in argument here: Argumentum ad nauseam (argument to the point of disgust; i.e., by repetition): This is the fallacy of trying to prove something by saying it...

I'm so sorry for atin-christ. He just doesn't get it. He is stuck, and you can't fix his dilemma. His protestations are specious, and result in one big cipher. The word for people here is associated directly with nagiyd, the prince - not the king, mashiyach who is Jesus; and that prince, then...

You have taken Jesus' prayer on the eve of His Crucifixion out of context and you have reversed the order to force it to say what it does not say. John 17:15 concerns the Disciples, soon to be Apostles, in the world after He is in Heaven. The protection tereo ek - found in keep them from evil...

Same as answer as Stranger - and the same one I've given before: John 14:1-3. The Church can be seen in Heaven in Revelation 7:9-17.

You know, rabbi keras is such a poor student, that he should never teach. I have to check everything he says because so often, as is the case here - the "facts" upon which he lays his foundation - are a lie. Reason #42 for a Pre-tribulation Rapture by John Walvoord: At the Rapture the saints...

Jesus was with Moses and the "congregation" of Hebrews, the 12 tribes, in the wilderness. - Literal reading in context with the passage where Stephen is giving a rendition of history to the rabbis - teaching the teachers, eh? How'd that work out for him? Luke's usage of ekklesia for what...

What do you mean "in the wilderness?"

There is an aspect of Rosh ha-Shannah, the Returning Anew, which does align with the aspect whereby no one knows when the Day of the Lord will come. There is an idiom as the "unknown day" which refers to this sighting, which could be obscured, which kept the announcement of this one Appointed...

And this would be a figurative reading.

Oh! So now we are limited from what you cannot see! NEWS FLASH: Your lack of vision does not determine the truth. One: it's John 14:1-3, and, Two: it's a literal reading. So rabbi keras now wants us to read it the way he reads it, and he says what it says it not what it says. Kind of reminds...

Only in your own mind; as I have shown, everything you offer up in the way of real work - has been consistently shown not to be what you purport it to be! However, you are completely unable to correct your errors, and instead, remain wallowed in your own muddy thinking. For instance - your...

I'm sorry, atin-christ, but Wilhelm Gesenius of the 19th century wrote about "people" and it's nothing like you make it out to be. I'll publish what he wrote later; it's not different at all from what is found in the more highly acclaimed Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament - which is...

(1) An incorrect, false statement. The third-person, singular, masculine conjugation of gabar refers to a male person, not a noun. (2) Another grammatically incorrect statement. ...and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. This is the second...