Search results

You have to be careful to pay attention to people who misuse the language in order to "score" a "point". In this case at-in-christ comes up short again. He simply doesn't get it. 1640a (‘am) people. The term seems to be derived from the common Semitic root ‘āmam (cf. e.g. UT 19: no. 1864)...

Again this is rather ridiculous: neither I nor Gabriel's prophecy said the "prince who shall come" issues the order to destroy the city and the Sanctuary. I'm not sure with your limited capacity you can read what either I or the Bible says. It says in simple sentence structural form: "...and...

I'm sorry but your error does not dead end what I said. The "he" implicit in the third person singular finds its source in the antecedent "prince who shall come." Not people... Your lack of understanding and intelligence prevents you from seeing simple facts and has you spinning others in all...

This is an example of Partial Preterism. Jesus did not "force" or "prevail by might" ANY limited-time covenant. The subject of gabar, is determined by the third person singular conjugation of the verb which can be rendered as the pronoun: he. The pronoun in Hebrew grammar, like English...

Folks: what you are seeing here above is the definition of 'stuck on stupid'. And you can't "fix" stupid...

See! He can't get it. You can explain it fourteen different ways until the cows come home and he just isn't going to "get it". But this will not stop him from trying to say this is a critical failing of Pre-Wrath. at-in-christ is not adopting the mindset of Pre-Wrath; he is falsely...

Trekson, I see you're having the same problem getting through to at-in-christ. He said: And you tried to offer an explanation: Which of course, was met with a wall and he just repeats his misunderstanding; unable to articulate his thoughts anyway else because, quite frankly, he's stuck in...

People who don't understand claim mistake. The biggest complainers about Pre-Wrath usually just make broad claims of error. They hardly ever get specific, because when they do, I can show how they are in error. So we start with the presumption that Pre-Wrath is flawed. Ho-hum. The second...

One of the tactics people use in "winning" an argument is to set up an impossible question. Since the question cannot be answered in the affirmative positively, then they will gloat that they win by default. This is a fallacy in argument in the Bible. Just because God omits a fact from an...

One of the things the reader must be aware is to keenly discern where an argument makes an illogical leap to a false conclusion, so as to not "buy" into it. When anyone says, "It is clear..." I know for instance, that whatever they are talking about is anything but "clear." The only thing that...

Here we have the reason rabbi keras posts. Like at-in-christ, he is on a mission to destroy an eschatology. Now I am not Pre-Trib, but most Evangelicals are. So this means the false messenger has set himself against the grain. They are linked in this endeavor and you can expect them to join...

Yes it is. They are standing before the Throne. Really now...

Trekson, he's followed me over to here stalking me because he got in trouble at Worthy Christian's website for sending me threatening messages.

Talk about dense. 9 After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could count, from every nation and all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, and palm branches were in their hands; 10 and they cry out...

"at-in-christ" is simply not worth the effort with which to respond. He is not a serious scholar, indeed, he is not a scholar at all. But along with the false messenger keras, at-in-christ completes a great dastardly duo with which to spread the message of destruction against those who hope as...

Again inchrist, your attack style is all bluster and bravado and lacking any substance whatsoever. When I or Trekson provide Scripture which directly refutes what you allege you neither correct yourself nor lend valid support to your vapid contentions. You merely play the role of destroyer and...

It is not false which is in Scripture. It is stated in the fourth and fifth chapters of the book of Revelation. Scripture refutes you. Your take is no more supported than rabbi keras' mistaken messages.

Silly rabbit, the bulk of the Great Multitude are not raptured. So to even say that is not true. Thus you ask the impossible so as only to destroy a whole brand of eschatology. Funny thing is, you cannot succeed; you cannot change people's thinking with just your biting non-sequitur. In...

Please notice the complete lack of substance in rabbi kera's rebuttal to the charges that his interpretations of Scripture are incorrect, totally wrong, and completely devoid of any wisdom.

Please notice the cognitive disconnect which must exist for rabbi keras to say that I say the Prophets are wrong when I say he is wrong. What must he think of himself?